<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Morphotactic effects on the processing of Italian derivatives</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pier Marco Bertinetto</string-name>
          <email>bertinetto@sns.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Chiara Celata</string-name>
          <email>celata@sns.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luigi Talamo</string-name>
          <email>luigi.talamo@unibg.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Scuola Normale Superiore</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>P.zza dei Cavalieri 7, Pisa</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Università di Bergamo</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Piazzetta Verzieri 1, Bergamo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>109</fpage>
      <lpage>111</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper investigates the processing of Italian affixed forms differing for morphotactic transparency. A lexical decision task with immediate priming was used. Following the principles of morphotactic transparency and Natural Morphology, the priming effect was hypothesized to be stronger for items with a higher degree of morphotactic transparency. However, the predictions were not totally met. The paper discusses possible explanations from the theoretical and methodological points of view, and highlights potential developments of the research.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        According to Dressler (1985, 2005),
morphotactic transparency is one of the main
parameters within the universal markedness
theory of the so-called System-Independent
Morphological Naturalness. It assumes the
widespread existence of “opacifying obstructions”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Dressler, 2005: 272)</xref>
        in inflectional, derivational
or compounding processes, and is expressed by
preference degrees along a naturalness scale. The
most natural forms are those without opacifying
obstructions, followed by those based on mildly
opacifying phonological processes (such as
resyllabification), while allomorphic rules and
suppletion are the most opaque and least natural
morphological operations. In this approach,
natural is synonymous with cognitively simple,
iconic and therefore easy to acquire and process.
      </p>
      <p>This work investigates the native speakers’
processing of Italian affixed forms differing for
morphotactic transparency. Derived forms
pertaining to two different classes of morphotactic
transparency but matching for length, average
frequency, stress pattern, as well as
morphosemantic transparency were used as
immediate primes in a lexical decision task; the
corresponding underived words were used as
targets. Following the principles of morphotactic
transparency and Natural Morphology, the
priming effect was hypothesized to be stronger for
items with a higher degree of morphotactic
transparency.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Morphotactic Transparency</title>
      <p>
        To date, the only database for morphotactic
transparency of derivational processes is
derIvaTario, an open-source annotated lexicon of
about 11,000 Italian derivatives
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(&lt;derivatario.sns.it&gt;; see Talamo &amp; Celata,
2011; Talamo et al., submitted)</xref>
        . The lexical
source of derIvaTario is CoLFIS, Corpus e
Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Bertinetto et al. 2005)</xref>
        , a fully lemmatized
threemillions word corpus of written Italian, sampled
out of a carefully balanced variety of books,
journals and newspapers. CoLFIS was created
with the purpose of representing the mental
lexicon of the ideal Italian speaker – or, more
exactly, reader – as reliably as possible
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Laudanna et
al., 1995)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        derIvaTario takes into account several
morphological properties of the base and of each
affix involved in the derivational cycles, crucially
including morphotactic and morphosemantic
transparency
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref5">(see Libben, 1998 and Dressler,
2005 for the latter)</xref>
        . With respect to the former,
derIvaTario provides a value according to the
Universal Scale of Morphotactic Transparency
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Dressler, 1985 and 2005)</xref>
        . The scale values
range from mt1 to mt8, as shown in Appendix A.
The items used in the present experiment
belonged to two sets of derivatives, respectively
characterized by full transparency (mt1) and
relative opacity (mt4).
3
3.1
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Experiment</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Materials and methods</title>
      <p>Adult native Italian speakers participated in a
speeded lexical decision task with orthographic
stimuli. 32 words and 32 nonwords functioned as
targets. Each target (consisting of an underived
word) was immediately preceded by a prime in
three different conditions: morphological (e.g.
ribellione/ribelle, ‘rebellion/rebel’), identity
(ribelle/ribelle) and unrelated (xxxxxx/ribelle).
Participants saw each target in only one of the
three conditions. The test items are listed in
Appendix B.</p>
      <p>All primes were morphosemantically fully
transparent. Half of them were classified as mt1
according to derIvaTario (full transparency), the
other half as mt4 (with intervening
morphophonological opacifying process). The two
groups were carefully balanced for: (a) average
lexical frequencies of both primes and targets,
(b) length of prime and target (as measured by N
of phonemes and N of graphemes), and (c) type
of base. The last point needs clarification. As is
well-known, Italian morphology is not
wordbased, i.e. the base does not correspond to an
actual word. Since derIvaTario assumes 7 base
types, it was necessary to control for the possible
effect of this variable. Only the two most
frequent base types were used in the present
experiment: (i) root, i.e. an underived word without
inflectional ending (e.g. bellezza ‘beauty’ as
based on the root bell- of bello
‘beautiful.M.SG.’), (ii) verbal theme, i.e. a verb root plus
the thematic vowel (e.g. battimento ‘beat’ as
based on the verbal theme batti- of battere ‘to
beat’). These two base types were equally
distributed within the two word sets: 11 verbal
themes, 5 roots.</p>
      <p>Nonwords were created by replacing one
phoneme in real Italian derivatives and the
corresponding underived words. They had the same
average length as the test words.</p>
      <p>The order of words and nonwords was
randomized across participants. Before performing
the task, the participants were trained on a list of
8 items (4 words, 4 nonwords).</p>
      <p>The priming effect of the derivatives was
assessed as the average RT difference between the
morphological condition and the identity and
unrelated conditions. A statistically significant
interaction between priming condition
(morphological, identity, unrelated) and morphotactic
transparency (mt1 vs. mt4) would suggest that
the morphotactic contrast is cognitively salient.
