<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>LINKING MOBILE ENHANCED COLLECTIVE LEARNING TO OPEN EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE (OEP)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>2</fpage>
      <lpage>4</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The enhancement of collective learning for teachers and students through mobile devices is the
building block of this ‘idea’ paper. We address the connection between mobile enhanced collective
learning and Open Educational Practice (OEP), as teaching and learning practice with Open
Educational Resources. The aims are to develop an understanding of the connections between mobile
enhanced group learning and OER/OEP, to discuss points of convergence and the pedagogical value
of such convergence. Group learning will be situated at learner level and at teacher level. At learner
level, we explore how learning processes can be fostered by mobile enhanced response systems
through which teachers use the results of a test or an exam to provide immediate feedback and to
identify ill-defined areas of knowledge through group activities (test results are gathered and displayed
by software connecting student mobile devices). At teacher level, we discuss future developments
from an OEP perspective, in which group learning facilities are offered to teachers teaching the same
subject and benefiting from materials and resources created by their peers.
In terms of designing m-learning artefacts that effectively support learning, Pachler, Bachmair and
Cook (2010) call for more “focus on the strength of mobile devices, such as immediacy of
communication and access to information, context-sensitivity and location-awareness” (p. 71).
Regarding ‘immediacy’, in this paper the term will be understood as the provision of immediate
feedback in a learning context and its pedagogical value for collective learning, and not merely as
immediate access to information (e.g. ubiquity, Viberg &amp; al., 2010, Sharples et al., 2009). From this
point of view, ‘immediacy’ is contextualized and put in the service of learning, thus moving from
access to information to its transformation and the shaping of the learning context.
The paper builds on findings from research we are conducting at HiST into mobile enhanced
immediate feedback provision in the classroom and in vocational learning settings, and its potential as
a group learning affordance and within an inquiry based training paradigm (Arnesen &amp; al., 2013;
Nielsen et al., 2013). A challenge for mobile learning design is whether mobile devices “serve as tools
for capturing immediacy or situations rather than enabling pupils to access and generate situations and
contexts in situ” (Pachler, Bachmain &amp; Cook, 2010: 210). This paper addresses the latter, presenting
two software applications developed for mobile devices (SRS and PeLe) that are used in learning
contexts in several countries and for a variety of learning subjects (cf. the portal
http://www.one2act.no). The software collects and displays the results of a test immediately after
students submit their answers. The learning potential of immediate feedback provision will be
explored, namely the possibility for a teacher to identify ill-defined areas of knowledge, to cater to
these
learning activities based on the test results with a view to explanation and elucidation. We argue that
the gap between ad hoc pedagogical support and knowledge construction is narrowed and assessment
comes closer to the co-construction of learning, as this occurs through group interaction and classroom
collaboration that is initiated after teacher explanations of test results. Engagement and motivation are
more
likely
to
occur
through
group
learning</p>
      <p>Moving a step further, the paper discusses one of our R&amp;D priorities, namely group learning at the
level,
linking</p>
      <p>While the OER concept is often criticized for its static dimension (pieces of licensed content made
available through a repository), more recently emphasis has been given to OEP due to its repurposing
potential in new learning contexts (Conole, 2013; Weller, 2010). Furthermore, the affordances of
knowledge co-construction and scaffolding advocated by sociocultural views of learning meet the
developments in the area of OER/OEP and lead us to think that sharing of materials (such as tests,
exams, exercises, etc.) among teachers using response systems is a natural outcome of the (mobile)
learning pedagogies that call for a more inclusive and collaborative approach to learning and training,
avoiding teacher activity in isolation. From a design point of view we set the ground for a database
containing tests and exams by subject that will be enhanced by networking functions (tagging and
recommendation possibilities) allowing teachers to learn from each other and exchange practice on
mobile enhanced immediate feedback as a trigger to collective learning.
Arnesen, K., Korpås, G., Hennissen, J. &amp; Stav, J.B. 2013. Experiences with use of Various Pedagogical Methods
Utilizing a Student Response System – Motivation and Learning Outcome, The Electronic Journal of e-Learning,
Vol. 11, Issue 3, pp 169-181. http://www.ejel.org/issue/download.html?idArticle=255
Conole, G. 2013. Designing for learning in an Open World. Springer
Nielsen, K., Hansen, G., and Stav, J.-B. 2013. Teaching with student response systems (SRS): teacher-centric
aspects that can negatively affect students' experience of using SRS, Research in Learning Technology, Vol. 21,
2013, 13 pages. http://www.researchinlearningtechnology.net/index.php/rlt/article/view/18989</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>