<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Semantic Web Technologies Supporting the BBC Knowledge &amp; Learning Beta Online Pages</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dong Liu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Eleni Mikroyannidi</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Robert Lee</string-name>
          <email>robert.leeg@bbc.co.uk</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>British Broadcasting Corporation, Future Media Knowledge &amp; Learning</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Salford</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The BBC has a rich collection of learning resources. The Knowledge and Learning website Beta aims to unlock the learning potential of this content for its users. To this purpose, the system employs semantic web technologies to organise the available learning resources. In this paper we describe the core data model that underlies the Knowledge and Learning website Beta1. The Curriculum Ontology formally describes the UK national curricula to allow users to easily discover content. We explain how the curriculum ontology supports the BBC Knowledge and Learning Beta website and discuss the challenges and bene ts that such an architecture provides.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Online learning resources have the potential to support a wide range of users.
Each learner is an individual, with his or her own motivation for studying,
accessing resources, and study habits and practices [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>The BBC has understood the value of online learning from the early stages
of the web, and has provided rich educational material to those wanting to learn.
An example of this is the BBC Bitesize website2, which started back in 1998 and
is a popular formal education resource.</p>
      <p>In the formal learning space the BBC has a number of sites: the already
mentioned Bitesize, Skillswise3 and Class Clips4 amongst others. There are tens
of thousands of content items across these sites, with each site having di erent
mechanisms for publishing, discovering and describing the content it serves.</p>
      <p>To provide a coherent learning experience to users, a model for describing
content in the context of the UK national curricula was developed. This model
provided the foundation for building the new Knowledge &amp; Learning beta
website, presenting learning resources in the context of the UK national curricula in
a consistent way. In addition, it allows for consistent re ection of changes in the
national curricula throughout the product.</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/education</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>2 http://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-3">
        <title>3 http://www.bbc.co.uk/skillswise</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-4">
        <title>4 http://www.bbc.co.uk/learningzone/clips/</title>
        <p>Designing the architecture of such a system is a challenging task. Each of
the existing sites have similar yet di erent ways of describing and navigating
through their content. In addition, the existing learning sites do not have a
single content description model that could be reused in the beta site. Having
a exible structure in the backend that can re ect the national curriculum and
that can be used for consistently describing and organising learning resources is
a key feature of the architecture.</p>
        <p>In this paper, we present the architecture behind the Knowledge &amp; Learning
Beta site and we focus on the curriculum ontology, which is central to the
architecture. We show how it is used to describe and organise learning resources,
how it supports navigation and how it is aligned with semantic markup
vocabularies for Search Engine Optimisation (SEO). We will also present some of the
challenges we faced and discuss future work.
2</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>The BBC Knowledge &amp; Learning Online Content</title>
      <p>The Knowledge &amp; Learning Beta website aims to bring together the variety of
BBC factual and learning content into a coherent model. At the time of writing,
the education pages serve two types of learning content; (1) Video Clips and (2)
Revision Guides.</p>
      <p>Video Clips Figure 1 shows an example video clip from the education pages.
Video clips are related to a learning topic and are accompanied by classroom
notes, which are notes on how a clip can be used in the classroom. The users
for these clips are mainly teachers. The material provided in these pages aims
to educate as well as stimulate the mind around topics in genres like history,
science, arts. A video clip can be suitable for many topics of study, however,
the classroom notes add value by providing information on the context of a
programme of study. For example, the video clip of Figure 1 is also featured
in other topics of study like Energy and Atoms and radiation. However, the
classroom notes can be di erent as the clip is presented in a di erent context.
Revision Guides Revision Guides are a rich interactive content format
consisting of revision chapters, tests and activities. An example revision guide is
shown in Figure 2.</p>
      <p>Revision Guides have a di erent learning purpose from video clips. They
provide learning material in a stepwise way so that the learner moves from
broader to more speci c knowledge on a topic. Revision chapters provide an
overview of educational material for a particular topic of study. Activities provide
interactive material such as videos, games etc. The tests have multiple choice
questions based on the revision chapters.</p>
      <p>Both video clips and revision guides are structured based on the UK
National Curricula. In the next section, we present the back-end architecture of
this system.</p>
      <p>
        The Knowledge &amp; Learning uses a Dynamic Semantic Publishing (DSP)
model in its architecture [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. In this architecture, semantic web models and
linked data are key features. Similarly, in the Knowledge &amp; Learning Online
Pages, di erent components of the front end are served by di erent systems in
the back-end. This is depicted in Figure 3. The curriculum ontology is the core
component of the architecture, which supports the navigation and organises the
learning resources based on the UK national curricula.
