<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Suffix perceptual salience in morphological processing: evidence from Italian</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hélène Giraudo</string-name>
          <email>giraudo@univ-tlse2.fr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Serena Dal Maso</string-name>
          <email>serena.dalmaso@univr.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Copyright © by the paper's authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Dip. Lingue e Letterature Straniere</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>In Vito Pirrelli, Claudia Marzi, Marcello Ferro (eds.): Word Structure and Word Usage. Proceedings of the NetWordS Final</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Conference, Pisa, March 30-April 1, 2015, published at http://ceur-ws.org</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Laboratoire CLLE (Equipe ERSS), CNRS &amp; Université Toulouse Jean Jaurès</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>120</fpage>
      <lpage>123</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The goal of the present research is to determine the role of suffixes and morphological schemas in the access and processing of Italian complex words and to investigate whether (and possibly to what extent) suffix salience affects such processes. Two experiments using the masked-priming methodology will contribute to verify if native speakers of Italian organize lexical items according to morphological series as they do according to morphological families.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>In usage-based approaches to language
representation and process (mainly Bybee’s Network
Model and Booij’s Constructional Morphology),
morphology is generally conceived as organizing
the lexicon according to two main dimensions: i)
morphological families, i.e. words connected
because sharing the same root: kind/ kindness/
kindly/ unkind/ kind-hearted, etc. and ii)
morphological series, i.e. words connected because
sharing the same affix kindness/ happiness/ sadness/
abruptness, etc. Psycholinguistic research has
mostly confirmed this view, demonstrating with
experimental data that words in the mental
lexicon are stored according to formal and semantic
similarity, thus following morphological
principles.</p>
      <p>
        More specifically, the relationship between
morphologically complex words and their roots
(or other members of the same morphological
family) has been extensively investigated by
means of the masked-priming experimental
paradigm
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref18 ref19 ref21 ref7">(i.e. Stanners, Neiser, Hernon &amp; Hall,
1979; Rastle, Davis, Marslen-Wilson &amp; Tyler,
2000; Clahsen, Sonnenstuhl &amp; Blevins, 2003;
Rastle, Davis &amp; New, 2004; Frost, Kugler,
Deutsch &amp; Forster, 2005)</xref>
        . This technique
focuses on the effect of the (visual) presentation of a
stimulus word (the ‘prime’) on the recognition of
a target word. Experimental results indicate that
the recognition of the target word is faster when
it is preceded by a morphologically related prime
(e.g. kindness/ KIND), compared to cases where
it is preceded by an unrelated word (e.g. raw/
KIND) or by an only orthographically similar
word (e.g. kin/ KIND; kite/ KIND). According to
Forster, these results show that “the cortical
representations of the prime and the target are
interconnected or overlap in some way such that the
representation of the prime automatically
activates the representation of the target word”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Forster, 1999)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        On the other hand, the relationship between
words with the same suffix and the same
morphological schema (in constructional terms), like
kindness/ happiness/ sadness, has been scarcely
investigated yet and results do not allow a
consistent and univocal interpretation.
MarslenWilson et al. 1996 investigated the role of
suffixes in English with a cross-modal technique and
found a significant priming effect for
morphologically related words (e.g. darkness/
TOUGHNESS) and no hints of orthographic priming
when the overlap did not involve real suffixes
(e.g. darkness / HARNESS). More recently,
Duñabeitia, Perea &amp; Carreiras 2008 found
significant facilitation effects on the recognition of
suffixed words in Spanish employing a series of
experiments with different degrees of prime
segmentation: 1) er/ WALKER; 2) %%%%er/
WALKER; 3) baker/ WALKER. The
experiments revealed priming effects in all the
conditions (independently from the degree of
segmentation of the prime) and a clear dissociation
between orthographic and morphological priming
(e.g. brevidad primes igualdad but volumen does
not prime certamen). Taken together these
results were interpreted as a strong evidence in
favor of an early prelexical morphological
decomposition (e.g.,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Duñabeitia et al., 2007</xref>
        ; Rastle et
al, 2004) of all forms that can be potentially split
into two “surface morphemes”
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(see for details
Rastle &amp; Davis, 2008)</xref>
        acknowledging to both
stems and affixes an equal status of access units
during word recognition.
