<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>KPDAYS '13 Symposium on Software Performance: Joint Kieker/Palladio Days 2013</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Preface</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2013</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>27</fpage>
      <lpage>29</lpage>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Proceedings
Editors’ addresses:</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Steffen Becker</title>
      <p>University of Paderborn
Heinz Nixdorf Institute
Zukunftsmeile 1
33102 Paderborn, Germany</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Wilhelm Hasselbring</title>
      <p>Kiel University
Department of Computer Science
Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4
24118 Kiel, Germany</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Andre´ van Hoorn</title>
      <p>University of Stuttgart
Institute of Software Technology
Universita¨tsstraße 38
70569 Stuttgart, Germany</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Ralf Reussner</title>
      <p>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institute for Program Structures and Data Organization
Am Fasanengarten 5
76131 Karlsruhe, Germany
Proc. Kieker/Palladio Days 2013, Nov. 27–29, Karlsruhe, Germany
Available online: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1083/
Copyright c 2013 for the individual papers by the papers’ authors. Copying permitted
only for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its
editors.
Performance is one of the most relevant quality attributes of any IT system. While good
performance leads to high user satisfaction, weak response times lead to loss of users,
perceived unavailability of the system or unnecessarily high costs of network or compute
resources. Therefore, various techniques to control and improve the performance of IT
systems have been developed, ranging from online monitoring and benchmarking to
modeling and prediction. Experience shows, that for system design or later optimization, such
techniques need to be applied in smart combination.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the “Symposium on Software Performance” brought together researchers and
practitioners interested in all facets of software performance, ranging from modeling and
prediction to monitoring and management. The symposium was organized by two already
established user groups: for the first time, the Kieker (http://kieker-monitoring.net) and the
Palladio (http://palladio-simulator.com) communities had a joint meeting in form of this
symposium. Kieker is a well-established tool and approach for monitoring software
performance of complex, large, and distributed IT systems. Palladio is a likewise-established
tool and approach for modeling software architectures of IT systems and for simulating
their performance. However, contributions were not limited to these two communities but
we also welcomed contributions from the field.</p>
      <p>The 3-day program featured an industrial and an academic keynote, two introductory talks
on Kieker and Palladio respectively, 12 technical talks, and dedicated slots for
discussions. In his industrial keynote, Stefan Siegl (NovaTec GmbH, Leinfelden-Echterdingen,
Germany) provided insights into “15 Years of APM—Why Applications Still Struggle
with Performance Problems.” In her academic keynote, Catia Trubiani (University of
L’Aquila, Italy) talked about “Software Performance Antipatterns Challenges: How to
Get Rid of Worms Before Contaminating the Apple?” The peer-reviewed papers for the
technical talks are included in this proceedings volume. A dedicated slot for break-out
groups allowed for discussions in smaller groups on specific topics that emerged during
the symposium. Co-located with the symposium was the Karlsruhe Web Performance
Meetup, where Steffen Krause (Amazon Web Services) reported about “Architecture Best
Practices for Web applications with Amazon Web Services.”
The roughly 50 participants helped to make the Kieker/Palladio Days a successful event
with interesting talks and fruitful discussions in a very friendly atmosphere. We would like
to thank all participants that contributed to the event, including the authors and presenters,
as well as the additional reviewers and local organizers.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>December 2013</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Steffen Becker, Wilhelm Hasselbring Andre´ van Hoorn, Ralf Reussner iv</title>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Program Committee Chairs</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Steffen Becker, University of Paderborn Wilhelm Hasselbring, Kiel University Andre´ van Hoorn, University of Stuttgart Ralf Reussner, KIT/FZI</title>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Additional Reviewers</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Matthias Becker, University of Paderborn</title>
      <p>Lucia Happe, KIT
Reiner Jung, Kiel University
Sebastian Lehrig, University of Paderborn
Fouad Omri, KIT
Misha Strittmatter, KIT
Jan Waller, Kiel University</p>
      <sec id="sec-9-1">
        <title>Organizers</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Ralf Reussner, KIT/FZI</title>
      <p>Andre´ van Hoorn, University of Stuttgart
Michael Hauck, FZI
Michael Langhammer, FZI</p>
      <sec id="sec-10-1">
        <title>Why and How We Should Use Graphiti to Implement PCM Editors</title>
        <p>Christian Stritzke and Sebastian Lehrig</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-2">
        <title>Everything in Sight: Kieker’s WebGUI in Action (Tutorial)</title>
        <p>Nils Christian Ehmke
Towards Automated Software Project Planning - Extending Palladio for the
Simulation of Software Processes</p>
        <p>Oliver Hummel and Robert Heinrich
Integrating the Palladio-Bench into the Software Development Process of a SOA</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-3">
        <title>Project</title>
        <p>Andreas Brunnert, Alexandru Danciu, Christian Vo¨gele, Daniel Tertilt and Helmut
Krcmar
Hora: Online Failure Prediction Framework for Component-based Software
Systems Based on Kieker and Palladio</p>
        <p>Teerat Pitakrat</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-4">
        <title>Towards a Modular Palladio Component Model</title>
        <p>Misha Strittmatter, Philipp Merkle, Andreas Rentschler and Michael Langhammer 49
A Benchmark Engineering Methodology to Measure the Overhead of
Application</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-5">
        <title>Level Monitoring</title>
        <p>Jan Waller and Wilhelm Hasselbring
1
11
20
30
39
59
69
79
89
99</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-6">
        <title>Towards Integrating Java EE into ProtoCom</title>
        <p>Daria Giacinto and Sebastian Lehrig</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-7">
        <title>A Concurrent and Distributed Analysis Framework for Kieker</title>
        <p>Nils Christian Ehmke, Jan Waller and Wilhelm Hasselbring
Scalable and Live Trace Processing with Kieker Utilizing Cloud Computing</p>
        <p>Florian Fittkau, Jan Waller, Peer Brauer and Wilhelm Hasselbring
Model-driven Instrumentation with Kieker and Palladio to Forecast Dynamic</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-8">
        <title>Applications</title>
        <p>Reiner Jung, Robert Heinrich and Eric Schmieders</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-9">
        <title>Controlling the Palladio Bench using the Descartes Query Language</title>
        <p>Fabian Gorsler, Fabian Brosig and Samuel Kounev
109</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>