=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1418/paper20
|storemode=property
|title=OPC UA Interface for a BPM Suite to Enable Seamless Process Management
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1418/paper20.pdf
|volume=Vol-1418
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/bpm/KannengiesserNH15
}}
==OPC UA Interface for a BPM Suite to Enable Seamless Process Management==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1418/paper20.pdf
OPC UA Interface for a BPM Suite to Enable Seamless
Process Management
Udo Kannengiesser1, Matthias Neubauer2 and Richard Heininger1
1Metasonic GmbH, Münchner Str. 29 – Hettenshausen, 85276 Pfaffenhofen, Germany
{udo.kannengiesser,richard.heininger}@metasonic.de
2Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik –
Communications Engineering, Altenbergerstaße 69, 4040 Linz, Austria
matthias.neubauer@jku.at
Abstract. This demonstration presents an interface for the seamless integration
of business processes and production processes. Specifically, the interface de-
fines the data to be exchanged between the execution engine of the Metasonic
Suite and the communication standard OPC Unified Architecture (OPC UA) that
is widely used in industrial process automation. This allows business processes
to trigger and react to changes in physical processes, thus increasing the scope
and the real-world awareness of BPM. The BPM conference participants will
learn how to model and execute such real-world aware business processes based
on examples from an ongoing EU research project. The target audience of this
demo includes BPM researchers interested in approaches to seamless process
management in production enterprises.
Keywords: Seamless process integration; OPC UA; S-BPM
1 Introduction and Significance
1.1 Innovation
The benefits of business process management (BPM) have been recognized in many
domains. Most of the approaches and tools in BPM are sufficiently generic to be applied
to a large variety of domain-specific processes. One of the industries using BPM is
manufacturing. While in this industry business processes are certainly considered im-
portant, they are not considered to be the core processes. It is the physical processing
and movement of materials on the shopfloor, with associated manual or automated ac-
tivities, that is the predominant concern of production managers and production work-
ers alike. On the other hand, most physical production processes need to be smoothly
embedded in the company’s business operations; for example, production cannot start
before raw materials are ordered and delivered, and products cannot be shipped before
their production is completed. Seamlessly integrating processes across business and
production is a major concern for next-generation manufacturing [1].
Copyright ©2015 for this paper by its authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.
The issue of seamless process management can be described using the IEC 62264
control hierarchy [2] shown on the left-hand side of Fig. 1. This hierarchy represents
the processes in production companies at four levels: field instrumentation control
(Level 1), process control (Level 2), manufacturing operations management (Level 3),
and business planning & logistics (Level 4). As these levels impose distinct require-
ments on processes with respect to real-time processing, data storage, safety and secu-
rity, the development of models and systems at each level has been undertaken rather
independently. This has resulted in poorly integrated applications especially between
Low Level Control (LLC, i.e. Levels 1 and 2) operating in real time and High Level
Control (HLC, i.e. Levels 3 and 4) operating in non-real time. Systems developed for
LLC include Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs), and systems for HLC include
ERP, MES and BPM.
This paper presents an interface developed for the Metasonic BPM Suite that allows
exchanging data with PLCs via the OPC UA [3] standard. OPC UA includes specifica-
tions for semantic data models that can be exchanged via web services or binary proto-
cols. The interface presented in this paper is the first OPC UA interface for a BPM tool
that uses the subject-oriented (S-BPM) approach [4]. S-BPM is unique in that it modu-
larises processes by encapsulating the behaviour of process actors (called “subjects”)
and coordinating them via messages. Unlike most monolithic process models based on
global control flow, S-BPM models can be easily modified as the effects of changes
can be limited to the individual modules of the process. As shown on the right-hand
side of Fig. 1, a generic “PLC subject” encapsulates an LLC process that uses the OPC
UA standard to exchange data with a PLC. When changes in the LLC process become
necessary (e.g. when low-level manufacturing steps need to be reconfigured for a new
product variant), only the behaviour of the PLC subject needs to be modified (with
potential renegotiation of its message exchanges with other subjects) rather than the
complete process model. This reduces change effort and increases agility.
