<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Novel Approach for Improving Chronic Disease Outcomes using Intelligent Personal Health Records in a Collaborative Care Frameworkolika</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Amol Wagholikar</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>: The Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Computational Informatics</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2013</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>4</fpage>
      <lpage>12</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Background- Effective management of chronic diseases is highly important to improve health outcomes of chronic disease patients. Emerging initiatives on online personal health records (PHR) have provided an opportunity to empower patients living with a chronic disease to take control of their own health data management. Online PHR solutions also provide data-driven intelligent analytics capability that can provide an effective view of the patient's health data to the patients themselves as well as to their consented clinicians and carers such as family members fully engaged in their routine care. Research suggests a tendency among chronic disease patients of using self-managed care without as well as with some support to monitor and manage their chronic disease. The rising usage of online solutions enable chronic disease patients store their physical as well as mental health information in self-managed online PHR. There are a variety of such online PHR mechanisms that are available via desktop computers, mobile smartphones, smart TVs as well as biometric devices. However, the main problem of disparate data sources and lack of a universal view of patient's health data still exists. These problems needs a novel way of integrating various types of PHRs in an efficient way and provide effective insights about the patient's health to empower and engage the patients in active management of their chronic condition. Objective- To describe a framework to integrate various online PHRs for providing effective self-managed and collaborative care. Methods- Comprehensive research was conducted to analyse current trends of various PHR mechanisms. A series of discussions were held with the clinical as well as non-clinical end users of online PHRs to identify the current problems with accessing PHRs and their expectations about usage of PHR in managing chronic disease condition. The requirements analysis and emerging technology trends were utilized to develop a framework that provides intelligent capabilities for a collaborative online platform. Results- The requirements analysis and discussions with the end-user representatives showed that the proposed framework is considered novel and intuitive by the stakeholders thus confirming our findings. Conclusion- The results of this investigation specified a novel framework that can enhance the value of PHRs and thus may address usability challenges identified by the PHR developers as well as the end-users.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Personal Health Record (PHR)</kwd>
        <kwd>Collaborative Care</kwd>
        <kwd>Selfmanaged care</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        A personal health record (PHR) is a record in a tangible document format (e.g.
information recorded on a piece of paper and/or in an electronic document); in which an
individual patient creates, maintains and controls his/her health related data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The
patient may access, modify as well as control the individual health information before
using it for specific purposes such as self-assessment and sharing it with care
providers through a consent process. The patients may also store a copy of data collected by
their clinicians in their personal health record. The patient’s PHR is a component of
complete set of the patient’s health related information as some information is also
created, stored and managed in hospital and clinic health information systems.
      </p>
      <p>
        Personal Health Records exist in paper-based (offline) format as well as electronic
format (online). Some percentage of patients may regularly use offline PHR’s to store
and access their chronic disease specific health information. A certain section of
patients may use various online PHR mechanisms (such as website-based tools and
mobile applications provided by private vendors) to manage their health related
information. The online PHR is an electronic record of an individual’s personal health
information stored securely in a central repository that can be accessed by an
individual patient for self-managed care, self-monitoring of health conditions and can be
shared with the clinicians for clinical use. The patients may choose to share the online
electronic health record with clinical information systems used by their care provider
to provide an accurate and a complete set of information required for providing
pointof-care health services at various geographic as well as clinical settings [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3 ref4">2, 3, 4</xref>
        ].
1.1
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Current State-of-the-art</title>
        <p>
          The online personal health record is an emerging discipline of research. The current
research in this discipline makes an attempt to improve value of the personal health
records through application of innovative intelligent data processing methods [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ]. The
concept of Personal Health Record (PHR) has been evolved along with the
advancements in web-based technologies. The current state-of-the-art suggests that intelligent
PHRs are evolving to add more features such as data exchange, data sharing with
clinicians, and family members. There are certain proprietary PHR solutions as well
as open source PHR solutions. Each of the PHR solution offers common functions
and features that can be accessed by the patients through a web-enabled device with a
web browser. These solutions are evolving to add more features such as data
exchange, data sharing with clinicians, families and carers. However, there are open
issues in the intelligent PR especially in the area of functions provided by these
solutions. Our review of the existing PHR solutions indicates that there is a lack of
collaborative functions in the PHR [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]. This work attempts to address this gap by
proposing a collaborative PHR platform.
