<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Access and Use of Contextual Expectations in Visual Search during Aging</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Moreno I. Coco (micoco@psicologia.ulisboa.pt)</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>MB is now at Maastricht University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>FPN</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Lisbon, Department of Psychology, Alameda da Universidade</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1600-214 Lisboa</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>358</fpage>
      <lpage>363</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Expectations are routinely utilized by the cognitive system to facilitate processing and optimize responses. However, as we age, the access and use of expectations might undergo significant changes. In an eye-tracking study, we investigate how search performance in young and old age is influenced by contextual priming of expectations, and the contextual consistency of the target object. We demonstrate that older participants congruently primed perform significantly worse, especially when the target object is inconsistent with the scene context (e.g., exposed to a 'restaurant' scene before performing the search in another 'restaurant' scene, but looking for an 'iron' rather than 'bread'). Even though congruency and consistency differentially impact on the eye-movement responses of the two age groups, they do not display any interaction. Overall, this study suggests that reliance on mechanisms of contextual expectations becomes stronger when we get older.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>aging</kwd>
        <kwd>active vision</kwd>
        <kwd>visual search</kwd>
        <kwd>contextual expectations</kwd>
        <kwd>priming</kwd>
        <kwd>eye-movements</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Plates and forks are more likely to be found in kitchens than
in bathrooms. Expectations of this sort are constantly
generated by our cognitive system to predictively anticipate the
state of events, and pro-actively generate appropriate
responses
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref5">(Bar, 2007; Clark, 2013)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        Visual attention is a cognitive modality that relies heavily
on such contextual expectations to maximize performance in
visual tasks
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Torralba, Oliva, Castelhano, &amp; Henderson,
2006)</xref>
        . In particular, the allocation of visual attention in
search tasks improves when semantic information of the
target is combined with the contextual information wherein
the target is embedded
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Malcolm &amp; Henderson, 2010)</xref>
        .
Moreover, this joint use of target and context information
can occur at early stages of search, as long as the quality and
quantity of the contextual information available is adequate
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">(Spotorno, Malcolm, &amp; Tatler, 2014)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        However, as we age, the visual system deteriorates and
performance on visual tasks starts to decrease
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref4">(Potter,
Grealy, Elliott &amp; Andrés, 2012; Brockmole and Logie, 2013)</xref>
        . In
particular, visual search for a target, manipulated on
lowlevel features (e.g., color, shape and orientation) and
embedded in an array of distractors (set of increasing sizes)
worsens with increasing age
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Humphrey &amp; Kramer, 1997)</xref>
        , even
though the age-related differences do not manifest to same
extent in short visual-working memory
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Brockmole, Parra,
Sala, &amp; Logie, 2008)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        Most of the above studies on aging focused on low-level
features, with few other studies approaching this topic from
a naturalistic perspective, where knowledge-based rather
than stimulus-based processing is examined
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Park, 2012)</xref>
        .
Thus, it remains an open question whether knowledge-based
expectancy mechanisms undergo similar changes to those
observed on low-level stimulus based information. In this
study, we precisely investigate the role of expectations by
comparing younger and older observers in a visual search,
contextual priming task situated in naturalistic scenes.
      </p>
      <p>Priming paradigms are used to probe, and activate,
semantic representations in memory. For example, if a prime
word is semantically related to a target word (plant-grass),
participants' lexical decision responses are shorter than
when the prime word does not belong to the same semantic
category (Stanovich &amp; West, 1981).</p>
      <p>
        Effects of priming manifest also during visual attention.
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Mudrik and Koch (2013)</xref>
        , for example, show in a
congruency detection task that contextual priming occurs
unconsciously, with scenes presented for as little as 33ms.