      </p>
      <p>In a nutshell, the ontology and its instance data are served by the Linked
Data Platform, which amongst other services it provides the BBC internal triple
store. Learning content such as video clips and revision guides are saved as XML
Documents in a di erent system named as Content Store. The Content Store
serves all the educational resources that are shown in the online pages and it is
also the main system used by the editorial team for authoring new content. The
coupling between Learning resources and curriculum ontology is done through
semantic annotation. In particular, the content items are tagged with
curriculum instances so that the Application Layer can retrieve related content for
curriculum ontology instances. The de nition of new curriculum instances and
the tagging procedure is part of the work ow for publishing content. Our
editorial teams initially de ne the vocabulary ( elds of study, topics of study etc)
that is used for annotating educational content. Then video clips and revision
guides are tagged with the corresponding topic of study. In this way the
Application Layer can retrieve the corresponding topics of study and their associated
content and render this information in the online pages.</p>
      <p>In the following sections, we will focus on the curriculum ontology and show
the bene ts of linked data for supporting online learning resources. One main
bene t is that using linked data in the backend can o er exibility on the
aggregations of content. In addition we will present how the ontology is mapped
with learning markup vocabularies and how linked data are used e ectively with
markup for improving search.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>The Curriculum Ontology</title>
      <p>The Curriculum Ontology is a core data model for formally describing the
National Curricula across the UK. The full documentation as well as the latest
version of the ontology are available online5. The instance data of the
curriculum ontology are published on GitHub6.</p>
      <p>The Curriculum Ontology aims to:
{ provide a model of the national curricula across the UK
{ organise learning resources, e.g. video clips and revision guides
{ allow users to discover content via the national curricula</p>
      <p>The Curriculum Ontology has been designed to organise content in a way
that allows students and teachers to navigate and discover learning resources. It
achieves this by providing broad units of learning (e.g. a Topic) and more nely
grained units (e.g. a Topic of Study). Figure 4 depicts the classes and properties
in the curriculum ontology.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Core concepts of the ontology</title>
        <p>The core concepts in the ontology are (1) Level, (2) Field of study, (3)
Programme of Study, (4) Topic of Study and (5) Topic. In the ontology, these
con</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>5 http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies/curriculum</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-2">
          <title>6 https://github.com/BBC-Knowlearn/curriculum-data</title>
          <p>
            cepts are represented as OWL Classes [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
            ]. The rationale for these concepts in
the domain model is outlined below.
          </p>
          <p>Level and its sub-concepts Level refers to di erent stages of education.
Typically, there are four di erent ways to specify the levels: Age Range, Year, Key
Stage and Phase. Thus, in the ontology these concepts are modeled as subclasses
of Level.</p>
          <p>Key Stage is a way to specify the stage of the state education system in
England, Wales, Northern Ireland. Some example Key Stages are KS3, GCSE
etc. Year is a way to specify the stages of education.</p>
          <p>The Phase sub-concept is borrowed from the controlled terms for describing
phase of education, which are published by the data.gov.uk7. The phases of
education include Primary, Secondary and 16-Plus.</p>
          <p>Fields of Study It refers to the discipline of a curriculum. Some example elds
of study are Science, Maths, English Literature etc.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-3">
          <title>7 http://education.data.gov.uk/</title>
          <p>Programmes of Study A programme of study is the combination of a nation,
an educational level and the subject (Field of Study) being studied. Thus, in
the ontology, the Field of Study class is connected to the Field of Study with the
taughtInField predicate and to the Level with the taughtAtLevel predicate. Some
example programmes of study are `GCSE Maths', `Higher Biology' etc.
Topics of Study A Topic of study is a topic within the context of a programme
of study. It aims to provide a formal learning context to an asset or a collection
of assets. An example topic of study is `Circuits', which is taught in the `KS2
Science' programme of study.</p>
          <p>
            Ordering Topics of Study The ordering of Topics of Study is a key
requirement in the Curriculum Ontology, because some Topics of Study can be
prerequisites of others. For instance, students have to learn the English alphabet
before English grammar. The TopicOfStudyList class uses the external Ordered
List Ontology [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
            ] to curate the sequences of Topics of Study. This is achieved
by assigning an indexed slot to each Topic of Study. For allowing multiple
indexing per Topic of Study, instead of directly assigning the index in the Topic
of Study, the TopicOfStudyList class is used, which is subclass of the OrderedList
class from the external Ordered List Ontology. This pattern allows a Topic of
Study to appear in many lists and have di erent order in each list. The
Ordered List Ontology is also described in the Ontology Design Pattern (ODP)
catalogue8 [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>Topics A Topic can highlight the content of the learning resources in a more
speci c way than the Field of Study. For example, energy is a topic of physics.
