Foreword Research in modeling, analyzing and mining large-scale networks has attracted an increasing effort in the last few years. Two main reasons, at least, may explain the rapid growth of interest in this field, as attested by the increasing number of scientific publications about this topic: • On one hand, many datasets studied in various different fields are best described by graphs or linked collection of interrelated objects. Exam- ples cover a wide variety of application fields including: biological system studies, (protein interaction, gene/miRNA regulation, . . .,) the world wide web, bibliographical networks (co-authoring, citation, . . .), P2P networks, semantic networks, and of course the now very popular on-line social networking and microblogging sites (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Google+), folksonomy-oriented sites (e.g., Foursquare, Delicious, Flickr) and social media platforms (e.g., YouTube, last.fm). Far beyond sharing a networked structure, many of these naturally arising graphs share some non-trivial features (such as power-law node’s degree distribution, small separation degree, high clustering coefficient, low density, . . ., etc). This fact has boosted the research in analyzing and mining this class of networks since findings in one field are expected to be easily applied to other analogue fields. • On the other hand, recent technological advances, in different areas, al- low today generating, elaborating and tracking the spatial and tempo- ral evolution of very large scale networks. For example, in systems biol- ogy, continuous improvement of technologies has enabled to provide high- throughput and heterogeneous datasets (genomic, proteomic, transcrip- tomic and metabolomic) allowing to construct huge networks with both rich node and edge meta-data. The possibility of repeating the same ex- periment at different time points allows to track the evolution of obtained networks, opening the way for understanding the causal relationships be- tween nodes and how these interactions change over time. Purchase data collected on e-commerce sites allow to build very large scale networks con- necting customers to products they bought. Again, analyzing and mining such networks would provide new directions for product recommendation computation. On-line social network sites connecting millions of users v vi and publicly available bibliographical databases featuring millions of en- tries are some examples where a temporal sequence of large-scale networks can be sampled. 107 nodes size networks are no more an exception. The spatial evolution of social phenomena is another promising field of re- search. For instance, investigating how memes diffuse geographically may support the validation or even the discovery of new important sociological hypotheses. The second edition of our Workshop on Dynamic Networks and Knowledge Discovery has received 15 submissions: 8 were only accepted as long presenta- tions. These are organized into three main sessions: Application session: This contains two papers. The first one by Shijaku et.al. introducing the concept of dynamic embeddedness with an application to the analysis of global pharmaceutical industry interaction network. The second paper is proposed by Correa and Alves, in which they provide a functional and visual analytic system for the exploration of enriched metabolic pathways on microbial genetic network. Large-scale network session: Three papers are included in this session. The first, proposed by Tabourier et. al., tackles the problem of link prediction applying an original rank merging approach. The second paper, by Grube et. al., deals with large-scale network sampling. The last paper, proposed by Geigl and Helic, presents a study on alternative approaches of decen- tralized search, stemming from the very famous papers by Kleinberg and Adamic on the same topic. Dynamic network session: This session include also three papers. The first one is by Redmond and Cunningham in which they propose a method to detect over-represented temporal motif in time-evolving network. the basic idea is to compare the frequency of temporal motif against that of a ran- dom temporal network. The second paper, by Vukadinovic Greetham and Ward, presents a study of dyadic and multi-actor conversations in twitter. Lastly, Ben Abdrabbah et al. present a framework for recommendation computations based on communities detected on time-stamped data. We would like to thank authors, Program Committee members and all addi- tional reviewers without whom the preparation of this program would not have been possible. Our gratitude also goes to the Computer Science Lab of the Paris-Nord University, the University of Torino and Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica that co-supported our workshop through supporting our activities. R. Kanawati R. G. Pensa C. Rouveirol