Moreover, repeated exposure to the same visual scene can
improve the speed of search, but only for the same target
object (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Vo &amp; Wolfe, 2012</xref>
        ). Additionally, as aging impacts on
executive control and inhibition suppression, search
performance in seniors would benefit from valid cues, and
conversely, take longer to recover from invalid cues (e.g.,
Müller-Oehring, et. al. 2013)
      </p>
      <p>The main goal of the current study is to establish how
contextual expectations are utilized by the visual system by
younger (under 25 years) and senior (over 65 years)
participants during a search task. In particular, using a priming
paradigm, we probe the congruency of contextual
information between two scenes (the prime scene and the search
scene), sequentially presented (e.g., bathroom-bathroom,
versus, kitchen-bathroom), and the consistency of the target
object with the search scene (e.g., a toothpaste versus a
fork). In line with research showing that seniors have
difficulties with inconsistent cues, we expect them to display a
significantly worst search performance when the target
object is inconsistent with the primed information. Their
difficulties with inhibition suppression would imply an
increased difficulty to detect a target object when it
inconsistently deviates from the congruently primed contextual
expectations.
In this eye-tracking study, we compare the behavioural
performance (accuracy and response time), and attentional
responses (search latency, first fixation and total gaze) of
younger and older participants in a visual search task
situated in naturalistic scenes. We investigate how contextual
priming and the semantic consistency of the search target
mediates performance during aging.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Method</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Participants</title>
        <p>Fifty-four participants Portuguese native speakers, divided
into two age groups: 32 younger (28 women), age 22.63
(SD = 9.03), University students; and 22 older volunteers
(19 women), age 67.9 (SD = 4.75), mostly recruited from
senior universities, with no medical history of
neuropsychological illness Both groups had normal or
corrected to normal vision. The study was approved by the
Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology,
University of Lisbon (FPUL).</p>
        <p>All participants underwent the Montreal Cognitive
Assessment Test - Portuguese Version (MoCA) (Simões et al.,
2008), used as a criteria to detect potential mild cognitive
deficit, especially for the older group. The MoCA was
applied on paper with instructions given orally. The young
group scored an average of 27.1 out of 30 on the MoCA (SD
= 1.83), while the elderly group scored an average of 24 out
of 30 (SD = 2.81). The groups significantly differ in their
performance, t(32.8) = 4.46, p &lt; 0.001), however, none of
the participants in the elderly group performed below the
cut-off score of 19.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Design</title>
        <p>Our 2x2x2 experimental design crosses object Consistency
(Consistent or Inconsistent), contextual Congruency
(Congruent, Incongruent) between the prime scene and search
scene, and a between-participants age Group condition
(younger or older participant). Refer to Figure 1 for an
example of the design material and Figure 2 for the trial run.
For example, a participant could be primed with a
Restaurant scene, then presented with another Restaurant scene, and
previously asked to search for a basket of bread. This
example corresponds to the Congruent and Consistent
experimental condition.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>Material</title>
        <p>We utilize 42 experimental scenes, 42 filler scenes and 84
prime scenes, which are all naturalistic, real-world
photographs. In particular, the 42 experimental items were
drawn from 7 different indoor scenarios (Restaurant,
Church, Office, Waiting Room, Bathroom, Living Room,
and Kitchen) with 6 items per scenario. The scenes were
captured in Lisbon, and surrounding areas, with a congruent
or an incongruent object placed by the photographer (refer
to section Validity pre-tests of experimental material for
details on the validation of the consistency between the
target objects and the search scene). The position of the
target object was counterbalanced with left-right conditions
to avoid the development of search strategies. We decided to
take photographs of the scenes to obtain a naturalistic visual
saliency, and avoid uncontrolled artifacts (e.g., brightness or
contrast) that could be introduced when the target object is
digitally inserted into the scene. Material was distributed in
4 lists using a Latin-Square Design.</p>
        <p>Primes and fillers were selected from various freely
available online databases, such as the SUN database (Xiao,
Hays, Ehinger, Oliva, &amp; Torralba, 2010) or Flickr. The
primes were selected on the basis of their Congruency with
respect to the experimental scenes (refer to next section).
