<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Exploiting Linked Spatial Data and Granularity Transformations</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Heidelinde Hobel</string-name>
          <email>heidelinde.hobel@tuwien.ac.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andrew U. Frank</string-name>
          <email>frankg@geoinfo.tuwien.ac.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Doctoral College Environmental Informatics Vienna University of Technology</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute for Geoinformation and Cartography Vienna University of Technology</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Geographic information is one of the fundamental core data sources for various applications. Freely available geographic information knowledge bases are emerging and the spatial dimension has become part of the Linked Open Data initiative. However, geographic information is stored as abstract geographic objects and exploring, extracting, and understanding the information must be facilitated for di erent user perspectives and use cases. We propose to use a semantic model and an extraction methodology which is aimed at allowing the consumption of geographic information in an intuitive way. We illustrate our approach based on previous work of a highway navigation conceptualization and present a functional approach to exploit granularity extractions targeted at enabling the user to change the point of view in navigation tasks.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Geospatial information is becoming more and more important for a variety of
applications in our everyday life. From supply chain management to e-Commerce
support and from navigation tools through to complex recommendation systems,
Geographic Information Systems are important interfaces to build suitable
applications with a local or global perspective. E orts in the elds of the Semantic
Web and Linked Data [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] led to the emergence of the Web of Data comprising
various geospatial data sources, e.g. LinkedGeoData3 or GeoLinked Data4. The
whole approach relies on Semantic Web technologies, especially the Semantic
Web's language, which is referred to as the Resource Description Framework
(RDF).
      </p>
      <p>However, one challenge in Geographic Information Science is to develop
suitable conceptual models that facilitate the understanding of geographic data,
relating this data with information sources of other domains, and using this
combined data to solve a speci c task. Therefore, we have to consider the user's</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>3 http://linkedgeodata.org</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>4 http://geo.linkeddata.es</title>
      <p>perspective and the goal he wants to achieve with the information provided in
distributed and heterogeneous data sources. OpenStreetMap5, and the
semantic counterpart LinkedGeoData, are based on the following abstract elements:
nodes, ways, relations, and tags. LinkedGeoData is aimed at linking the spatial
dimension with knowledge bases from other domains. Although semantics have
become an integral part of the geographic perspective, the required semantics
to understand and explore geographic information in an intuitive way and from
di erent user perspectives are not yet integrated in the geographic linked data
e orts.</p>
      <p>
        The goal of our research is to e ciently handle geographic data on di
erent granularity levels by enabling the user to change the point of view. The
contribution of our paper is summarized as follows:
{ We implemented a descriptive model for topological navigation tasks based
on di erent levels of detail by modeling di erent graph representations in
the semantic model.
{ We formalized the granularity transformations by using canonical projection
functions.
{ We highlight future challenges and compare our approach with the approach
from Timpf and Kuhn [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: In Section 2, we describe
shortly the fundamental conceptual model for way nding as well as related work.
In Section 3, we present our ontology and the extractions to retrieve the data for
the navigation tasks at the previously proposed granularity levels. We continue
with the comparison of our approach with the approach from Timpf and Kuhn
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] (Section 4) and discuss some remaining challenges (Section 5). We conclude
our work in Section 6.
2
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Related Work</title>
        <p>
          The geographic conceptual model we have chosen to investigate was rstly
introduced by Timpf et al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ], where navigation tasks are modeled at three levels of
detail: (1) planning, (2) giving and receiving instructions, and (3) driving. Timpf
and Kuhn [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ] extended the previous hierarchical model by taking graph
granulation theory into account. Their main goal was to build a theory of granularity
transformations for way nding processes. To achieve their goal, they formalized
conceptual models for each of the previously introduced task levels (referred to
as conceptual levels or levels of detail).
