=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1152/paper8
|storemode=property
|title=ICT Applications In the Supply Chain of Greek Agricultural Cooperatives
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1152/paper8.pdf
|volume=Vol-1152
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/haicta/MakriSMV11
}}
==ICT Applications In the Supply Chain of Greek Agricultural Cooperatives==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1152/paper8.pdf
ICT APPLICATIONS IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN OF
GREEK AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVES
Dimitra – Nefeli Makri1, Athina Skandalou1
Vasiliki Manthou1, Maro Vlachopoulou1
1
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia
dnefeli@hotmail.com, athskandal@yahoo.gr, manthou@uom.gr, mavla@uom.gr
Abstract. The agricultural sector plays a crucial role in the Greek economy.
Cooperatives are an integral part of the agricultural sector and the logistics
cost impacts the pricing policy of the agricultural products, taking into
consideration the value added of all trading partners along the supply chain.
Many governments all over Europe pay special attention to this issue trying to
make agriculture prosperous by using information systems and technology
(IS/IT). The aim of this study is to identify the present situation of ICT
applications regarding the value added logistics processes of the Greek
agricultural cooperatives. Especially, the role of specific information systems
is examined in order to estimate the impact of logistics applications and
partners in the cost of the products. For this purpose a questionnaire regarding
the above issues was given to the Greek cooperatives. Almost all the
cooperatives are characterized as Producers’ Cooperatives and are focused
more on packaging and warehousing logistics operations. The application of
Quality systems in the Greek Agricultural Cooperatives has been imposed
mainly by the customers’ concern for the quality of the product and the
protection of the environment. Although the respondents recognize the
contribution of ICT in their supply chain management, the research concludes
that the majority of Greek cooperatives is not aware of IT/IS in great extent
and this derives from the inadequate organizational culture and education.
Keywords: Agricultural Cooperatives, Supply Chain, Product Cost, Logistics,
Information Systems and Technology
1 Introduction
The agricultural sector plays a crucial role in every economy. Agricultural
Cooperatives are an integral part of the agricultural sector and they constitute an
important part of the supply chain.
All over Europe, Cooperatives are present in many sectors of the economy, like
agriculture, banking, retail, insurance, and health care. The 132.000 cooperatives in
the European Union employ 2.3 million people (European Union, 2001). They are
__________________________________
Copyright ©by the paper’s authors. Copying permitted only for private and academic purposes.
In: M. Salampasis, A. Matopoulos (eds.): Proceedings of the International Conference on Information
and Communication Technologies
for Sustainable Agri-production and Environment (HAICTA 2011), Skiathos, 8-11 September, 2011.
89
dominant in agriculture. For example, in 1996 the market share of cooperatives in
agriculture was 83% in the Netherlands, 79% in Finland and 55% in Italy (Hendrikse,
2004). In another study, Skurnik and Vihriala (1999) observed that in the European
Union there are well over 30,000 rural cooperatives with some 12 million
memberships, having over 50% of shares in the supply of agricultural inputs and over
60% of shares in the collection, processing and marketing of agricultural products.
Agricultural product logistics is a branch of modern logistics industry and it means
the physical flow process of agricultural products and relevant information from the
agricultural product producing center point to the agricultural product consuming. It
includes the producing, purchasing, transporting, loading and unloading, packaging,
warehousing, distributing, selling, and information activity. It involves the producing
field, circulating field and consuming field of agricultural products, and connects the
supplier and consumers. The aim of the Agricultural Product Logistics Development
is to conquer the obstacle of time, cost and space, to put forward the efficient and fast
transportation and storage services for agricultural products, to enhance the values of
agricultural products, to save the circulation cost, and to elude the market risks to
some extent. (Chen and Xie, 2007).
The aim of this paper is to identify the impact of specific information systems on the
value added logistics processes of the Greek agricultural cooperatives. There are two
crucial questions to be answered. a) How the cost of the agricultural product is
affected by the Supply Chain procedures. b) How can IS/IT, through strategy and
ICT application, optimize the relationship between product cost and farmer’s profit.
All the implicated entities in the supply chain such as farmers, producers,
intermediaries, traders and consumers are examined. The paper begins with a
literature review on agricultural cooperatives, the implications of agricultural product
logistics on the supply chain and the IS/IT used in the agricultural sector. In the next
section, the research methodology is presented, as well as, the data analysis that
resulted from the statistical processing of the questionnaires. Further to the factors
identification, the results are discussed and conclusions are presented.