Moreover, we made sure that the prime scene never
contained the target object. The same databases were used
for the filler scenes, and we have chosen scenes belonging
to similar contexts. No filler trials did included the target
object.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>Validity pre-tests of experimental material</title>
        <p>Firstly, we asked 10 students of the FPUL (6 women)
between the ages of 20-25 years (mean = 21.5, SD = 1.433)
to name 8 objects they considered typical of each of the 7
contexts. 198 unique objects were produced overall, and
among those we selected the 8 most nominated objects for
each context (e.g., pillow for context bedroom), as the
consistent targets. The 8 inconsistent objects, instead, were
drawn from another pool of objects never mentioned by any
of the participants. A new group of 20 participants (12
women, mean age = 21.2, SD = 1.23), was then asked to
judge the consistency between the target objects previously
selected (8 consistent, 8 inconsistent) and the embedding
context on a 6-point Likert scale (1 – Totally inconsistent; 6
– Totally consistent). We selected the 6 objects that had
highest (consistent) and lowest (inconsistent) scores for
each context (e.g., Soap – Bathroom: mean = 5.9, SD =
0.31; Flashlight-Bathroom: mean = 1.3, SD = 0.67). Finally,
a new group of 12 participants (6 women, mean age = 22.5,
SD = 1.87) was asked to respond to another Likert scale
questionnaire and rate: (a) the contextual congruency
between the prime scene and the search scene, (b) the
typicality of the prime scene and search scene given their
context, (c) the consistency of the target object within the
search scene, and (d) the ease of recognizing the target
object given its linguistic denotation.</p>
        <p>The purpose of this last questionnaire was to empirically
validate the Congruency and Consistency manipulations.
Results show that: (a) the difference between congruous
prime scene/search scene (mean = 5.4, SD = 1.09) and their
incongruent version (mean = 1.5, SD = 0.92), was
statistically significant (t(489) = 44, p &lt; 0.001); (b) both prime
scene (mean = 5, SD = 0.87) and search scene (mean = 5 ,
SD = 0.86) were considered to be highly representative
examples of their context (t(503) = 0.167, p = 0.87); (c) the
target objects consistent with the search scene (mean = 5.1,
SD = 1.6) were rated as significantly more likely than their
inconsistent counterparts (mean = 1.7, SD = 1.2) t(470) =
28, p &lt; 0.001); and (d) the target objects were rated as
highly identifiable by their linguistic denotation (mean = 5.3
SD = 1.7).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>Equipment</title>
        <p>Visual stimuli were presented on a LG Flatron L194ws
19inch LCD screen with a 60 Hz refresh rate, 55cm away from
participants' eyes. Eye-movements were recorded using an
SMI IVIEW X™ HI-SPEED eye-tracker at a sampling rate
of 1250 Hz on a 21” screen (1024 x 768 px. image
resolution). Viewing was binocular but only the participant’s
dominant eye was tracked (determined by a prior parallax test).
Chin rest, and forehead support were used to stabilize the
head position, and keep viewing distance constant.
Participants logged their answers regarding the presence (or not)
of the target object in the scene, using a Logitech Cordless
Rumblepad 2 controller. They used 3 buttons for: “Yes”,
“No” and to advance to the next trial. The experimental
protocol was controlled by ExperimentCenter 3.2 (SMI).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Procedure</title>
        <p>
          Participants were first presented with the target object (a
written cue for 500ms). Then, a fixation cross appeared in
the center of the screen for 1000ms after which the prime
scene is presented for 250ms, followed by a mask2 of the
same scene for 250ms. The mask is utilized to disrupt
feedback between lower and higher visual areas and keep the
perception of the prime scene on a subliminal level
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Enns &amp;
Di Lollo, 2000)</xref>
          . Finally, the search scene appears and the
participants can inspect it until they self-terminate the trial
by stating whether they saw (or not) the target object.
