<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>NLEL at CLEF 2009 Robust WSD Task</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Davide Buscaldi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paolo Rosso Natural Language Engineering Lab</string-name>
          <email>prossog@dsic.upv.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>ELiRF Research Group</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Universidad Politecnica de Valencia</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This report describes our approach to the Robust - Word Sense Disambiguation task. We applied the same index expansion technique used in 2008 for the Question Answering WSD task, with the addition of pseudo (blind) relevance feedback. In our approach, a WordNet expanded index is generated from the disambiguated document collection. This index contains synonyms, hypernyms and holonyms of the disambiguated words contained in documents. Query words are searched for in both the expanded WordNet index and the default index. The results show that the use of the extended index did not prove useful, obtaining 14 16% less in MAP with respect to the base system.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Information Retrieval</kwd>
        <kwd>Word Sense Disambiguation</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        In 2008 we participated in the QA-WSD task using an index expansion method based on WordNet
hypernyms, synonyms and holonyms, which exploited the disambiguated collection [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The results
did not show any relevant di erence between the use of disambiguation or not, although we
observed that passages returned using the disambiguated collection and our method tended to be
shorter with respect to the base system. We took the opportunity presented by the Robust WSD
Task at CLEF 2009 to test the same method in this task. A novelty for this participation was the
introduction of a nave Pseudo Relevance Feedback[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">3, 4</xref>
        ] method, consisting in the expansion of
the query with the top 5 terms (according to their tf.idf weights) resulting from the unexpanded
query.
      </p>
      <p>In the following section, we describe the RobustWorSE (Robust Wordnet Search Engine)
system. In section 3 we describe the characteristics of our submissions and discuss the obtained
results.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The RobustWorSE System</title>
      <p>
        The core of the system is a standard Lucene1 search engine (version 2.4.1). During the indexing
phase, we create two indices: the rst one (text ) contains all the terms of the sentence; the second
one (expanded index, or wn index) contains all the synonyms of the disambiguated words (we
consider the sense with the highest score to be the \right" sense). In the case of nouns and verbs,
it contains also their hypernyms. For nouns, the holonyms (if available) are also added to the
index, in a similar way to the GeoWorSE system that participated in the 2008 GeoCLEF track
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. For instance, let us consider the following sentence from document GH951115-000080:
Splitting the left from the Labour Party would weaken the battle for progressive policies
inside the Labour Party.
      </p>
      <p>The underlined words are those that have been disambiguated in the collection. For these
words we can found their synonyms and related concepts in WordNet, as listed in Table 1.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the wn index will contain the following terms: separate, part, move, position, place,
labor party, political party, party, change, alter, con ict, ght, engagement, war, warfare, military
action, action, reformist, argumentation, logical argument, line of reasoning, line.</p>
      <p>During the search phase, in the default con guration, the text is searched for question terms.
The top 5 resulting documents are analysed to extract up to 5 keywords that are used to expand
the query. The keywords are</p>
      <p>selected according to their tf.idf weight. Inverse document frequency is calculated over the
entire document collection.</p>
      <p>In the WSD con guration, search is carried out in a similar way, with the di erence that every
noun and adjective is also searched for in the wn index.</p>
      <p>In Table 2 we show the expansion terms obtained for the topic 147-AH : \Oil accidents and
birds", using the two di erent con gurations. From the example it is possible to notice that
weights of the terms from the WordNet query resulted higher than those obtained with the base
query.
mode
No-WSD
WSD
term
gero
pigeon</p>
      <p>i
spill
wildlife</p>
      <p>spill
pipeline
river
arco
sh
We submitted four runs with the WSD system, two using the NUS labeled collection and two with
the UBC labeled collection. For each collection, we submitted one run using only the topic title
and another one using both the title and the description. As baseline, we submitted two non-WSD
runs, one in the con guration \title only" and one in the con guration \title and description".</p>
      <p>In Table 3 we show the results obtained by the two non-WSD runs and the four WSD runs.</p>
      <p>The results show that the use of the disambiguated collection did worsen the results obtained
by the base system. There are di erences of 16% in MAP between the normal and WSD runs
in the title only con guration, and up to 14:21% between in TD con guration. There is little
di erence ( 1% in TD con guration) between the use of the NUS disambiguated collection and
the UBC disambiguated collection.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The index expansion method proved to be particularly ine ective, reducing the MAP of the base
system up to 16%. We still have to investigate the speci c reasons of such a negative behaviour,
and the role of the pseudo relevance feedback in the obtained results.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>We would like to thank the TEXT-ENTERPRISE 2.0 TIN2009-13391-C04-03 research project for
partially supporting this work.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Davide</given-names>
            <surname>Buscaldi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Paolo</given-names>
            <surname>Rosso</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Some experiments in question answering with a disambiguated document collection</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access 9th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>CLEF</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          , Aarhus, Denmark,
          <source>September 17-19</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          , Revised Selected Papers, volume
          <volume>5706</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
          <volume>442</volume>
          {
          <fpage>447</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Davide</given-names>
            <surname>Buscaldi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Paolo</given-names>
            <surname>Rosso</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Using geowordnet for geographical information retrieval</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Evaluating Systems for Multilingual and Multimodal Information Access 9th Workshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>CLEF</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          , Aarhus, Denmark,
          <source>September 17-19</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          , Revised Selected Papers, volume
          <volume>5706</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
          <volume>863</volume>
          {
          <fpage>866</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Robertson</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>On term selection for query expansion</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Doc.</source>
          ,
          <volume>46</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <volume>359</volume>
          {
          <fpage>364</fpage>
          ,
          <year>1990</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jinxi</given-names>
            <surname>Xu</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W. Bruce</given-names>
            <surname>Croft</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Query expansion using local and global document analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In SIGIR '96: Proceedings of the 19th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval</source>
          , pages
          <volume>4</volume>
          {
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>1996</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>