=Paper= {{Paper |id=None |storemode=property |title=A Movement of Higher Education Institutions to Consortiums of Institutions Banding Together to Create a Position of Strength |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1000/ICTERI-2013-p-003-003-Inv-2.pdf |volume=Vol-1000 |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/icteri/Pratt13 }} ==A Movement of Higher Education Institutions to Consortiums of Institutions Banding Together to Create a Position of Strength== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1000/ICTERI-2013-p-003-003-Inv-2.pdf
   A Movement of Higher Education Institutions
 to Consortiums of Institutions Banding Together
         to Create a Position of Strength


                                   Gary L. Pratt

Eastern Washington University, 202 Huston Hall, Cheney, Washington 99004, USA

                                gpratt@ewu.edu



 Abstract. Colleges and universities compete for students, faculty, and business,
 industry, and research partnerships with quality programs, strong faculty, re-
 search opportunities, affordable cost, and high student success factors. Yet, at
 the infrastructure level, most of these institutions provide many similar informa-
 tion technology services and support. On top of this, many of these institutions
 struggle to provide this quality infrastructure because of a variety of factors, in-
 cluding: shrinking budgets, minimal strategic planning, and a lack of institu-
 tional vision of information technology as a strategic asset. This presentation
 will showcase best practice examples of how higher education institutions can
 band together, to create strong consortium relationships that can help all part-
 ners in this relationship move forward as a strong force. Examples will include
 actual successes experience by the Kentucky Council on Postsecondary Educa-
 tions Distance Learning Advisory Committee (DLAC), the Washington Legis-
 lative Technology Transformation Taskforce (TTT), and the Washington
 Higher Education Technology Consortium (WHETC).These successes range
 from statewide strategic planning efforts, to significant consortial purchasing
 contracts, to collaborative technology systems, services, and training opportuni-
 ties. This presentation will show that institutions can be stronger working to-
 gether than working individually.


 Keywords. University consortium, best practice, competition, infrastructure, in-
 formation technology, strategic asset, strategic planning, collaborative technol-
 ogy system


 Key terms. Academia, Information Technology, Infrastructure, Cooperation,
 Management