<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Colin Atkinson, Georg Grossmann, Thomas Kuhne</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Juan de Lara</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>In recent years there has been growing interest in the use of multi-level modelling
approaches to better represent the multiple classi cation levels that are frequently found
in the real world and are needed to e ectively engineer languages. Multi-level modelling
approaches have not only been successfully used in numerous industrial projects and
standards de nition initiatives they are now supported by an array of dedicated tools.</p>
      <p>However there is still no clear consensus on what multi-level modelling actually is and
what kinds of constructs and concepts provide the best support for it. For example, there
are diverging views on whether it is sound to combine instance facets and type facets into
so-called clabjects, whether strict metamodelling is too restrictive, and what principles
should be used in establishing meta-level boundaries, etc.</p>
      <p>The MULTI 2014 workshop was established to address this problem by bringing
together researchers and practitioners with an interest in multi-level modelling to foster a
fruitful cross-pollination of ideas and lay the foundation for a uni ed discipline. In
particular, the workshop aimed to identify a set of criteria for judging the strengths and
weaknesses of di erent multi-level modelling approaches and for de ning possible
benchmark case studies. To this end, the workshop encouraged submissions on new concepts,
implementation approaches and formalisms as well as controversial positions, requirements
for evaluation criteria or case-study scenarios. Contributions in the area of tool building,
multi-level modelling applications, and educational material were also welcome.</p>
      <p>From a total of 16 submissions, 12 papers were selected that addressed a range of topics
related to multi-level modelling. In terms of technology papers, three papers presented
proposals for enhancing existing multi-level modeling approaches, two papers presented
alternative formal foundations for multi-level modeling, and two papers presented
approaches for checking the consistency and integrity of multi-level models. A further four
papers presented applications of multi-level modeling to di erent scenarios; two focusing
on industrial applications and two focusing on the applications of multi-level modeling to
the ubiquitous problems of interoperability and big, distributed data. Finally, the
remaining paper presented ideas for improving the way in which multi-level modeling approaches
can be evaluated and compared. In addition to two paper sessions, the workshop included
an invited talk answering the question \What is Multi-Level Modeling?" and two plenary
discussions focused on core multi-level themes and the future of the edgling multi-level
community.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>