Topics of Study viewed as Topics In the curriculum ontology, the di erence
between a Topic of study and a topic is that mapping content to a Topic of
Study makes it easy to nd speci c content whilst mapping to a generic Topic
allows users to discover a wider range of content.</p>
          <p>A Topic of Study is de ned as a Topic in the context of Programme of Study.
It addresses the following issues:
{ A Topic across Levels. The meaning of a Topic, e.g. `Geometry (Shape
&amp; Space)', can vary for di erent Levels. Geometry for KS1, usually called
`Shape &amp; Space', needs a di erent description to Geometry in KS3 as KS1
is typically for primary-age students whereas KS3 is for secondary-age
students.
{ A Topic across Fields of Study. For example, `Energy Resources' is a
Topic of both Physics and Geography, but the learning content for `energy
resources for physics' and `energy resources for geography' can be di erent.
{ Topic synonyms. The topic of `algebra' is usually described as `relationships'
in the Scottish national curricula and as `Algebra' in the English curricula.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-4">
          <title>8 http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Ontology:Ordered_List_Ontology</title>
          <p>Fields of Study viewed as Topics A Field of Study could also be viewed as
just a Topic covering a broader area of learning. The reasons for de ning them
as two separate concepts are:
{ Fields of Study are published by Government bodies. For instance,
the Fields of Study taught at primary schools in England are published by
the government here. In general the national curricula de ne the breadth of
a eld of study but do not provide a prescriptive list of individual topics,
although in some levels (e.g. GCSE) exam boards do specify a list of Topics
of Study for each Field of Study.
{ Usage of topics across di erent Fields of Study. As mentioned
previously, some Topics can be used across Fields of Study.
5</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Describing Learning Content with the Curriculum</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Ontology</title>
      <p>E ective description and organisation of learning content is achieved by
semantically annotating learning content with instance data from the Curriculum
Ontology. Figure 5 shows an example instantiation of the core concepts from the
curriculum ontology.</p>
      <p>Figure 5 depicts the interlinking of two topics of study (`GCSE Physics
Electricity' and `KS2 Science Circuits') that belong to di erent programmes of study,
but they are around the same topic, which is `Electricity'. The `GCSE Physics'
programme of study has a relationship with the corresponding Field (`Physics')
and Level (`GCSE')9. The information about a topic of study holds also
information about the level, programme of study and related topic. Having such a
structure in the backend has multiple bene ts, such as achieving more dynamic
aggregations of content and providing a meaningful organisation of the content
that re ects the UK National Curricula.
5.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>Dynamic Semantic Publishing</title>
        <p>The Curriculum Ontology is the glue that holds the content together and the
basis of the website navigation. Following a Dynamic Semantic Publishing
approach we moved away from a relational publishing model to one that separates
semantics from content and allows dynamic aggregations.</p>
        <p>Figure 6 shows an example of the use of the curriculum ontology instance data
for organising content and for the provision of the main navigation in the website.
In particular, it shows how the topic of study GCSE Physics Electricity and related
data of Figure 5 are shown in the front end. Related information about the Level,
Super eld (Science) and sibling elds (Biology, Chemistry, Physics) are presented
in a hierarchical way in the navigation panel. This information is retrieved by
querying the triple store through the Curriculum API. The curriculum API
9 More precisely, `GCSE' is the Phase but it is inferred to be a Level too.
provides the result of the SPARQL queries in the Application API (Figure 3).
In addition, the list of topics of study shown in Figure 6 is implemented with
the Ordering List Ontology Design Pattern (ODP), described in Section 4.1.</p>
        <p>The use of Linked Data in the architecture of the system can help towards
a dynamic aggregation of content. Additional views can be implemented by
querying a di erent part of the graph like for example, creating an aggregation
view of content grouped by topic.
5.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Mapping to LRMI Vocabulary</title>
        <p>
          The Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref14">1,14</xref>
          ] has been adopted by
http://schema.org and aims to establish an open standard for adding semantic
mark-up to online learning resources. Using the LRMI vocabulary enables easier
discovery of content by search engines and other organisations. Thus, mapping
concepts from the BBC curriculum ontology to the LRMI vocabulary contributes
towards a model of consistent organisation and discovery of content. The
conceptual mappings between the Curriculum Ontology and LRMI are shown in the
Figure 7.
