=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-1152/paper79 |storemode=property |title=Spatial Variation and Correlation Between Electric Conductivity (EM38) and CO2 Emissions from a Cultivated Peat Soil |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1152/paper79.pdf |volume=Vol-1152 |dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/haicta/Berglund11 }} ==Spatial Variation and Correlation Between Electric Conductivity (EM38) and CO2 Emissions from a Cultivated Peat Soil== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1152/paper79.pdf
           Spatial variation and correlation between electric
           conductivity (EM38) and CO2 emissions from a
                          cultivated peat soil

                                            Örjan Berglund1
       1
           Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,
                              Sweden, e-mail: orjan.berglund@slu.se




           Abstract. Approximately 15 percent of Sweden’s land area is covered by peat
           ( 30 cm deep). In drained peatlands, decomposition of the peat produces
           greenhouse gases such as CO2 and N2O. Electric conductivity, measured with
           the instrument EM38, can be used to assess spatial variation in soil properties.
           To easier decide the quantity of the CO2-emissions from a peatland the
           possible relation between electric conductivity and CO2-emissions, water
           content, peat depth and soil temperature is investigated. The test site is located
           at Bälinge mossar, approximately 20 kilometers north of Uppsala. On the peat
           field 40 test points are marked where the measurements take place. The results
           of the investigation show that the only correlation that exists is the one
           between electric conductivity and water content.


           Keywords: EM38, spatial variation, peat, CO2 emission.




1 Introduction


In their natural state peatlands are accumulating organic matter, which means that
they bind large quantities of carbon, about 5 and 50 g C / m 2 / year. The drainage
and cultivation of peat soils increase the aeration of the soil, which in turn results in
faster brake down of the organic material than if the land is left untouched. The
degradation of the organic material release greenhouse gases such as CO2, N2O and
CH 4 (Kasimir-Klemedtsson et al., 1997). CO2 emissions dominate at high oxygen
levels, while CH4 is mainly released under anaerobic conditions. The organic soils
(8% of all cultivated land in Sweden) are the dominant greenhouse gas emitters from
arable land in Sweden. Greenhouse gas losses from these soils contribute as much as
10% (Eriksson, 1991) of the total anthropogenic emissions (in which fossil fuels
accounts for most) and greatly affect the agricultural sector's contribution of
greenhouse gases. Greenhouse gas measurements from cultivated land are often
done on few points per field, or by integrating over a larger area with eddy
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB
&RS\ULJKW‹E\WKHSDSHU¶VDXWKRUV&RS\LQJSHUPLWWHGRQO\IRUSULYDWHDQGDFDGHPLFSXUSRVHV
,Q06DODPSDVLV$0DWRSRXORV HGV 3URFHHGLQJVRIWKH,QWHUQDWLRQDO&RQIHUHQFHRQ,QIRUPDWLRQ
                                                 
DQG&RPPXQLFDWLRQ7HFKQRORJLHV
                                                 
IRU6XVWDLQDEOH$JULSURGXFWLRQDQG(QYLURQPHQW +$,&7$ 6NLDWKRV6HSWHPEHU
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 891
covariance methods (Campbell et al., 2004), which gives a large uncertainty in the
estimation of gas emissions. A lysimeter study conducted 2002-2005 showed large
variations in CO2 emissions between different places, peat type and drainage depth
(Berglund et al., 2010), while field trials during the same period showed a very large
spatial variation within the same field. This may be due to the fact that organic soils
have very large spatial variations in physical and chemical properties, often larger
than on mineral soils. One way to obtain information about this variation is by
measuring the electrical conductivity of soil with an EM38 (Geonics Ltd.,
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada), which is sensitive to differences in the amount of
organic matter and water holding capacity (Delin and Berglund, 2005). Another way
to estimate the moisture content variation is to measure the natural gamma radiation
from 40K, which is released from rock / mineral soil and blocked by water. Peat soils
often contains large amounts of water thus providing no or very low reaction at the
gamma-ray spectrometer measurements (Ek et al. , 1992). From these variations we
identified sub-regions with similar conditions. Within these more homogeneous
zones CO 2 emissions are measured and a number of soil properties such as moisture
content, bulk density, soil temperature, loss on ignition and pH. In this pilot study,
the aim is to find better methods for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from
cultivated organic soils.

CO2 emissions from cultivated peat soils exhibit a large spatial variation, which gives
uncertain estimates of greenhouse gas emissions.
Hypotheses:
         CO2 emission varies with soil properties
         The spatial variability of soil properties in a cultivated peat soil can be
         identified by measuring the electrical conductivity or gamma radiation
         By correlating the CO2 emission with different soil characteristics, a better
         estimate of gas emissions from cultivated peat soils can be made.




