<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Consuming Linked data in Supply Chains: Enabling data visibility via Linked Pedigrees</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Monika Solanki</string-name>
          <email>m.solanki@aston.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christopher Brewster</string-name>
          <email>c.a.brewster@aston.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Operations and Information Management Group Aston Business School, Aston University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The performance of a supply chain depends critically on the coordinating actions and decisions undertaken by the trading partners. The sharing of product and process information plays a central role in the coordination and is a key driver for the success of the supply chain. In this paper we propose the concept of \Linked pedigrees" - linked datasets, that enable the sharing of traceability information of products as they move along the supply chain. We present a distributed and decentralised, linked data driven architecture that consumes real time supply chain linked data to generate linked pedigrees. We then present a communication protocol to enable the exchange of linked pedigrees among trading partners. We exemplify the utility of linked pedigrees by illustrating examples from the perishable goods logistics supply chain.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The notion of visibility in supply chains can be summarised as \Visibility is the
ability to know exactly where things are at any point in time, or where they have
been, and why"1. Critical to achieving visibility in the end-to-end supply chain
is collaboration between trading partners2, usually facilitated by the sharing
of information through their IT infrastructures. The performance of the supply
chain and consequently the success or failure of trading partner businesses largely
depends on the ease and timeliness with which real-time process and product
knowledge can be shared and utilised in decision making.</p>
      <p>End-to-end visibility requires integrated infrastructures and alignment of
supply chain processes that streamline the exchange of data and knowledge.
However, an analysis of existing procedures reveal that data and information
ow along the supply chain is highly restricted and extremely complex. This is
compounded by a very conservative \need-to-know" attitude such that
essentially information ows only \one-up, one down". There is an urgent need for
information and knowledge to be interlinked, shared and made available
consistently along the supply chains not least for regulatory reasons but also due to
increasing consumer demands of being able to track and trace commodities.
1 http://www.gs1.org/docs/GS1 SupplyChainVisibility WhitePaper.pdf.
2 We use the terms trading partners, actors and stakeholders interchangeably.</p>
      <p>Two speci c supply chain domains, where lack of an information model that
facilitates the exchange of end-to-end supply chain knowledge has been
recognised as a critical issue for a long time are the agri-food sector and the
pharmaceuticals industry. In agri-food supply chains, importance is given to tracking
and tracing of foods in the context of health and safety and in order to both
prevent and respond to food emergencies (mad cow disease, and most recently
E. Coli). Another major factor is the growing desire on the part of food
consumers to know more about their food. Healthcare on the other hand, requires
an added element of visibility, which is the capability to capture and document
the chain of custody and chain of ownership of a pharmaceutical product as it
moves through the supply chain.</p>
      <p>In this paper we present a distributed and decentralised framework for the
real time tracking and tracing of goods, powered by Semantic Web standards and
linked data principles. We propose the concept of \Linked pedigrees" - linked
datasets curated by consuming real time supply chain linked data, that enable
the capture of a variety of tracking and tracing information about products
as they move among the various trading partners. Linked pedigrees overcome
a signi cant limitation prevalent in conventional pedigree exchange - that of
information being available only from partners one-up or one-down in the
supply chain. Deferencing URIs make it possible to sequentially traverse the chain
of pedigrees exchanged between partners and retrieve traceability information,
given that adequate access control mechanisms are in place.</p>
      <p>We present \OntoPedigree", an ontology design pattern for the data
modelling of these \pedigrees", that can be specialised and extended to de ne
domain speci c or indeed product speci c pedigree ontologies. We illustrate how
EPCIS(Electronic Product Code Information Services)3 governing supply chain
events can be exploited to generate linked pedigrees. Throughout the paper, we
exemplify the utility of linked pedigrees by providing motivating examples from
the perishable goods and logistics supply chain.</p>
      <p>The paper is structured as follows: Section 2 discusses background and related
work. Section 3 presents the concept of Linked Pedigrees , the content ontology
design pattern \OntoPedigree" and a brief summary on how linked pedigrees are
generated using EPCIS event data. Section 4 discusses our proposed linked data
architecture with reference to the agri-food supply chain. Section 5 presents the
linked pedigree communication protocol. Section 6 illustrates a motivating
scenario from the perishable goods logistics supply chain. Finally, Section 7 presents
conclusions and future work.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Background and Related Work</title>
      <p>Conventionally, pedigrees can be paper based or documents exchanged
electronically (e-pedigree). The use of pedigrees for tracking and tracing commodities
3 http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/epcis
is most widely prevalent in the pharmaceutical industry4. Pedigree or electronic
pedigree (e-pedigree) is an audit trail that records the path and ownership of a
drug as it moves through the supply chain, in which each stakeholder involved in
the manufacture or distribution of the drug adds to the pedigree. The Pedigree
standard5, rati ed by EPCglobal, provides an XML schema for the description
of the life history of a product across arbitrary supply chains. Recently the
concept of \Event based Pedigree"6 has been proposed that utilises EPCglobal's
EPCIS speci cation for capturing events in the supply chain and generating
pedigrees based on a relevant subset of the captured events. The generation of
linked pedigrees as presented in this paper, builds on the event based pedigree
approach.</p>
      <p>
        Content ontology (CP) design patterns [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref7">2,7</xref>
        ] are reusable ontological artifacts
that aim to provide solutions to recurrent, domain speci c modelling problems
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. A repository of content ontology design patterns 7 can be found at the
Ontology Design Patterns Portal.
