<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Geographic Information Expertise</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Matt Duckham</string-name>
          <email>matt@duckham.org</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>GSR_3 Geospatial Science Research 3 School of Mathematical and Geospatial Science, RMIT University</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>As research becomes increasingly interdisciplinary, the unique expertise of researchers in the field of geographic information science (GIScience) becomes harder to distinguish from that of scientists in other domains. What makes a GIScientist different from a biologist, economist, physicist, or epidemiologist, for example, who happen to be developing innovative new techniques for handling or analyzing geographic information in their specific domain? This talk critically examines the role of some established research topics in GIScience, and provides a reasoned perspective on what topics GIScience might claim to constitute its unique area of expertise.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body />
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>