<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Inevitable Ontological Commitment or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Ontology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Giancarlo Guizzardi</string-name>
          <email>gguizzardi@inf.ufes.br</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Ontology and Conceptual Modeling Research Group (NEMO), Federal University of Espírito Santo (UFES)</institution>
          ,
          <country country="BR">Brazil</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>1The author is currently a visiting professor at the University of Trento (Italy) whose research is supported by the ERC advanced grant 267856 for the project entitled “Lucretius: Foundations for Software Evolution” (http://www.lucretius.eu).</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the application of Foundational
Ontologies, i.e., formal ontological theories in the philosophical sense, for providing
real-world semantics for conceptual modeling languages, and theoretically sound
foundations and methodological guidelines for evaluating and improving the
individual models produced using these languages.</p>
      <p>The lack of properly developed ontological foundations has a clear impact for
conceptual modeling and in a way that is perceived by practitioners. For instance, solid
empirical evidence shows that the perception of ontological deficiencies in a
conceptual modeling language has a negative impact on the perception of usefulness and
usability of these languages. In this talk, I will discuss the formal notion of
ontological commitment and its relation to real-world semantics, language metamodel and
visual concrete syntax. Moreover, I will discuss how a particular ontology-based
approach for language analysis and (re)design has been employed over the years to
address recurrent problems in the literature of conceptual modeling. These problems
range from fundamental issues dealing fundamental modeling aspects (e.g., object,
events, dependent objects, taxonomic structures, intrinsic and relational properties,
property measurement spaces, part-whole relations) to complex aspects of
representing social reality (e.g., goals, services, capabilities, organizational structures, social
roles and software).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>