<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta />
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Modularity has been and continues to be one of the central research topics in
ontology engineering. The number of ontologies available, as well as their size, is
steadily increasing. There is a large variation in subject matter, level of speci
cation and detail, intended purpose and application. Ontologies covering di erent
domains are often developed in a distributed manner; contributions from di
erent sources cover di erent parts of a single domain. Not only is it di cult to
determine and de ne interrelations between such distributed ontologies, it is also
challenging to reconcile ontologies which might be consistent on their own but
jointly inconsistent. Further challenges include extracting the relevant parts of
an ontology, re-combining independently developed ontologies in order to form
new ones, determining the modular structure of an ontology for comprehension,
and the use of ontology modules to facilitate incremental reasoning and version
control.</p>
      <p>Modularity is envisaged to allow mechanisms for easy and exible reuse,
combination, generalization, structuring, maintenance, collaboration, design
patterns, and comprehension. This is analogous to the role of modularity in software
engineering, where there are well-understood notions of modularity that have led
to generally accepted and widely supported mechanisms for the named tasks. In
contrast, modularity for ontologies is still an active research eld with open
questions because existing approaches are heterogeneous and less universally
applicable. For ontology engineering, modularity is central not only to reducing
the complexity of understanding ontologies, but also to maintaining, querying
and reasoning over modules. Distinctions between modules can be drawn on the
basis of structural, semantic, or functional aspects, which can also be applied to
compositions of ontologies or to indicate links between ontologies.</p>
      <p>In particular, reuse and sharing of information and resources across
ontologies depend on purpose-speci c, logically versatile criteria. Such purposes include
\tight" logical integration of di erent ontologies (wholly or in part), \loose"
association and information exchange, the detection of overlapping parts,
traversing through di erent ontologies, alignment of vocabularies, module extraction
possibly respecting privacy concerns and hiding of information, etc. Another
important aspect of modularity in ontologies is the problem of evaluating the
quality of single modules or of the achieved overall modularization of an
ontology. Again, such evaluations can be based on various (semantic or syntactic)
criteria and employ a variety of statistical/heuristic or logical methods.</p>
      <p>Recent research on ontology modularity has produced substantial results and
approaches towards foundations of modularity, techniques of modularization and
modular developments, distributed and incremental reasoning, as well as the use
of modules in di erent application scenarios, providing a foundation for further
research and development. Since the beginning of the WoMO workshop series,
there has been growing interest in the modularization of ontologies, modular
development of ontologies, and information exchange across di erent modular
ontologies. In real life, however, integration problems are still mostly tackled
in an ad-hoc manner, with no clear notion of what to expect from the resulting
ontological structure. Those methods are not always e cient, and they often lead
to unintended consequences, even if the individual ontologies to be integrated
are widely tested and understood.</p>
      <p>Topics covered by WoMO include, but are not limited to:
What is Modularity?
{ Kinds of modules and their properties
{ Modules vs. contexts
{ Design patterns
{ Granularity of representation
Logical/Foundational Studies
{ Conservativity and syntactic approximations for modules
{ Modular ontology languages
{ Reconciling inconsistencies across modules
{ Formal structuring of modules
{ Heterogeneity
Algorithmic Approaches
{ Distributed and incremental reasoning
{ Modularization and module extraction
{ Sharing, linking, and reuse
{ Hiding and privacy
{ Evaluation of modularization approaches
{ Complexity of reasoning
{ Implemented systems
Application Areas
{ Modularity in the Semantic Web
{ Life Sciences
{ Bio-Ontologies
{ Natural Language Processing
{ Ontologies of space and time
{ Ambient intelligence
{ Social intelligence
{ Collaborative ontology development and ontology versioning
Previous events. The WoMO 2013 workshop follows a series of successful
events that have been an excellent venue for practitioners and researchers to
discuss latest work and current problems. It is intended to consolidate
cuttingedge approaches that tackle the problem of ontological modularity and bring
together researchers from di erent disciplines who study the problem of
modularity in ontologies at a fundamental level, develop design tools for distributed
ontology engineering, and apply modularity in di erent use cases and
application scenarios. Previous editions of WoMO are listed below. The links refer to
their homepages and proceedings.</p>
      <p>WoMO 2006. The 1st workshop on modular ontologies, co-located with ISWC
2006, Athens, Georgia, USA. Invited speakers were Alex Borgida (Rutgers)
and Frank Wolter (Liverpool). Organizers and program chairs were
http://www.cild.iastate.edu/events/womo.html
http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-232
WoMO 2007. The 2nd workshop, co-located with K-CAP 2007, Whistler BC,
Canada. The invited speaker was Ken Barker (Texas at Austin).
http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-315
WoRM 2008. The 3rd workshop in the series, co-located with ESWC 2008,
Tenerife, Spain, entitled `Ontologies: Reasoning and Modularity' had a
special emphasis on reasoning methods.
http://dkm.fbk.eu/worm08
http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS/Vol-348
WoMO 2010. The 4th workshop in the series, co-located with FOIS 2010,
Toronto, Canada. Invited speakers were Simon Colton (London) and Marco
Schorlemmer (Barcelona).
