<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Iranian EFL Teachers' perspectives on their use of ICT in their Teaching practices: A multiple Case Study</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Parivash Mozafari</string-name>
          <email>P.Mozafari-Goroorani@warwick.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>David Wray</string-name>
          <email>D.J.Wray@warwick.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Warwick</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Coventry</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>57</fpage>
      <lpage>64</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Within a socio-cultural epistemology and in an interpretivist qualitative paradigm, this study aims to explore the perspectives of practicing EFL (English as Foreign language) teachers on the integration of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into their teaching in Iranian high schools. This study also aims to explore the individual and socio-cultural factors which have influenced and shaped the perspectives and perceptions of these teachers about ICT integration. Due to the fact that this study is in the very early stages of data collection and given the limited number of Iranian studies on the topic, this paper explores the world literature which bears upon the various opportunities and limitations for the integration of ICT into the teaching English as a foreign language (EFL) education. Arguing from a change or innovation perspective on integrating ICT in schools (in general), some of the well documented key factors that can affect the successful implementation of ICT are outlined. From amongst those factors, the role of the teachers and their pedagogical technological content knowledge (TPACK) emerge from the literature as essential factors.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>ICT</kwd>
        <kwd>EFL</kwd>
        <kwd>Communicative Language Teaching</kwd>
        <kwd>AT</kwd>
        <kwd>SCT</kwd>
        <kwd>mediation</kwd>
        <kwd>TPACK</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        It has been argued that even in the EFL classrooms with the most communicative
approaches, given the limited time available (in the Iranian case, 2 hours a week),
students have little opportunity to interact in English
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref7">(Demo, 2001; Blake, 2008)</xref>
        .
Also due to the lack of exposure to authentic language and context, second or foreign
language classrooms are unlikely to develop learners’ communicative skills in the
target language
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Demo, 2001)</xref>
        . Technology and multimedia have the capacity to
provide increased exposure to authentic language and to enhance learning by providing
opportunities for developing communication skills
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Larsen-Freeman and Anderson,
2011)</xref>
        . They also have the potential to provide the opportunities for students and
teachers to communicate within their own community or with the outside world
beyond the restrictions of time or place
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Blake, 2008; ibid)</xref>
        . This could be possible
through social networking websites, emails, online discussion rooms and wikis, blogs,
and online chat rooms in less stressful atmospheres
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref3">(Blake, 2008; Larsen-Freeman
and Anderson, 2011)</xref>
        . Additionally, technology can increase students’ motivation and
provide the opportunity for learners’ self-directed learning and sense of autonomy
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Thorne, 2006; Larsen-Freeman and Anderson, 2011)</xref>
        . Furthermore, with the
utilization of ICTs, learners and teachers can use teaching materials as many times as they
wish
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Davies et al, 2005; Larsen-Freeman, 2011)</xref>
        . Technology, as such, if effectively
integrated into the curriculum, could be a powerful teaching learning tool in and out
of the classroom.
      </p>
      <p>English language has been included as part of the Iranian school curriculum as a
compulsory subject taught from Grade 1 in junior high schools (age 11-14). English
in Iran is considered and taught as a foreign language. With the increasing importance
of English as the language of international communication and a growing recognition
of the challenges and realities of the information age, and an increasing awareness of
the necessity to change and improve the preparation of students to meet the
challenges of the 21st century, in the Iranian National Curriculum Plan, the importance of a
communicative approach to foreign language teaching and the use of information and
communication technologies to improve teaching and learning in schools have been
highlighted. But Moheyuddin Bahram Mohammadian, the Deputy Minister in Iranian
Ministry of Education, and the head of the Iranian Organisation for Educational
Research and Planning, in an interview in Mehr News (2010, 26th Nov.) reported that
Iranian EFL teachers’ technology use in schools is limited.</p>
      <p>
        The importance of this study comes from the fact that in recent years -marked as
the information era- many countries have incorporated the use of information and
communication technology (ICT) in their education
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(e.g. Albirini, 2006)</xref>
        . But in spite
of the fact that its significant role, especially in improving foreign language
education, has been emphasised
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref14 ref17 ref3">(e.g. Davies et al, 2005; Hennessy, et al, 2005; Blake,
2008; Larsen-Freeman and Anderson, 2011)</xref>
        , there seems to have been little progress
in integrating ICT in education
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">(Fullan, 2013)</xref>
        . By the same token, it is important to
know why the Deputy Minister of Education in Iran can still claim that the only
media by which English is taught in Iranian schools is through textbooks. What is amiss?
