<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>An Ontology to Improve Accessibility and Quality of Patient Instructions</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Juho Heimonen</string-name>
          <email>juho.heimonen@utu.fi</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tapio Salakoski</string-name>
          <email>tapio.salakoski@utu.fi</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Sanna Salanterä</string-name>
          <email>sanna.salantera@utu.fi</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Turku Centre for Computer Science</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Joukahaisenkatu 3-5, FI-20520 Turku</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FI">Finland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Turku, Department of Information Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>FI-20014 Turun yliopisto</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FI">Finland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Turku, Department of Nursing Science</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>FI-20014 Turun yliopisto</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FI">Finland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2012</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the Finnish health care system, patient instructions are public documents written for patients to support them through the care. The ontology introduced in this paper addresses two problems with the patient instructions of Intermunicipal Hospital District of Southwest Finland: the instructions are not extensive and readable enough to fully support patients and the collection of these instructions is poorly organised. The ontology is being developed in cooperation with Intermunicipal Hospital District of Southwest Finland and will be evaluated as a part of a pilot study for an authoring tool in Turku University Hospital. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other suitable ontologies available for modelling Finnish patient instructions. The ontology is an OWL DL ontology produced with the Protégé resource. It models the document structure and the associated metadata specifying the usage and content of the document. The metadata include the topics essential in supporting patients, the characteristics of the intended reader, the phase of the care as well as the organisational hierarchy and the health care processes of the hospital district. The ontology can be utilised in the organisation of patient instructions and can aid in the efforts to improve their quality. The documents can be filtered through the provided facets for improved accessibility. The writing process can be supported by ontology-based methods that facilitate giving feedback: preferred or commonly used pieces of text can be automatically suggested based on a given topic and machine-learning methods can be employed to notify the author of text unintentionally drifting from one topic to another or not matching its assigned topic. The author can also be notified of missing or irrelevant topics by comparing the content of the document to its expected content. These approaches help to write coherent and comprehensive instructions. In the future, patient instructions could be personalised e.g. by focusing the content on issues specific to a particular patient while excluding irrelevant details.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Ontology</kwd>
        <kwd>Patient Instruction</kwd>
        <kwd>Text Mining</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Patient instructions are public documents in the Finnish health care system. They
contain information relevant to the care, ranging from the descriptions of procedures
and symptoms to actions to be taken before and after the treatment. They are written
for patients and routinely handed out before or during the care but also made available
on the web. Although patient instructions have an important role in the successful
treatment of patients, most specifications (such as HL71) focus on patient records and
other clinical information.</p>
      <p>This abstract discusses how an ontology could be utilised to make patient
instructions more easily accessible as well as to improve their quality. The study was
motivated by two observations regarding publicly available patient instructions of
Intermunicipal Hospital District of Southwest Finland. First, the instructions are poorly
accessible on the web for patients who do not (and should not) know the classification
of instructions by professionals. Second, the instructions should be more
comprehensive and apprehensible to support patients through the care.</p>
      <p>The discussed ontology models the content of instructions as well as the relations to
relevant actors in health care. The ontology is work in progress and being developed
in cooperation with Intermunicipal Hospital District of Southwest Finland. To the best
of our knowledge, there are no other suitable ontologies available for modelling
Finnish patient instructions.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>The ontology is being developed as an OWL DL ontology using the Protégé resource
(http://protege.stanford.edu). It contains two major sections: the
document structure and the associated metadata. Both are needed to describe the content in
sufficient detail to computational methods that guide authors in the writing process. In
addition, the latter facilitates the organisation of instructions based on their usage and
content.</p>
      <p>The metadata is currently limited to the topics specified in the criteria of good
patient instructions2, the characteristics of readers as well as the organisational hierarchy
and the health care processes of the hospital district. The last two aspects determine
when and where instructions are used. The criteria of good patient instructions
describe, among others, the topics that should be discussed in a document in order to
address all the problems patients may encounter.</p>
      <p>The needed ontology concepts are mostly determined in a very straightforward
manner by the health care organisation. For example, the care processes are explicitly
present in the organisation and their number is manageable. The details of the topics