2 Literature Review
According to the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA), Cooperative is an
automatic alliance of members which is structured voluntarily in order to confront
mutual economic, social and cultural needs. Agricultural Cooperative can be defined
as a “society” which belongs to users (farmers and producers), is controlled by them
and its principal aim is to safeguard the interests of its member, to pursue research
into the latest developments in the agricultural cooperative movement and to promote
mutual understanding and economic collaboration between the agricultural
cooperatives on one hand and the farmer and other types of cooperatives on the other
hand (ICA, 1995).
Hansamann (1996) presented a framework establishing four types of organizations,
along with their owners in order to explain their targets (table 1)
90
Table 1. Organizations – Owners – Target
Organizations Owners Target
Producers’ Cooperatives Producers-Suppliers Maximize the price
Workers’ Organizations Labor force Maximize the wage
Investors’ Organizations Capital Maximize the profit
Consumers’ Organizations Consumers Minimize the price
Source: Hansamann, 1996
The researchers put the agricultural cooperatives in the category of Producers’
Cooperatives, since farmers are the actual producers. In Greece, the cooperatives
were created, not as a state decision which was imposed on farmers, but by farmers,
in order to protect their property. In Greece, the history of cooperatives started, back
in 1900 (Almiros Volos). This was an automatic association established voluntarily
to meet common needs through a co-owner and democratically-run business. The
function was defined by the statutes and specific provisions. Members were all
individuals who had direct connection with farming.
According to the Statute of operating Agricultural Cooperatives, some of the values
and objectives of an agricultural cooperative are, solidarity, cooperation among
producers, free will, democratic- improving economic and social life, support and
development of agricultural incomes. However, cooperatives are facing some
problems. These problems primarily refer to, introversion of Agricultural
Cooperatives, underfunding, petty interests within the cooperative, disconnect the
needs of farmers from rural legislation (CAP, single payment, State Agency’s
(referring to buying and selling) Code), lack of co-operative idea, and lack of
technological infrastructure.
Finally, regarding the present conditions of the Greek agriculture, there is great
reduction of the volume of agricultural production (promoted by European funding),
whereas there is a reduction in exports and increase in imports. As a result shrinking
of agriculture’s contribution to GDP is noted. Furthermore, the last few years, banks
kept lending farmers. However, due to the financial crisis, banks became very strict
regarding borrowing procedures. If this does not change, producers will gradually
abandon their farms.
A useful tool for the analysis of agricultural cooperatives’ environment is the model
of PEST (Political Economic Socio-cultural Technological) (Nelsen and Scolbe,
2006). According to it, economical factors are dealt with the agricultural section and
the conditions which compose the total economy. Political factors have an impact,
direct or implicit, in the policy of the cooperative. Socio-cultural factors along with
the institutions, tendencies and perceptions mold the consumptive standards and
consequently the cooperative’s policies. Finally, technological factors affect to a
great extent the development of new products and the producing processes.
Processes that take part in the supply chain are distribution, warehousing,
transportation, packaging, customer service, and procurement (Lambert, 1993).
Warehousing and distribution deal with the location, the ownership, the automation
and the cost. Transportation aims for speed, reliability, flexibility and cost. Packaging
91
affects a company’s sales and for this reason its target is the quality protection, the
product preservation and the safe and easy cargo transport of the product. Customer
services’ principles are focused on dependability, time, convenience, communication,
honesty and cost. Last but not least, procurement’s goals are to improve the quality
and reduce the cost, remove the obstacles to the free flow of information to supply
chain, create real-time visibility into inventory in motion, and eliminate the long
lead-times for critical materials (Gourdin, 2006).