        </p>
        <p>Each block contained 42 experimental trials and 42 filler
trials, for a total of 84 trials, which were randomly presented
to each participant. The target object was present in the
experimental trials, and absent in the filler items guaranteeing
a balanced 50-50 distribution of yes/no responses, as well as
keeping the participants engaged in the search task. 4
practice trials were administered at the beginning of the
experimental session to familiarize participants with the task. A
15-points calibration procedure was performed at the
beginning of the trial; and repeated every 10 trials (8-points) to
ensure accurate tracking. The calibration was accepted when
angle threshold was ≈ 0.8/1.2 for x and y respectively. On
average, the younger population had 0.61º ± 0.42º deviation
error on the x-axis. and 0.72º ± 0.58º on the y-axis. The
older population had 0.82º ± 0.60º deviation error on the
xaxis and 1.12º ± 0.79º on the y-axis. The experiment was
explained using written instructions and the eye-tracking
session lasted for approximately twenty to thirty minutes.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-7">
        <title>Analyses</title>
        <p>
          The performance measures analyzed are: (a) response
accuracy, a binomial variable for correct and incorrect
responses (1, 0), and on correct trials only, (b) the response
time to pass to the next trial (in ms.). From the
eye-movement responses to the target object, only for correct trials
2The masks were generated by splitting the prime scene into 12
by 9 quadrants, 100x100 pixel squares, and randomly shuffle them.
we compute: (c) the search latency in ms. (i.e., the time
from scene onset until the target object is looked at for the
first time), (d) the duration of the first fixation in ms., and
(e) the total duration of fixations on target-object in ms.
These eye-movement measures are commonly used to
characterize attentional performance in search tasks
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Malcolm &amp; Henderson, 2010)</xref>
          . Fixations to the target
object AOI were mapped using BeGaze (SMI). Statistical
tests on the dependent measures were carried out using
mixed-ANOVAs where the between-participant independent
variables are Congruency between the prime scene and the
search scene (2 levels: congruent and incongruent), object
Consistency (2 levels: consistent and inconsistent) and the
within-participant Group variable (2 levels: younger and
older). All analyses are performed using R (ver. 3.0.2, R
Core Team, Austria).
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Accuracy</title>
        <p>In Table 1, we report means and standard deviation for each
dependent measure across all experimental conditions,
which are also visualized in Figure 3 and 4. We observe a
significant main effect of Congruency, whereby prime
scenes congruent with search scenes improve the detection
of the target object [F (1, 1153) = 10.2, p &lt; 0.01]. Younger
participants are overall more accurate than older participants
[F (1,1153) = 44.4, p &lt; 0.001]. Moreover, we find a
significant two-ways interaction Consistency:Group, whereby
older participants detect more accurately inconsistent than
consistent object [F (1,1153) = 4.22 p &lt; 0.05] Moreover, we
observe a significant three ways interaction
Congruency:Consistency:Group, whereby response
accuracy of older participants drastically drops when prime
scene and search scene are Congruent, but the target object
is Inconsistent with the search scene [F (1,1153) = 14.07,
p &lt; 0.001].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Reaction time</title>
        <p>Scenes where the target object was consistent with the
context of the search scene took longer to be responded [F
(1, 1109) = 17.83, p &lt; 0.0001]. Older participants took
longer to respond than younger participants [F (1, 1109) =
309.82, p &lt; 0.0001]. When looking at the two-ways
interaction, we find that a search scene containing a
Consistent target object, which was Congruently primed [F
(1, 1109) = 8.98, p &lt; 0.01] yielded faster response times
than a scene with an Inconsistent target object; especially in
older participants [F (1, 1109) = 6.77, p &lt; 0.01].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Search latency</title>
        <p>Young participants are overall faster than older participants
to look at target object for the first time [F (1, 1109) =
95.81, p &lt; 0.0001]. Search latency is faster when the object
is Inconsistent with the search scene, compared to when it is
Consistent [F (1, 1109) = 24.06, p &lt; 0.001]. However, when
prime scene and target scene are Congruent, and the target
object is Consistent, we observe significantly shorter search
latencies [F (1, 1109) = 4.19, p &lt; 0.05].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>First fixation</title>