2
2.1
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Review of the literature</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>ICT-mediated Communicative EFL Pedagogy and Socio-cultural theory</title>
        <p>
          The term ICT stands for information and communication technology. It embraces a
range of technical media from hardware (desktop computers, laptops, netbooks,
tablets, mobile phones, projection technology, data logging and digital audio and visual
equipment), software applications (generic software, multimedia resources) to
information systems (Intranet, Internet, cloud computing)
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Hennessy et al, 2005)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          According to Kern (2006) research studies that are concerned with technology use
in language learning have mainly focused on the role of technology as a medium. It
could also be said that, in recent years, the literature on second and foreign language
learning reflects a move away from a cognitive viewpoint which sees language as a
purely psychological and cognitive phenomenon and places considerable focus on the
learner, towards studies within the framework of a social constructivist perspective
which are concerned with understanding the acquisition process within sociocultural
settings
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref4">(Brown, 2007; Gass and Selinker, 2008)</xref>
          . In the current paradigm shift in
foreign/second language education, socio-cultural theory (SCT) ‘as a theory that
simultaneously considers mental and social factors in learning’ is being developed as an
appropriate theoretical framework for investigating learning processes. Based on
SCT, learning could be contextualised by collaborative activities and tasks, and be
mediated by semiotic tools such as language and other tools. In this view, beside other
mediating tools such as technology, language not only functions as a medium of
communication but as a mediator of learning
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">(Lantolf, 2005)</xref>
          .Within this framework,
strong versions of communicative language teaching (CLT) such as task based
instruction (TBI) and project based instruction (PBI) are suggested as approaches that
can provide effective bases for foreign language teaching. These approaches stress
language use both as a communicative tool and as a mediating tool for learning, rather
than merely being an objective of learning, and are often based on activity theory
(AT) as a primary concept in socio-cultural theory. Activity theory posits that an
activity or communicative task provides the contextualising framework for interaction
and that is motivated by a biological or social need or desire
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">(Magnan, 2008)</xref>
          . From
an AT perspective, ICT is considered as a tool that by providing the means and
ground for interaction between humans and their environment, mediates educational
interaction, and promotes collaborative learning
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Lamy and Hampel, 2007)</xref>
          . As such,
there appears to be a natural affinity between the main pedagogical concepts of
Sociocultural theory (SCT) and specially its primary concept -activity theory- and the major
components of communicative language teaching (CLT) such as interaction,
collaboration, group work, negotiation of meaning, information gap activities, teacher as
facilitator and coach, and self-regulation
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref18 ref4">(Brown, 2007; Magnan, 2008; Gass and
Selinker, 2008)</xref>
          2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>The importance of teachers’ cognitions</title>
        <p>“Educational change depends on what teachers do and think, it’s as simple and as
complex as that. It would all be so easy if we could legislate changes in thinking.”
Fullan (2007: 129)</p>
        <p>
          While the availability of technological tools and their affordances along with other
factors seem to be essential in enhancing or limiting learning opportunities, teachers’
perspectives towards these technical artifacts may be more important than the tools
themselves in the integration of ICT into language pedagogy
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Lamy and Hampel,
2007)</xref>
          . This perspective supports Kern’s (2006) and others’ calls for research into the
teachers’ roles and their perceptions and perspectives on technology use in education.
        </p>
        <p>
          As underlined by Fullan above, for a successful design and practice of
technologyintegrated-FLE, the individual teacher’s understanding of the change knowledge,
technical tools’ affordances and their pedagogical decisions are determining factors.