Quality Control is of utmost importance in the agricultural sector in general and in
agricultural cooperatives in particular. Consumers demand not only higher levels of
safety in the products (Hobbs et al, 2002, Baltzer, 2004), but they also express their
anxiety through their choices for the environment protection, and the health
protection of farmers and animals (Buzby, 2001). All these changes in consumers’
preferences and values have been affected by the various food scandals like dioxins,
mad-cow disease or dangerous fertilizers and consequently consumers, are doubtful
about the quality and safety of the food (Knowles et al, 2007). Agricultural
cooperatives try to improve their image in order to meet consumers’ needs
(Hendrikse, 2004). They need to expand in existing markets or develop new markets
in order to promote their products, while it is obvious that internal processes have to
be improved in order to increase their volume and services (Burt, 2004). One of the
goals of the agricultural cooperatives by the application of control systems is to
reduce production costs and improve product prices. According to Burt (2004),
Agricultural Cooperatives try to improve their profitability in terms of increasing the
net income. Control systems have been conceptualized in terms of implementing an
organization’s strategy, and ensuring continuing competitive advantage and quality
control (Simons, 2002). International Life Sciences Institute –of India (2007)
recognizes also the importance of monitoring and the surveillance of agricultural
cooperatives by the administration. The above factors have led to the development of
Management of Health and Food Safety systems which are based on HACCP
(Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points) and ISO 22000:2005 Management of
Food Safety. Apart from them, a variety of certified systems have been created like
ISO 9000, ISO 14000:1996 Environmental Management Systems and AGRO 2.1 and
AGRO 2.2 which are based on Integrated Management of Production.
Today’s agricultural sector has to face critical challenges from internal and external
sources, such as farmers and traders. This development coincides with the increasing
pressures on the agri-food sector to intensify process controls and to improve quality,
food safety, tracking and traceability of products throughout the supply chain, and
the environmental consequences of its operations. Information Technology and
Information Systems are the key enablers to respond to these challenges
(Vlachopoulou, M. and Matopoulos, A. 2010; Matopoulos et al, 2009). Information
systems combine the internal and external needs of an organization, with the future
requirements (Gourdin, 2006).Efforts are made to integrate IS/IT opportunities in an
appropriate way into agricultural activities. IS/IT refers to a rapidly expanding range
of services, methods, techniques, applications, equipment, and electronic
technologies used for the collection, manipulation, processing, classification, storage,
and retrieval of recordable information and knowledge sound, and graphics,
including video. Such technologies include computers, personal digital assistants
(PDAs), Automatic Identification and Data Capture (AIDC), Radio Frequency
92
Identification (RFID), high-capacity storage, networks, telecommunications,
databases, data warehouses, multimedia, the internet and its world wide web.
Applications include Geographic Information Systems (GIS), Supply Chain
Management (SCM), Enterprise-Resource-Planning (ERP), Transport Management
System (TMS), Warehouse Management System (WMS), online services, video
conferencing, electronic trade, executive information systems (EIS), electronic mail,
and expert systems (Schiefer, 2003).
The above technological developments provided another point of view, established
customers’ protection, and enhanced the traceability function of the agricultural
economy. A basic scheme of traceability systems is that a unique ID is assigned to
each identification unit (lot) of the products and an ID label or tag is attached to it.
On the premise of RFID application, a simple and versatile at the same time database
to input and refer unified distribution process records was designed. The key concept
of traceability is that a temporal identification unit is an “event” which is recorded at
each point of the distribution process. Data of an event record consist of an event ID,
a point ID, event time, and involved lot IDs. Basic types of events are “movements”
of lots such as incoming or outgoing and “transforms” of lots such as combination,
division, processing, or packaging (logistics’ parts of the supply chain). By cross-
referring the event IDs and the lot IDs on the database, it is possible to trace forward
and back the individual products on the distribution process which helps a lot both
customers and wholesalers to trace their products for various reasons. Based on this
database, an on-site data recording system was developed by applying RFID tags
which contain unique IDs, handy RFID readers which enable wireless LAN, and an
Internet-accessible database server. On the events of the distribution process, the
users read the RFID tags attached to the individual lots by using the RFID readers,
and these records are sent to the database server via the Internet, where are processed
for any reason. The users can retrieve and refer the whole distribution process
records in the database (Sugahara, 2007; Manikas, et al, 2010).
Although the significance of IS/IT for the agricultural cooperatives is great, their use
is difficult since it involves people, technology and processes (Lowry, 1997). IT/IS
impacts the organization, and organization affects the use of IT/IS. Boynton et al
(1994), Zawawi et al (2011) found that information technology knowledge is a
dominant factor in explaining the high level of information technology use in
organizations. Burn et al (1997), Xiao & Dasgupta (2005) found that its adoption
and use depends strongly on organizational culture, showing thus good management
leadership.
3 Methodology
The performance criteria that have been identified during the literature review
process were used as a basis for the construction of the questionnaire that was mailed
to 30 sustainable Agricultural Cooperatives all over Greece, taking into consideration
geographical spreading. The Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Development was
the source for locating rural cooperatives in Greece. A telephone contact took place
before sending the questionnaire to the cooperatives, in order to introduce the scope
93
of the study and to emphasize the significance of their participation.. Apart from the
first contact, each member received an initial email, consisting of a short description,
explaining officially the aim of the research, accompanied by the questionnaire.