2 Materials and methods

The field site was a fen peat soil with a peat depth of about 1 meter. Soil from the
field has previously been used in greenhouse gas measurements in lysimeters in
EUROPEAT, a European project which ran between 2002 and 2006 (Berglund et al.,
2010). EM38 is an instrument that measures soil electrical conductivity (Söderström,
2004). The instrument is drawn after a 4-wheeler while the position is measured with
DGPS (position accuracy <2 m) and data from the EM38 and GPS recorded
continuously. EM38 creates an electromagnetic field that gives rise to a secondary
magnetic field that is recorded and the relationship between the magnetic field and
the EM38 value is a function of conductivity. Depending on whether the instrument
is angled horizontally or vertically, the conductivity is mainly measured on the soil
surface, 0-50 cm in the latter case or 0-100 cm with a maximum response of about 40
cm depth (Sudduth et al., 2001) in the former case. In this experiment, we measured
the conductivity with both methods. The conductivity is influenced by organic matter



                                          892
content and soil moisture, so variation in the conductivity shows the variations in
these properties, which in turn could affect the CO2 emission. CO2 emission was
measured by circulating the atmosphere from a 28 cm high dark chamber placed on
the ground, through a carbon dioxide analyzer (Vaisala GMP343) for 3 minutes to
measure the CO2 concentration increase (Fig. 1). The water content was measured
both gravimetrically (0-10 and 30-40 cm) with defined volume samples and also with
a Profile Probe (Delta-T Devices Ltd.), which measures the dielectric constant at
depths 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm.




Fig. 1. Chamber and Vaisala GMP 343 for CO2 measurements

During measurements in the spring of 2009 we also used a "mole" (The Soil
Company - www.soilcompany.com ), which measures gamma radiation
from 40K, 238U, 232Th, and 137Cs (Söderstrom et al., 2008).


3 Results

The measurements were carried out October 21, 2008 and 14 May 2009 in order to
compare the variation at different seasons and moisture contents.

Autumn 2008
Conductivity measurements with the EM38 give approximately a value every 2.5
meters in the direction of travel and the distance between the rows was about five
meters. In the field a total of 3448 points was measured. Fig. 2 shows all data points
from the EM38 run. The reason to run a few zig-zag turns is to be able to ensure that
the EM38 value is stable during the entire run.




                                        893
                                 em38
                                 CV0_5
                                    25,5 - 32,8
                                    32,9 - 34,8
                                    34,9 - 36,8
                                    36,9 - 40,5
                                    40,6 - 47,7




                                      Ü
                                      1:1 500

Fig. 2. All data points at EM38 driving at Örke 21 October 2008.

To obtain values for the entire field the values were interpolated with kriging (Oliver
et al., 1989). Fig. 3 compares the top soil values (0-50 cm) with the deeper (0-100
cm) layers. The values for the deeper measurement show the same pattern as the top
soil, but with higher absolute values.
In the autumn survey the soil dielectric properties were also measured (a form of
moisture measurement) with a Profile Probe from Delta-T.




                                                894
Fig. 3. Interpolated values from the top layer (shallow, 0-50 cm deep) and the deep layer
(deep, 0-100 cm depth). EM38 measurements at Örke 21/10/2008.

We made two transects across the fields and in Fig. 4 the Profile Probe value (mv)
and EM38 value from the deeper run is shown. Although both EM38 value and
Profile Probe value is a measure of water content, the relationship was not entirely
clear, with relatively low R2 values. The deeper EM38 measurements (0-100 cm)
gave the best agreement with Profile Probe measurements (Fig. 5).




                                          895
     Profile Probe (mv)




Fig. 4. EM38 measurement 0-100cm (filled contours) and Profile Probe measurement at 30 cm
depth (Blue circles).




                                           896
Fig. 5. Surface (0-50 cm) and deep (0-100 cm) EM38 measurements compared to the Profile
Probe value at depths 10, 20, 30 and 40 cm.




                                         897
Spring 2009

In the spring (14/05/2009) we conducted a more detailed study in which an EM38
survey was supplemented with gamma-ray measurements with a mole (Fig. 6). The
correlation table (Table 1) shows that the EM38 values show a similar variation both
between depth and between autumn and spring but there is no correlation between
the different gamma ray measurements. At the same time as the EM38 measurements
was done we also carried out a field survey of 40 points in which CO2 emissions,
water content (gravimetrically), moisture (ProfileProbe), C, N, pH, peat depth (19
points) was measured.
                                                 137
     40
          K                                            Cs




    232                                         238
          Th                                          U




Fig. 6. Gamma radiation maps from 40K, 137Cs, 232Th and 238U.