        </p>
        <p>Since the emergence of the Web of Data, there have been major e orts to
populate the Linked Data cloud with useful information. The advantages of the
Linked Data cloud are evident in many areas such as research, collaboration, and
creation of value. Also in the eld of geospatial data, initiatives are pushing ahead
and populate the Web with interlinked geospatial data [3{5]. Together with the</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>5 http://www.openstreetmap.org/</title>
      <p>
        \Semantic Geospatial Web" [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], a plethora of tools, extensions, and
optimizations were developed, e.g. GeoSPARQL6 and stRDF/stSPARQL [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], facilitating
the creation, publication, and processing of enriched geospatial data. According
to Egenhofer [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], geospatial ontologies and query languages should be optimized
to deal with synonyms, algebraic treatment of properties, and mapping of
spatial terms onto corresponding geometries. Visser et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ] illustrated the need
for formal ontologies of geospatial data and demonstrated how these ontologies
enhance the retrieval of information. However, these geospatial characteristics
are not directly suitable for the way nding graph model described by Timpf and
Kuhn [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ], Tomko introduced a case study, where web-accessible data
was used to enrich navigation routes.
      </p>
      <p>
        The idea of multiple levels in the presentation of geospatial data, referring to
the concept of di erent levels of detail, is already explored in various application
elds of GI science. Weibel and Dutton [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ] address the need of generalizing
geospatial data as well as the models and algorithms dealing with these issues.
In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], Butten eld proposed an algorithm for transmitting vector data on less
detailed representations that are re ned at ner levels. Stell and Worboys [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]
proposed a framework to deal with generalizations on graph based data
structures. An approach to model the levels of detail of spatial processes based on
partial function application was proposed by Weiser et al. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
3
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Way nding Ontology and Granularity Transformations</title>
        <p>
          In this section, we introduce our idea of how to develop a descriptional
semantic model, which allows di erent users to explore and understand geographic
information of road networks based on a topological network data model and
extract the corresponding information for the use cases introduced by Timpf and
Kuhn [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ].
3.1
        </p>
        <p>
          The Topological Network Model
Road networks are typically represented as graphs. Cities, interstates, and exits
or entrances are modeled as nodes and roads between the nodes are described
as links. For instance, the RDF Graph Modeling Language (RGML) illustrates
the opportunities of RDF to describe graph structures [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ] corresponding with
road networks. Based on the principles of Linked Data, we describe the objects
of interest as entities and add semantic annotations to add information. In [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]
it is described how to use Linked Data's Graph structure to naturally represent
network topologies. Based on Timpf and Kuhn's ontology, we designed an
ontology that is aimed at facilitating the consumption of highway network graphs,
where the graph amalgamations are interwoven in the data set (see Figure 1).
One problem of automatically generated amalgamations is that the world is
versatile and concepts such as intersections, exits, and entrances are not easily
generalizable due to their di erent properties.
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>6 http://geosparql.org</title>
      <p>
        The following section illustrates how the ontology can be used to extract the
information required to solve previously introduced [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ] navigation tasks.
In the Semantic Web Science typically SPARQL7 is used to select, lter, and
query information. We used an independent approach to illustrate the
granularity transformations for a wider public.
      </p>
      <p>
        In our model, instead of granularity mappings, we use coarsening functions,
mapping from one conceptual level to another by removing information, given in
form of triples. This means that we explicitly suppress some information which
results in a more abstract level of detail. This process can be iterated (i.e.,
changing from one level to another) and based on di erent criteria. Starting with
the following notation for RDF graphs derived from the W3C RDF Semantics
speci cation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], we describe an RDF graph G as a set of triples (which are
often denoted as sentences) G = (E ; P; V), where
      </p>
      <p>
        E is the set of entities, which describe anything in the universe of discourse
and can be seen as a vocabulary [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Entities denote the things we want to
describe with our RDF graph and are referred to as subjects.