Within 30 days after the first contact, two reminders were forwarded to the non-
respondents.
In total, 10 viable responses were received, resulting in 33% response rate. Ethical
issues like economic profit, respect for the laws, quality and quantity impact, and
safety issues were taking into consideration in our research questions (Diouf 2001).
The questionnaire begins with general information about the cooperatives like the
respondents profile, the kind of the generated products, the involved partners, supply
chain / logistics processes and growth factors as well. Furthermore, our attention is
focused on control and quality standards, factors affecting pricing, specific logistics
application and ICT use. A Likert scale (1-5 range, 1=completely insignificant,
5=significant significant) was used. . The research is based on primary data collected
from agricultural cooperatives targeted in the territory of Greece so as to have more
reliable results, covering a great variety of products.
4 Research Findings - Discussion
The questionnaire regarding the above research study contains fifteen questions.
Although, the response rate was small, the agricultural cooperatives that answered
our questionnaire are sustainable and are these which apply a significant part of
logistics functions in accordance with the processes of the supply chain. In the first
part the questions aimed at the cooperatives profile. An important issue was to define
the type of organizations involved in the exchange of products in accordance to table
1. According to the answers, almost all the cooperatives are characterized as
Producers’ Cooperatives. Producers are interested in good prices, stability and
continuous interchange with Cooperatives. The Cooperatives take products from
producers and then pass them into the market. This operation results in no
communication between Cooperative and Consumer, or in other words there is no
direct communication or a system that connects these two parts. On the other hand
the Cooperatives are not directly connected with Workers’ Organizations or
Investors’ Organizations. That shows they are not interested in the growth of the
profits regarding the investors, but only in the growth of the profits for producers.
One of the most important findings is related to the crucial role that the legislation
plays for the development of the agricultural co-operatives (Figure 1). It seems that
the issue of the government Legislation implies the policy that this organization is
going to follow. The issues of Technology and Know-How, governments’ political
movements, and the international security seem also to be important for the
cooperatives.
94
Trade
Growth factors Associations
Other 2%
Standard Demographics organizations
Consumer level 4%
4%
11%
Economic-
political system
13% International
economy
16%
Technology and
Know-how
Governments -
16%
political
movements
Legislation 16%
18%
Figure 1. Growth factors of agricultural cooperatives
The findings are congruent with similar studies that outline “Legislation” and
“Technology-Know how” as the most important factors stated by logistics companies
(Rodrigue at al., 2001).
But how can all these parameters and why do they, play so crucial role for
Agricultural Cooperatives? The question still remains. This could be more
intelligible if we had a deeper knowledge concerning who is the main Supplier of the
raw material for the production of the agricultural products. Some possible choices of
trading parties that are usually suggested by a great range of bibliography (Martinez
L. and Thornsbury S. 2006; Fang W. and Tan Y. 2010; Ortmann GF and King RP,
2007) are
· Producers- Farmers
· Other Cooperatives
· Wholesalers – intermediaries
· Other
In our research 69% of trading partners constitute the producer-farmers (table 2)
where their significance in the activation of the Supply Chain is obvious.
Table 2. Trading parties in Agricultural Cooperatives
Producer-Farmers 69%
Wholesalers – intermediaries 31%
95
Other Cooperatives 0%
According to a study by Wensong and Danfeng (2004), in America and in Europe
agricultural cooperatives are focused more on distribution and customer service-
product marketing while in Greece they are focused on packaging (25%) and
warehousing (23%) (figure 2).
Figure 2. Operations of supply chains in agricultural cooperatives
The majority of Greek cooperatives is not aware of IT/IS in great extent and this
derives from the inadequate organizational culture and education. It is worth to be
noted that only 3/10 apply an ERP system while only one of them - the Agricultural
Cooperative of Velvento, called “Dimitra” states the use of a WMS, as well. As for
TMS or WMS, the rest of the respondents don’t recognize the use of such systems,
thus, indicating the lack of integrated IS usage.
Furthermore, at this point is very important to note, that nothing would have
advanced technologically, with such a fast rate without the decisive intervention of
traceability.