        </p>
        <p>
          Instead of modeling school curricula, LRMI provides a generic framework
for describing learning resources, which is independent from certain educational
frameworks. To this end, LRMI introduces the concept AlignementObject and
the educationalAlignment property [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]. The AlignementObject is an abstract
concept mapped to educational levels, subjects and topics. The educationalAlignment
links a learning resource with an educational concept. The Curriculum Ontology
classes share the same intent as the Schema.org AlignmentObject, thus they are
de ned as sub-concepts of the AlignmentObject concept.
        </p>
        <p>The AlignmentObject class provides an alignmentType property that describes
the type of alignment being speci ed. In Figure 7, there are two types of
alignment, the `educationLevel' and the `educationalSubject'. These types allow
alignment to the corresponding Curriculum Ontology classes. OWL restrictions are
used to enforce that correct alignmentType properties are used. Thus, if we want
to say that all instances of curric:Level are of schemorg:AlignmentType
\EducationalLevel" this can be implemented in OWL as:
curric : Level a rdfs : Class ;
rdfs : s u b C l a s s O f _ : o w l R e s t r c t i o n A ;
rdfs : s u b C l a s s O f schemorg : A l i g n m e n t O b j e c t .</p>
        <p>schema.org/</p>
        <p>Text
schema.org/
alignmentType
schema.org/
AlignmentObject
educsactihoenmalaA.loigrgn/ment
schema.org/
VideoObject</p>
        <p>owl:hasValue
owlRestrictionA
rdfs:subClassOf owl:onProperty
curric:Level
rdfs:subClassOf</p>
        <p>rdfs:subClassOf
rdfs:subClassOf curric:FieldOfStudy</p>
        <p>rdfs:subClassOf
rdfs:subClassOf
curricO:PfSrotugdraymme
rdfs:subClassOf
curric:Topic
educationLevel
schema.org/
alignmentType
rdfs:subClassOf
curric:TopicOf</p>
        <p>Study</p>
        <p>rdfs:subClassOf
rdfs:subClassOf
educationalSubject
schema.org/
alignmentType
owl:onProperty
owlRestrictionB
owl:hasValue
schema.org class
OWL Restriction
Curriculum Ontology class
Literal value</p>
        <p>Similarly every instance of a curric:ProgrammeOfStudy, a curric:Topic,
curric:FieldOfStudy, curric:TopicOfStudy can be implied to be an schemorg:AlignmentType
\edcationalSubject".
5.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-3">
        <title>Markup on BBC Education Website</title>
        <p>In order to feed search engines with metadata about learning resources and the
UK curricula, semantic markup is added to the HTML pages of a content item,
i.e. a video clip. Figure 8 demonstrates an example markup using typicalAgeRange
and educationalAlignment. GCSE is associated to an instance of VideoObject. The
content of the alignmentType property indicates that GCSE is an educational
level. Similarly, a eld of study and topic of study can be de ned as educational
subjects by de ning the value of alignmentType to educationalSubject.</p>
        <p>
          Google Custom Search engines10 can be easily built with the help of
semantic markup. A custom search engine built with re nement for GCSE and
KS3 (more:p:AlignmentObject-name:KS3, more:p:AlignmentObject-name:GCSE)11
is shown in Figure 9. The screenshot shows the results for GCSE and KS3 levels
when searching for `Hamlet'.
10 https://www.google.com/cse
11 https://www.google.com/cse/publicurl?cx=005635636900202455771:
bttbeggy8g0
For this work a number of online education resources and vocabularies were
researched. The UK government12 provides a very useful structure in their online
educational resources, which were considered in the curriculum ontology as well.
In particular, the notion of Educational Phase is also used in the BBC
curriculum ontology. Other ontologies like the Bolowgna ontology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ] and the ROLE
Learning ontology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ] have been developed as part of educational projects before
the curriculum ontology. The purpose of the Bolownga ontology was to model
an academic setting and to support the publication and exchange of information
among universities. The ROLE Learning ontology was developed to support
selfregulating learning and it represents a Psycho-Pedagogical Integration Model of
connecting learning strategies, techniques and activities.
        </p>
        <p>
          In addition, the work from [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref13">13,11</xref>
          ] was also reviewed when designing the
curriculum ontology. It is one the most structured resources related to education
that preexisted the curriculum ontology and its analysis was a precursor to the
development of this ontology.
        </p>
        <p>
          The support of education data with Semantic Web Technologies [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ] has been a
key element in e orts like the Linked Universities initiative13 and the LinkedUp14
project. In this work semantically annotate learning content using the curriculum
ontology. The details of semantic annotation of media are presented in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
12 http://education.data.gov.uk/
13 http://linkeduniversities.org/lu/
14 http://linkedup-project.eu/
        </p>
        <p>Fig. 9: Google Custom Search Engine for BBC Education.
