=Paper= {{Paper |id=None |storemode=property |title=MediaEval 2013 Visual Privacy Task: Pixel Based Anonymisation Technique |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1043/mediaeval2013_submission_78.pdf |volume=Vol-1043 |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/mediaeval/PantojaAI13 }} ==MediaEval 2013 Visual Privacy Task: Pixel Based Anonymisation Technique== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1043/mediaeval2013_submission_78.pdf
           MediaEval 2013 Visual Privacy Task: Pixel Based
                     Anonymisation Technique

               Cesar Pantoja                      Virginia Fernandez                         Ebroul Izquierdo
          Queen Mary University of               Queen Mary University of                Queen Mary University of
                  London                                 London                                  London
              Mile End Road                          Mile End Road                           Mile End Road
           E1 4NS, London, UK                     E1 4NS, London, UK                      E1 4NS, London, UK
           cesar.pantoja@eecs                 virginia.fernandez@eecs                   ebroul.izquierdo@eecs
               .qmul.ac.uk                            .qmul.ac.uk                            .qmul.ac.uk

ABSTRACT                                                          egory containing more information than the previous.
In this paper, a pixel-based method for personal anonymi-           The core of the method applies a pixelisation filter to all
sation in visual surveillance applications, is presented. The     ROIs, but additional steps are performed to each “level”,
proposed method tries to tackle the problem of balancing          becoming more and more specific in the type of filter applied.
the intelligibility with privacy, by including some form of       The description of the different levels and the filters applied
contextual information in the anonymisation process. Ob-          are described in the following subsections, followed by a brief
jective and subjective evaluations show promising results in      discussion of the method.
intelligibility and appropriateness, but they also show that      2.1    Accessories and Hair
privacy could be further improved.
                                                                     This level carries the less information about the person
                                                                  being anonymised, so the more general filter is applied in this
1.   INTRODUCTION                                                 step, which is the pixelisation filter. In our tests, a pixel size
   Proactive efforts to ensure citizens’ security lead to wide-   of 24x24 yielded the best results for the presented scenarios,
spread adoption of invasive video surveillance systems. The       but different conditions might need a different pixel size, and
ever-increasing amount of recorded information poses a di-        the proposed method is flexible enough to allow a different
rect threat to citizens’ privacy and their right to preserve      pixel size via a parameter, so it could be changed easily to
their personal information. Thus, a general social concern        adapt to a different scenario.
has emerged for the loss of privacy, demanding new ap-
proaches to preserve and protect it, ensuring their anonymity     2.2    Skin Regions
and freedom of action whilst maintaining the surveillance            In this step, a skin colour detector in the hue, satura-
performance. We propose a new approach to preserve per-           tion, and value (HSV) colour space is used to detect and
sons’ identity in visual surveillance information for the Me-     change the subject’s skin. We used a fixed range in the
diaEval Privacy Task [5]. The proposed approach tries to          colour space in which all pixels within this range are con-
balance the privacy and the intelligibility of the scene by       sidered skin. Since we are only applying this to skin ROIs,
combining different filters for different parts of the scene.     the risk of false positives is low, while the amount of true
Both objective and subjective evaluations show promising          positives is maximised. In our experiments, this range was
results in intelligibility and appropriateness, but a low score   H ∈ [0◦ , 28.23◦ ], S ∈ [0.04, 1], V ∈ [0, 1].
in privacy shows there is still room for improvement of the          The colour of each detected skin pixel is then changed
filter. The rest of the paper is organised as follows: Section    to a single colour. This ensures everyone to have the same
2 presents the proposed method, the objectives and design         skin colour, effectively concealing their true race. In this
choices behind it’s development. Section 3 presents the eval-     particular scenario, we choose the colour (14.11◦ , 0.31, 0.39).
uation of the method using both objective and subjective             This step also introduces other parameters to further adapt
metrics. Finally, section 4 draws some closing remarks and        the method to different scenarios, which are the skin detec-
states future research opportunities.                             tion range and the skin colour changing.

                                                                  2.3    Face
2.   PROPOSED METHOD DESCRIPTION                                     The face is considered apart from the skin to improve not
   When designing the anonymisation method, the main goal         the privacy but the intelligibility. In this step, after the
is to maximise the privacy of the person while maintaining        skin colour change and the pixelisation, edges of the face,
a very good intelligibility. With this in mind, we listed the     detected by the Canny Edge Detector[1], are overlaid, which
possible types of ROIs and the information they carried to        allows to keep some information of the subject and the class
identify a person. After this, we classified the possible types   of the ROI. A final set of parameters are introduced in this
of Regions of Interest (ROIs) into three categories, each cat-    step with those belonging to the Canny Edge Detector.