Traceability Systems for Agricultural Products Distribution based on RFID (Radio
Frequency Identification) technology were developed. Historically, the first efforts
for standardization and establishment of Greek standards are made in 1970 by
various bodies and chambers that are trying to create a specification without having
impressive results.
Quality control goes together with the quantity control. The most popular
certification system for quantity is the ISO systems. Agricultural cooperatives, in
order to avoid fatal errors, should apply the technique of traceability. Regarding the
ISO systems used in Greece, the majority of the respondents in the questionnaire
apply HACCP, ISO 2200:2005 and AGRO 2.1 and 2.2. It is important to point out
96
that the above applications have been imposed mainly by the customers’ concern for
the quality of the product and the protection of the environment.
The application of Quality systems in Agricultural Cooperatives is based on a variety
of factors. The table below (table 3) presents in which extent the quality standards are
important for the agricultural cooperatives in order to incorporate Management of
Health and Food Safety systems.
Table 3. Factors affecting the use of control
FACTORS REFERENCES PERCENTAGE
Demanding customers Hobbs et al, 2002, 8%
Baltzer, 2004
Image Improvement Hendrikse, 2004 8%
Expansion into new markets Burt, 2004 9%
Increase customer Buzby, 2001 10%
satisfaction and reduce
customer complaints
Need to improve internal Burt, 2004 8%
processes
Need for better surveillance International Life 8%
by the administration Sciences Institute – India
,2007
Reduce production costs Burt, 2004 8%
Improving profitability Burt, 2004 9%
Due to competition Simons, 2002 5%
Developing competitive Simons, 2002 8%
advantage
Quality policy Simons, 2002 9%
The majority of the Agricultural cooperatives (60%) consider that the application of
control systems is efficient while the remainders (40%) consider that this control is
extremely significant. Agricultural cooperatives taking into consideration the above
factors, apply all the necessary systems in order to satisfy their needs and customers’
needs, as well. At the same time, ISO or HACCP affects in a great extent the
products’ prices as 70% of the Agricultural Cooperatives changed their pricing
strategy after the application of these systems.
Apart from the use of control, the agricultural cooperatives’ pricing strategy is
affected by other factors. Dealers’ room affects their policy to the greatest extent – in
a percentage of 43% - and this means that the competition is increased while rates of
super markets influence them in a percentage of 36%.
Our attention is focused in particular processes of supply chain, referring to
transportation, packaging and warehousing.
Table 4 indicates transportation alternatives. Owned vehicles use is preferred less
than outsourcing transportation.
97
Table 4. Transfer from Cooperatives
3PL 39%
Owned vehicles 23%
Other 38%
According to the respondents the main goal of the transportation, it is to minimize
total cost and time (half of the respondents consider that this goal is very important
while 30% of them consider it important).
Packaging constitutes a central process of Greek Agricultural Cooperatives and thus
the relative decisions are of utmost importance. These decisions are based on
managers' opinion (24%), the opinion of the marketing department (24%), consumer
claims (32%) and competition (20%). Since packaging appears as a key element for
the total product image, the objectives of the packaging function was investigated.
Table 5 presents the most considerable packaging objectives.
Table 5. Objectives of packaging
Facilitating consumer 18%
Protecting product quality 26%
Better maintenance of the product 19%
Easy and safe distribution 26%
Other 11%
Last but not least, warehousing is another process of supply chain in agricultural
cooperatives. They choose deliberately one of the following ways of warehousing as
each one of them try to satisfy their private needs and achieve their target. The ways
to store products are focused on owned facilities (54%), external partner (23%) and
rented premises (23%).
Taking into consideration the responses of the cooperatives, a Supply Chain
Management System could be a possible solution to the problems the cooperatives
face. Special attention should be given to the entities and the corresponding goals
(table 6) and should be considered.
Table 6. System entities and objectives
OBJECTIVES OF THE USE OF THE To have a picture of those involved in
SYSTEM the process
USERS - PROFESSIONALS To be able to order raw materials
offered by the cooperative
To have a picture regarding to
- the structure of the cooperative
- the economic drive of the cooperative
- the products traded
- the views of local farmers
- ordering
98
OBJECTIVES OF THE USE OF THE - The structure of the cooperative
SYSTEM - Economic drive of the cooperative
USERS – BUYERS - Products traded
- The views of local farmers
- Ordering (HL / CR CART)
OBJECTIVES OF THE USE OF THE Filling the site with reports
SYSTEM Clear and reliable details of any current
ADMINISTRATORS order.
