When Effort exceeds Expectations: A Theory of Search Task Difficulty Diane Kelly School of Information and Library Science University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA dianek@email.unc.edu Abstract Biography In a recent review of over one hundred interactive informa- Diane Kelly is a Professor at the School of Information tion retrieval studies, Wildemuth et al. [1] observed that and Library Science at the University of North Carolina at despite widespread usage of the concepts of task complex- Chapel Hill. Her research and teaching interests are in inter- ity and task difficulty, “clear and consistent definitions of active information search and retrieval, information search these attributes are lacking and there is no consensus on behavior, and research methods. She is the recipient of how to distinguish levels of complexity or difficulty within the 2014 ASIST Research Award, the 2013 British Com- a set of search tasks” (p. 1119). Importantly, the authors puter Society’s IRSG Karen Spärck Jones Award, the 2009 called for the creation of richer conceptual models and more ASIST/Thomson Reuters Outstanding Information Science precise and valid measurement practices. In this talk, I will Teacher Award and the 2007 SILS Outstanding Teacher of present a theory of search task difficulty that arose from the Year Award. She is the current ACM SIGIR treasurer results of a recent empirical study that evaluated a set of and served as conference program committee co-chair in search tasks that were constructed using a cognitive com- 2013. She serves on the editorial boards of several jour- plexity framework from educational theory. While results of nals including ACM Transaction on Information Systems, this study showed participants engaged in significantly more Information Processing & Management, and Information search activity when completing more cognitively complex Retrieval Journal. Kelly received a Ph.D., M.L.S. and a tasks, they did not evaluate more cognitively complex tasks graduate certificate in cognitive science from Rutgers Uni- as more difficult and were equally satisfied with their per- versity and a B.A. from the University of Alabama. formances across tasks. These findings have led to a new theory of search task difficulty that is rooted in expectancy and appraisal theories, and posits that when searchers first encounter a search task description, they first appraise the task and its requirements in the context of their abilities, de- sires and other aspects of the search situation (e.g., system familiarity, time limits) and then make an estimate of how much effort will be needed to complete the task to achieve their ideal level of performance. A search task, consequently, becomes “difficult” when expended effort exceeds expected effort. This theory differs from many current notions of search task difficulty that assume a linear relationship be- tween search task difficulty and search behavior. It also has implications for how search task difficulty is measured. References [1] B. W. Wildemuth, L. Freund, and E. G. Toms. Untan- gling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies. Journal of Documentation, 70(6):1118–1140, 2014. Copyright c 2015 for the individual papers by the papers’ authors. Copy- ing permitted for private and academic purposes. This volume is published and copyrighted by its editors. ECIR Supporting Complex Search Task Workshop ’15 Vienna, Austria Published on CEUR-WS: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1338/.