      </p>
      <p>
        However, when
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Giraudo &amp; Grainger 2003</xref>
        addressed this issue using French materials and an
experimental design controlling the effect of
morphological primes relative to formal primes,
results did not show any reliable morphological
priming effect, i.e. both priming conditions
produced significant priming effects relative to the
unrelated baseline but the morphological
condition did not yield significantly faster RTs with
respect to the orthographic condition. Note that,
according to within priming comparisons, the
effect of morphological primes is compared to
the effect of the orthographic primes on the same
targets, e.g., fumet ‘scent’ - MURET ‘down wall’
vs. béret ‘beret’- MURET ‘down wall’,
considering that fumet and muret share the same
functional suffix –et, while béret and muret do not
because béret is a monomophemic word in French
and ber- is not a possible stem. Giraudo and
Grainger, who conversely found in the same
study clear morphological priming effects when
manipulating prefixed words, interpreted these
asymmetrical results on the base of different
semantic and syntactic functions carried by
prefixes and suffixes in French. An alternative
explanation for the results of Giraudo &amp; Grainger
study could be linked to the issue of perceptual
salience of suffixes (i.e. their size and
segmentalprosodic features) and to the connected degree of
suffix likelihood (the probability for a word to be
a suffixed word). As a matter of fact, it seems
that the more a word ending is salient and
functionally consistent, the stronger the probability it
is a suffix.
2
      </p>
      <p>The present study</p>
      <p>On such premises, in the present research we
verify by means of a masked priming experiment
and a within-comparison design whether the
processing of morphologically complex words is
affected by the morphological schema and, more
specifically, whether the processing is affected
by the formal salience of the suffix.</p>
      <p>We choose to run the experiments on Italian
not only because Italian has a rich, productive
and relatively regular morphology, but also
because, being a phonetically ‘conservative’
language, at least significantly more conservative
than French, Italian has relatively long suffixes
(e.g. lat. -ĭttu(m) &gt; it. -etto vs. fr. –et, realized
phonetically as [e] as in it. muretto/fr. muret).</p>
      <p>
        Moreover, as a result of the fact that Italian
has undergone little phonological reduction, it
has a high degree of orthographic transparency
and consistency, which can contribute to the
perception and representation of functional word
endings
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">(Taft 2003)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>Finally, although in Italian the great majority
of suffixed words are paroxytone, i.e. stressed on
the penultimate syllable, as suffix generally carry
the word stress, there is a limited number of
proparoxytone words (i.e. stressed on the third to
last syllable, with a suffix which does not carry
the word stress). Consequently, suffixed words in
Italian can have different prosodic contours and
suffixes can show different degrees of perceptual
prominence at the prosodic level. For these
reasons, we considered Italian as an ideal test
situation to verify the role of salience on suffixed
word processing and access.</p>
      <p>More precisely, for our experiments we
selected some productive suffixes –tore, –ico and -etto
because they show different segmental and
prosodic features.</p>
      <p>
        Moreover, they have different degrees of
functional consistency, i.e. a different
proportion between suffixed and non-suffixed words
(i.e. monomophemic words) in a series of
words ending with a given letter string
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Laudanna et al. 1994)</xref>
        . As a matter of fact, while
78% of the words ending with –tore and
52,04% of words with –ico are suffixed, only
20% of the words ending with –etto is suffixed
(quantitative data are taken from COLFIS and
Derivatario). The criteria according to which
we defined the perceptual salience of the
suffixes are:
      </p>
      <p>
        i. size of the suffix (number of phonemes
and graphemes);
ii. different degrees of morpho-tactic
transparency
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Dressler 1985)</xref>
        and of
phonological integration of the suffix to the base, in
particular in relation to the phenomenon of:
-­‐ resyllabification: no resyllabification
takes place with -tore which has always two
syllables, independently from the root,
whereas –ico, and –etto, starting with a vowel, are
more integrated with the stem ([i] and [e]
become the coda of the last syllable of the stem
(sto.ria/ sto.ri.co) and the suffixed word is
resyllabified);
      </p>
      <p>
        -­‐ morphological boundary: with -tore the
boundary of the suffix always coincides with
the boundary of the syllable, whereas with –
ico and –etto the suffix is split in the two last
syllables. In the Natural Morphology