Fullan (2013) in discussing the integration of technology into teaching and learning
activities assigns the most important role to teachers and argues “teachers are needed,
but it is new role that is required--the teacher as change agent”. Kern argued that
successful technology-mediated-pedagogy “has been repeatedly shown to depend largely
on teachers’ efforts in coordinating learners’ activities” (p. 200). Kern’s conclusions
supported a call for a descriptive study of second language teachers and their
experiences in integrating technology. There is, indeed, a substantial body of evidence that
regards teachers’ roles as a key factor influencing the integration of ICT in education
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref2 ref5">(Albirini, 2006; Kern, 2006; Chen, 2008; Park and Son, 2009)</xref>
          . These studies have
argued that teachers’ perspectives and attitudes towards technology and media may be
a major factor that influences their patterns of behaviour regarding the initial or future
use of ICT in their teaching experiences.
        </p>
        <p>
          On the other hand, there is evidence
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref17 ref20">(Kim, 2002; Peeraer and Petegem, 2011;
Rahimi and Yadollahi, 2011)</xref>
          that teachers’ positive attitudes towards ICT do not
ensure their actual use of ICT in teaching. These interpretations are consonant with
some other researchers (Afshar et al, 2009; Altun, 2002) who have suggested that
teachers’ attitudes toward technology are related to teachers’ ICT literacy. Kim
(2002) found that although teachers expressed strong positive attitudes and
enthusiasm for using ICT in their study, they actually were not able to use ICT in their
classrooms due to insufficient ICT knowledge, time constraints, technology anxiety and
lack of confidence. As such it seems a reasonable argument that teachers’ attitudes
towards using ICT are linked to teachers’ ICT competence; as teachers who are more
competent in using technology, have been shown to be more willing to integrate it
into teaching
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Altun, 2002; Rahimi and Yadollahi, 2011)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>In addition to ICT knowledge and skill, teachers need to have sufficient knowledge
of ICT pedagogy. In this regard Baylor and Ritchie (2002) stated, ‘‘regardless of the
amount of technology and its sophistication, technology will not be used unless
faculty members have the skills, knowledge and attitudes necessary to infuse it into the
curriculum’’ (p: 374). It means that the knowledge and capability of teachers for
meaningful exploitation of ICT for pedagogical purposes is a determining factor. The
degree to which teachers see the usefulness and relevance of these innovational
changes from a practical task perspective, determines the likelihood of them
embracing these changes.
2.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>ICT in Iranian schools</title>
        <p>
          A number of the Iran specific studies
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17 ref6">(e.g. Shahamat and Riazi, 2009; Rahimi and
Yadollahi, 2011; Dashtestani, 2012)</xref>
          have indicated that teachers generally expressed
positive views about the integration of ICT, but that their technology use in
classrooms was limited. The interpretations offered by the researchers about this, although
they are resonant with the literature, are mainly based on the results of surveys using
questionnaires to explore teachers’ beliefs and perspectives about technology use in
teaching. Indeed, as these Iranian researchers acknowledge, these studies with a
typical quantitative design and methodology fall short of providing a deep understanding
of the teachers’ underlying beliefs and perspectives or of providing insight into how
and to what extent technology is used in EFL classrooms. Evidence about this issue is
scarce. Thus, as suggested by the Iranian researchers
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(e.g. Rahimi and Yadollahi,
2011)</xref>
          , qualitative studies need to be done to investigate Iranian teachers’
perspectives, beliefs and professional knowledge relating to the use of ICT, in reference to
classroom teaching-learning practices. As such, in order to contribute to bridging this
gap, the current study will be conducted to explore and obtain an inside knowledge of
Iranian high school EFL teachers perspectives and perceptions about the various
factors that might have promoted or prevented the integration of ICT in their teaching
practices. I am also interested in understanding and describing the classroom
processes and practices of ICT-mediated language teaching/learning and how ICT (if any) is
used by these teachers in their classroom. And finally to interpret how individual
teachers’ thinking or cognition relates to their classroom practices and how they
interact in the broader social context. In so doing the following main and sub research
questions will be addressed.
        </p>
        <p>Research Questions:
1. From the perspectives of teachers of EFL, how is ICT currently used as a medium
for teaching English as a foreign language in Iranian high schools?
(a) What ICT tools do these teachers have access to?
(b) How do teachers currently use those tools?
2. What are the attitudes of a group of Iranian high school teachers towards using ICT
in teaching and learning English?
(c) What factors do they perceive as either inhibiting or promoting their use of ICT
in teaching English in their schools?
(d) To what extent do these Iranian high school teachers of English feel that they
have the requisite knowledge and skills to use ICT in the classrooms?
