=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1278/paper8
|storemode=property
|title=
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1278/paper8.pdf
|volume=Vol-1278
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/dmrs/CantadorF14
}}
====
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1278/paper8.pdf
On the Exploitation of User Personality in
Recommender Systems
Iván Cantador, Ignacio Fernández-Tobías
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
{ivan.cantador, ignacio.fernandezt}@uam.es
Abstract. In this paper we revise the state of the art on personality-aware
recommender systems, identifying main research trends and achievements up to
date, and discussing open issues that may be addressed in the future.
Keywords: recommender systems, collaborative filtering, personality.
1 Introduction
Human personality, as defined in psychology, is a combination of characteristics or
qualities that form an individual’s style of thinking, feeling and behaving in different
situations [24]. Among the existing models proposed to characterize and represent
human personality, the Five Factor model [4] states that there are five main factors
that allow describing an individual’s personality: openness, conscientiousness,
extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism.
Personality influences how people make their decisions [18]. Recent research has
shown that correlations between user personality traits and preferences exist in different
domains, such as music [2, 20, 21, 22], movies and TV shows [2, 3, 19, 21], books and
magazines [2, 21], and websites [15]. These correlations can be used to enhance
personalized information access and retrieval [10, 17]. Specifically, in recommender
systems, the exploitation of user personality information has enabled address cold-start
situations [25], facilitate the user preference elicitation process [8], mitigate the sparsity
problem [11], and improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering [5, 23].
Despite these achievements, the exploitation of user personality in recommender
systems is a challenging and still largely under explored topic.
2 Open Issues in Personality-aware Recommender Systems
Similarly to user preferences, personality factors can be inferred explicitly, e.g. by
means of psychometric questionnaires [1, 4, 8], or implicitly, e.g. by analyzing digital
footprints [14], linguistic features of user texts [23], and by correlating personality
traits with patterns of social network use, such as posting, rating, establishing
friendship relations, and participating in user groups [1, 12]. Whereas explicit
questionnaires are more accurate than techniques inferring personality from user
generated contents, they require the users’ effort to fill them. Note that the well
known IPIP [7] proxy for Costa and McCrae’s NEO-PI-R test [4] may have between
60 and 240 items. Hence, innovative techniques to efficiently acquire user
personality in recommenders have to be developed, and may be incorporated into the
user preference elicitation process [8].
Once extracted, it is needed to model user personality. Most of existing
personality-aware recommenders deals with a vector representation composed of the
numeric values of personality factors [5, 8, 11]. This, nonetheless, may not be the best
choice. There are works that have considered using discrete value intervals of the
personality factors [5], sets of predefined personality categories – e.g. reflective and
energetic people [22], and aesthetic, cerebral, communal, dark, and thrilling contents
[21] –, and personality-based stereotypes [2, 16]. In this context, a balance between
recommendation accuracy and comprehension (explicability) could be important.
Moreover, instead of broad user personality representations, using more fine-grained
information provided by the IPIP tests, such as the facets of each personality factor
[9] may help achieve better recommendations; Note e.g. that a particular individual
with a high overall openness score, may have high imagination and artistic interests,
but may not have a high level of adventurousness. Finally, the modeling task is even
more challenging if we account for variables that could influence particularities of an
individual’s personality. In this case, special attention should be given to the users’
age, gender, and educational attainment, as pointed out in [2, 3, 5].
Assuming that user personality can be inferred and modeled by a recommender
system, another set of open issues is related with the particular exploitation of user
personality for making recommendations. In general, simple approaches have been
investigated so far, from content-based [23] to collaborative filtering [5, 8, 11, 17]
heuristics. There is plenty of room for alternative, more sophisticated methods. In
particular, we envision matrix factorization as a powerful model in which user
personality information can be easily integrated with content-based and collaborative
filtering user profiles. Moreover, in addition to user preferences, contextual signals
may have an important role in personality-aware recommendations. In a particular
context, people with distinct personalities react differently. The identification and
exploitation of relations between context and personality is thus of special interest in
recommender systems. In fact, the user’s current mood is one of the contextual signals
that has been shown as directly related with personality [18, 19]. It is known that an
individual’s personality influences her mood changes due to external emotional
stimuli [13], and these stimuli may be generated by received recommendations. In all
the above cases, we may go beyond the accuracy of personality-aware
recommendations, and deal with other metrics, such as novelty and diversity [20];
Note, for example, that open-minded people may appreciate diverse and serendipitous
recommendations, while introverted people may prefer recommendations much more
related with their past preferences. Finally, we would like to highlight the fact that
exploiting personality could also help address new recommendation scenarios, such as
those of cross-domain recommender systems [2], in which information from a source
domain is used to enhance or generate recommendations in a different target domain,
where the user’s preferences may not be available [6, 26].