are determined by annotating existing instructions after which missing yet essential
concepts are filled in by domain experts.</p>
      <p>The ontology will be evaluated as a part of a pilot study for an authoring tool in
Turku University Hospital. In this tool, instructions are written using a form that
produces structured text documents and ensures that the author gives all the compulsory
metadata. The usability of the tool will be evaluated and compared to that of the tool
currently in use (WYSIWYG HTML editor) while the content of the resulting
instructions will be assessed for improved quality with established method2. The capability
to enhance accessibility will be evaluated by asking professionals and patients to
classify instructions using the ontology and comparing the classifications to those of the
authors. Also, the applicability of the ontology to the instructions of other Finnish
hospital districts will be studied.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>A patient instruction (document) is modelled with part of relation to consist of textual
elements: document, chapter, section, and paragraph. The elements are associated
through is about relation with topics reflecting their content. The document as a
whole is also associated with the other pieces of metadata through e.g. intended for
[reader] and used in [hospital unit] relations.</p>
      <p>The reader is currently characterised by role (patient or guardian), gender, and age
group. The associated health care process is characterised from both professionals'
and patients' point of view in order to provide an easy access for both groups. For
example, professionals would classify the instructions related to angioplasty under
Coronary arteries disease (disease) treated in Cardiology (speciality) within Internal
medicine (hospital unit) while patients would expect to simply find them under Heart
(anatomical unit). The temporal aspect of the health care processes is addressed by
associating the instructions with the phase of the care: either Preparation, Treatment,
or Post-treatment care.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The ontology provides facets by which the document base can be filtered. This
functionality can be easily implemented as a search engine. For example, a person with a
scheduled knee surgery could search for Knee – Preparation – Surgery to get
information about how to prepare for the upcoming procedure. Leaving out Preparation
from the query would yield all the instructions associated with a knee surgery
allowing the person to get familiar with the whole process he or she is about to enter.</p>
      <p>The authoring of high-quality instructions can be supported by ontology-based
methods that facilitate giving feedback during the writing process. The topics provide
a classification with which machine-learning methods can be trained to analyse text.
Several such methods are currently being developed to answer questions like “Does
the content of a chapter match with its assigned topic?” and “Is a section coherently
discussing a single topic or drifting from one to another?”. Similarly, the system can
suggest preferred or commonly used pieces of text to be written under each topic.
These approaches help to write coherent and comprehensive instructions.</p>
      <p>In addition to text mining, the document can be analysed by comparing its structure
to the specifications of a particular instruction type and the author notified of missing
or irrelevant topics. For example, surgery-related instructions should always consider,
among others, how long a sick leave is needed and which post-operation symptoms
require contacting the hospital. These specifications are still largely under
construction.</p>
      <p>In the future, patient instructions could be personalised so that the details irrelevant
for a particular patient are omitted. For example, if a certain medication interferes
with the treatment, only those patients who are on that medication should be
instructed to pause it.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Patient instructions are routinely used in the Finnish health care system but their
accessibility and quality could be improved. The introduced ontology models patient
instructions for this purpose. It can be utilised in organising instructions effectively
and serves as a basis for the development of text mining tools supporting the
authoring of high-quality instructions. In the future, it may be extended to take into account
the characteristics of individual patients.</p>
      <p>Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Riitta Danielsson-Ojala, Heljä Lundgren-Laine, Minna Pohjola, Weronica
Gröndahl, and Laura-Maria Murtola for sharing their knowledge as health care professionals.
This work was conducted using the Protégé resource, which is supported by grant LM007885
from the United States National Library of Medicine.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dolin</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alschuler</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boyer</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beebe</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Behlen</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Biron</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shabo Shvo</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association</source>
          .
          <year>2006</year>
          ;
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>30</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>39</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johansson</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salanterä</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katajisto</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leino-Kilpi</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Written orthopedic patient education materials from the point of view of empowerment by education</article-title>
          .
          <source>Patient Education and Counseling</source>
          .
          <year>2004</year>
          ;
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>181</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>