<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>An Investigation into the Correlation between Willingness for Web Search Personalization and SNS Usage Patterns</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Arjumand Younus</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Colm O'Riordan</string-name>
          <email>colm.oriordang@nuigalway.ie</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gabriella Pasi</string-name>
          <email>pasig@disco.unimib.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Computational Intelligence Research Group, Information Technology, National University of Ireland</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Galway</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IE">Ireland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Information Retrieval Lab</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Informatics, Systems and Communication</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>University of Milan Bicocca</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Milan</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>80</fpage>
      <lpage>84</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper presents a user survey-based analysis of the correlation between the users' willingness to personalize Web search and their social network usage patterns. The participants' responses to the survey questions enabled us to use a regression model for identifying the relationship between SNS variables and willingness to personalize Web search; the obtained results show that there is a strong relationship between willingness for personalized Web search and social network usage patterns. Finally, based on the ndings of our survey we present some implications and directions for future work.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        For over a decade Web search personalization has been viewed as an e ective
solution for user-tailored information-seeking and its e ectiveness depends on
the quality of user-related information, which is generally implicitly gathered.
The implicit collection of user information however often raises serious privacy
concerns, and it represents one of the major barriers in deploying personalized
search applications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref8">6, 8</xref>
        ]. The relationship between users' usage patterns of social
networking services (SNS) and their willingness for Web search personalization
is a promising direction that can help signi cantly towards the deployment of
personalized search applications. Search engines could in this way select the
category of users who could be targeted for personalized search applications.
      </p>
      <p>To the aim of nding a characterisation of users who would prefer
personalized search results more than non-personalized search results we conducted a
user survey. We designed the user survey so that we can investigate the social
network usage patterns of users along with their preferences to opt for
personalized Web search. The collected data were then used in a regression model
to analyse the correlation between SNS variables and willingness to personalize
Web search. In doing this analysis we discovered a number of useful patterns and
behaviours about users' openness to Web search personalization; these outcomes
can be of help in the future developments of personalized Web search and social
search systems.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Work</title>
      <p>
        For over a decade Web search personalization has been viewed as an e ective
solution for user-tailored information-seeking. A huge amount of research
proposes the use of implicitly-gathered user information such as browser history,
query and clickthrough history and desktop history to improve search results
ranking on a per-user basis [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref4 ref9">4, 9, 11</xref>
        ]. The collection of such implicit user
information often raises serious privacy concerns which is one of the major barriers in
deploying personalized search applications [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref8">6, 8</xref>
        ]. The relationship between users'
social network usage patterns and their willingness for Web search
personalization is a promising direction that can help signi cantly towards the deployment
of personalized search applications. The decision to investigate the correlation
between social network usage patterns and willingness for Web search
personalization was taken on account of many studies that have shown people to spend
a considerable amount of time on social networks [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. This high amount of
social network usage by users in turn has also a ected their information-seeking
habits and speci cally, the way they interact with search engines [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. Hence, we
argue in this contribution that it is necessary to revisit the notion of Web search
personalization from this perspective.
      </p>
      <p>
        The literature closest to our identi ed research questions addresses the use of
social information in Web search [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref5">2, 5</xref>
        ]. However, these e orts do not aim towards
using social network activities for inferring users' willingness towards Web search
personalization. Research by Morris et al. pursues a comparison of
informationseeking using search engines and social networks and proposes the design of
future search systems that can help direct users to social resources in some
circumstances [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. We propose a somewhat similar notion through an analysis
of the correlation between user's willingness for Web search personalization and
his/her social network usage patterns.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Survey Methodology</title>
      <p>In order to understand how SNS usage patterns a ect people's willingness to
personalize Web search results, we designed a survey and dispatched it to a wide
range of people in various countries (i.e. Ireland, Italy, Spain, France, United
Kingdom, Finland, United States, Canada, Pakistan, India, South Korea). The
survey comprised 16 close-ended questions with ve questions of a general nature
(collecting demographic information about the participants), four questions
related to various aspects of Web search personalization3 and ten questions related
3 Respondents were asked through a binary variable a \Yes" or \No" response whether
or not they considered personalized search results to be of any bene t to them.
49.5% of the respondents considered personalized Web search as useful while 50.5%
considered it as not useful.
to SNS usage4. The survey was completed by 380 people with 61.8% males and
38.2% females. Statistics about the use of various SNS tools are shown in Table
1 and Table 2. Participants were recruited via university distribution lists (both
online and o ine) and social networking sites (chie y, Facebook and Twitter)
and we recruited a diverse range of people; distribution lists were employed to
avoid recruiting only those participants who have a social network presence and
thereby avoiding high skew in the results.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Survey Results</title>
      <p>The results from Table 3 show that males are more likely to consider Web
search personalization as bene cial. Furthermore, the presence of a user on
Twitter and/or Google+ is a strong indicator that he/she will consider Web search
personalization as bene cial and similar is the case for his/her high usage of
Twitter and/or Google+ (row 7-8 corresponding to WP and row 12-13
corresponding to WP ); the increase is more signi cant for user presence on Google+
and for high usage of Google+. Additionally, as expected an increase in
posting frequency on Facebook increases the odds of willingness to personalize Web
search and contrary to expectation, an increase in the number of users' friends
on Facebook decreases the odds of willingness to personalize Web search (row 16
and row 18 corresponding to WP ). Lastly, users who use SNS more frequently
for Q &amp; A activities are more likely to be willing to opt for Web search
personalization in addition to users who frequently consider that responses coming from
SNS as more reliable than responses from search engines (row 23-26
corresponding to WP ).