1.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Main Problem</title>
        <p>There are certainly growing efforts both in private as well as public domains for
adopting online PHR as a data recording and analysis tool for self-managed care,
selfmonitoring of disease conditions, as a preventative health intervention and clinical
use. There is growing number and various types of private online PHR solutions that
are available as a web-application and/or mobile application storing patient health
data. The growing number of mobile health applications for tracking and monitoring
exercise is a good example of this evolution (E.g. Nike+ app or the Fitbit app with
optional weight scale and wrist fitness band). The various types of PHR’s can be also
categorised as per the devices that can be used to access the PHR. The types of online
PHR are shown in table 1.</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-2-1">
          <title>Access Devices</title>
          <p>Desktop Computer, Smart phone, tablet device
Smart phone, tablet device</p>
          <p>Smart phone + portable device such as blood
glucose monitor
The advances in web-based and mobile apps online technologies as well as rising use
of online data recording and analysis solutions has led to the development and launch
of private and public online PHRs. The broad categories of online PHR systems are
illustrated in Figure 1 which links with the relationship illustrated in Figure 1.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Chronic Disease Patient</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Private</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>Online PHR Systems pro</title>
        <p>vided by private vendors,
mobile health apps</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Public</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>Online PHR systems pro</title>
        <p>vided by government such
as Australia’s PCEHR</p>
        <p>EHR and/or EMR
Due to the widespread use of web-based PHR solutions, the patient’s health data is
stored in various disperse data sources. Thus, despite advances in online solutions, the
core issue of “Health Information SilOs” (HISO) still exists and thus the issue of
accurate information for self-managed care as personalised decision support is still
largely unresolved. We propose an approach in the form of a framework that attempts
to address this issue with a new design proposal for an intelligent PHR framework.
2</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>This research was undertaken for an initiative that aims to improve journey of chronic
disease survivors. The following main steps were undertaken for our research.
 Expert Interviews: A group of clinical experts, patient representatives as well as
technology experts was engaged to understand the real-life issues of chronic
disease survivors. A series of expert interviews were conducted to understand the
main drivers as well as requirements for developing an online technology approach
to leverage advances in PHR, established as well as emerging industry trends in
health information technology. A key challenge of providing a seamless experience
for the patients to manage their own health data was identified during these
interviews. The challenges of adoption by the chronic disease patients with limited
health and information technology literacy were also identified. The inputs from
the interviews were used to specify requirements of our proposed platform. The
specifications aimed to propose an innovative design of a PHR-based solution
using a vendor-provided PHR platform with customization.
 Online Solution Investigation: A comprehensive research was conducted to
investigate global landscape of emerging online PHR solutions including desktop as
well as smart devices (smart phones and tablets) based solutions. The results of the
comprehensive research are summarized in the table
below Proposed Approach Development: The investigation resulted into
recommendation of our technology platform that can address the issues of HISO in an online
PHR context.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Proposed Approach for an Integrated PHR</title>
      <p>Our investigation resulted into identifying key challenges and critical needs for
providing a single platform that can provide a holistic view of the patient’s PHR. We
propose a platform that can not only record critical data but also provide intelligent
analysis of patient’s health data to patients as well as their carers. A schematic
representation of our approach is shown in figure 2.
One of the central components of our proposed platform is the intelligence engine.
The intelligence engine component will executive algorithms driven by the personal
health data stored in the PHR. The specific details of the algorithms will be reported
as the research progresses. Our proposed platform also provides intelligent analytics
of the patient’s health data which improves patient’s own understanding of their
health data. The intelligent analytics also improves monitoring of key health
indicators such as weight, mood, and nutrition in a personalized visual dashboard.