      </p>
      <p>
        Supply chain information visibility has also received signi cant attention in
recent years [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. The use of Semantic Web technologies for capturing and
managing data across the supply chain was rst proposed in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] although the focus
was on the environmental impact of food in the organic food supply chain. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]
the authors present a solution that utilises both RFID and GPS for tracking
and tracing of international shipments. The CASSANDRA project 8 proposes
the concept of a virtual data pipeline that connects entities and gathers and
distributes data according to prede ned conditions. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] the authors present a
contextual architecture for making supply chain data available to applications
designed for customs authorities. A crucial limitation of this approach is the use
of a centralised linked data store for crawled linked open data.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Linked Pedigrees</title>
      <p>As highlighted earlier in Section 2, a pedigree is a record that traces the
ownership and transactions of a product as it moves among various trading partners.
Analogous to the notion of pedigree, in this paper, we propose the concept of
\linked pedigrees".</p>
      <p>A linked pedigree is a dataset, identi ed using an http URI, described and
accessed using linked data principles and represented using the RDF data model.
Linked pedigrees encapsulate the knowledge required to trace and track
products in the supply chain on a Web scale as well as capture a variety of other
types of relevant data. They provide a domain independent data model for the
sharing of knowledge among Semantic Web enabled systems deployed for the
4 http://www.axway.com/products-solutions/b2b/life-sciences-solutions/
epedigree
5 http://www.gs1.org/gsmp/kc/epcglobal/pedigree
6 http://www.gs1.org/docs/healthcare/Healthcare Traceability Pedigree Background.pdf
7 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Submissions:ContentOPs
8 http://www.cassandra-project.eu/
tracking, tracing and data capture concerning commodities as they physically
ow downstream or upstream in the supply chain, something which is currently
severely limited in the agri-food sector.</p>
      <p>The de nition of a linked pedigree includes URIs for product, transaction
and consignment information curated in the trading partner's knowledge base.
Additionally, apart from the pedigree initiated and created by the rst partner
in the supply chain, e.g., the farmer in the agri-food sector, all other linked
pedigrees include URIs to the pedigree datasets for the stakeholders in the immediate
upstream or downstream of the supply chain.</p>
      <p>We propose a content ontology design pattern \OntoPedigree" that can be
incorporated while building domain speci c pedigree ontologies. OntoPedigree9
provides a minimalistic abstraction, that de nes conceptual entities for the
modelling of knowledge required to enhance data visibility in a supply chain. The
pattern can be specialised to de ne domain speci c pedigrees.</p>
      <p>The pattern aims to provide answers to the following competency questions:
{ Who is the creator of the pedigree ?
{ What is the supply chain creation status of a given pedigree?
{ Which are the business transactions recorded against a particular
consignment?
{ Which products have been shipped together?
{ Which other pedigrees are included in the received pedigree?</p>
      <p>EPCIS event data arises during supply chain business processes when
product movement information needs to be captured and shared among trading
partners. Each EPCIS event, recorded and registered against RFID/barcode tagged
artifacts has four information dimensions. It encapsulate the \what", \when",
\where" and \why" of these artifacts at the RFID/barcode scan point. Event
data grows over time and for any given supply chain process, a large number
9 http://purl.org/FIspace/pedigree#
of events are recorded at each trading partner's end, a subset of which can be
consumed and harnessed to generate linked pedigrees.</p>
      <p>Based on the EPCIS speci cation, we have developed an OWL DL
ontology, EEM 10 - the EPCIS event model. We have implemented the LinkedEPCIS
Java library 11 for capturing EPCIS events as linked data. The type
hierarchy in LinkedEPCIS is based on the entities de ned in the EEM data model.