Fig. 1. Seamless process integration across the IEC 62262 control hierarchy (image on left-
hand side adapted from [1]), based on S-BPM process models and OPC UA
1.2 Features
The features of the OPC UA interface have been derived from the structure of the
OPC UA standard [3, 5]. OPC UA systems apply the fundamental client-server concept
to implement the interaction between different communication partners, e.g. a work-
flow engine (client) and a plant floor PLC (made accessible via an OPC UA server). To
allow requesting services provided by an OPC UA server or within a network of OPC
UA servers, OPC UA defines an AddressSpace model. In such an AddressSpace an
OPC UA server defines which contents (i.e. nodes representing objects, variables,
methods etc. for real objects) are visible/editable for clients. Servers also allow clients
to monitor attributes and events at the server. Every client can subscribe to the attributes
and events it is interested in and will then be notified accordingly.
The following features have been developed: (1) configure the endpoint of the
server, (2) configure the relevant node (e.g. variable, method, and event), (3) read/write
variables from/to business objects, (4) invoke methods on the server, and (5) subscribe
to attributes or events provided by the server. Features 3, 4 and 5 are schematically
described in Fig. 2 using the example of a “PLC subject” in the Metasonic Suite inter-
acting with a PLC. Fig. 3 shows the user interface (called “refinement template” in the
Metasonic Suite) for configuring a process step, using a lighting control process as an
example. In the example, the activity “Switch Light On” is configured to set the value
of a variable provided by an OPC UA server based on the value of a field in a business
object. The usage is illustrated in Fig. 3 using three highlighted steps. Step 1 defines
the dedicated OPC UA server endpoint. For a valid server URL the available nodes are
displayed in a tree, from which the desired node can be selected (step 2). Finally, the
field of the business object value to be written to the selected node is selected (step 3).
Fig. 2. Schematic feature presentation
After modelling and configuring all subject behaviours, the process can be executed
in Metasonic’s workflow engine. A screenshot of the user interface for executing the
lighting control process is shown in Fig. 4.
1. Configure Endpoint
2. Configure Node
3. Configure Business Object value
Fig. 3. Writing a value from a business object to an OPC UA server variable
Fig. 4. Process execution – Lighting control example
2 Maturity
The OPC UA interface is currently at the prototype stage. It is a result of ongoing
research in the SO-PC-Pro project (Subject-Orientation for People-Centred Produc-
tion). It has been tested within four application scenarios. In the first scenario, a process
for managing sun-blinds in a smart home has been modelled and executed. In the sec-
ond scenario, the prototype has been used to manage room lights in offices at different
locations. In the third scenario, the power consumption of production machines in a
medium-sized manufacturing company has been measured and analysed for process
control and improvement. In the fourth scenario, an assembly process has been mod-
elled in which the stress level of a worker (measured using a wearable sensor) is indi-
cated by LED lights (green | yellow | red). A video showing the interoperation between
the Metasonic Suite, a PLC for controlling the LEDs and a wearable sensor is available
at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBi7Alv-dpE
3 Conclusion
The tool presented in this paper represents a new feature for Metasonic’s S-BPM
modelling suite: an OPC UA interface for exchanging data between the workflow exe-
cution engine Metasonic Flow and PLCs. This feature allows modelling processes that
span across all conceptual levels of production enterprises, making business processes
able to respond to real-time events and trigger automated physical processes. Seamless
process management capabilities are a key enabler of future production models such as
internet-of-things (IoT) manufacturing.
Acknowledgements. The research leading to these results has received funding from
the EU Seventh Framework Programme FP7-2013-NMP-ICT-FOF(RTD) under grant
agreement n° 609190 (www.so-pc-pro.eu).
References
1. Gerber T., Theorin A. and Johnsson C. (2014) Towards a seamless integration between pro-
cess modeling descriptions at business and production levels: work in progress, Journal of
Intelligent Manufacturing 25(5), pp. 1089-1099.
2. IEC 62264-1:2013 Enterprise-control system integration – Part 1: Models and terminology,
International Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
3. IEC 62541-1:2008 OPC Unified Architecture – Part 1: Overview and Concepts, Interna-
tional Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.
4. Fleischmann A., Schmidt W., Stary C., Obermeier S. and Börger E. (2012) Subject-Oriented
Business Process Management, Springer, Berlin.
5. IEC 62541-3:2010 OPC Unified Architecture – Part 3: Address Space Model, International
Electrotechnical Commission, Geneva.