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>We will now discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our study. The
correlations (and their results) investigated here may seem intuitively obvious
4 These were related to various SNS tools (more speci cally Facebook, Twitter,
LinkedIn etc.) as well as at the characteristics of SNS usage (such as frequency
of SNS usage, frequency of posting SNS updates, number of friends on SNS,
frequency of asking questions on SNS) that relate more closely to users' willingness for
Web search personalization.</p>
      <p>WP</p>
      <p>Male 1.635**
American 0.001</p>
      <p>Asian 0.001
European 0.001</p>
      <p>Age 1.069
Facebook Presence 0.982
Twitter Presence 1.544*
Google+ Presence 1.816***</p>
      <p>LinkedIn Presence 0.940
Bookmarking Sites Presence 1.289</p>
      <p>High Usage of Facebook 1.599
High Usage of Twitter 1.166*
High Usage of Google+ 3.042***
High Usage of LinkedIn 1.193
Facebook Usage Frequency 0.898
Facebook Posting Frequency 1.637***
Facebook Liking Frequency 0.920
No. of Facebook Friends 0.873*</p>
      <p>Twitter Mentions 1.000</p>
      <p>Twitter Retweets 1.001
No. of Topics in Tweets 0.997</p>
      <p>No. of Tweets 0.999</p>
      <p>Prefers Q &amp; A Activity on SNS 1.821***
Considers Q &amp; A Activity on SNS as Useful 1.771***</p>
      <p>Frequency of Q &amp; A Activity on SNS 1.366**</p>
      <p>Frequency of Considering Responses
from SNS More Useful than Search Engines 1.374***</p>
      <p>
        Note *p&lt;.05, **p&lt;.01, ***p&lt;.001
in terms of high engagement in social networks signifying a higher degree of
readiness to accept the (at least partial) loss of privacy that is inevitably
involved in search personalization. However, recent research indicates that this is
not the case as users of SNS have shown growing privacy concerns [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. Boyd
and Hargittai [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] found that the majority of young adult users of Facebook have
engaged with managing their privacy settings on the site at least to some extent
and noted a rise in such privacy settings' engagement between 2009 and 2010, a
year in which Facebook unveiled many controversial privacy changes that made
more of information on the site public. In fact even as our data shows the
percentage of survey respondents who do not consider Web search personalization
as bene cial is higher than expected.
5.1 Implications
Users' privacy concerns have proven to be a signi cant challenge with respect
to Web search personalization, and the issue of when to personalize and when
not personalize assumes a relevant role, which has not been deeply investigated
yet. We argue through the investigations in this paper that social network usage
patterns of users can serve as a signi cant predictor for determination of when
to personalize and when not to personalize. Understanding the target audience
of personalized search systems is an important aspect for the development of
meaningful and well-accepted systems, and hence, this work serves as a rst
step in that dimension. This could aid towards removing the need for the user
to state privacy requirements and to infer these settings through social network
usage patterns.
6
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper, we utilized a survey methodology to investigate the correlations
between users' social network usage patterns and their openness to opt for Web
search personalization. We believe that the ndings of our study may have
significant implications for the design of future personalized search and social search
applications. Proper exploitation of SNS data can lead to advancements in
personalized Web search systems by providing a more acceptable method for
derivation of user interests.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
            <surname>Boyd</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Hargittai</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Facebook privacy settings: Who cares? First Monday,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>8</issue>
          ),
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Carmel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Zwerdling</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Guy,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ofek-Koifman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>N.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Har'el, I.</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ronen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uziel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yogev</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chernov</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Personalized social search based on the user's social network</article-title>
          .
          <source>CIKM '09</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>1227</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>1236</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2009</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>DiSalvo</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Are social networks messing with your head? Scienti c American Mind</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          :
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Dou</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.-R.</given-names>
            <surname>Wen</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A large-scale evaluation and analysis of personalized search strategies</article-title>
          .
          <source>WWW '07</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>581</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>590</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2007</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Heymann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Koutrika, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Garcia-Molina</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Can social bookmarking improve web search?</article-title>
          <source>WSDM '08</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>195</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>206</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2008</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.-M. Karat</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brodie</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karat</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Usable privacy and security for personal information management</article-title>
          .
          <source>Commun. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>56</volume>
          {
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Morris</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Jaime</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Panovich</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A Comparison of Information Seeking Using Search Engines and Social Networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>ICWSM '10</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>291</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>294</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Sackmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Struker, and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Accorsi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Personalization in privacy-aware highly dynamic systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Commun. ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ):
          <volume>32</volume>
          {
          <fpage>38</fpage>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sept</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Shen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Tan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Zhai</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Implicit user modeling for personalized search</article-title>
          .
          <source>CIKM '05</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>824</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>831</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2005</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
            <surname>Stutzman</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Networked Information Behavior in Life Transition</article-title>
          .
          <source>PhD thesis</source>
          ,
          <source>THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. Teevan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dumais</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Horvitz</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Personalizing search via automated analysis of interests and activities</article-title>
          .
          <source>SIGIR '05</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>449</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>456</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2005</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>