Every event curated in our event data triple store, using the library, is
systematically assigned an HTTP URI. An important component of the library is the
\LinkedPedigreeGenerator" which automates the generation of linked pedigrees
by querying the triple store for event URIs corresponding to the commissioning,
shipping, receiving and transaction events12. Additionally, URIs for the product
master data, made available as linked data are retrieved. Consignment
information is populated with spatial data for locations from DBpedia and Geonames.</p>
      <p>The pedigree status is dynamically set, based on the point at which the
pedigree is generated. Table 1 highlights how various elements of the linked
pedigree are populated.
10 http://purl.org/FIspace/eem#
11 http://code.google.com/p/linked-epcis/
12 The interested reader is referred to the EPCIS standard for further details
We propose an open, scalable and decentralised architecture for enabling real
time data visibility in supply chains. We assume that information management
systems with dedicated Web service interfaces are in place for the capture and
visualisation of the integrated information. Every actor in the supply chain
manages its own datastore, i.e., there is no central repository for holding integrated
datasets. We also assume that the services are equipped with interfaces through
which semantically enriched queries, e.g., SPARQL queries can be executed and
results can be obtained in one or more of the several standard formats such as
RDF/XML, Turtle, JSON or JSON-LD. Visual Web interfaces that hide the
complexity of SPARQL queries for the more general user may also be available.</p>
      <p>Linked pedigrees can be obtained via a push model, i.e., an upstream actor
sends the URI of the pedigree to a downstream actor or a pull model, i.e., a
downstream actor requests pedigree information from an upstream actor. In this
paper we assume a pull model for retrieving pedigrees. The high level architecture
as exempli ed for the agri-food supply chain is illustrated in Figure 2. Shared
data models, vocabularies, Web based and mobile application components are
provided as cloud based services. Below we provide an account of key components
comprising the architecture:
{ Linked Pedigree Manager agent: The pedigree manager agent is the
central component that interfaces between the EPCIS event store and external
systems. Some of the responsibilities of the agent include:</p>
      <p>RESTfully query linked pedigrees from upstream/downstream
stakeholders and locally corroborate electronic information recorded on
received physical goods against the query results. Besides the pedigree
being checked against the goods received or sent by supply chain
partners, inspection/checking of pedigrees may be routinely undertaken by
third parties. The manager agent is responsible for mediating between
pedigree checking requests and event data held in the event store.</p>
      <p>On receiving a request to provide a pedigree against a consignment of
physical goods, generate the pedigree on the y from the knowledge
curated in the event data stores of the stakeholder, assign it a URI
and include outgoing links to external datasets. Pedigrees may also be
curated by the agent before goods are shipped.
{ knowledge services: The management, update, query and access of the
knowledge repository is facilitated via a set of Web services with RESTful
interfaces. Besides these functionalities, the service suite provides standalone
components or \apps" that can be integrated within the IT infrastructure
for individual stakeholders. Examples include components implementing
access control, dataset interlinking middleware services and dataset metadata
(VOID13) stores.
