<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>New Proposed Solution for the Safeguard of Artworks</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lisa Volpe</string-name>
          <email>lisa.volpe@unife.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carmela Vaccaro</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>TekneHub, University of Ferrara, Dept. Physics and Earth Science</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ferrara, IT</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Ferrara, Dept. Physics and Earth Science</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ferrara, IT</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>33</fpage>
      <lpage>37</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In the field of Cultural Heritage, the safeguard of artworks contends new and complex problems linked not only to conservative condition, maintenance, etc. but also to the introduction of fakes and problems linked to this aspects. In last years, dating and authentication studies, mainly based on historicalartistic-stylistic studies, have been supported by scientific world both through identification of materials and artistic techniques and proposing new anti-counterfeiting marks. Unfortunately, these solutions do not always solve doubts about counterfeits and the fight against fakes continues developing further research aimed to discover and to prevent the introduction of forgery. The current study shows a new possible solution in order to safeguard the artworks, creating an artwork's identity card that can be useful to control replacement of artworks, especially for paintings and during Fine Arts transportation.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>During the centuries, the great interest, which has always been aroused by Art
commerce, has caused often an increase of the demand for art-works that
changes according to fashions and times. For this reason, the introduction on the
market of art-fakes or counterfeit works is unfortunately a common practice that
has continued up nowadays.</p>
      <p>Among the new form of sly Art-thefts, the replacement of original paintings
with perfect copies is one of most difficult to recognize. Moreover, considering
that a painting or a mobile artwork increases its value also in correlation to the
number of art-exhibitions around the world [BG06], [Goo06], [LL06], in which
it takes part, artworks’ handling can stand up for the masterpieces’ substitution,
increasing the problems linked to fine art transportation.</p>
      <p>In the last years, scientists have tried to propose new solutions for the safeguard
of artworks (i.e., Elettra-Synchrotron light source mark) [BBD+12], but the
impossibilities to mark always surface or to apply tags, barcodes, RFID systems,
etc. suggests to look for other possible solutions. The study, developed in a
recent Ph.D. research [Vol13b], could be considered among new possible
solution proposed to prevent forgeries and unpleasant replacements: through a
multi-analytical approach, it is possible to identify artworks’ characteristics that
are helpful to establish the uniqueness of a particular artwork. In addition to
draw up a sort of “artwork’s identity card”, these characteristics are useful to
support authentication and dating studies integrating historical-artistic-stylistic
information, designed for false artworks’ identification. The features that are
collected in a particular database are searched among the morphology of
pictorial layer and the chemistry of pigments’ composition identified by pigment
analysis.</p>
      <p>The current paper shows some results obtained by the suggested multi-analytical
procedure tested on modern and contemporary artworks made by important and
renowned artists (A. Modigliani, P. Picasso, S. Sargent, F. De Pisis, G. Boldini)
and on minute samples taken from them [Vol13a].</p>
      <p>For each artwork (artistic techniques, materials, etc.), it was selected analytical
methods that will be less invasive and more appropriate according to studied
artwork (Figure 1).</p>
      <p>For some of the analysed painting, the results demonstrated to be also important
to support authentication and dating studies. For instance, the study carried out
on some white samples taken from artworks brought interesting results (Figure
2, 3), especially for the White titanium dioxide pigment, considered dating for
ancient and modern artworks. The researches highlighted different morphology
of pigment based on identified anatase or rutile phases [Vol13a]; according to
the history of use of Titanium White Pigment, it was possible to suggest
different post-quem achievement date according to the purity and morphology
of pigment [EWCS08], [McC94], [Leo05], [Lew87], [Fit97].</p>
      <p>Several analytic techniques allow to identify pictorial characteristics of artistic
technique through morphological studies of painting’s surface (Figure 4b, 4d)
and artistic palette through pigment analysis (Figure 4c, 4e), etc. [Vol13a].</p>
      <p>Other artworks, instead, shows particularities in the pictorial layers highlighting
the relationship between color and material (Figure 5), that is one of the most
interesting aspects in the field of Cultural Heritage, fascinating both scientist for
the creativity and technical knowledge of the past, which origin are in Alchemy,
and historians, restorers to better understand artistic flair and for restoration
interventions.</p>
      <p>In conclusion, the proposed solution allowed to draw a card identity for the
analysed painting, supporting also dating and authentication studies currently in
progress.
Owners of the studied paintings are gratefully acknowledged for their
availability and great interest in testing the present research on their artworks.
[BG06]
[BBD+12]
[EWCS08]
[Fit97]
[Goo06]
[LL06]
[Leo05]
[Lew87]
[McC94]
[Vol13a]
[Vol13b]</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benhamou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ginsburgh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Copies of Artworks: The Case of Paintings and Prints, Handbook of the economics of art and culture</article-title>
          , Elsevier ed., Amsterdam,
          <fpage>253</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>283</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bollanti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonfigli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di</surname>
            <given-names>Lazzaro</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>P.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <source>(et al.)</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Is this artwork original or is it a copy? The answer by a new Anti-Counterfeiting Tag</article-title>
          ,
          <source>ENEA Rev. II-2012</source>
          ,
          <fpage>162</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>168</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eastaugh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walsh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chaplin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siddall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Pigment compendium. A dictionary and optical microscopy of historical pigments</article-title>
          .
          <source>Elsevier</source>
          , Oxford, 960 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fitzhugh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>1997</year>
          . Artists' Pigments.
          <article-title>A handbook of their history and characteristics</article-title>
          .
          <source>National Gallery of Art</source>
          , Washington, 368 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goodwin C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>Art and culture in the history of economic thought in Handbook of the economics of art and culture</article-title>
          , Elsevier editor,
          <source>XXXV, 1321</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>31</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>33</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Landes W.M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Levine</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.B.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <article-title>The economic analysis of Art Law, Handbook of the economics of art and culture</article-title>
          , Elsevier ed., Amsterdam,
          <year>2006</year>
          ,
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>251</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leonardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Nuclear physics and painting: sub-topic of the wide and fascinating field of Science and Art</article-title>
          . Nucl.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phys</surname>
          </string-name>
          . A,
          <volume>752</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>659</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>674</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (ed.),
          <year>1987</year>
          .
          <article-title>Pigment handbook</article-title>
          . Vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          , Properties and economics, 2nd ed. John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, p.
          <fpage>976</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>McCrone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>1994</year>
          .
          <article-title>Polarized Light Microscopy in Conservation: a personal perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Am. Inst. Conserv.</source>
          ,
          <volume>33</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>101</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>114</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Volpe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Earth Science and Modern-Contemporary art: fingerprints for the safeguard of artworks in view of Fine Arts transportation, Plinius (Italian suppl</article-title>
          .
          <source>Eur. J.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Mineralogy)</source>
          ,
          <volume>39</volume>
          vol.,
          <volume>121</volume>
          -
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Volpe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Earth Science and Modern-Contemporary art: fingerprints for the safeguard of artworks in view of Fine Arts transportation</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Ph.D. Thesis</source>
          , University of Ferrara (Italy).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>