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research design and methodology</title>
      <p>My aim is to answer my research questions and to examine this particular educational
phenomenon within a socio-cultural epistemology and in an interpretivist qualitative
paradigm. And within this paradigm, I chose to use activity theory as an analytical
tool. As it is clear from the research questions and purpose of the study, the unit of
analysis in this study is the activity of integration of ICT in high schools. But based
on activity theory an activity could not be analysed without considering its actors,
their motives, as well as a dialectic and dynamic interaction that exists among them
and other contextual, social, historical factors that exist within and beyond an activity
system. As such, for the overall purpose of this study and to provide various
perspectives and multiple sources of information about the phenomenon, a multiple-case
study has been planned, and to place a boundary around my cases, the multiple cases
that I chose for this study are an approximate number of five English teachers in 5
Iranian high schools across the capital city of Tehran, with each teacher being treated
as one case. Data collection will be conducted in Fall 2013. During this time, I will
collect data from various sources to provide both a thick description of the
phenomenon under study and to explain and interpret the phenomenon with reference to “how”
and “why” questions.</p>
      <p>The choice of teachers and their EFL classroom practices has been made for two
reasons. Firstly, because I am interested (for the purpose of my study) in the situations
in which students had just passed two years of elementary (and beginners) EFL
instruction, and seemed to be ready in terms of age group and their English language
ability for ICT mediated communication and interaction; and secondly, because I
intended to bridge certain gaps in the earlier quantitative studies that had been done
with teachers of the same age level in Iranian high schools.
3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Methods and procedure</title>
        <p>The present study will be undertaken in three sequential phases:
─ Data from previous research surveys of teachers at the same levels in high schools,
as well as national educational policies and curriculum both at the national and
school level as sources of information, will be investigated.
─ Observation of the technological infrastructures in the participating schools as
well as the observation of EFL classrooms will be conducted in the context of
gaining the perspectives of teachers. Observation is essential and will enable me to
get a sense of context and stimulate subsequent discussion with the observed
teachers.
─ Individual (face to face) semi-structured interviews with the participating teachers
to obtain detailed information regarding their perceptions and opinions as well as
other relevant information about integration of ICT that could add to the
understanding of the situation.
4</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Implications of the study</title>
      <p>This study is believed to be the first qualitative study of this topic in the context of
Iranian high schools. With its focus on the how of ICT integration and the teachers as
‘change agents’ and issues related to them, this study can provide Iranian policy
makers with useful information about preparedness, skills, experiences, perspectives and
perceptions of teachers about the implementation of ICT in EFL pedagogy. As such,
it could be said that it can add to the relevant knowledge in the daunting task of
integrating ICT that in turn can lead to improvements in EFL education that may be of
potential benefit to the stakeholders and the society.
21. Rahimi, M. and Yadollahi, S. (2011) ICT Use in EFL Classes: A Focus on EFL Teachers’
Characteristics. World Journal of English Language. Vol. 1, No. 2, 17-29. Accessed from:
http://www.sciedu.ca/journal/index.php/wjel/article/viewFile/443/211. [12/02/2013]
22. Shahamat, F., and Riazi, A. (2009) The Place of Information Technology in Second
Language Teaching in Girl's High Schools and Private English Institutes in Shiraz. Iranian
EFL Journal, Volume 4, 71-93. Accessed from: http://www.academia.edu/1564986/
There_is_never_any_one_right_way_to_teach. [12/02/2013]
23. Thomas, G. (2011) How to Do Your Research Project: a guide for students in education
and applied social sciences. London: Sage.
24. Thorne, S. (2006). New Technologies and Additional Language Learning. CALPER
Working Papers Series, No.7. The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Advanced
Language Proficiency Education and Research.
25. Volman, M., &amp; Van Eck, E. (2001) Gender Equity and Information Technology in
Education: The Second Decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 613–634.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Afshari</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Abu</given-names>
            <surname>Bakar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Luan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Abu Samah</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            and
            <surname>Fooi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>F.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>Factors Affecting Teachers' Use of Information and Communication Technology</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Instruction</source>
          .