Our proposed approach is in the form of a collaborative PHR platform addresses the
issue of disperse health data sources. It allows the patients as well as their care
providers a universal view of patient’s health data governed by the consent process. The
clinicians also have the ability to view as well as add clinical notes to the patient’s
PHR. The patient’s can collaborate with their clinicians as well as similar patients
through the platform which can integrate with patient-driven social network. The
patients can connect with their carers through video, voice as well as text
communication methods enabling different communication mediums. Our platform also
improves patient engagement as it enables collection of their physical health data
through wearable health monitoring devices that seamlessly integrate with our
platform. This integration with biometric devices improves efficiency in data recording.
3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Challenges</title>
        <p>
          Our proposed approach has the potential to support care models that deliver better
health outcomes. However, the successful execution requires understanding of the
challenges involved in online PHR integration. The challenges are
 Adoption: The adoption rate for mobile health applications for health monitoring
and health tracking for self-management among healthy population is increasing
over the last decade. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ]. However, the Australian and worldwide research shows
that the adoption rate for online PHR based solution among adults with chronic
disease conditions is less than expected [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref14 ref15">13, 14, 15</xref>
          ]. Our proposed solution aims to
improve the uptake rate by providing a simple and yet highly effective solution.
        </p>
        <p>The challenges in adoption of online PHR mechanisms are not only applicable to
the patients but clinicians and carers as well.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Online PHR User Category</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Challenges</title>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-1">
          <title>Families</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-2">
          <title>Primary and Specialist Clinicians</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-3">
          <title>Nursing Staff</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-4">
          <title>Allied Health clinicians (E.g. Physiotherapists)</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-5">
          <title>Care coordinators</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-6">
          <title>IT Literacy, Interpretation of data</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-7">
          <title>Quality of concern Patient recorded data for treatment decisions, Time to access patient reported data in online PHR</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-8">
          <title>Data Quality, Time to access patient reported data in online PHR</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-3-9">
          <title>Quality concern of Patient recorded</title>
          <p>data, Lack of instant physical
interaction with men</p>
          <p>
            Quality concern of Patient recorded
data for care plan development and
implementation
 Data Quality: The data quality in the PHR should be endorsed by the clinicians.
 Cost-effectiveness: The evidence suggesting online PHR as a cost-effective tool to
manage personal health information is not clearly established [16, 17, 18, and 19].
 Health Outcomes: There is also no clear evidence about better health outcomes
due to online PHR [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>The above challenges can be addressed through a careful implementation of the
proposed platform. The implementation of the proposed platform is under progress and
the evaluation of the platform will be undertaken in a randomised clinical trial
settings. The proposed approach has received positive feedback from the patient as well
as clinical community representatives.
4</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>This research has made an attempt to address the current issues of disperse personal
health data sources. The proposed platform aims to provide a single view of the
patient’s PHR that can empower chronic disease patients and improve collaboration
with the clinicians for self-managed care. The proposed platform will be implemented
and evaluated as this research progresses in future.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Limitations</title>
      <p>The author acknowledges that the research is a work-in-progress. The proposed
platform is not evaluated with a sample data yet. The concepts proposed in this paper are
specified strategic perspective. The research does not provide real-life evaluation of
the proposed PHR platform as well as core design of the intelligent PHR.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>This research is mainly supported by Movember Foundation as a part of its
survivorship initiative. This research is also supported by the Australian e-Health Research
Centre, CSIRO as a project collaborator. The author would like to thank Movember
Foundation and the Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO for their support and
this opportunity.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tang</surname>
            , Paul; Ash, Joan; Bates, David; Overhage,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ; Sands,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daniel</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>"Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption"</article-title>
          .