      </p>
      <p>P is the set of properties (i.e., the predicate of sentence), which describe the
relations between entities and values.</p>
      <p>V is the set of values, which are either entities or atomic values (i.e., literals).</p>
      <p>The value of a triple is denoted as object of a sentence.</p>
      <p>We start with a set E of entities, a set P of properties and a set V of values,
that allow us to express sentences. We represent a world W, i.e. universe of
discourse, in form of an RDF graph, which is formalized as a set of triples, where
each triple t consists of an entity e 2 E , a property p 2 P, and a value v 2 V,
i.e. t = (e; p; v), and therefore we obtain: W := fti : i = 1; 2; : : :g E P V .</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>7 http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/</title>
      <p>By employing the concept of canonical projection functions on E P V
(e.g., 1 retrieves the entity of triples), we can extract information and thus
precisely describe certain entities which appear in triples (which can be subject
to further conditions) in a world: e.g., to get all entities with property p0 and
value v0 we can write:</p>
      <p>A :=
1
2 1(p0) \ 3 1(v0) \ W
= fe 2 E : (e; p0; v0) 2 Wg</p>
      <p>Therefore, properties and values allow us to search using di erent criteria.
The canonical projection functions are de ned on the whole space E P V ,
which requires to intersect all appearing preimages with our universe of discourse
W (as can be seen in the example above). In the following step, all triples
including the identi ed entities as subject or object have to be removed. For
instance, let us consider a country with several cities. We can use functions to
nd these cities, but if we consider a more granular world, e.g. only cities with a
high population, we have to remove all information about these small cities, i.e.
all triples concerning these smaller cities. Hence we are interested in all triples
with the entity e and values v not in A (with p = \is"; v = \small"), (Ac denotes
A complement) so we consider the set:</p>
      <p>
        fw 2 W : w = (e; p; v) ^ e 2= A ^ v 2= Ag = W \ 1 1(Ac) \ 3 1(Ac)
Based on the requirements of Timpf and Kuhn [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], way nding requires three
different conceptual models: Wdriver; Winstruction and Wplanning. Whereas Wdriver
corresponds with the full descriptional model W. According to our coarsening
process the following relation holds:
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Wplanning</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Winstructional</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-3">
        <title>Wdriver</title>
        <p>E</p>
        <p>P</p>
        <p>V
According to our construction, an operation that is executed on a given level
of detail can also be executed on a more detailed level, e.g. the function route
planning has to be executable at the planning level as well as the driver level.
However, it is not possible to execute the function driving at the planning level.</p>
        <p>In order to map from the driving level to the instructional level, we remove
triples from Wdriver describing the lanes and road segments, resulting in a
predicate containing a disjunction (denoted as _):</p>
        <p>C1 := fe 2 E : (e; \isA"; \Lane") _ (e; \isA"; \Segment") 2 Wdriverg
=)</p>
        <p>Winstructional = fz 2 Wdriver : z = (e; p; v) ^ e 2= C1 ^ v 2= C1g</p>
        <p>Similarly, the coarsening function which maps from the instructional to the
planning level includes removing the directions of the highways. We assume that
in this case this comprises all \Ramps", \Junctions", and \Directions":</p>
        <p>C2 := fe 2 E : (e; \isA"; \Ramp") _ (e; \isA"; \J unction")_</p>
        <p>_(e; \isA"; \Direction") 2 Winstructionalg
=)</p>
        <p>Wplanning = fw 2 Winstructional : w = (e; p; v) ^ e 2= C2 ^ v 2= C2g
4</p>
        <sec id="sec-6-3-1">
          <title>Comparison</title>
          <p>
            In this section, we compare our implementation for granularity transformations
based on Linked Data with the Graph Transformations of Timpf and Kuhn [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
            ].
          </p>
          <p>The rst advantage of Linked Data is that every relation and information
can be mapped in a exible and iterative way. Hence, instead of using di erent
graphs, where we have to use graph amalgamations to map from model to model,
we can describe the connectivities of the entities in one descriptional model.