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>104</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Albirini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>Teachers' attitudes toward information and communication technologies: the case of Syrian EFL teachers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers and Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>47</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>373</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>398</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blake</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>Brave New Digital Classroom: Technology and Foreign Language Learning</article-title>
          . Georgetown University Press: Washington, D.C.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brown</surname>
          </string-name>
          , H. D. (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>Principles of Language Earning and Teaching (5th ed</article-title>
          .).
          <source>White Plains</source>
          , NY: Pearson Education.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>Factors Affecting the Integration of Information and Communications Technology in Teaching English in Taiwan</article-title>
          . In Paul Robertson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            and
            <surname>Nunn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. (eds) Asian
          <source>EFL Journal-Professional Teaching Articles</source>
          ,
          <fpage>337</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>372</lpage>
          . Busan, Korea: Asian
          <source>EFL Journal Press (online)</source>
          . Accessed from: http://www.asian
          <article-title>-efl-journal</article-title>
          .com/pta_08.pdf. [
          <volume>10</volume>
          /03/2011].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dashtestani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
          <article-title>Barriers to the implementation of CALL in EFL courses: Iranian EFL teachers' attitudes and perspectives</article-title>
          .
          <source>JALTCALL Journal (online)</source>
          .
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>70</lpage>
          . Accessed from: http://journal.jaltcall.org/articles/8_2_Dashtestani.pdf. [
          <volume>23</volume>
          /03/2013]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Demo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <article-title>Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers</article-title>
          . ERIC Digests,
          <year>ED456672</year>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          . (Online). Accessed from: http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED456672.pdf. [
          <volume>17</volume>
          /4/2011]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fullan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>The New Meaning of Educational Change (4th ed</article-title>
          .). New York: Teachers College Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fullan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <article-title>Stratosphere: Integrating Technology</article-title>
          , Pedagogy, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Change</given-names>
            <surname>Knowledge</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Toronto, Ontario: Pearson Canada Inc.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gass</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selinker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course</article-title>
          (3rd Ed.). New York: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hennessy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruthven</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brindley</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>Teacher perspectives on integrating ICT into subject teaching: commitment, constraints, caution and change</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Curriculum Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>155</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>192</lpage>
          (online). Accessed from: http://journalsonline.tandf.co.uk/link.asp? id=QX3P25Q0WMAT). [5/4/2011].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kangro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kangro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <article-title>Integration of ICT in Teacher Education and Different School Subjects in Latvia</article-title>
          . Educational Media International,
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>37</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kern</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>Perspectives on Technology in Learning and Teaching Languages</article-title>
          .
          <source>TESOL QUARTERLY</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>183</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>210</lpage>
          (online). Accessed from: http://wha.arizona.edu/classes/ariew/ slat596/Kern_tech.pdf. [
          <volume>10</volume>
          /2/2013]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klopfer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Squire</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Environmental detectives: the development of an augmented reality platform for environmental simulations (online)</article-title>
          . Accessed from: http://website.education.wisc.edu/kdsquire/manuscripts/ETRD-handheld- Draft.doc. [
          <volume>15</volume>
          /03/2005]
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lamy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hampel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>Online Communication in Language Learning and Teaching</article-title>
          . New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lantolf</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>Sociocultural and Second Language Learning Research: An Exegesis</article-title>
          . In: Hinkel,
          <string-name>
            <surname>E</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (ed.)
          <article-title>Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning</article-title>
          . New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Larsen-Freeman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <article-title>Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching (3rd ed</article-title>
          .). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Magnan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>The unfulfilled promise of teaching for communicative competence: insights from sociocultural theory</article-title>
          . In: Lantolf,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            and
            <surname>Poehner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Ed.)
          <source>Sociocultural Theory and the Teaching of Second Languages</source>
          ,
          <fpage>349</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>380</lpage>
          . London: Equinox Publishing Ltd.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mohammadian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
          <article-title>Implementing the National Curriculum Over a 6-year Term/ Unclear EFL Curriculum Policicies</article-title>
          . Interview in Mehr News Agency (
          <year>2010</year>
          , 26th Nov.)
          <article-title>(online)</article-title>
          . Accessed from: http://khabarfarsi.com/ext/89904. [2/4/2011].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peeraer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petegem</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>ICT in teacher education in an emerging developing country: Vietnam‟s baseline situation at the start of „The Year of ICT‟</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers and Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>56</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>974</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>982</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>