Humor can improve a performance of creative problem solving; this phenomenon was repeatedly demonstrated in various studies. However, mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still unclear. We analyze the possible mechanisms of how humor facilitates creative problem solving. The experiment demonstrates that preliminary humor production facilitates insight problem solving. There is no such an effect in noninsight problems. Humor and stress relief similarly facilitate visual insight problem solving. We suggest that facilitation effect of humor and stress relief is based on the attentional mechanisms of defocusing.
A few studies have shown that an affective influence
facilitates the creative problem solving and creativity
Humor can not be unambiguously attributed to the affective or cognitive processes; hence definition and operationalization of humor and its effects on solver are strongly hindered. To understand the possible mechanisms of relationship between humor and problem solving process we should compare their psychological components. Processes underlying humor production and understanding are similar to insight problem solving process in many ways. The list of similarities include affective and cognitive processes, which, in our opinion, are related to common nature of humor and insight.
A number of common features can demonstrate
structural and phenomenological similarity of insight and
humor. First, an instantaneous understanding is the basis
of humor and insight
Second, insight and humor are accompanied by positive
emotions, which are connected with the understanding of
a problem or a joke. The positive emotion can persist even
after an experimenter told a right answer or explained a
joke, when a solver was not able to understand a joke or a
problem. A special genre of creative (insight) problems,
which has a common structure with a verbal joke, is funny
riddles
Third, problem solving and understanding of jokes are
based on the internal conflict or collision between at least
two cognitive schemes. A text can be interpreted as a
humorous, if two conditions are observed: 1) text is
compatible and actualizes two different scripts; 2) these
scripts are opposite
4. Humor and insight problem solving are likely to
involve a violation of prohibitions. One of the possible
mechanisms of thinking “outside the box” and functional
fixedness overcoming in insight problem solving is
relaxation of constraints in strategies and problem
representation
Cognitive mechanisms are associated with the actualization of contradictory scripts and ways of solving the two scripts collision. These mechanisms may contribute to overcome the limitations in problem solving by variation of a set of heuristics and problem elements. They can create presetting of remote associations searching and contribute to “go beyond” in representation of a problem. The impact of cognitive mechanisms can be content specific and content nonspecific.
Affective (affective-regulatory) mechanisms of humor, in its turn, aim to reduce emotional strain in a situation of problem solving, as well as contribute to increase the overall level of resources, which it related with the efficiency of problem solving.
In this experiment, we planned to reproduce the effect of facilitation of insight problem solving by humor and to answer a number of potential objections to this phenomenon. First, the standard research paradigm of humor and affective facilitation studies involves the presentation of positively stained stimuli (such as video fragments). In this case, we observe a passive perception of humor and emotional reaction to a joke. Participants in positive mood respond more originally and creative; they set remote associations and solve insight problems more sufficiently. In this study, we plan to test a reproducibility of the effect of facilitation provided by participant’s humor production. Humor production can include additional cognitive mechanisms of joke generation, which can affect the problem solving in another way.
Second, humor facilitates insight problem solving, but its specificity for insight problem requires verification. We need to compare how humor affects the insight and noninsight problem solving. In addition, humor can differently facilitate different types of representation formats that can indicate different mechanisms of facilitation. In this study, we decided to compare textual format (semantic processes) and visual format (perceptual processes).
Third, the humor has a social nature, and insight can be a phenomenon of social interaction. The situation of the experiment, which tests the participant’s ability to solve creative problems, itself, can be a source of frustration, stress, and excessive motivation, which can reduce an effectiveness of insight problem solving. Hence, facilitation may be a consequence of stress relief in the situation of communication with an experimenter. We have tried to include the variable of stress relief via a confidential conversation between the subject and the experimenter. According to our idea, such a conversation can reduce motivational and emotional stress in respect of problem solving as well as a humor.
The hypotheses are: 1. Humor production facilitates insight problem solving.
2. The effect of facilitation of insight problem solving is a result of stress relief in the situation of interaction with an experimenter.
3. Humor specifically facilitates insight problems of various representation format.
The main study sample consists of 36 participants, aged 17 to 45 years (М = 24.3, σ = 6.96). The study involved university and school students, people with secondary and higher education. All participated on a voluntary basis, without additional motivation. The preliminary study sample consists of 10 participants, aged 20 to 22 years (М = 20.8, σ = 0.79), to equalize the difficulty of problems.
Before the experiment, a set of six problems was established. According to results of the preliminary study with 10 participants who did not participate in the main series, we selected four problems with equal time of solution to control difficulty for the main series of the experiment. We used two types of problems: insight and noninsight problems and two types of representation format: textual and visual format. The textual insight problem: “Two men play five games of checkers. Each man wins the even number of games. There are no ties. How is that possible?” The textual noninsight problem: “There are five bulbs: red, green, yellow, blue and gold. How many ways are there to decorate five trees if you want each tree to wear only one bulb?” The visual insight problem: “Remove three matches to get only three triangles”. The visual noninsight problem: “Find the perimeter of the given figure. The dimensions are 1 cm x 1 cm. Give an answer in square centimeters.” using the sentence completion test (examples: “Most of all, I would like…”, “I hope that…”). Two experimental conditions were equalized by using the same number of statements for the completion. In the control condition (neutral condition) participants did not receive stimuli for emotional priming.
