<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>University of Indonesia Participation at Query Answering-CLEF 2005</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Mirna Adriani and Rinawati Faculty of Computer Science University of Indonesia Depok 16424</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ID">Indonesia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>We present a report on our participation in the Indonesian-English question-answering task of the 2005 Cross-Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF). We chose to translate an Indonesian query set into English using a commercial machine translation tool called Transtool. We used a linguistic tool, the Monty Tagger, to find the answer to the question in a passage that has the same tagging as the query. The University of Indonesia IR-group participate in the bilingual Query-Answering (QA) task in Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF) 2005, i.e., the Indonesian-English QA. We use commercial machine translation software called Transtool1 to translate an Indonesian query set into English. We learned from our previous work [2] that freely available dictionaries on the Internet did not provide sufficiently good translation terms, as their vocabulary was very limited. We hoped that we could improve the result using machine translation.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Finding the Answer in the Document</title>
      <p>The translated queries were run using an information retrieval system to retrieve the top 100 documents. These
top 100 documents were then split into passages each containing two sentences. Each passage was then ran
through Monty Tagger2 to identify the name entity of each word such as NN, NNP for nouns, and CD for
numbers, etc. Based on the category of the query, i.e., based on its query tag: location, person, etc., we specified
that terms with NN tags are the answers to location type questions, and terms with CD tags are the answer to
date type questions, and so forth.</p>
      <p>
        In order to give the score to the passages, we use a similar scoring technique as the one used by Li and Croft [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]
in their QA work. The scoring rules are as follows:
1 See http://www.geocities.com/cdpenerjemah/.
2 See http://web.media.mit.edu/~hugo/montytagger/.
      </p>
      <p>1.
2.
3.
4.
5.</p>
      <p>Give 0 to a passage if its tag is not the same as the query tag.</p>
      <p>Give 0 to a passage if the number of words in the query is smaller than some specified threshold,
otherwise give the passage a score equal to the number of words in the query (count_m).</p>
      <p>Add 0.5 if all words in the query are in the passage.</p>
      <p>Add 0.5 if the order of words in the passage is the same as the query.</p>
      <p>Calculate the final score of the passage:</p>
      <p>Score = score + count_m / passage_size
where:
count_m = the number of the words in a query.</p>
      <p>passage_size = the number of the words in the passage.</p>
      <p>Once the passages obtained their scores, get the top 20 passages that have the highest scores. The answer to the
question in the passage can be estimated by calculating the distance between the candidate words and the queries
words. The passage that has the smallest distance is the answer.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Experiment 4</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>The collection contains English documents from the Glasgow Herald and the Los Angeles Times. There are 200
queries that are being used in this year QA task. We use Lemur3 information retrieval system to index and
retrieve the documents.</p>
      <p>Our work focused on the bilingual task using Indonesian queries to retrieve English documents. The result that
we submitted is the translated queries from using the machine translation tool. The average number of words in
the original English queries is 8.50 words, in the Indonesian queries is 7.89 words, and in the translated English
queries is 8.94 words. Transtool failed to translate 8 Indonesian words into English.</p>
      <p>Our result shows that only two correct answers are being found (Table 1). There were 36 inexact (ambiguous)
answers and 162 wrong answers. One of the reasons why the result was so poor was because our tagger did not
provide specific enough tagging to the passages. As a result, the tagging in most passages was too general. For
example NN tags could be the answer to questions about location or about organization. We did not have enough
time to analyze the results before submitting them and correct this problem.</p>
      <p>Task : Bilingual QA
W (wrong)
U (unsupported)
X (inexact)
R (right)</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Adriani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Bilingual CLEF for English and Dutch</article-title>
          . In CLEF 2001 Working Note Workshop. Germany,
          <year>September 2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clarke</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. L. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Cormack</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. I. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Kisman</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Lynam</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Question Answering by Passage Selection: The 9th Text retrieval Conference (TREC-9)</source>
          .
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hull</surname>
          </string-name>
          , David.
          <source>Xerox TREC-8 Question Answering Track Report: The 8th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC8)</source>
          .
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Xiaoyan dan Croft, Bruce. Evaluating Question-Answering Techniques in Chinese</article-title>
          .
          <source>In NIST Special Publication: The 10th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-10)</source>
          .
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>