framework, the more the morphology overlaps with
the phonological components (i.e. the higher
the morpho-tactic transparency) the easier the
recognition;
iii. word stress: the suffixes -tore and –etto
always carries the word stress, while -ico does
not. Moreover, in Italian, the stressed syllable
has a long vowel [–’to:re] which, although not
phonological, may constitute a perceptual hint
for an easier identification. Finally, words
with –tore and –etto show the more frequent
stress pattern in Italian
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref23 ref4">(about 80% of the
words have the word stress on the penultimate
syllable, Thornton, Iacobini &amp; Burani 1997,
see Burani &amp; Arduino 2004 and Giraudo &amp;
Montermini 2010 on the effect of stress
regularity and stress consistency in stress
assignment for Italian words)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>According to these criteria – tore is the most
salient suffix and –etto is more salient than –ico.</p>
      <p>In the first experiment we will verify: a)
whether words with a perceptually salient suffix
like –tore are recognized faster than words with a
less salient suffix like –ico. If this would be the
case, the word lavoratore should prime
viaggiatore better than ironico primes metallico; b)
whether a word belonging to a more consistent
word ending series (like –tore) is recognized
faster than a word belonging to a less consistent
word ending series (like –etto). According to this
hypothesis, we expect higher priming effect for
words with –tore than for words with –etto.</p>
      <p>The affix condition (our test condition), i.e.
the effect of the presentation of a suffixed word
as a prime on the recognition of a complex target
word with the same suffix (servitore/
EDUCATORE, sinfonico / NOSTALGICO, boschetto/
PEZZETTO), will be considered in relation to 3
other conditions: the identity condition
(educatore/ EDUCATORE, nostalgico/ NOSTALGICO,
pezzetto/ PEZZETTO) which should yield the
main facilitation effect and consequently the
shortest RTs and the unrelated condition
(colomba / EDUCATORE, approccio/ NOSTALGICO,
ombelico/ PEZZETTO) which, on the contrary, is
expected to yield the smallest facilitation effect
and the longest RTs. These two conditions are
considered as baselines to assess RTs obtained in
the test condition. Moreover, in the stem
condition we will contrast the strength of the
connection between words with the same suffix and
morphological schema (test condition) with the
strength of the connection between words
sharing the same stem (educare / EDUCATORE,
nostalgia / NOSTALGICO, pezzo / PEZZETTO).</p>
      <p>In the second experiment we will focus on the
issue of the sequential organization of the word,
namely that the access and processing of a
suffixed word is affected by the position of the
suffix at the end of the word and by the (visual)
perception of the final part of the word. In order to
verify this aspect, we will use the same critical
materials as in the first experiment but we will
manipulate the location of the fixation point.</p>
      <p>Specifically, in the forward mask which
precedes the presentation of the prime/target pairs,
the fixation marks (####), whose aim is to focus
attention on a certain point of the screen, will
overlap with the suffix position.</p>
      <p>To sum up, our research will contribute to
verify the role of suffixes and morphological
schemas in the access and processing of Italian
complex words and to investigate whether (and
possibly to what extent) suffix salience affects such
process. Results will indicate if native speakers
of Italian organize lexical items according to
morphological series as they do according to
morphological families.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Alessandro</given-names>
            <surname>Laudanna</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Cristina Burani, Antonella
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cermele</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Prefixes as processing units</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language and Cognitive Processes</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>295</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>316</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bertinetto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Laudanna</surname>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marconi</surname>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ratti</surname>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rolando</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thornton</surname>
            <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS)</article-title>
          . http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/CoLFIS_home.htm.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Booij</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <source>Construction Morphology</source>
          . Oxford: Oxford University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arduino</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns</article-title>
          .