        <p>On the duration of the first fixation, we only find that: (1)
consistent target objects are fixated the first time for longer
than inconsistent objects [F (1, 1109) = 4.42, p &lt; 0.05]; and
(2) older participants linger on the target object for longer
than younger participants [F (1, 1109) = 5.05, p &lt; 0.05].</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Total fixation</title>
        <p>On the total fixation duration to the target object, we find
main effects of Consistency, whereby participants fixated an
Inconsistent target object for longer than when it was
Consistent [F (1, 1109) = 9.10, p &lt; 0.01]; and of Group, with
younger participants displaying shorter total duration of
fixation than older participants [F (1, 1109) = 32.96,
p &lt; 0.001]. Furthermore, a two-way interaction effect
between these two variables was also observed, whereby
older participants fixated the target object overall less when
it was Consistent with the scene [F (1, 1109) = 19.92
p &lt; 0.001].</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-5-1">
          <title>Discussion</title>
          <p>
            Both age groups are clearly influenced by contextual
priming, object consistency, as well as by their interaction.
In particular, correct detections of the target object strongly
depend on the type of priming participants receive.
Incongruent primes improve target detection, but this is
more strongly the case when the object is also inconsistent.
By probing an unrelated contextual template, participants
may become more aware of inconsistency within the search
scene. The most interesting result, however, is that the
detection performance of older participants abruptly drops
when prime and search scenes are congruent, but the target
object is inconsistent with the search scene. This result
confirms previous literature showing that older adults have
more difficulties to inhibit invalid cued information
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(MüllerOehring, 2013)</xref>
            . Another possibly related explanation is that
older participants might rely more strongly on contextual
expectations than younger participants. So, when primed
with an appropriate context (i.e., restaurant-restaurant), they
generate strongly structured expectations for consistent
information (e.g., finding the bread on the table of a
restaurant). Thus, when the target object violates such
expectations, they do not manage to inhibit contextual
priming, and the target escapes their attention. These results
are largely corroborated by the response times on correct
responses, where again we find faster response times with
incongruent primes for inconsistent target objects. Crucially,
older participants are much slower to respond with
inconsistent objects after being primed with contextually
congruent information. As just said but from a slightly
different angle, this result might indicate that young
participants better adapt contextual expectations to the
actual search scene, and hence are better able to resolve the
mismatch generated by the inconsistency of the target object
with the primed expectations. On eye-movement responses,
older participants compared to younger participants are
overall slower locating the target object and spend more
time processing its identity during the first fixation and
overall. Moreover, inconsistent objects are found faster than
consistent object irrespective of the group, in line with
previous literature manipulating this experimental factor
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Bonitz &amp; Gordon, 2008)</xref>
            . Both groups improve their search
latency if the priming is congruent, and the object is
consistent. This indicates that appropriate contextual
priming can improve performance, but only if the object to
be looked at is consistent with the primed information.
Crucially, however, we did not find a significant three-ways
interaction between Congruency, Consistency and Group;
which might indicate that aging does not really mediate the
joint influence of Consistency and Congruency on
attentional responses.
          </p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-5-2">
          <title>Conclusion</title>
          <p>
            Expectations are routinely used by the cognitive system to
anticipate information about real-word events, and optimize
appropriate action-responses
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref5">(Bar, 2007; Clark, 2013)</xref>
            .
Visual attention is one of the components that can benefit
from contextual expectations in tasks such as visual search,
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref8">(Malcolm &amp; Henderson, 2010; Spotorno et. al. 2014)</xref>
            .
