=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1315/invited2
|storemode=property
|title=Work on the Dual Structure of Lexical Semantic Competence
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1315/AbstractInvited2.pdf
|volume=Vol-1315
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/aic/Marconi14
}}
==Work on the Dual Structure of Lexical Semantic Competence==
<pdf width="1500px">https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1315/AbstractInvited2.pdf</pdf>
<pre>
         Work on the Dual Structure
       of Lexical Semantic Competence
                  Invited talk at AIC 2014
           November 26-27 University of Turin, Italy
                      http://aic2014.di.unito.it


                             Diego Marconi

                 Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy



Abstract. Philosophical arguments and neuropsychological research on
deficits of lexical processing converge in indicating that our competence
on word meaning may have two components: inferential competence,
that takes care of word-word relations and is relevant to tasks such as
recovery of a word from its definition, pairing of synonyms, semantic
inference (“Milan is north of Rome” ! “Rome is south of Milan”) and
more; and referential competence, that takes care of word-world rela-
tions, or, more carefully, of connections between words and perception of
the outside world (through vision, hearing, touch). Normal subjects are
competent in both ways; however, there are patients in which one com-
ponent seems to be impaired while the other performs at normal level.
Typically, cases are found of patients that are excellent at defining, say,
the word ‘duck’ but cannot recover the word when shown the picture of
a duck. Complementary cases have also been found and studied. Recent
experiments using neuroimaging (fMRI) found that certain visual areas
are active even in purely inferential performances, and a current exper-
iment appears to show that such activation is a function of what might
be called the “visual load” of both the linguistic material presented as
stimulus and the target word. Such recent results will be presented and
discussed. It should be noted that the notion of “visual load”, as apply-
ing to both individual words and complex phrases, has also been given
a computational interpretation.




                             Page 14 of 171

</pre>