Hence, Timpf and Kuhn's approach does not support the semantics between the
described entities. For instance, when exploring a lane, we want to know the
name of the highway the lane belongs to. Extractions facilitate in addition the
retrieval of smaller subsets of information, which can be compared to humans'
natural abstraction abilities. The second advantage we could identify is that the
Linked Data model can be easily enriched with further information that can
be used for various applications. For instance, nodes could be enriched with
sights or landmarks to improve navigation tools or the links could be enriched
with risk data that can be used to decide about the best route in supply chain
management.
5</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-6-3-2">
          <title>Discussion and Limitations</title>
          <p>The proposed approach leaves some open challenges. In this section, we discuss
challenges arising when using RDF graphs for way nding.</p>
          <p>
            Incompleteness Modeling the real world in simple triples is a time-consuming
and challenging task, since the annotation of all conceivable conditions requires
signi cant e orts in creating descriptive content. The knowledge base we
create is, therefore, mostly incomplete and reasoning based on this knowledge base
will not always reveal the best solution. Arguable, the Semantic Web, Linked
Open Data, and an open data community represent the the rst step to
mitigate the problem of incomplete knowledge, since everyone can contribute and
extend the fundamental knowledge for reasoning. For instance, with the
mentioned concepts, linking a concrete route by using an array of location points
(a snapshot of the route) is a standard task. Linking nodes of OpenStreetMap
enables OpenStreetMap contributors to edit the information when exploring the
network graphs.
Imperfect Models While modeling the ontology introduced in Section 3.1, it
became apparent that modeling the concepts and relations is highly dependable
on the application area and the use cases to be considered. Creating the perfect
model for all kinds of application tasks is therefore not possible. In Section 3.2,
we have introduced our idea of granularity transformations. Extracting,
transforming, and mapping information out of a comprehensive knowledge base into
a suitable model is, due to RDF's exible nature, a justi ably tting approach.
In this paper, we have redesigned the formalization rstly introduced in [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
            ]
to match with our expectations of conceptual levels of detail in way nding. By
altering the connections of our entities and adding additional information by
annotations as well as our granularity transformations, we showed, based on a
use case example, the bene ts of a simple RDF notation and transformation
operations.
          </p>
          <p>
            Oversized Search Space In [
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
            ], the authors evaluated their implementation
based on a shortest path search in the formalized way nding graph. One problem
we could not solve was identifying an appropriate extraction method for the
highway graphs in order to nd the best heuristic for the search of shortest paths.
Under realistic geospatial workloads, i.e. all real world entities are mapped in the
RDF triple store, and thus without extraction of a suitable subset reasoning is a
time-consuming and costly task. Geospatial operations, e.g., nding all location
points in a given area, also formed part in extensions of RDF and SPARQL
(cf. Section 2). How these functions could be used to extract heuristics for our
model, is a further research topic, especially when considering that Linked Data
could be used to nd perfect sightseeing trips.
6
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-6-3-3">
          <title>Conclusion and Future Work</title>
          <p>The Web of Data is gaining importance, o ering users the possibility to utilize
it as an open knowledge base serving information for various applications.
Publishing and consuming data for geographical reasoning is still in an early stage,
since the application elds are versatile and the development of fundamental
ontologies and query languages has not been nished. The data of proprietary
navigation tools is kept on inaccessible company servers. This major drawback
inspired us to analyze a previously introduced formal model for way nding on
di erent levels of detail. We used the derived results to develop an ontology and
functional transformation operations, which should facilitate the consumption
of topological network data.</p>
          <p>We aim to extend our rst approach to a framework that should enable
to explore geospatial data and useful links in an intuitive way, which should
facilitate data retrieval, linking, visualization, and hence the consumption of
open data with a geospatial perspective.</p>
          <p>Acknowledgements This research was partially funded by the Vienna
University of Technology through the Doctoral College Environmental Informatics.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Bizer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Heath</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Berners-Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Linked data-the story so far</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)</source>
          ,
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):1{
          <fpage>22</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>B. P.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Butten eld. Transmitting vector geospatial data across the internet</article-title>
          . In M. J. Egenhofer and D. M. Mark, editors,
          <source>GIScience</source>
          , volume
          <volume>2478</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
          <volume>51</volume>
          {
          <fpage>64</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>A. de Leon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saquicela</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vilches</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Villazon-Terrazas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Priyatna</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corcho</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Geographical linked data: a spanish use case</article-title>
          .