Aging, however, might impair attentional performance, and
consequently change the way contextual expectations are
accessed, and subsequently used, to allocate attention on
scenes. For example, visual performance in search tasks,
manipulating low-level features, appears to degrade with
increasing age
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Humphrey &amp; Kramer, 1997)</xref>
            . An open
challenge was to investigate whether knowledge-based
expectations undergo similar degradation, and especially,
how attentional mechanisms would be differently used.
          </p>
          <p>In the current study, we used a contextual priming
paradigm to probe expectations, and compared visual
performance in a search task between younger and older
observers. We demonstrated that older observers rely more
strongly on consolidated expectations than younger
observers. In particular, when the prime and search scene
overlapped in context, older participants had a worse
performance than the younger, especially if the target object
was inconsistent with the primed expectations. This result
suggests that older observers might have more difficulties
re-computing the semantics of individual objects when
primed, and hence compensate for unexpected information.
Nevertheless, eye-movement responses did not show a
reliable difference in this interaction between congruency
and consistency due to aging. Both groups experienced
better search performance when the target object was
consistent with expectations, but no difference was observed
in this interaction due to age.</p>
          <p>This study opens intriguing questions on the role of
primed contextual expectations in clinical populations
affected by neuro-degenerative disease (e.g., Alzheimer);
and especially on how would behavioural patterns compare
with a normally aging population.</p>
          <p>Overall, this work confirms the important role that
contextual information plays on the active allocation of
visual attention and shows that reliance on it may become
stronger as we age.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-5-3">
          <title>Acknowledgments</title>
          <p>Fundação Amadeu Dias for student award to MB, and
Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia research fellowship</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Trends in cognitive sciences 11 (7)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>280</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>289</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonitz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gordon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Attention to smoking related and incongruous objects during scene viewing</article-title>
          .
          <source>Acta Psychologica</source>
          ,
          <volume>129</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>255</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>263</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brockmole</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Logie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Do binding deficits account for age-related decline in visual working memory? Psychonomic Bulletin</article-title>
          &amp; Review,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>543</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>547</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brockmole</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Logie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Age-related change in visual working memory: a study of 55,753 participants aged 8-75</article-title>
          . Frontiers in Psychology,
          <volume>4</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Whatever next? predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science</article-title>
          .
          <source>Behavioral and Brain Sciences</source>
          <volume>36</volume>
          (
          <issue>03</issue>
          ), 310
          <fpage>181</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>204</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Enns</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. &amp; Di</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lollo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>What's new in visual masking? Trends in Cognitive Sciences</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>345</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>352</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Humphrey</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kramer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Age differences in visual search for feature,conjunction, and triple-conjunction targets</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychology and Aging</source>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>704</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>717</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Malcolm</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during realworld scene search</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vision</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>4</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mudrik</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Differential processing of invisible congruent and incongruent scenes: A case for unconscious integration</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vision</source>
          ,
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>13</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>24</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Müller-Oehring</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schulte</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rohlfing</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pfefferbaum</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sullivan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Visual search and the aging brain: discerning the effects of age-related brain volume shrinkage on alertness, feature binding, and attentional control</article-title>
          .
          <source>Neuropsychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>48</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Denise, ed.
          <source>Cognitive aging: A primer</source>
          . Psychology Press,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Potter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grealy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elliott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Andrés</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Aging and performance on an everyday-based visual search task</article-title>
          .
          <source>Acta Psychologica</source>
          ,
          <volume>140</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>208</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>217</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Spotorno</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Malcolm</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tatler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>How context information and target information guide the eyes from the first epoch of search in real-world scenes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vision</source>
          ,
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>7</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stanovich</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>West</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1983</year>
          ).
          <article-title>On priming by a sentence context</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</source>
          ,
          <volume>112</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Torralba</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oliva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Castelhano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes:The role of global features in object search</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological review</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>113</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>766</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>786</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Võ</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. L. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wolfe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</source>
          ,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>