<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Shape of Things</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stefano Borgo</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paulo Santos</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Rio de Janeiro</institution>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>World Congress and School on Universal Logic</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Oliver Kutz</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Workshop held at the</p>
      <p>Editors
Shape, Form, and Structure are some of the most elusive notions within diverse
disciplines ranging from humanities (literature, arts) to sciences (chemistry,
biology, physics etc.) and within these from the formal (like mathematics) to the
empirical disciplines (such as engineering and cognitive science). Even within
domains such as computer science and arti cial intelligence, these notions are
replete with commonsense meanings (think of everyday perception and
communication), and formalisations of the semantics and reasoning about shape, form,
and structure are often ad hoc. Whereas several approaches have been proposed
within the aforementioned disciplines to study the notions of shape, form and
structure from di erent standpoints, a comprehensive formal treatment of these
notions is currently lacking and no real interdisciplinary perspective has been put
forward.</p>
      <p>The workshop series SHAPES provides an interdisciplinary platform for the
discussion of all topics connected to shape (broadly understood): perspectives from
psycho-linguistics, ontology, computer science, mathematics, aesthetics, and
cognitive science, amongst others, are welcome to contribute and participate in the
workshops. We seek to facilitate a discussion between researchers from all
disciplines interested in representing shape and reasoning about it. This includes
formal, cognitive, linguistic, engineering and/or philosophical aspects of space, as
well as their application in the sciences and in the arts.</p>
      <p>We also welcome contributions on the relationship of shape representations at
di erent levels of detail (e.g. 2D, 3D) and in di erent logics, and with respect
to di erent qualitative and quantitative dimensions, such as topology, distance,
symmetry, orientation, etc.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Form and Function in Natural and Arti cial Systems</title>
      <p>Within the philosophy and practice of design, the ontological notions of shape,
form and structure have a further role of constraining function, malfunction, and
behaviour of things. In this perspective, the decision-making process in design
is a trade-o between physical, logical and cognitive laws and constraints that
intertwine shapes and functionalities. Here, the spatio-linguistic, conceptual,
formal, and computational modeling of shape serves as a crucial step towards the
realization of functional a ordances. This line of thought extends to several other
disciplines concerned not only with the design of technical systems, but also with
the understanding of biological as well as socio-technical systems. For instance,
in biochemistry the shape of molecular entities (proteins, small molecules) has a
direct e ect on their interactions which give rise to the capacities they can
manifest and, in turn, to the processes of life and death. Representing and reasoning
about the shapes and realizable functionalities of these entities is essential to
understand basic biological processes. Of special importance, in this as well as other
contexts, is the understanding of shape complementarity, that is, categorising the
shapes of holes as well as the shapes of the entities that can t into those holes,
which can either facilitate or block the functionality of the overall system.
The results of this workshop will stimulate and facilitate an active exchange on
interdisciplinary applications, ideas, approaches, and methods in the area of
modelling shape, form, pattern and function. The format of the workshop combined
invited speakers, peer-reviewed full contributions, as well as short position and
demo papers, and allowed ample time for open discussions amongst the
participants. Topics covered included:
Linguistics / Philosophy shape and form in natural language; di erences between
shape, form, structure, and pattern; shape in natural and arti cial objects.
Cognition shape perception and mental representation; gestalt vs. structuralist
understanding of shape cognition; perception and shape (e.g. identifying
objects from incomplete visual information); a ordances, dispositions, and
shape.</p>
      <p>Logics, Spatial Representations formal characterisations of shape and form;
logics for shape: e.g. fuzzy, modal, intensional; logics for topology, symmetry,
shape similarity; design semantics, spatial semantics; shape and 3D space;
shape and space in cognitive assistance systems.</p>
      <p>Ontology ontologies and classi cations of shapes; ontological relations among
shape, objects and functions; patterns as shapes of processes; forms and
patterns in ontology.</p>
      <p>Applications Biology &amp; Chemistry : molecular shapes, shape in anatomy and
phenotype de nitions, shape complementarity between objects and holes, shape
in medical image analysis and annotation.</p>
      <p>Visual Art and Aesthetics: shape in Film and Photography; shape in
computational creativity.</p>
      <p>Naive Physics and Geography: e.g. qualitative classi cations of shapes of
geographic objects.</p>
      <p>Design &amp; Architecture: shape grammars; CAD, symmetry and beauty in
architectural design.</p>
      <p>Engineering: formal shape analysis in engineering processes.</p>
      <p>The workshop SHAPES 2.0 followed a successful rst event held at CONTEXT
2011 in Karlsruhe, Germany.1
SHAPES 2.0 grew signi cantly in its second installment2, running as a full
twoday workshop, and attracting a total of 23 contributed submissions of which
we selected 14 for presentation at the workshop, with an additional 5 invited
contributions. We thank all the speakers for their great presentations, and the
audience for generating very lively and fruitful discussions.</p>
      <p>1See http://cindy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/cosy/events/shapes/ for the workshop website. The
proceedings have been published as Vol. 812 of the CEUR workshop proceedings, edited by
Janna Hastings, Oliver Kutz, Mehul Bhatt, and Stefano Borgo, see http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-812/.
2See http://cindy.informatik.uni-bremen.de/cosy/events/shapes2/ for the workshop website</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We would like to thank the program committee members and the additional reviewers for their
timely reviewing. We thank our invited keynote speakers|Roberto Casati, Roberto M. Cesar
Jr, Simon Colton, Antony Galton, and Barbara Tversky|for their support and contributions.
We also thank the UniLog conference, in particular Jean-Yves Beziau, for hosting the second
edition of SHAPES, and for generously providing free conference registration to our keynote
speakers and workshop organisers.</p>
      <p>SHAPES 2.0 has been generously sponsored by the following organisations:</p>
      <p>CAPES { Coordination for the improvement of Higher-level Personnel (www.capes.gov.br)
CNPq { National Council for Scienti c and Technological Development (www.cnpq.br)
International Association for Ontology and its Applications (IAOA) (www.iaoa.org)
SHAPES is an initiative of the IAOA Special Interest Group:
Design Semantics (www.designsemantics.org)
Mehul Bhatt and Oliver Kutz acknowledge support of the German Research Foundation (DFG)
via the Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8) co-located at the University of Bremen,
and the University of Freiburg, Germany (http://www.sfbtr8.spatial-cognition.de).
Oliver Kutz</p>
      <p>Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8)
University of Bremen, Germany
Cognitive Systems (CoSy), and
Spatial Cognition Research Center (SFB/TR 8)
University of Bremen, Germany
Laboratory for Applied Ontology (LOA), ISTC-CNR, Trento, Italy
Arti cial Intelligence in Automation group, Centro Universitrio da FEI</p>
      <p>Sao Paulo, Brazil
Additional Reviewers</p>
      <p>The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
University of Toronto, Canada
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
Geekie Software, Brazil
Universidade Federal do ABC, Brazil
Universidade Federal do ABC, Brazil</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>