<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>CHiC  2011  -  Cultural  Heritage  in  CLEF:  From  Use  Cases  to   Evaluation  in  Practice  for  Multilingual  Information  Access   to  Cultural  Heritage.  </article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria Gäde</string-name>
          <email>maria.gaede@ibi.hu-berlin.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Nicola Ferro</string-name>
          <email>ferro@dei.unipd.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Monica Lestari Paramita</string-name>
          <email>m.paramita@shef.ac.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Berlin School of Library and Information Science, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Digital libraries and other information systems that access Cultural Heritage
(CH) materials are becoming increasingly complex. They must often manage a
diverse range of content from different CH institutions – such as libraries,
museums, written and audiovisual archives – and have to provide access to
them in a unified and coherent way. The content from CH institutions is often
multilingual and multimedia (e.g. text, photographs, images, audio recordings,
and videos), usually described with metadata in multiple formats and of
different levels of complexity. CH institutions have different approaches to
managing information and serve diverse user communities, often with
specialized needs. This makes the meaning of “search and browse” quite
different for users of a library or archive and non-specialist users may not be
able to successfully retrieve relevant results or may be disoriented by the kind
of results they obtain. Interaction patterns of users with CH information systems
do not represent clear separated and isolated use cases but alternate with each
other thus representing possible sequences of user interactions with a CH
information system.</p>
      <p>Invited talks will address further challenges and possibilities of alternative
evaluation approaches from different perspectives or applications. Participants
are asked to bring in statements dealing with the following topics:
•
•
•
use cases, evaluation needs, and best practices coming from field experience
in the CH institutions;
evaluation perspectives, frameworks, and alternative approaches in the digital
library and digital curation fields;
synergies and relationships between large-scale evaluation campaigns and CH
evaluation.</p>
      <p>The CHiC 2011 workshop aims at moving towards a systematic and large-scale
evaluation of cultural heritage digital libraries and information access systems.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>