Each group of participants received four problems to solve. In each group, the emotional priming corresponding to the condition was presented before each problem solving. The duration of problems and priming tasks performance was pre-equalized. The sequence of priming tasks and problems was randomly varied. Time of each problem solving is the efficiency parameter of the experimental exposure. Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA with repeated measures, Mann-Whitney Utest, Wilcoxon T-test.
Participants solved the presented problems completely. According to the ANOVA with repeated measures, the factor of problems type significantly affects the time of solution (F(1, 144) = 12.15, p < .001, ηp2 = .27). Humor significantly facilitates insight problem solving. There are significant differences in solution time between insight and noninsight problems in the stress relief condition (T(24) = 43, p <.01) and humor production (T(23) = 49, p <.01), whereas there are no such differences in neutral condition. showed no significant differences (U(24) = 212, p = .12). This means that the stress relief is not enough for the effect of facilitation.
In addition to differences between insight and noninsight problems there are significant differences in problem solving of various representation formats (F(1, 144) = 36.38, p < .001, ηp2 = .52). Visual problems are solved quickly in general. The interactions between problem type and the type of representation was not found (F(1, 144) = .35, p = .56, ηp2 = .01).
Thus, humor production can facilitate insight problem solving. There is no significant effect of humor production in noninsight problem solving. We found that participants solve insight problems in humor production condition significantly faster comparing to neutral condition. These findings are supported by a) the aggregate data: humor production condition significantly different from the neutral condition without reference to types of representations; and b) visual format of representation data: humor production condition significantly different from the neutral condition in solving of visual insight problems. That means that humor specifically affects creative problems and this supports the assumption about the relationship between humor and the creative process. At the same time, we have not found the facilitation effect in textual insight problem solving.
The most previous studies demonstrated that humor comprehension facilitate insight problems. There was a lack of information about how participant’s activity in the humor production influences problem solving. We can conclude that the production of humor can facilitate insight problem solving as well as the humor comprehension. Hypothetically, the mechanisms of facilitation by the humor production and the humor comprehension may be common or similar.
We have received conflicting data on the role of stress relief in insight problem solving. On the one hand, the average data show that the stress relief is not sufficient to affect insight problem solving in general. It may be interpreted as stress relief is an important component of humor that can contributes facilitation in a situation of communication with an experimenter, but simple relaxation is not enough to improve the efficiency of problem solving. On the other hand, an independent review of the data of problem solving with the different formats of representation demonstrates that stress relief as well as humor similarly affects problem solving. Neither stress relief nor humor does not affect the textual insight problem solving. However, both stress relief and humor significantly affect the visual insight problem solving. It means that stress relief and humor affect insight problems the same way. Relaxation (or stress relief under the experimental conditions) can be an important component of the facilitation, particularly, of visual insight problems.
We found that humor specifically facilitates insight problems of the various formats of representation. Humor significantly facilitates only visual insight problem solving. There is no facilitation effect in the textual insight problem. As mentioned above, the stress relief condition demonstrates the same pattern.
These results can be interpreted from the different points of view. First, we assumed that humor as well as stress relief facilitate problem solving via a changes in social interaction between participant and experimenter. Relaxation, the tension reducing, and the motivation decreasing must affect insight problems in general. However, we can see clearly that facilitation effect has representational specificity, which is difficult to interpret solely by social interaction.
Second, we can use the working memory model to
understand how different representations of problems are
related with independent variables (humor production and
stress relief tasks). The problems’ formats of
representation used in the experiment are correlated with
the slave systems of working memory
Third, one of the possible interpretations of the facilitation effect is arousal increase. Arousal can provide an additional cognitive resource for problem solving. However, arousal should have a nonspecific impact on problem solving. It is not clear why insight problems are more sensitive to arousal than noninsight problems as well as why visual insight problems are more sensitive to arousal than textual insight problems.
Fourth, we assume that a crucial difference between
facilitation effect of humor and stress relief is based on
the attentional mechanisms. Facilitation effect appears to
be associated with low-level perceptual processes,
because the effect is significant only in the visual insight
problem. Insight problems are related to perceptual
processes of gestalt restructuring
Finally, we have to notice some limitations of the research. In our experiment, we used only two insight problems. The visual insight problem can be solved via defocusing of the visual representation of triangles presented to the participants. Nevertheless, the textual insight problem used in the experiment do not have key markers of representation in text that should be defocused. This problem is based on the biases of mental models of the proposed situation. Thus, the insight problems used in our research have different formats of representation and different structures.
We can conclude that our experiment demonstrated that humor production facilitates insight problem solving. Humor and stress relief similarly affects insight problem solving which allows us to assume the common or similar nature of facilitation mechanisms. Humor specifically facilitates visual insight problem solving. We suggest that facilitation effect of humor and stress relief is based on the attentional mechanisms of defocusing. However, the specific facilitation of the representational format and the problem structure in insight problem solving requires further investigation.
This work is supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 15-06-07899а) and President grant MK-3877.2015.6.