Clear and reliable information of each
order (address and telephone customer)
Identify orders that are the most urgent
(depending on the time of order)
Monitoring the order status
5 Conclusions
The majority of trading parties in agricultural cooperatives in Greece are composed
of producers and suppliers, thus their principal aim is to maximize the price of the
products that they merchandise Every agricultural cooperative is obliged to follow
the legislation and the specific rules that European Union has established.
The complexity of the agricultural processes is an important issue and thus proper
attention must be drawn to the selection and evaluation process of supply chain in
agricultural cooperatives. The aim of this study was to identify the key measures of
the Greek agriculture cooperatives examining the existing situation of information
systems as integral parts supporting logistics applications.
According to our research, agricultural cooperatives deal with fresh products and
natural origin products. Consequently, they follow different strategies and techniques
having as basic criteria the type of the product that they merchandise. It is important
to mention that fresh products demand special treatment in packaging, transfer and
every process of the supply chain tries to solve special problems whenever specific
prerequisites are necessary. Packaging is important for the maintenance and the
protection of the products and at the same time affects the consumers’ choice of the
product. It limits the risk derived from warehousing and transportation of the
product. On the other hand, the ownership of warehousing facilities or the use of
third party logistics (3PL) is a strategic decision. It affects inventories, customer
service, and product cost. The connection between the price and processes is
interdependent and vice versa. However, the basic goal of an agricultural cooperative
still remains the effort of balancing the cost, the profit and the maintenance of the
product with business consumers and producers. Last but not least, it is the process of
transportation between the supply chain nodes. The decision between the use of
owned vehicles or the use of a 3PL, aims at the elimination of cost and time.
The most significant factors, resulted from the research, are considered to be the
following:
· Greece has an old-fashioned technological infrastructure
99
· Although in Greece there are companies that can provide
cooperatives with the appropriate software, the staff is inexperienced and there is
lack of know-how
· The management of the agricultural cooperatives does not take into
consideration the significance of logistics, and as a consequence its development is
very limited
· Farmers and producers believe in the institution of the agricultural
cooperative as it can provide better prices and services and this is the reason that
cooperatives can and should develop their logistics operations based on new
technologies and information systems…
· Processes of supply chain that are already applied in agricultural
cooperatives in a great extent are packaging and warehousing`
A proper integrated system of data selection and monitoring regarding products’
transfer supported by new technology and information systems aims to a normal
logistics function of the cooperative and generally to the recording of every condition
occurring in the cooperative. Thus, the agriculture cooperative could achieve the
overall supervision of the movement of the products in the supply chain.
Taking into consideration the problems the cooperatives face, as well as the low use
of ICT, the integration of a Supply Chain Management System in the cooperatives
should be examined. Furthermore, the cooperatives’ portals should be enhanced or
developed to include forum for better communication among their members, and
negotiation of prices. These portals could be managed by government institutions
supporting them technologically or by individuals with appropriate personnel
training.
References
1. Baltzer K. (2004). Consumers’ willingness to pay for food quality-the case of
eggs. Acta Agric, Scand. Sect. C. Food Economics, Vol. 1, pp. 78-90
2. Boynton A.C., Zmud R.W. Jacob G.C. (1994). The influence of IT Management
Practice on It Use in Large Organizations, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp.
299-318
3. Burn J., Davison R. &Jordan E. (1997). The Information Society – A Cultural
Fallacy? , Journal of failures and Lessons Learned in It Management, Vol. 1, No.
4, pp. 219-232
4. Burt L. (2004). A Brief Introduction to Agricultural Cooperatives. Oregon State
University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.
5. Buzby J.C. (2001). Effects of food-safety perceptions on food demand and global
trade, Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade/WRS -01-1,
Economic Research Service/USDA, Washington, DC.
6. Chen L.Q. and Xie Z.Z., (2007). Discussion and analysis of logistics development
of farming product in China under the model of management of Supply Chain,
Science Technology and Industry, Vol. 7, pp. 37-41
100
7. Diouf J.(2001). Ethical issues in food and agriculture. Food and Agriculture
organization of the United States, Rome.
8. European Union, (2001). Cooperatives in Enterprise Europe, Commission of the
European Communities, Brussels. (http://www.cpfund.ca/pdf/co-operatives-in-
enterprise-europe.pdf)
9. Fang W. and Tan Y. (2010). The Wholesale Market as the Core of Aquatic
Products Supply Chain Management Model. Commercial college of Central
South university of Forestry & Technology, Changsha, Hunan, China.
