=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1154/paper11
|storemode=property
|title=Using Augmented Reality, Artistic Research and Mobile Phones to Explore Practice-based Learning
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1154/paper11.pdf
|volume=Vol-1154
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/biiml/SpikolRSGK14
}}
==Using Augmented Reality, Artistic Research and Mobile Phones to Explore Practice-based Learning==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1154/paper11.pdf
"This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License."
Spikol, D., Ryd, C., Smolicki, J., Ginslov, J. & Kozel. S. (2014). Paper presented at the Bristol Ideas in Mobile Learning 2014
Symposium, Bristol
Using Augmented Reality, Artistic
Research and Mobile Phones to Explore
Practice-based Learning
Introduction
Mobile devices like smartphones, tablet computers, and wearable devices
have been widely adapted and new technologies are constantly consumed.
Pachler and colleagues (2010) clearly positioned that mobile learning is a
rapidly emerging field of education research and practice and that developing
theoretical and conceptual frameworks to explain the complex
interrelationships between learning, everyday life and new technologies is a
complex endeavour. Cook (2010) argues that one of the aims of design
research is to identify and model technology-mediated, social learning and
behaviours in order to design tools that support and promote the practices
under investigation. While Adams and colleagues (2013) illustrate that these
types of research activities for mobile technologies as boundary crossing that
negotiate between different communities and context as a means to support
and investigate technology-enhanced learning. This paper the use artistic
research practices as means to further explore design research for education
in two on-going research projects. Drawing from Kozel’s (2011) view of
artistic research as a convergence of materialities, which allows the research
to be pulled in different directions with the notion that vision is material, as is
the tactile engagement with objects; concepts have their own materiality, and
movement provokes a dance of materiality and meaning. Connecting mobile
learning to a kinaesthetic approach rather than the visual addresses the
convergence between the virtual and the physical world and provides a novel
way to investigate mobile learning. Our research aim is to explore how
augmented reality with mobile devices coupled with artistic research be used
for practice-based education. The objective is to investigate if these diverse
practices can be a stepping-stone for larger mobile learning projects that can
leverage practice-based learning with mobile devices into more sustainable
and scalable educational experiences.
1
Background
Over the last year as part of two on-going research projects; Living
Archives and AffeXity an ancillary investigation of how this research could
be used for supporting practice-based learning that leverages 21 -century
st
digital skills with diverse groups of learners is being conducted. Living
Archives1 is research project that investigates the role of the public archive by
performing memory, connecting open and diverse data through participatory
design. While the AffeXity project explores augmented choreography in
cities, and a-fixity as an urban condition. The core of these two project has
grown from artistic research, that includes a set of overlapping practices:
artistic practices of dance improvisation, video shooting, digital image editing
and sound composition, combined with the daily practices of moving through
a city and using mobile devices (Kozel, 2012). Our interest is to position
mobile learning research into these on-going projects that serve multiple aims
of the host projects while providing and test-bed for design-based research
for education.
Description of Interventions
Research was conducted in three workshops focused on practice-based
learning with diverse adults that ranged from amateur dancers, high school
students, and university students. The three of the interventions were design
workshops were the researchers, professional dancers, and choreographers,
and the learners co-created experiences that ended with a public exhibition.
The first workshop was with six adult amateur dancers that are part of a
physically disabled organisation. The second workshop was with high school
students from the local performing arts school. The third workshop was part
of a University mobility for the Baltic countries, where design students
worked with the technology in the city. Each of these workshops followed a
general participatory design process where we worked in a professional
environment (the first two at the local dance company the other at the
university) with a mixed team of researchers, professional dancers,
choreographers, and the learners. For the workshops we conducted short pre
and post surveys to determine the level of experience of the learners with
mobile augmented reality, opinions about the workshops for practice-based
learning. Additionally, we video documented the workshops and conducted
1
http://livingarchives.mah.se/
2
group after action reviews of their experiences. For the first two workshops
we also conducted a survey with the audience in order to get some insight on
performance.
Initial Results
Our initial findings point towards benefits of mobile learning for practice
based learning for kinaesthetic activities that leverage both the physical and
visual aspects in these cases dance. This may have significance, since the
value of mobile learning is tied to the affordances that these technologies offer
rather then the anyplace anytime metaphor. Other findings from the work
focus on the process of digital creation and the tools used. For these
interventions, we focused on commercially available application that work on
standard smartphones (Android and iOS) and a web-based tool, yet for
collaborative work these tools proved inefficient. From the learning
perspective, most of the students had some familiarity with the tools, but less
experience in creating digital content in a formal sense in terms of video
shooting, image making, and sound design. From an interaction design
perspective, a multitude challenges were observed in the design of augmented
reality locative performances in terms of having groups of the audiences
vying for the same tag to trigger the digital component, the overlapping of
audio streams, and the tension created by the live performers and their digital
avatars. Designing for group interaction where each user has a device and
can move freely around provides orchestration challenges that can range for
collaboration to cooperation (Perttula et al., 2013). In the case of the high
school students, the majority of the students are familiar with producing
media from an informal practice but have no formal training in media
practices.
Conclusion
The strength of coupling artistic research to DBR is the acknowledgement
that design research requires tensions that include successes and failures. We
see these interventions as technology sketches that provide a way to balance
the research aims with products and services that allow more iterations that
solve the design problem.
3
References
Adams, A., Fitzgerald, E., & Priestnall, G. (2013). Of Catwalk Technologies and
Boundary Creatures. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI, 20(3).
doi:10.1145/2491500.2491503
Cook, J. (2010). Mobile Phones as Mediating Tools within Augmented Contexts for
Development. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 2(3), 1–12.
Kozel, S. (2011). The Virtual and the Physical: A Phenomenological Approach to
Performance Research. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to
Research in the Arts-Routledge (pp. 204–222).
Kozel, S. (2012). The Fibreculture Journal, 1–26.
Pachler, N., Cook, J., & Bachmair, B. (2010). Mobile learning: structures, agency,
practices.
Perttula, A., Tuomi, P., Kiili, K., Suominen, M., Koivisto, A., & Multisilta, J. (2013).
Enriching shared experience by collective heart rate. International Journal of Social and
Humanistic Computing, 2(1), 31–50.
4