We only found a correlation between C and N and between water levels. Fig. 7
shows the CO2 emission from the 40 sampling points. There is considerable variation
in gas emission between the points, from 521 mg CO2 m-2 h-1 to 6638 mg CO2 m-2 h-
1
  . We found no correlation between gas emission and any of the other parameters we
measured. The field was divided into eight conductivity zones (EM38) to obtain a
better correlation between conductivity and water content measured with the Profile
Probe. When excluding two outliers the relationship between EM38-value and




                                        898
Profile Probe-value of 20 cm depth was much better (R2 = 0.89), but there was still
no relationship between the EM38-value and the CO2 emission or peat depth.
Table 1. Correlation between the deep EM38 measurement 2008 (08EM38 100), the
Toplayer 2008 (08EM3850), Toplayer 2009 (09EM3850) and gamma radiation from
potassium (K40), thorium (Th232), uranium (U238) and cesium (Cs137)

Layer             08EM38      08EM38       09EM38      K40     Th232 U238 Cs137
                  100         50           50
08EM38 100        1           0.95         0.87        0.04    -0.01    0.10     0.10
08EM38 50                     1            0.91        -0.05   -0.05    0.12     0.05
09EM38 50                                  1           -0.05   -0.08    0.21     -0.09
K40                                                    1       0.26     -0.16    0.41
Th232                                                          1        -0.37    0.09
U238                                                                    1        -0.28
Cs137                                                                            1




Fig. 7. Map of the field at Örke showing EM38 values as background colors and CO2 emission
from the 40 points as circles.




                                          899
4 Conclusions

The maps from the EM38 runs show that there is a consistent variation of the
conductivity between depths and between seasons. There is some correlation between
EM38 values and water content measured with Profile Probe, but otherwise there was
no correlation between the different parameters (EM38, CO 2 emissions, pH, peat
depth, !-rays, C, N, and bulk density). It must therefore be one factor that we have
not measured that affect the variation shown by the EM38 map. As in previous
studies, we can see that the CO2 emissions show a large spatial variation, but we
could in this pilot not find a correlation with the parameters we measured.

References
Berglund, K., 1996. Cultivated Organic Soils in Sweden: Properties and
         Amelioration. PhD Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,
         Uppsala, 39 pp.
Berglund Ö, Berglund K. 2010. Distribution and cultivation intensity of agricultural
         peat and gyttja soils in Sweden and estimation of greenhouse gas emissions
         from cultivated peat soils. Geoderma;154(3-4), 173-180.
Berglund Ö, Berglund K, Klemedtsson L. 2010. A lysimeter study on the effect of
         temperature on CO2 emission from cultivated peat soils. Geoderma;154(3-
         4), 211-218.
Campbell, D., Smith, J. and Thornburrow, B., 2004. Net ecosystem exchange of CO2
         in New Zealand peat wetlands, The 7th INTECOL International Wetlands
         Conference. Internet, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Delin, S. and Berglund, K., 2005. Management Zones Classified With Respect to
         Drought and Waterlogging. Precision Agriculture, 6(4): 321-340.
Ek, B.-M., Aaro, S. and Näslund-Landenmark, B., 1992. Utnyttjande av
         flygradiometriska data och IR-bilder vid inventering av sumpskogar och
         andra våtmarker, SGU och Lantmäteriverket, Uppsala.
Eriksson, H., 1991. Sources and sinks of carbon-dioxide in Sweden. Ambio, 20(3-4):
         146-150.
Kasimir-Klemedtsson, Å. et al., 1997. Greenhouse gas emissions from farmed
         organic soils: A review. Soil Use and Management, 13(4): 245-250.
Oliver, M., Webster, R. and Gerrard, J., 1989. Geostatistics in physical geography.
         Part I: theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 14(3):
         259-269.
Sudduth, K.A., Drummond, S.T. and Kitchen, N.R., 2001. Accuracy issues in
         electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for
         precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 31(3): 239-
         264.
Söderström, M., 2004. Inomfältsvariation en nyckelfaktor vid precisionsodling,
         Jordbrukskonferensen,        23-24      november         2004.     Stiftelsen
         Lantbruksforskning, Jordbruksverket, SLU Uppsala.
Söderström, M., Gruvaeus, I. and Wijkmark, L., 2008. Gammastrålningsmätning för
         detaljerad kartering av jordarter inom fält, Avdelningen för
         precisionsodling, Skara.




                                         900