10. Gourdin K. (2006), Global Logistics Management: A Competitive Advantage for
the New Millennium, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, United Kingdom.
11. Hansamann H. (1996). The ownership of Enterprise. The Belknap Press of
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
12. Hendrikse G.W.J. (2004), Restructuring Agricultural Cooperatives. Erasmus
University Rotterdam, Rotterdam School of Management, Rotterdam, Holland.
13. Hobbs J.E, Fearne A. & Spriggs J (2002). Incentive structures for food safety and
quality assurance: An international comparison, Food Control, Vol. 13, pp. 77-81
14. ICA, (1995). The International Co-operative Alliance Statement on Co-operative
Identity, Review of International Co-operation, Vol. 88, No. 3, pp. 3-4
15. International Life Sciences Institute – India (2007). A surveillance and
Monitoring System for Food Safety for India
(http://www.ilsiindia.org/PDF/Conf.%20recommendations/Food%20and%20Wat
er%20Safety/Food%20safety%20Surveillance%20and%20Monitoring%20Syste
m%20for%20India%20-%20Final.pdf)
16. Knowles T., Moody R. & McEachern M.G (2007). European Food scares and
their impact on EU food policy. British Food Journal, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 43-67.
17. Lowry R.G. (1997). Postgraduate research training for information systems:
improving standards & reducing uncertainty, 8th Australian Conference on
Information Systems.
18. Manikas I., Manos B., Vlachopoulou M. and Manthou V. (2010). A case study
evaluation of the factors affecting fresh produce traceability. International Journal
of Business Innovation and Research, Vol. 4, No.3 pp. 232 – 255
19. Martinez L. and Thornsbury S. (2006), U.S. Fresh produce wholesale sector trade
practices: Initial survey results. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan
State University. East Lansing, USA.
20. Matopoulos, A., Vlachopoulou, M. and Manthou, V. (2009). Understanding the
factors affecting e-business adoption and impact on logistics processes, Journal of
Manufacturing Technology Management, www.emerladinsight.com/1741-
038X.htm , Vol. 20, No. 6, pp. 853-865
21. Nelsen J. and Scolbe M. (2006). Social License to Operate Mines: Issues of
Situational Analysis and Process. Department of Mining Engineering, University
of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
22. Ortmann GF and King RP (2007). Agricultural Cooperatives I: History, Theory
and Problems. Agrekon, Vol. 46, No.1.
23. Rodrigue J.-P., Slack B., Comtois C. (2001). Green Logistics (The paradoxes of).
Published in A.M. Brewer, K.J. Button and D.A. Hensher (eds), The Handbook
of Logistics and Supply-Chain Management, Handbooks in Transport #2,
London.
101
24. Sugahara K. (2007). Traceability system for agricultural products based on RFID
and mobile technology, National Agriculture Research Center, Kannondai 3-1-1,
Japan.
25. Schiefer G. (2003). New Technologies and their impact on Agriculture,
Environment and the Food Industry, EFITA Conference 5-9. July, Debrecen,
Hungary
26. Simons R. (2002). The role of management control systems in creating
competitive advantage: New perspectives, Harvard University Graduate School
of Business Administration, USA
27. Skurnik, S. and V. Vihriala (1999), Role of Cooperative Entrepreneurship in the
Modern Market Environment: Introduction and Summary. The Finish Journal of
Business Economics, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 375-383.
28. Vlachopoulou, M. and Matopoulos, A. (2010). ICT and E-business in the Food
Supply Chain, Ιn the book titled: “Delivering Performance in Food Supply
Chains” (Eds: Mena, C. and Stevens, G.), Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge,
UK, pp. 416-431, ISBN: 9781845694715.
29. Wensong Z. & Danfeng L. (2004). Logistic System Comparison in Agriculture –
US, European and China, School of economics and management, Beijing
Jiaotong University, P.R. China
30. Xiao L. & Dasgupta S. (2005). The impact of Organizational Culture on
Information Technology Practices and Performance. The George Washington
University, Washington, DC.
31. Zawawi A.A. , Zakaria Z., Kamarunzaman N.K., Noordin N., Mohamed Sawal
M.Z.H., Junos N.M., Najid N.S.A (2011). The Study of Barrier Factors in
Knowledge Sharing: A Case Study in Public University, Management Science
and Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 59-70
102