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/%7Eokutz/womo4
http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=16268
WoMO 2011. The 5th workshop in the series, co-located with ESSLLI 2011,
Ljubljana, Slovenia. Invited speakers were Stefano Borgo (Trento), Stefan
Schulz (Graz) and Michael Zakharyaschev (London).
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/%7Eokutz/womo5
http://www.booksonline.iospress.nl/Content/View.aspx?piid=20369
WoMO 2012. The 6th workshop in the series, co-located with ICBO/FOIS 2012,
Graz, Austria. Invited speakers were Thomas Eiter (Vienna) and Luciano
Sera ni (Trento).
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/ ts/womo2012/
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-875/
Organizers of the previous editions and editors of the proceedings were Diego
Calvanese (Bozen-Bolzano) { 2008; Bernardo Cuenca Grau (Manchester, Oxford)
{ 2007, 2008, 2010; Peter Haase (Karlsruhe) { 2006; Jie Bao (Rensselaer) {
2010; Joana Hois (Bremen) { 2010; Vasant Honovar (Iowa State) { 2006, 2007;
Oliver Kutz (Manchester, Bremen) { 2006, 2010, 2011; Ulrike Sattler
(Manchester) { 2008; Anne Schlicht (Mannheim) { 2007; Thomas Schneider (Bremen) {
2011, 2012; Luciano Sera ni (Trento) { 2008; Evren Sirin, (Clark &amp; Parsia LLC,
Washington DC) { 2008; York Sure (Karlsruhe) { 2006; Andrei Tamilin (Trento)
{ 2006, 2008; Michael Wessel (Hamburg) { 2008; Dirk Walther (Madrid) { 2012;
Frank Wolter (Liverpool) { 2007, 2008
This volume contains the papers presented at the 7th International Workshop
on Modular Ontologies (WoMO 2013) held on September 15, 2013 in Corunna,
Spain as a satellite event of the conference LPNMR 2013. We received 9
submissions. Each submission was reviewed by three program committee members.
The committee decided to accept ve papers for long or short presentations. The
program also included two invited talks:
{ Till Mossakowski (University of Bremen, Germany)</p>
      <p>The Distributed Ontology, Modeling and Speci cation Language
{ George Vouros (University of Piraeus, Greece)</p>
      <p>Combining ontologies in settings with multiple agents
Acknowledgments. We would like to thank the PC members and the
additional reviewers for their timely reviewing work, our invited speakers for
delivering keynote presentations at the workshop, and the authors and participants
for contributing to the workshop program. We would also like to thank the
organizers of LPNMR 2013 for hosting the WoMO workshop, the IAOA and
SINTELNET for their generous nancial support, and the EasyChair developers for
greatly simplifying the work of the program committee.</p>
      <p>September 27, 2013
Manchester, Toronto, Madrid
and Dresden
Chiara Del Vescovo</p>
      <p>Torsten Hahmann</p>
      <p>David Pearce
Dirk Walther
Fast atomic decomposition using axiom dependency hypergraphs : : : : : : : : 61</p>
      <p>Francisco Mart n-Recuerda and Dirk Walther
Short Papers
Towards a Uni ed Approach to Modular Ontology Development Using
the Aspect-Oriented Paradigm : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 73</p>
      <p>Ralph Schafermeier and Adrian Paschke
Kenneth Baclawski
Eva Blomqvist
Alex Borgida
Stefano Borgo
Gerhard Brewka
Mike Dean
Chiara Del Vescovo
(co-chair)
Thomas Eiter
Pawel Garbacz</p>
      <p>Northeastern University, Boston, USA
Linkoping University, Sweden
Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA
Laboratory for Applied Ontology, ISTC-CNR,
Trento, Italy
University of Leipzig, Germany
Raytheon BBN Technologies, Ann Arbor, USA
The University of Manchester, UK</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>