{ Integrated Linked pedigree store: The integrated linked pedigree store
provides an overarching, governing service, thereby giving an end-to-end
context to the pedigree transactions taking place within individual supply
chains. It can be observed in Figure 2 that the architecture is decentralised,
i.e., there is no central datastore. The pedigrees in their de nition include
the URIs of the pedigree received from the upstream or downstream
stakeholders. Linked pedigrees can be sequentially traversed, to eventually
construct an ordered chain of pedigrees in the supply chain, by dereferencing
the URI corresponding to the hasReceivedPedigree relationship for every
actor. However access control restrictions mean that it may not be possible
for stakeholders themselves to obtain complete information related to
products and consignments from every other stakeholder. The integrated linked
pedigree store mitigates this limitation, should the need arise, by acting as
the governing authority and providing a service that can facilitate the
endto-end dereferencing of linked pedigrees in the supply chain. Additionally,
13 http://vocab.deri.ie/void
the store can provide validation services for establishing the conformance
of the information recorded on received physical goods against the results
returned by querying the received pedigree URI, should a stakeholder agent
not be available or equipped to perform the validation.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Linked Pedigree communication protocol for supply chains</title>
      <p>A note on privacy, access control and non repudiation
The decentralised nature of the architecture and the message oriented
communication protocol make security and privacy important considerations. Due to the
inherent nature of tracking and tracing data being commercially sensitive, it is
assumed message exchange will be appropriately secured via digital signatures
and deferencing of pedigree URIs and event data URIs corresponding to various
elements of a pedigree will be controlled via access controlled restrictions. We
do not address these issues further in the paper.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Exemplifying Linked Pedigrees</title>
      <p>The lifecycle of perishable goods e.g., tomatoes in the agri-food sector, is a
complex process until they reach the end consumer because of the number of
involved stakeholders and the diverse set of data that is produced. The tomato
supply chain involves thousands of farmers, hundreds of traders and few retail
groups. Figure 4 shows a generalised food chain scenario with a reduced level
of complexity. This scenario covers 90% of the supply scenarios for fresh food
products.</p>
      <p>The general work ow involving the capturing of events, generation of linked
pedigrees and exchange of pedigrees related to the sale of tomatoes between
stakeholders such as the farmer (Franz), the trader (Joe), the distribution centre
(FreshFoods Inc) and the supermarket (Orchard) is outlined below. We assume
that all supply chain trading partners have an EPCIS implementation installed
that exploits the LinkedEPCIS library for capturing and querying event and
pedigree datasets.</p>
      <p>{ Franz farmer specialises in growing tomatoes. The packaging of tomatoes is
done in punnets, each of which are tagged with RFID labels. Shipment of
tomatoes to downstream partners is done in cardboard boxes each of which
is tagged with a RFID label.
{ Joe trader bundles tomatoes procured from multiple farmers to larger
product batches before dispatching them to distribution centres.
{ Freshfoods Inc. sources tomatoes from multiple traders and splits up large
product batches to smaller batches for distribution to retail supermarkets.
{ Orchards is a supermarket that receives fresh produce from distribution
centres such as Freshfoods Inc.</p>
      <p>As highlighted in Section 5, traceability data is commercially sensitive, Most
trading partners are wary of sharing it outside their B2B setup. Due to the
above constraint, we are unable to reproduce the actual real-time event data in
this paper. We ran a simulation of the scenario, implemented using the EPCIS
library, that generated the events and the pedigrees linked datasets, which were
curated in the OWLIM 5.3 triple store. The simulation was in alignment with
the real-time processes and is presented below.</p>
      <p>
        Joe trader requests pedigree information on an identi ed tomato batch that
has been delivered to him by Franz farmer. The request is made by RESTfully
invoking Franz farmer's agent which is part of the FMS (farm management
system) installed at Franz farmer's end [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Joe trader receives an authenticated
and certi ed message containing the pedigree URI. Joe trader's agent
dereferences the URI and receives the pedigree dataset. Object property value resources
in the pedigrees are asserted using EPCIS event data URIs. A snippet of the
pedigree is illustrated below. We exclude pre xes to save space.
### http://fispace.aston.ac.uk/franzfarmer/pedigrees/
      </p>
      <p>FranzTomatoFarmerPedigree123
fsc:FranzTomatoFarmerPedigree123 rdf:type ped:Pedigree;
ped:hasSerialNumber "tomPed123"^^xsd:String;
ped:hasStatus ped:Initial;
ped:hasConsignmentInfo fci:FranzFarmerObjectEvent10,</p>
      <p>fci:FranzFarmerAggregationEvent6;
ped:hasTransactionInfo fti:FranzFarmerShippingEvent12;;
ped:hasProductInfo ftp:FranzTomatoesMay2013Data.</p>
      <p>Joe trader combines the tomato produce received from Franz with those
received from other farmers (e.g., Bob) into shipments which are then forwarded
to Freshfood Inc. On receiving a pedigree request from Feshfood Inc, Joe trader's
agent sends the pedigree which includes URIs to the pedigree provided by Franz
farmer and Bob farmer. The pedigree information provided by Joe trader for the
shipment and retrieved by Freshfoods Inc. is illustrated below:
### http://fispace.aston.ac.uk/joetrader/</p>
      <p>pedigrees/JoeTomatoTraderPedigree456
jsc:JoeTomatoTraderPedigree456 rdf:type ped:Pedigree
ped:hasSerialNumber "joeTradePed456"^^xsd:String;
ped:hasStatus ped:Intermediate;
ped:hasConsignmentInfo jci:JoeTraderObjectEvent20,</p>
      <p>jci:JoeTraderObjectEvent30;
ped:hasTransactionInfo jti:JoeTraderTransactionEvent40;
ped:hasProductInfo jpi:JoeTradesMay2013Info.
