<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Crossing the Chasm with Semantic Technology</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marin Dimitrov (CTO)</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>• Semantic Technology – Fad or Future?
• Innovation, Hype &amp; Chasm
• Lessons Learned
#2</p>
      <p>About Ontotext
• Provides products &amp; solutions</p>
      <p>enrichment and metadata management
• Major clients and industries
– Media &amp; Publishing
– Health Care &amp; Life Sciences
– Cultural Heritage &amp; Digital Libraries
– Government
– Recruitment
#3
SEMANTIC
FUTURE?</p>
      <p>TECHNOLOGY – FAD OR
#4
May 2014</p>
      <p>Showcases &amp; Talks at SemTechBiz Since 2010
• Accenture, AFP, Alcatel-Lucent, Autodesk,
BestBuy, Boeing, CapGemini, Cisco, Daimler,
Disney Media, DoD, eBay, EC, Elsevier, EMC,
Fujitsu, Gartner, Getty, Google, IBM, Library of
Congress, Lockheed Martin, Mayo Clinic, Merck,
Microsoft, NASA, Novartis, Oracle, Press
Association, Renault, Salesforce, SAP, Siemens,
Statoil, Teradata, TIBCO, Walmart, Wells Fargo,
Yahoo, Yandex
May 2014
Top Information Management Trends 2013 (Gartner)
Semantic Technologies
Semantic technologies extract meaning from data, ranging from
quantitative data and text, to video, voice and images. Many of these
techniques have existed for years and are based on advanced statistics,
data mining, machine learning and knowledge management. One
reason they are garnering more interest is the renewed business
requirement for monetizing information as a strategic asset. Even more
pressing is the technical need. Increasing volumes, variety and velocity
— big data — in IM and business operations, requires semantic
technology that makes sense out of data for humans, or
automates decisions
#10
May 2014
#11
May 2014
INNOVATION, HYPE &amp; CHASM
#13
May 2014
May 2014
• Performance</p>
      <p>– Consistent reliability, availability, quality
• Integration
– Innovation must fit into existing environments &amp;
constraints
• Penetration</p>
      <p>– Critical mass of adopters required
• Payback
– Deriving business values, cost savings, ROI
– Amounts and/or timing usually difficult to estimate
May 2014
#16
Semantic Technologies on the Hype Cycles 2013
(Gartner)
• Hype cycles for Web Computing, Information
Infrastructure, Enterprise Information management,
etc.
• Related technologies
– Graph databases, Semantic Web, metadata management,
content/text analytics, taxonomy &amp; ontology
management, entity resolution &amp; analysis
– Positioned in the early phases: on the rise / at the peak /
sliding into the trough
May 2014
#18</p>
      <p>Technology Adoption Lifecycle
Technology
enthusiasts
Pursue new
technology
aggressively
Risk tolerant</p>
      <p>Not too
concerned
about ROI</p>
      <p>Visionaries
Pursue new
benefits</p>
      <p>Overestimate ROI
Risk tolerant
No need for</p>
      <p>wellestablished
references
Easily handle</p>
      <p>new
technology</p>
      <p>Pragmatists</p>
      <p>Conservatives
May 2014
#19
May 2014
#20
May 2014
#21</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Gaps: each group differs significantly from the previous one</title>
      <p>May 2014
#22
M
S
A
H
C</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Low risk tolerance</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Early Market success stories are not a good reference</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Need a “whole product” (complete solution) to a business-critical problem</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>More concerned about existing product infrastructure</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Prefer to buy from market leaders</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Technology companies unable to deliver the “whole product” because they lack focus – get stuck on the “chasm”</title>
      <p>Early Market
May 2014
#23</p>
      <p>Crossing The Chasm (Geoffrey Moore)
• Identify one attractive mainstream market customer
(niche)
• Focus on providing the “whole product” for their
problem
– Partnerships with other providers may be required
– A reference “success story” for other mainstream buyers
• Become the market leader in the niche &amp; move into
adjacent niches
– Bowling alley effect
May 2014
#24
The Competitive-Positioning Compass (Geoffrey</p>
      <p>Moore)</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>Benchmarks</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>Product reviews</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-3">
        <title>Sales volume</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-4">
        <title>Trade press</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-5">
        <title>Visionary endorsement</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-6">
        <title>Architecture</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-7">
        <title>Trials &amp; demos</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-8">
        <title>Technology press</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-9">
        <title>Guru endorsement</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-10">
        <title>Revenues</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-11">
        <title>Partners</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-12">
        <title>Top customers</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-13">
        <title>Full product line</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-14">
        <title>Business press</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-15">
        <title>Financial analyst endorsements</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-16">
        <title>Market share</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-17">
        <title>Standards &amp;</title>
        <p>certification</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-18">
        <title>3rd party support</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-19">
        <title>Industry press</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-20">
        <title>Industry analyst endorsements</title>
        <p>May 2014
#25
#26
• Innovations go through ups and downs before
reaching the productivity phase
– Customer: experimentation and patience often required
before value is delivered
– Customer: TCO often higher than expected
– Provider: target the value gaps early: Performance,</p>
        <p>Integration, Penetration, Payback
• Understand the technology adoption challenges
– Early market success does not translate to mainstream
market success
– Different strategies for delivering value to Enthusiasts,
Visionaries, Pragmatists &amp; Conservatives
May 2014
#27
• Follow the “chasm crossing” principles
– Focus on an attractive mainstream customer / niche
– Find partners &amp; deliver the “whole product” (complete
solution) that solves a business-critical problem
– Use the success story as a 1st reference point
– Move into adjacent niches (bowling alley effect)
• Clearly convey the benefits of your solution
– Not via a product feature list or benchmarks
– Speak the language of the customer
– How is your solution better than the current one?
– Measurable returns and timeframe for achieving them
May 2014
#28
Clearly Convey the Benefits of Your Solution
FAIL</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Ontotext brochure 2012</title>
      <p>May 2014
#29
May 2014
#30
May 2014
#31</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>