<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>DREAM 9: An Acute Myeloid Leukemia Prediction Big Data Challenge</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>David Noren</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Steven M. Kornblau</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chenyue W. Hu</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Byron Long</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alex Bisberg</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Raquel Norel</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kahn Rhrissorrakrai</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gustavo Stolovitzy</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Amina A. Qutub</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Bioengineering, Rice University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Houston, TX</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Leukemia, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Houston, TX</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>IBM T.J. Watson Research Center</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Yorktown Heights, New York</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2014</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>108</fpage>
      <lpage>109</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Demo of Algorithms &amp; Clinical Visualization In 2014, there will be 18,860 new cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 10,460 deaths from AML. There is urgency in finding better treatments for this type of leukemia, as only about a quarter of the patients diagnosed with AML survive beyond 5 years. The goal of the 2014 DREAM 9 Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Outcome Prediction Challenge is to harness the power of crowd-sourcing to speed the pace of analyzing a high-dimensional proteomics and clinical dataset for AML. The DREAM (Dialog for Reverse Engineering of Assessments &amp; Methods) community consists of diverse computational researchers, biomedical scientists and clinicians who apply their skills to solve a biomedical problem. In this year's DREAM AML Outcome Challenge, participants worldwide compete to develop the best predictive models of AML clinical outcome based on clinical attributes and proteomics. Results of the Challenge include predictive clinical models that surpass current standards; new algorithms to visualize high-dimensional clinical outcome data; and insight into markers of AML and potential new cancer drug targets. In this short demo, we will present on some of the methods behind this crowd-sourced biomedical data challenge. Methods. In June 2014, DREAM 9 participants were provided a dataset of 190 AML patients seen at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, and treated with ARA-C therapy. The dataset includes 40 clinical correlates and the expression level of 231 proteins probed by RPPA protein array analysis. This AML dataset provides information that will enable researchers for the first time to link protein signaling with mutation status and cytogenetic categories - offering DREAM Challenge participants the potential to surpass existing methods in identifying drug targets and tailoring therapies for cancer patient subpopulations. Challenge participants were posed three questions based on this data: to predict which AML patients will be primarily resistant to therapy and which patients will have complete remission; to predict remission duration; and to predict overall survival. Baseline predictive models of AML outcome (relapse, remission duration and overall survival duration) were provided participants by the scientific organizers. Each week, teams predict outcomes for 100 representative patients whose outcome was withheld, based on their choice of clinical and proteomic features. These predictions are scored against the test data using two statistical comparisons for each Challenge question. In addition to the development of data</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>analytics methods, new visualization tools were introduced for the first time in this DREAM
Challenge to help participants navigate the clinical data fields and explore patterns in the original
protein levels (Figure 1). We will demonstrate the use of these tools on the AML dataset.
Results: The best algorithms are in the process of being developed and scored for the Challenge,
which finishes September 15th. The results of the top-scoring algorithms – either separately or
averaged – will provide insight into the main factors determining AML outcome, both with and
without proteomic data included. Baseline statistical models with no parameter optimization were
already provided to the competing teams. These models considered all or some of the data
(clinical correlates and RPPA protein levels). The four model types consisted of logistic
regression, Random Forest, decision tree with adaptive boosting and support vector machine.
Median and mode imputation was used to replace missing patient data values. Area under the
ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve was used to assess the models’ ability to predict
patient outcome. In this demo, we will briefly introduce and show the performance of these diverse
models on the clinical data.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>