          <source>Brain and Language</source>
          ,
          <volume>90</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>318</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>325</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bybee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1988</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Morphology as lexical organization</article-title>
          . In M. Hammond &amp; M. Noonan (eds.),
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Theoretical</given-names>
            <surname>Morphology</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Approaches to modern linguistics (pp.
          <fpage>119</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>142</lpage>
          ). San Diego: Academic Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bybee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Regular morphology and the lexicon</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language and Cognitive Processes</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          ,
          <issue>5</issue>
          ,
          <fpage>425</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>55</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clahsen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sonnenstuhl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blevins</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Derivational morphology in the German mental lexicon: A Dual Mechanism account</article-title>
          . In H. Baayen &amp; R. Schreuder (Eds.),
          <source>Morphological structure in language processing</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>155</lpage>
          ). Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dressler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1985</year>
          ).
          <article-title>On the predictiveness of Natural Morphology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Linguistics</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>321</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Duñabeitia J. A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Perea</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Carreiras</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>M.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for morpho-orthographic decomposition</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cognition</source>
          <volume>105</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>691</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>703</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Forster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1984</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>680</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>698</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Forster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The microgenesis of priming effects in lexical access</article-title>
          .
          <source>Brain and Language</source>
          ,
          <volume>68</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Frost</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kugler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deutsch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Forster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: principles of lexical organization in a given language</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1293</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1326</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Giraudo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grainger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>On the role of derivational affixes in recognizing complex words: Evidence from masked affix priming</article-title>
          . In R. H. Baayen and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Schreuder</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.),
          <source>Morphological Structure in Language Processing</source>
          . Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin,
          <fpage>209</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>232</lpage>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Giraudo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Montermini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Primary stress assignment in Italian: linguistic and experimental issues</article-title>
          .
          <source>Lingue e Linguaggio</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>129</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nespor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vogel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ). Prosodic Phonology. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Orsolini</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marslen-Wilson W.D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ),
          <article-title>Universals in morphological representation: Evidence from Italian</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language and Cognitive Processes</source>
          <volume>12</volume>
          :
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>47</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rastle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          <article-title>Morphological decomposition based on the analyses of orthography</article-title>
          .
          <source>In : Language and Cognitive Processes</source>
          .
          <volume>23</volume>
          ,
          <issue>7</issue>
          -
          <fpage>8</fpage>
          , p.
          <fpage>942</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>971</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rastle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>New</surname>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychonomic Bulletin and Review</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1090</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1098</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rastle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Marslen-Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.D.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Tyler</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>L.K.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study</article-title>
          .
          <source>Language and Cognitive Processes</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>4-5</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>507</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>537</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reid</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marslen-Wilson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ),
          <article-title>Lexical representation of morphologically complex words: Evidence from Polish</article-title>
          . In Baayen,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.H.</given-names>
            &amp;
            <surname>Schreuder</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>R</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (eds.),
          <source>Morphological Structure in Language Processing</source>
          ,
          <fpage>287</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>336</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stanners</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Neiser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hernon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hall</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1979</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Memory representation for morphologically related words</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>399</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>412</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Taft</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning</article-title>
          . In E. Assink, &amp; D. Sandra (Eds.) Reading complex words. Amsterdam: Kluwer,
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>137</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thornton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Iacobini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burani</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>BDVDB Una base di dati sul Vocabolario di Base della lingua italiana, seconda edizione riveduta e ampliata</article-title>
          . Roma. Bulzoni
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vroomen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>de Gelder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Lexical access of resyllabified words: evidence from phoneme monitoring</article-title>
          .
          <source>Memory and Cognition</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>413</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>