ped:hasReceivedPedigree fsc:FranzTomatoFarmerPedigree123,</p>
      <p>bsc:BobTomatoFarmerPedigree123.</p>
      <p>The signi cant advantage of exchanging traceability information using linked
pedigrees over conventional mechanisms is that the pedigree received by
FreshFood Inc. from Joe trader includes URIs to pedigree datasets provided by Franz
farmer and Bob farmer, even though they are not FreshFood Inc's one-up or
onedown partners. Consuming EPCIS event data curated as linked data to generate
and exchange linked pedigrees as outlined above can help derive implicit
knowledge that can expose ine ciencies such as shipment delay, inventory shrinkage
and out-of-stock situations.
7</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Data visibility in supply chains has received considerable attention in recent
years. Information systems are now being designed to facilitate the process of
making data available in real time to stakeholders in the supply chain, while
keeping access control restrictions in place. In this paper we have shown how
Semantic Web standards, ontologies and linked data can be utilised to curate
and represent real time supply chain knowledge, thereby signi cantly
contributing to the vision. We have introduced the concept of \linked pedigrees" within
the framework of an open, scalable and decentralised architecture. We have
proposed a design pattern \OntoPedigree" that provides a minimalistic abstraction
for designing domain speci c pedigree ontologies. Finally, we have presented a
linked pedigrees communication protocol and an exemplifying usecase from the
perishable food logistics domain. It is worth noting that our approach is domain
independent and can be widely applied to most scenarios of traceability.</p>
      <p>Distributed and decentralised systems have been the focus of research for
the last few decades. There are several issues such as trust relationship between
actors, access control mechanisms and performance optimisation that need to be
considered. In this paper we have abstracted from those issues. Our aim was to
show the relevance of consuming supply chain event data to the problem of real
time tracking and tracking in supply chains.</p>
      <p>While we strongly believe that linked pedigrees can make a signi cant di
erence to current visibility approaches in supply chains, much work still needs to
be done. As part of our future work we are investigating the use of rule based
reasoning to enable real-time checking of pedigrees and identify problems such as
\dwell-time consistency" before shipment are sent out or received. We are also
re ning our event model to enable optimised query retrieval over large event
datasets.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>The research described in this paper has been partially supported by the EU FP7 FI
PPP projects, SmartAgriFood (http://smartagrifood.eu) and FISpace http://www.
fispace.eu/</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Brewster</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Glaser</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Haughton</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Aktive food: Semantic web based knowledge conduits for the organic food industry</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the ISWC Workshop Semantic Web Case Studies and Best Practice for eBusiness (SWCASE 05)</source>
          , 4th International Semantic Web Conference, 7 November, Galway, Ireland,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Ontology design patterns for semantic web content</article-title>
          .
          <source>In The Semantic Web - ISWC 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          . Springer,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>He</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A solution for integrated track and trace in supply chain based on RFID &amp; GPS</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Hofman</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Supply chain visibility with linked open data for supply chain risk analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on IT Innovations Enabling Seamless and Secure Supply Chains (WITNESS2011)</source>
          , volume
          <volume>769</volume>
          . CEUR Workshop proceedings,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hulstijn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Overbeek</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Aldewereld</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Christiaanse</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Integrity of supply chain visibility: Linking information to the physical world</article-title>
          .
          <source>In CAiSE Workshops</source>
          , pages
          <volume>351</volume>
          {
          <fpage>365</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaloxylos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Eigenmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Teye</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Politopoulou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Wolfert</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Shrank</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Dillinger</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Lampropoulou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Antoniou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Pesonen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Nicole</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Thomas</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Alonistioti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Kormentzas</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Farm management systems and the future internet era</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers and Electronics in Agriculture</source>
          ,
          <volume>89</volume>
          (
          <issue>0</issue>
          ):
          <volume>130</volume>
          {
          <fpage>144</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Presutti</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Content ontology design patterns as practical building blocks for web ontologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, ER '08</source>
          , Berlin, Heidelberg,
          <year>2008</year>
          . Springer-Verlag.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Public</given-names>
            <surname>Sector</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Information Domain of the CTO Council's cross Government Enterprise Architecture. Designing URI Sets for the UK Public Sector</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical report, Chief Technology O cer Council</source>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Staab</surname>
          </string-name>
          and R. Studer, editors.
          <source>Ontology Design Patterns. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, 2nd edition</source>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>