          <source>In A. Paschke</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Henze</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and T. Pellegrini, editors,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I-SEMANTICS</surname>
          </string-name>
          , ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. ACM,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Egenhofer</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Toward the semantic geospatial web</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 10th ACM international symposium on Advances in geographic information systems</source>
          ,
          <source>GIS '02</source>
          , pages
          <issue>1</issue>
          {
          <fpage>4</fpage>
          , New York, NY, USA,
          <year>2002</year>
          . ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Giaccardi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Fogli</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A ective geographies: toward a richer cartographic semantics for the geospatial web</article-title>
          . In S. Levialdi, editor,
          <source>AVI</source>
          , pages
          <volume>173</volume>
          {
          <fpage>180</fpage>
          . ACM Press,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Gruber</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Human-Computer Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>43</volume>
          (
          <issue>5-6</issue>
          ):
          <volume>907</volume>
          {
          <fpage>928</fpage>
          ,
          <year>1995</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Hart</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Dolbear</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Linked Data: A Geographic Perspective</article-title>
          . CRC Press,
          <volume>1</volume>
          <fpage>edition</fpage>
          , Jan.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Koubarakis</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Kyzirakos</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Modeling and Querying Metadata in the Semantic Sensor Web: the model stRDF and the query language stSPARQL</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 7th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2010)</source>
          ,
          <year>June 2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Punin</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Krishnamoorthy</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Describing structure and semantics of graphs using an rdf vocabulary</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Extreme Markup Languages</source>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Stell</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
            <surname>Worboys</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Generalizing graphs using amalgamation and selection</article-title>
          .
          <source>In SSD</source>
          , pages
          <volume>19</volume>
          {
          <fpage>32</fpage>
          ,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Timpf</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Kuhn</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Granularity transformations in way nding</article-title>
          . In C. Freksa,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Brauer</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Habel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          K. F. Wender, editors,
          <source>Spatial Cognition</source>
          , volume
          <volume>2685</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
          <volume>77</volume>
          {
          <fpage>88</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12. S. Timpf,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
            <surname>Volta</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
            <surname>Pollock</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
            <surname>Egenhofer</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>A Conceptual Model of Way nding Using Multiple Levels of Abstraction</article-title>
          . In A. U. Frank,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Campari</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and U. Formentini, editors,
          <source>Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space</source>
          , International Conference GIS - From Space to Territory:
          <article-title>Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning</article-title>
          , volume
          <volume>639</volume>
          of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages
          <volume>348</volume>
          {
          <fpage>367</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>1992</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Tomko</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Case study-assessing spatial distribution of web resources for navigation services</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Web and Wireless Geographical Information Systems</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>90</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>104</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14. U. Visser,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Stuckenschmidt</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Schuster, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Vo</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>gele. Ontologies for geographic information processing</article-title>
          .
          <source>Computers &amp; Geosciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>28</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>103</volume>
          {
          <fpage>117</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15. W3C. RDF Semantics. Website,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <source>Technical Report</source>
          , http://www.w3.org/TR/ rdf-mt/;
          <source>last visited on July 20th</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Weibel</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Dutton</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Generalising spatial data and dealing with multiple representations</article-title>
          .
          <source>Geographical information systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          :
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>155</fpage>
          ,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Weiser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A. U.</given-names>
            <surname>Frank</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Abdalla</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Process composition and process reasoning over multiple levels of detail</article-title>
          .
          <source>In GI Science 2012 Extended Abstract</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>