7</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Discussion and Future Work</title>
      <p>The BBC o ers tens of thousands of learning resources across its sites, with each
site having di erent mechanisms for publishing, discovering and describing the
content it serves.</p>
      <p>To improve consistency, we incorporated ontology models and linked data in
the architecture of the BBC Knowledge &amp; Learning Beta Online Pages. In
particular, the development and use of the curriculum ontology in the architecture
of the system allowed for interlinking curriculum concepts allowing every content
item to be semantically annotated with relevant curriculum topics. In addition,
content can be discovered consistently and shown in context with other similar
content. This is achieved by semantically annotating learning content with
Curriculum Ontology instance data. Mapping the Curriculum Ontology concepts
with learning markup vocabularies, such as the Learning Resource Metadata
Initiative (LRMI), allowed for better precision in search using the metadata of
the learning content.</p>
      <p>Hiding the model's complexity and providing a consistent navigation is a
challenge of the architecture, which is achieved with the implementation of
services and APIs on the top of the linked data. A bene t of the ontology supporting
the BBC online education pages is that it can o er dynamic aggregations of
content achieved by querying the linked curriculum data. It can also help to easily
discover content. For example, the recommendations on other relevant topics to
a clip is done via the ontology data. Building additional recommendation
services using the curriculum ontology and other ontologies is a good future work
direction.</p>
      <p>One key requirement of the new Knowledge &amp; Learning is to provide a
consistent model re ecting the UK National curricula where users can learn more
about science, nature, history, religion, arts and more, in a continuous learning
journey. Semantic Web Technologies and Linked Data can give a leverage in
accomplishing this task as they allow an e ective interlinking and querying of web
data.</p>
      <p>Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank Ali Craigmile, Jemma
Summer eld, Paul Rissen, Amaal Mohamed and Zoe Rose for their help on the
design of the BBC Curriculum Ontology.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>1. The Learning Resource Metadata Initiative (LRMI) Speci cation</article-title>
          . http://www. lrmi.net/the-specification.
          <source>[Online; accessed 03-July-2014].</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Abdallah</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Ferris</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The Ordered List Ontology Speci cation</article-title>
          . http: //smiy.sourceforge.net/olo/spec/orderedlistontology.html,
          <year>2010</year>
          . [Online; accessed 03-July-2014].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Barker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Explaining the LRMI Alignment Object [blog post]</article-title>
          . http://blogs. cetis.ac.uk/philb/2014/03/06/explaining-the-lrmi
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          alignment-object/,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Berthold</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Dahn</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Kiefel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Lachmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Nussbaumer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>D. Albert.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>ROLE Learning Ontology: An Approach to Structure Recommendations for SelfRegulated Learning in Personalized Learning Environments</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Future of Learning Innovations and Learning Quality, page 104</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Collison</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Elbaum</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Haavind</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Tinker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Facilitating online learning: E ective strategies for moderators</article-title>
          .
          <source>ERIC</source>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>d'Aquin. Linked Data for Open and Distance Learning</article-title>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Demartini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Enchev</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Gapany</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Cudre-Mauroux</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The Bowlogna ontology: Fostering open curricula and agile knowledge bases for Europe's higher education landscape</article-title>
          .
          <source>Semantic Web</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>53</volume>
          {
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Gangemi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Presutti</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Ontology Design Patterns</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Handbook on Ontologies</source>
          , pages
          <volume>221</volume>
          {
          <fpage>243</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Horrocks</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Patel-Schneider</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>F. Van Harmelen. From SHIQ</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <article-title>RDF to OWL: The making of a Web Ontology Language</article-title>
          .
          <source>Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):7{
          <fpage>26</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10. G. Kobilarov,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Scott</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Raimond</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Oliver</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Sizemore</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Smethurst</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Bizer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Media Meets Semantic Web{How the BBC Uses DBpedia and Linked Data to Make Connections. In The semantic web: research and applications</article-title>
          , pages
          <volume>723</volume>
          {
          <fpage>737</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>R. D. Morris</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Web 3.0: Implications for online learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>TechTrends</source>
          ,
          <volume>55</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>42</volume>
          {
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12. J.
          <article-title>Ray eld. Dynamic semantic publishing</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Semantic Technologies in Content Management Systems</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>64</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Rissen. A Curriculum Ontology</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>[blog post]</article-title>
          . http://www.r4isstatic.
          <source>com/179</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          . [Online; accessed 03-July-2014].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. K. Waters. Sifting the Data. T.H.E. Journal</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>January 2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>