<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Key Actor Perspectives on Smart Grids</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Cajsa Bartusch</string-name>
          <email>cajsa.bartusch@angstrom.uu.se</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrea Perna</string-name>
          <email>andrea.perna@angstrom.uu.se</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Engineering Sciences, Division of Industrial Engineering and Management, Uppsala University Uppsala</institution>
          ,
          <country country="SE">Sweden</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>-This paper aims at investigating how the implementation of smart grids takes place in the context of the Swedish power market. We performed an exploratory study that in its first step has pinpointed the key actors involved in smart grid implementation. In this respect, we have identified several public and private organizations that are relevant to the development, making, operation and use of smart grids such as power transmission and distribution system operators, producers, energy service providers, researchers, regulatory authorities etc. Subsequently, we focused on analyzing the motives and incentives of those key actors and thus identifying the potential challenges, in terms of barriers and opportunities. We applied theories on technological development and industrial networks in order to shed more light on the phenomenon under investigation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>smart grid</kwd>
        <kwd>implementation</kwd>
        <kwd>incentives</kwd>
        <kwd>barriers</kwd>
        <kwd>opportunities</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>key
actors;</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>I. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Smart grids are expected to play a key role in realizing
European energy, environment and climate policies. The
political goals among other things involve increasing efficiency
in electricity use and the share of renewables in power
production, which in turn entail boosting consumption
flexibility and investments in intermittent energy sources. The
theoretically available gains of implementing smart grids are
well documented in the scientific literature, yet the actual
realization of them seems to be tardy. Seeing as the core of the
necessary technological advances to this end are already behind
us, technological barriers are probably not the main reason why
smart grids, despite the well-documented and hence anticipated
economic and environmental gains, are slow to emerge in the
Swedish power market.</p>
      <p>This state of affairs suggests that the implementation of
smart grids is associated with other than technological barriers.
Accordingly, the complexity of the implementation process
needs to be confronted with the involved actors’ perceptions.
Against this background, this study aims at assessing the
motivations and incentives of key actors, and thus identifying
the potential barriers and opportunities in bringing smart grids
to fruition in Sweden. Hence, one key research question is how
the involved actors perceive smart grids? The paper is
organized as follows. First, we offer some theoretical insights
based on the roles and perceptions of actors during the
technology implementation. Following a short methodological
note, we then conclude by highlighting our research results
based on the empirical data we collected in Sweden.</p>
      <p>II. DIFFERENT ACTORS’ PERCEPTION ON SMART</p>
      <p>GRID IMPLEMENTATION</p>
      <p>
        When implementing a new technology the initiative of
certain actors is often important to induce other actors to
combine their resources in new ways to devise new technical
solutions, as well as to perform certain activities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. This is,
however, not a linear and predictable process. Actors need to
be coordinated together and they all have to gain something
from the technology implementation. Our starting point is that
the development and implementation of a technology
inevitably build on close interactions between providers and
users [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ] as few companies can realize innovations by using
only their internal assets.
      </p>
      <p>
        As pointed out by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], many opportunities as well as
tensions might emerge among the involved actors when the
new technology is implemented and embedded into an already
existent context. One reason is the actors’ different perceptions
of the technology in terms of the benefits that they can achieve
by adopting it. Moreover, actors might have diverse
understandings of the technology complexity, how the
technology will impact on the overall socio-economic system
and affect their possibilities to achieve their own business
goals. Thus, each actor might have a different view on the
economic deal resulting from the technology development,
implementation and use.
      </p>
      <p>It is rather clear that the actors’ perception of the
technology influence the implementation and adoption of it.
Opportunities and barriers do emerge from the technology
implementation and all the actors involved might play different
role in facilitating or hindering this process.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>III. A NOTE ON THE METHODOLOGY</title>
      <p>This is a still ongoing study that so far includes 9
semistructured face-to-face interviews with different actors involved
in the implementation of smart grids in Sweden, from industry,
university and policy sectors. In addition to the interviews, data
was also collected through participant observations at webinars
where experts from different business and research areas
discussed various smart-grid related issues.</p>
      <p>The informants were identified by means of the authors
consulting experts in the smart grid field of research. We
collected data with the explicit task to identify the key players
involved in the implementation of smart grids. Moreover, our
interviews dealt with issues such as barriers and opportunities
that induce the various actors to participate in the smart grid
process.</p>
      <p>Barriers and incentives that emerge from the
implementation of smart grids were investigated in relation to
financial, technological, political and psychological
dimensions.</p>
      <p>IV. A PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT OF SMART GRID</p>
      <p>IMPLEMENTATION IN SWEDEN</p>
      <p>The financial dimension related to smart grid
implementation was perceived as a barrier to the smart grid
implementation process by almost all the actors included in this
study. For instance, seeing as the electricity price level in
Sweden is considered to be fair among consumers, there is at
this point no obvious motivation for pushing the smart grid
implementation ahead until there is an efficient and critical
balance between electricity demand and offer. There is also
uncertainty regarding the monetary flows, which are expected
to derive from the financial investments necessary for
implementing smart grids.</p>
      <p>From a technological point of view smart grids represent a
complex system built of different artifacts and components.
The Swedish grid is stable and it is able to satisfy the electricity
demand at almost all times. Moreover it shows ability to
incorporate alternative sources of energy, especially
renewables. All actors agree that the technology necessary to
accommodate and coordinate alternative energy sources is very
reliable. However, in order to achieve a fully intelligent grid,
the actors involved will have to identify, negotiate and agree to
standards. There are many different highly technological and
very complex parts in a system of this magnitude, which means
that its functionality is dependent on how the components are
assembled and adapted to each other. Thus we concluded that
the technological dimension of smart grids in Sweden does not
represent a barrier per se.</p>
      <p>From a policy perspective the smart grid implementation in
Sweden is still an open issue. The regulations to some extent
offer companies incentives to reduce customer demand, but
will need to create a new system of rate structures in order to
reward consumption flexibility. All the actors seem to share the
opinion that the lack of incentives is something that acts as a
barrier, but they have a rather positive attitude to the Swedish
policy commitment for supporting the “green” incentive system
in the same way as the recycling strategy.</p>
      <p>The last dimension we have considered to be relevant in
our study deals with the psychological side of the smart grid
implementation in Sweden. Our respondents agree that
Swedish consumers will most probably react positively to a
different electricity market that requires them to actively make
a decision to change their consumption pattern, reduce their
energy usage and hence their costs. In addition to this, Swedish
consumers are very keen on generating and selling electricity
back to their local utility. It seems that Swedish people are
generally aware of the potential of smart grid implementation.</p>
      <p>In light of the fact that the most important barrier to
realizing smart grids is the involved actors’ lack of economic
incentives, it seems that government intervention in terms of
policy instruments are required to this end. This means that it is
ultimately an ideological issue; in other words, is it a state
affair or is it the power market alone that is supposed to make
them happen.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Håkansson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Snehota</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Developing relationships in business markets, London: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Håkansson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Waluszewski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Managing Technological Development. IKEA, the environment</article-title>
          and technology, London: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Perna</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Baraldi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.L.</given-names>
            <surname>Gregori</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>“Exploring the conditions for marketing an innovative and unique customized solution: Mexus case study,” The IMP J</article-title>
          . vol.
          <volume>6</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Wagrell</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. Waluszewski “</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The innovation process and its organisational setting - fit or misfit?” The IMP J</article-title>
          . vol.
          <volume>3</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Håkansson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Waluszewski</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>Knowledge and Innovation in Business and Industry. The importance of using others</article-title>
          , London: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>