          <source>JAMIA</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>121</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>126</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1197/jamia.M2025
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>National</surname>
          </string-name>
          e-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), http://www.nehta.gov.au/ehealthimplementation/what-is
          <article-title>-a-pcehr</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Viewed 19 February</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3. Markle Foundation Personal Health Working Group,
          <article-title>Connecting for Health: A PublicPrivate Collaborative</article-title>
          . New York, NY Markle Foundation2003;
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yamin</surname>
            <given-names>CK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Emani</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
            <given-names>DH</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>The digital divide in adoption and use of a personal health record</article-title>
          .
          <source>Arch Intern Med</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          ;
          <volume>171</volume>
          :
          <fpage>568</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>74</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Irini</given-names>
            <surname>Genitsaridi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Haridimos Kondylakis, Lefteris Koumakis, Kostas Marias, Manolis Tsiknakis,
          <source>Towards Intelligent Personal Health Record Systems: Review, Criteria and Extensions</source>
          , Procedia Computer Science, Volume
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , Pages
          <fpage>327</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>334</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Open issues in intelligent personal health record - an updated status report for 2012</article-title>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J Med</given-names>
            <surname>Syst</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          Jun;
          <volume>37</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>9943</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>National</surname>
          </string-name>
          e-Health Transition Authority (NEHTA), http://www.nehta.gov.au/ehealthimplementation/what-is
          <article-title>-a-pcehr</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Viewed 19 February</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>NHS</given-names>
            <surname>Healthspace</surname>
          </string-name>
          , http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/healthspace, Viewed 20
          <string-name>
            <surname>February</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9. NHS Information Strategy, http://informationstrategy.dh.gov.uk/,
          <source>Viewed 20 February</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>US</surname>
            <given-names>MYPHR</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , http://www.myphr.com/resources/choose.aspx,
          <source>Viewed 21 February 2013</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11. Big Blue Button, http://www.va.gov/BLUEBUTTON/index.asp,
          <source>Viewed March</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          , Viewed
          <issue>21</issue>
          <year>February 2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12. Big Button Plus, http://bluebuttonplus.org/index.html, Viewed 2
          <string-name>
            <surname>April</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13. NEHTA Compliant Product Registers, https://epipregister.nehta.gov.au/registers, Viewed 25
          <string-name>
            <surname>February</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boulos</surname>
            <given-names>MN</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wheeler</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tavares</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX</article-title>
          .
          <source>Biomed Eng Online</source>
          .
          <year>2011</year>
          ;
          <volume>10</volume>
          :
          <fpage>24</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Australian PCEHR Registration Targets</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Pulse IT Magazine Article, http://www.pulseitmagazine.com.au/index.php
          <article-title>?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=13 17:half-a-million-pcehr-registrations-still-achievable-doha&amp;catid=16:australianehealth</article-title>
          &amp;Itemid=328\\,
          <source>Viewed 22 February 2013</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Sunyaev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Chomyi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Mauro</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Krcmar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Evaluation Framework for Personal Health Records: Microsoft HealthVault vs</article-title>
          .
          <source>Google Health," in Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 43)</source>
          , Kauai, Hawaii,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Executive Summary Integrated Cancer Care Programme</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Report by UnitedHealth Europe.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <article-title>Evaluation of Phase 1 of the One-to-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>One</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>Support Implementation Project, Baseline Report Macmillan Cancer Support</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Imison</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gorman</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Woods</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>Barriers and Drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved</article-title>
          . Evid Rep/Technol Assess;
          <volume>175</volume>
          (
          <article-title>Prepared by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No</article-title>
          .
          <fpage>290</fpage>
          -02- 0024). AHRQ Publication No.
          <fpage>09</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>E004</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality</article-title>
          .
          <source>Nov</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          Eung-Hun, Stolyar Anna,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lober William</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herbaugh Anne</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shinstrom Sally</surname>
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zierler Brenda</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Soh Cheong</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim Yongmin</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Challenges to using an electronic personal health record by a low-income elderly population</article-title>
          .
          <source>J Med Internet Res</source>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          ;
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>e44</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>