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
(TIN2013-47090-C3-2).
References
1. Bachrach, Y., Kohli, P., Graepel, T., Stillwell, D. J., Kosinski, M.: Personality and Patterns
of Facebook Usage. In: Proceedings of the 4th Web Science Conference, pp. 24-32 (2012)
2. Cantador, I., Fernández-Tobías, I., Bellogín, A.: Relating Personality Types with User
Preferences in Multiple Entertainment Domains. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on
Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services, pp. 13-28 (2013)
3. Chausson, O.: Who Watches What? Assessing the Impact of Gender and Personality on
Film Preferences. myPersonality project, University of Cambridge (2010)
4. Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R.: Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO
Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources (1992)
5. Fernández-Tobías, I., Cantador, I.: Personality-aware Collaborative Filtering: An
Empirical Study in Multiple Domains with Facebook Data. In: Proceedings of the 15th
International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies (2014)
6. Fernández-Tobías, I., Cantador, I., Kaminskas, M., Ricci, F.: Cross-domain Recommender
Systems: A Survey of the State of the Art. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Spanish Conference
on Information Retrieval, pp. 187-198 (2012)
7. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R.,
Gough, H. G.: The International Personality Item Pool and the Future of Public-Domain
Personality Measures. Journal of Research in Personality 40, pp. 84-96 (2006)
8. Elahi, M., Braunhofer, M., Ricci, F., Tkalcic, M.: Personality-based Active Learning for
Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. In: Proceedings of the 13th International
Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, pp. 360-371 (2013)
9. Goldberg, L. R.: A Broad-bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the
Lower-level Facets of Several Five-factor Models. Personality Psychology in Europe 7,
pp. 7-28 (1999)
10. Hu, R., Pu, P.: A Study on User Perception of Personality-Based Recommender Systems.
In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and
Personalization, pp. 291-302 (2010)
11. Hu, R., Pu, P.: Enhancing Collaborative Filtering Systems with Personality Information.
In: Proceedings of the 5h ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp.197-204 (2011)
12. Hu, R., Pu, P.: Exploring Relations between Personality and User Rating Behaviors. In:
Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Emotions and Personality in Personalized Services,
pp. 29-40 (2013)
13. Hume, D.: Emotions and Moods. In: Robbins, S. P., Judge, T. A. (Eds.), Organizational
Behavior, pp. 258-297 (2012)
14. Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Graepel, T.: Private Traits and Attributes are Predictable
from Digital Records of Human Behavior. National Academy of Sciences 110(15), pp.
5802-5805 (2013)
15. Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D. J., Kohli, P., Bachrach, Y., Graepel, T.: Personality and
Website Choice. In: Proceedings of 4th ACM Conference on Web Science, pp. 251-254
(2012)
16. Lin, C.-H., McLeod, D.: Exploiting and Learning Human Temperaments for Customized
Information Recommendation. In: Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Internet and
Multimedia Systems and Applications, pp. 218-223 (2002)
17. Nunes, M. A. S. N.: Recommender Systems based on Personality Traits: Could Human
Psychological Aspects Influence the Computer Decision-making Process? VDM Verlag
(2009)
18. Nunes, M. A. S. N., Hu, R.: Personality-based Recommender Systems: An Overview. In:
Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 5-6 (2012)
19. Odić, A., Tkalčič, M., Tasič, J. F., Košir, A.: Personality and Social Context: Impact on
Emotion Induction from Movies. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Emotions and
Personality in Personalized Services (2013)
20. Rawlings, D., Ciancarelli, V.: Music Preference and the Five-Factor Model of the NEO
Personality Inventory. Psychology of Music 25(2), pp. 120-132 (1997)
21. Rentfrow, P. J., Goldberg L. R., Zilca R.: Listening, Watching, and Reading: The Structure
and Correlates of Entertainment Preferences. Journal of Personality 79(2), pp. 223-258
(2011)
22. Rentfrow, P. J., Gosling, S. D.: The Do Re Mi’s of Everyday Life: The Structure and
Personality Correlates of Music Preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
84(6), pp. 1236-1256 (2003)
23. Roshchina, A.: TWIN: Personality-based Recommender System. MSc thesis, Institute of
Technology Tallaght, Dublin (2012)
24. Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., Wegner, D. M.: Psychology. Worth Publishers (2010)
25. Tkalčič, M., Kunaver, M., Košir, A., Tasič, J. F.: Addressing the New User Problem with a
Personality Based User Similarity Measure. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on User
Models for Motivational Systems (2011)
26. Winoto, P., Tang, T.: If You Like the Devil Wears Prada the Book, Will You also Enjoy
the Devil Wears Prada the Movie? A Study of Cross-Domain Recommendations. New
Generation Computing 26, pp. 209-225 (2008)