                                                                  2.4    Method Discussion
Copyright is held by the author/owner(s).                           When developing the anonymisation filter, several things
MediaEval 2013 Workshop, October 18-19, 2013, Barcelona, Spain    were considered. Pixelisation, as the main filter, was con-
      Figure 1: Output produced by the filter.
                                                                               Figure 3: Subjective Evaluation


                                                                   vacy task. The proposed method applies different filters
                                                                   depending of the level of privacy information carried in a
                                                                   ROI. Objective and subjective evaluations show that the fil-
                                                                   ter performs very well in intelligibility and appropriateness
                                                                   but there is still opportunities to improve the privacy pre-
                                                                   serving aspect of the filter. Because the filter is developed in
                                                                   a modular way, different parts of the filter can be improved
                                                                   separately. The inclusion of parameters also allows to an
                                                                   improvement in results without modifying the method itself.
                                                                   For example, the pixelisation filter could produce smaller or
                                                                   bigger pixels. The range of colour in the colour detection,
            Figure 2: Objective Evaluation
                                                                   and the target colour in the skin colour change, could be all
                                                                   changed to include more (or less) tones of skins or to produce
sidered because it has shown to have a very good balance of        a darker or lighter skin tone. Finally, the Canny Edge De-
privacy and intelligibility [3][4]. Additionally, Skin colour is   tection algorithm used in the face introduces it’s own set of
regarded as one of the most important features when iden-          parameters to detect the edges. More advanced adjustments
tifying humans[2], which is why an additional step was con-        to the filter include the colour change part of the method.
sidered to conceal the person’s real skin colour before the        For example an advance colour transfer technique could be
pixelisation filter. Finally, the face’s edges are imposed over    used to produced more natural results. The edge detection
the colour change and pixelisation of the face ROI as a mea-       could also be improved by softening the detected edges to
sure of intelligibility. This allows to keep some information      produce a more natural result, or using a different method
on the subject’s face while keeping his true identity con-         to detect the edges altogether.
cealed. Figure 1 shows an example output produced by the
filter, next to the original, unfiltered ROI.                      5.   REFERENCES
   The filter was implemented in C++ using the OpenCV              [1] J. Canny. A computational approach to edge detection.
library for image processing and Xerces-C++ to load the                Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE
ROIs from an XML file. In particular, the implementation               Transactions on, PAMI-8(6):679–698, 1986.
uses the parallel programming paradigm to perform the dif-         [2] M. Demirkus, K. Garg, and S. Guler. Automated
ferent stages of the algorithm concurrently to achieve a near          person categorization for video surveillance using soft
real-time performance.                                                 biometrics. Proc. SPIE, 7667:76670P–76670P–12, 2010.
                                                                   [3] P. Korshunov, C. Araimo, F. De Simone, C. Velardo,
3.   EVALUATION RESULTS                                                J. Dugelay, and T. Ebrahimi. Subjective study of
   Results of the objective and subjective evaluations are             privacy filters in video surveillance. In Multimedia
shown in Figures 2 and 3 respectively. The figure shows                Signal Processing (MMSP), 2012 IEEE 14th
the score of the proposed method paired against the average            International Workshop on, pages 378–382, 2012.
score of the other methods presented in the challenge. The         [4] P. Korshunov, S. Cai, and T. Ebrahimi. Crowdsourcing
use of pixelisation combined with the face’s edges combined            approach for evaluation of privacy filters in video
paid of in the high score seen in intelligibility and appropri-        surveillance. In Proceedings of the ACM multimedia
ateness, while the change of the colour skin did not affect            2012 workshop on Crowdsourcing for multimedia,
this measures. The evaluation results also show that there is          CrowdMM ’12, pages 35–40, New York, NY, USA,
still room for improvement in the privacy preserving aspect            2012. ACM.
of the filter.                                                     [5] T. Reuter, S. Papadopoulos, V. Mezaris, P. Cimiano,
                                                                       C. de Vries, and S. Geva. Social Event Detection at
4.   CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK                                       MediaEval 2013: Challenges, datasets, and evaluation.
  A pixel-based anonymisation method of visual surveillance            In MediaEval 2013 Workshop, Barcelona, Spain,
information has been presented for the MediaEval 2013 pri-             October 18-19 2013.