=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1248/preface
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1248/Preface.pdf
|volume=Vol-1248
}}
==None==
<pdf width="1500px">https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1248/Preface.pdf</pdf>
<pre>
Preface

Modularity has been and continues to be one of the central research topics in
ontology engineering. The number of ontologies available, as well as their size, is
steadily increasing. There is a large variation in subject matter, level of specifica-
tion and detail, intended purpose and application. Ontologies covering different
domains are often developed in a distributed manner; contributions from differ-
ent sources cover different parts of a single domain. Not only is it difficult to
determine and define interrelations between such distributed ontologies, it is also
challenging to reconcile ontologies which might be consistent on their own but
jointly inconsistent. Further challenges include extracting the relevant parts of
an ontology, re-combining independently developed ontologies in order to form
new ones, determining the modular structure of an ontology for comprehension,
and the use of ontology modules to facilitate incremental reasoning and version
control.
    Modularity is envisaged to allow mechanisms for easy and flexible reuse,
combination, generalization, structuring, maintenance, collaboration, design pat-
terns, and comprehension. This is analogous to the role of modularity in software
engineering, where there are well-understood notions of modularity that have led
to generally accepted and widely supported mechanisms for the named tasks. In
contrast, modularity for ontologies is still an active research field with open
questions because existing approaches are heterogeneous and less universally
applicable. For ontology engineering, modularity is central not only to reducing
the complexity of understanding ontologies, but also to maintaining, querying
and reasoning over modules. Distinctions between modules can be drawn on the
basis of structural, semantic, or functional aspects, which can also be applied to
compositions of ontologies or to indicate links between ontologies.
    In particular, reuse and sharing of information and resources across ontolo-
gies depend on purpose-specific, logically versatile criteria. Such purposes include
“tight” logical integration of different ontologies (wholly or in part), “loose” as-
sociation and information exchange, the detection of overlapping parts, travers-
ing through different ontologies, alignment of vocabularies, module extraction
possibly respecting privacy concerns and hiding of information, etc. Another
important aspect of modularity in ontologies is the problem of evaluating the
quality of single modules or of the achieved overall modularization of an ontol-
ogy. Again, such evaluations can be based on various (semantic or syntactic)
criteria and employ a variety of statistical/heuristic or logical methods.
    Recent research on ontology modularity has produced substantial results and
approaches towards foundations of modularity, techniques of modularization and
modular developments, distributed and incremental reasoning, as well as the use
of modules in different application scenarios, providing a foundation for further
research and development. Since the beginning of the WoMO workshop series,
there has been growing interest in the modularization of ontologies, modular
development of ontologies, and information exchange across different modular
ontologies. In real life, however, integration problems are still mostly tackled
in an ad-hoc manner, with no clear notion of what to expect from the resulting
ontological structure. Those methods are not always efficient, and they often lead
to unintended consequences, even if the individual ontologies to be integrated
are widely tested and understood.
    WoMO aims at bringing together researchers and practitioners from the for-
mal ontology community and related disciplines to discuss these issues in a
multi-disciplinary forum. The goal of the workshop is to present latest research
developments, to discuss current directions in the field, and to collect first-hand
feedback from the community.
    Submissions to WoMO 2014 were peer-reviewed by at least two members of
the Program Committee. The accepted papers, bound in these proceedings were
carefully selected based on their quality, relevance to the workshop topic, and
their potential to bring forward interesting ideas to be discussed at the workshop.
    Thanks to the invaluable and much appreciated contributions of the authors,
the invited speaker and the Programme Committee, WoMO 2014 provides par-
ticipants with an opportunity to position their contributions with respect to one
another. Hopefully, this will encourage further cross-pollination and set out the
constitution of a truly interdisciplinary research-community around the different
aspects and approaches to modularity in ontologies.



                   (Boston, Brisbane, Orono, Rio de Janeiro – September 2014)
         Kenneth Baclawski, Tudor Groza, Torsten Hahmann, Ivan Varzinczak

</pre>