3.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Repeated measure ANOVAs were run with
priming condition as within-subject factor and
morphotactic transparency as between-subject
factor. The mean results are shown in Table 1.
Comparing the morphological and the unrelated
conditions, mt1 primes facilitated target
recognition to a larger extent than mt4 primes. Similarly,
comparing the morphological condition with the
identity condition, mt4 primes slowed down
target recognition to a larger extent than mt1
primes. Although the general tendency was
consistent with the experimental hypothesis, the
interaction condition x morphotactic transparency
was not significant (Pillai’s trace F=0.547, p &gt;
.05). Thus, although the priming effect exerted
by mt4 derivatives onto the corresponding
underived words was weaker than the one yielded
by mt1 derivatives, the current experiment does
not support the initial hypothesis.
The purpose of this experiment was to
investigate whether morphotactic transparency is a
cognitively relevant factor in the processing of
Italian base forms when primed by corresponding
derivatives. A significant differential priming
effect was expected between mt1 and mt4
primes, which would have lent support to the
Universal Scale of Morphotactic Transparency as
implemented by derIvaTario. The experiment,
however, did not produce the expected result,
despite encouraging tendencies.</p>
      <p>A possible explanation for this result is the
strictly on-line character of the technique used
(immediate priming). As Laudanna et al. (2004)
have shown for verbal inflection, the effect of
complex morphological properties on the
processing of isolated words is more likely to be
detected in off-line techniques, such as free recall
tasks, implying a short-term and/or episodic
memory component.</p>
      <p>In addition, the assumed difference between
transparent and partially opaque derivatives in
priming their base forms might surface to a
larger extent when the morphological condition is
compared with a phonological priming condition
(e.g. colazione/colare ‘breakfast/percolate’), in
which no morphological relatedness is found
between the prime and the target, although their
formal relationship is the same as in a
morphologically related pair (e.g. formazione/formare
‘formation/form’). This hypothesis is currently
under investigation.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Appendix A. Scale of morphotactic transparency.</title>
      <p>DEGREE
mt1
mt2
mt4
mt6</p>
      <p>NATURE OF PHENOMENON
none
purely prosodic and phonological
(e.g. resyllabification, assimilation)
phonological, with neutralization of phonetic
constituents (e.g. flapping)
morpho-phonological, without loss of constituents
(e.g. articulatory weakening)
morpho-phonological, with loss of constituents
(e.g. deletion)
purely morphological
(e.g. paradigmatic alternation of affixes)
lexical: weak suppletion
lexical: strong suppletion</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Appendix B. Experimental words.</title>
      <p>Mt1
Mt4</p>
      <p>Prime
disegnatore
bruciatore
suggeritore
cancellazione
esclamazione
dominazione
nuotatore
accentuzione
bollitura
piegatura
fregatura
intrusione
perversione
ribellione
introversione
avversione</p>
      <p>Target
disegnare
bruciare
suggerire
cancellare
esclamare
dominare
nuotare
accentuare
bollire
piegare
fregare
intruso
perverso
ribelle
introverso
avverso</p>
      <p>Prime
traducibile
discutibile
tessitura
competitore
emettitore
roditore
scommettitore
perseguibile
godibile
cedimento
spargimento
rassegnazione
concitazione
desolazione
discrezione
depravazione
Target
tradurre
discutere
tessere
competere
emettere
rodere
scommettere
perseguire
godere
cedere
spargere
rassegnato
concitato
desolato
discreto
deparavato</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Pier</given-names>
            <surname>Marco</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bertinetto</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cristina Burani, Alessandro Laudanna, Lucia Marconi, Daniela Ratti, Claudia Rolando, and Anna Maria Thornton.
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS)</article-title>
          . http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/Home.htm Wolfgang U.
          <article-title>Dressler 1985</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>On the Predictiveness of Natural Morphology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Linguistics</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>321</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>337</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wolfgang U. Dressler</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Word-Formation in Natural Morphology</article-title>
          . In: Štichauer P.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lieber</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) Handbook of Word-Formation, Springer:
          <fpage>267</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>284</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Alessandro</given-names>
            <surname>Laudanna</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Simone Gazzellini, and Maria de Martino 2004.
          <article-title>Representation of grammatical properties of Italian verbs in the mental lexicon</article-title>
          .
          <source>Brain and Language</source>
          <volume>90</volume>
          :
          <fpage>95</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Alessandro</given-names>
            <surname>Laudanna</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Anna Maria Thornton, Giorgina Brown,
          <source>Cristina Burani, and Lucia Marconi</source>
          <year>1995</year>
          .
          <article-title>Un corpus dell'italiano scritto contemporaneo dalla parte del ricevente</article-title>
          . In: Bolasco S.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lebart</surname>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salem</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (
          <article-title>eds) III Giornate internazionali di Analisi Statistica dei Dati Testuali</article-title>
          , Roma: Cisu:
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>109</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Gary Libben</source>
          <year>1998</year>
          .
          <article-title>Semantic Transparency in the Processing of Compounds: Consequences for Representation, Processing</article-title>
          , and Impairment.
          <source>Brain and Language</source>
          <volume>61</volume>
          :
          <fpage>30</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>44</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Luigi Talamo and Chiara Celata</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>Toward a morphological analysis of the Italian lexicon: developing tools for a corpus-based approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>mt7 mt8</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>