<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>VIT@MediaEval 2013 Social Event Detection Task: Semantic Structuring of Complementary Information for Clustering Events</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Itika Gupta, Kshitij Gautam, Krishna Chandramouli Division of Enterprise and Cloud Computing School of Information Technology and Engineering VIT University Vellore</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IN">India</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2013</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>18</fpage>
      <lpage>19</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper describes our participation in Social Detection Task@ MediaEval 2013, which involves the detection of social events with associated images in collaboratively annotated by online users. Two tasks are pursued: (i) cluster all images into events in a way that they belong together; (ii) classify the images based on event type. For this we have developed a framework for semantically structuring the social image collection. For Task 1 and Task2, we achieved an overall F1 main score 0.1426 and 0.4409 respectively.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Digital multimedia collections are growing at an
extraordinary rate, with the availability of increasing a ordable
digital data acquisition equipment e.g., digital cameras, smart
phones. In addition the recent widespread use of personal
computers with abundant storage, users are generating
digital data on a day-to-day basis. In an e ort to share one's
social experience, numerous online multimedia sharing
communities have been developed. Collaborative annotation
and tags (e.g. Hashtag) as well as public comments are
commonplace on such social media websites that describes the
observed experiences and occurrences of the events. Thus
the careful analysis of available information about an event
on social media sharing website can be used to address the
challenge of e cient indexing and classi cation of huge
multimedia data. In this paper we present a framework to i)
cluster the images so that they belong together and ii)
classify the images on event types, as a part of MediaEval 2013
- Social Event Detection Task.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>LITERATURE REVIEW</title>
      <p>
        The research work leading to this paper has been partially
supported by the MMV Research Group, QMUL. We also
thank Prof. Izquierdo for providing comments towards the
manuscript preparation
Multimedia processing and in particular event detection
has attracted a lot of interest in recent years [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]
authors study event detection in the context of social network,
particularly in Facebook or Twitter considering the textual
metadata for distinguishing events. The presented approach
was constrained only towards the analysis of textual
information rather than media objects. Authors of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] addressed
the use of media items for event clustering by considering
personal photo collections for distinguishing events.
However, they have failed to exploit the additional resources
associated with media items namely annotations and tags. As
an extension, research on exploiting the textual information
associated with media items has been reported in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
Addressing the challenge of event clustering, in this paper we
present a framework that exploits the timeline and semantic
similarity to enhance event clustering.
3.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>METHODOLOGIES</title>
      <p>The proposed framework for event clustering is presented
in g1. The framework consists of three stages, which
includes pre-processing, ltering, and clustering &amp; classi
cation. In the pre-processing stage, the textual metadata,
namely title, description and user tags of all the media items
from given dataset were processed to eliminate the
occurance of HTML tags followed by removal of special
characters and stop words. Furthermore, the compound words
usually found among the user tags were split into respective
stem words and then a POS Tagger1 was used to determine
semantic sense from words(e.g. noun, verb, adjective and
adverb). Finally, the WordNet Stemmer was integrated to
extract the root word for further processing.
3.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>TASK1: TIMELINE, GEOGRAPHIC LO</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>CATION, TAGS</title>
      <p>The geographical coordinates is an important component
and indicator of where an event has happened. For that
reason, we separated the media items with geo location and
used location window along with comparison between
principal components extracted from tag set using Lin
Similarity to di erentiate them into di erent clusters. If there
were media items without the annotation of geo location,
time information was considered as a pivotal parameter for
event clustering. The event clusters are nalised through
the weighted occurrence of tags among the distribution of
media annotation and Lin Similarity measure between
principal component tag set.</p>
      <p>Cc(i) =</p>
      <p>T agC
CT agSet
+
&lt; l1
dist
+</p>
      <p>dt
&lt; T imeLine &gt;
(1)
where, 'C-Tagset' is Cluster tagset, 'l1-l2' is di erence in
mean location of cluster and media item location, 'u-dist' is
geo location window size, 'dt' is di erence in mean timeline
of cluster and media item timeline.
3.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>TASK 2: SEMANTIC SIMILARITY US</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>ING WORDNET</title>
      <p>
        The system computes the similarity between synset
representing the tags(c1) and each of the categories(c2). There is
a large body of work on WordNet-based measures of
semantic similarity [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. We use Lin similarity measure, a method
to compute the semantic relatedness of word senses using
the information content of the concepts in WordNet and
the 'Similarity Theorem', and the mathematical formula for
the same is presented in Equation 2. Further, if any photo
encounters same Lin Similarity measure for more than one
category, other constraints (Date, time) were considered.
      </p>
      <p>Siml(c1; c2) =
2 logp(lso(c1; c2))
(2)
4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS</title>
      <p>In this section we present the evaluation results obtained
for task1 and task2 from SED task organisers and
summarised in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3 respectively. We
preformed experiments on MediaEval 2013 SED dataset that
consists of 437,370 photos for Task 1 and 27,754 photos for
Task 2 and evaluated the submissions to these tasks with
ground truth information, a result of an annotation process
done by human annotators.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>We presented an approach to cluster the photos that
belongs together and classify photos into di erent events as a</p>
      <sec id="sec-9-1">
        <title>SED Task2</title>
        <p>Submission Run 1</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-9-2">
        <title>Categories</title>
        <p>Conference
Fashion
Concert
non event
Sports
Protest
Other
Exhibition
Theater Dance
Average</p>
        <p>F1 per category
0.0094
0.0000
0.0000
0.8069
0.0000
0.0127
0.0107
0.0410
0.0153
0.0996
part of MediaEval2013 Social Event Detection Task. The
classi cation task was achieved with the help of WordNet
synset which was combined with textual information from
the given dataset. In the future, we plan to improve our
results by further tuning image and text based ltering
methods coupled with social interaction.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Bensonl</surname>
          </string-name>
          and et al.
          <article-title>Event discovery in social media feeds</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACL</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Budanitsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>G. Hirst.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>evaluating wordnet-based measures of lexical semantic relatednedd</article-title>
          .
          <source>Comput. Linguist.</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>13</volume>
          {
          <fpage>47</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Roy</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Event detetction from ickr data through wavelet-based spatial analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACM CIKM</source>
          , pages
          <volume>523</volume>
          {
          <fpage>532</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Cooper</surname>
          </string-name>
          and et al.
          <article-title>Temporal event clustering for digital photos collections</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACM TOMCCAP</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <volume>269</volume>
          {
          <fpage>288</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Reuter</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Papadopoulos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Mezaris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Cimiano</surname>
          </string-name>
          , C. de Vries, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Geva</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Social event detection at mediaeval 2013: Challenges, datasets,and evaluation</article-title>
          . in mediaeval 2013 workshop, barcelona, spain, october
          <volume>18</volume>
          -
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>