<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effects of Emotion and Age on Cognitive Control in a Stroop Task</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Eddy J. Davelaar (e.davelaar@bbk.ac.uk)</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Psychological Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Birkbeck</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>University of London</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Malet Street London, WC1E 7HX</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UK">UK</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Natalie Berger</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>370</fpage>
      <lpage>375</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Research indicates that cognitive control is affected by aging and by emotion. However, no studies have addressed whether performance in an emotional Stroop task varies in older relative to younger adults. We examined the effect of aging in a classic Stroop color-naming task (Experiment 1) and in an emotional Stroop task using faces (Experiment 2). Results suggest that aging is associated with changes in cognitive control but that older adults benefit more than younger adults from positive information in an emotional Stroop paradigm.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>cognitive control</kwd>
        <kwd>emotion</kwd>
        <kwd>aging</kwd>
        <kwd>Stroop task</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The ability to exert cognitive control in the presence of
taskirrelevant information is crucial for adaptive cognitive
functioning in everyday life and has been studied
extensively in experimental research. A commonly used
task to examine cognitive control is the classic Stroop
colornaming paradigm
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">(Stroop, 1935)</xref>
        . In this task, color words
are printed in congruent or incongruent ink (e.g., “red”
printed in red vs green ink) and participants have to name
the color of the ink while ignoring the color word. While
congruent items require the same response for both word
reading and color naming, word reading interferes with the
correct color-naming response for incongruent trials. Thus,
incongruent trials are typically associated with slower, less
accurate responses than congruent trials
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">(MacLeod, 1991)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        Although the exact mechanisms that enable cognitive
control are still debated, there is reason to believe that
cognitive control is not a unitary process. According to the
dual mechanisms of control (DMC) theory
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Braver, Gray, &amp;
Burgess, 2007)</xref>
        , cognitive control operates in two distinct
control modes, ‘proactive control’ and ‘reactive control’. In
their theory, Braver et al. conceptualize proactive control as
an actively sustained control mode, which is initiated before
the occurrence of conflict. Thus, proactive control is thought
to bias attention and action systems in a goal-directed way.
In contrast, reactive control is activated by the occurrence of
conflicting events and thus, is only mobilized when needed.
As both control modes are thought to be associated with
advantages and limitations (e.g., resource-demanding but
fast mode of proactive control vs. parsimonious but slow
mode of reactive control), it is suggested that both systems
are needed for successful cognitive performance.
      </p>
      <p>
        The Stroop task has also been used to induce shifts in
control modes. For instance, increasing the amount of
congruent and incongruent trials relative to ‘neutral’ trials
(non-words such as XXXX printed in different ink colors) is
thought to facilitate a shift to proactive control due to high
expectancy of conflict
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(e.g., Entel, Tzelgov, Bereby-Meyer,
&amp; Shahar, 2014)</xref>
        . In contrast, reducing the amount of
congruent and incongruent trials relative to neutral trials is
thought to facilitate a shift away from proactive to reactive
control due to low expectancy of conflict. Similarly,
trialby-trial changes in control modes can be introduced in cuing
paradigms
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref21">(e.g., Goldfarb &amp; Henik, 2013)</xref>
        . Incongruent
trials that are cued are thought to induce shifts to proactive
control in contrast to non-cued items. Studies using the
Stroop task to test cognitive control usually report longer
RTs for congruent than neutral trials (reversed facilitation)
and relatively increased RTs for incongruent compared to
neutral trials (interference) when proactive control is low
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">(e.g., Goldfarb &amp; Henik, 2007)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        Despite a large body of research examining cognitive
control, studies investigating the effect of aging on different
control modes are relatively sparse to date. In studies using
the AX-CPT task, which requires participants to maintain
goal-related information and to make target responses on
cued trials and non-target responses on all other trials, older
adults were found to show significantly impaired goal
maintenance relative to younger adults
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref24">(e.g., Haarmann,
Ashling, Davelaar, &amp; Usher, 2005)</xref>
        . These results are
usually interpreted as evidence for a reduction in proactive
control among older adults. However, such results have not
been replicated in other experiments
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">(e.g., Paxton, Barch,
Racine, &amp; Braver, 2008, Exp. 2)</xref>
        suggesting that age-related
changes in proactive control are still poorly understood.
Reactive control seems relatively preserved in aging
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Braver, 2012)</xref>
        , but brain-imaging data suggest that reactive
control is associated with an increase in transient activation
in older relative to younger adults
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">(Paxton et al., 2008)</xref>
        . This
pattern of results was interpreted as evidence that older
adults might perform similar to younger adults by resorting
to compensatory mechanisms. However, more research is
needed to understand age-related changes in control modes.
As the results reported above have been found using the
AX-CPT paradigm, other tasks may help to shed light on
age-related changes in cognitive control.
      </p>
      <p>
        The Stroop task has also been adapted to investigate the
effects of emotion on cognitive control, often in the context
of anxiety or mood disorders. For instance, negative words
(e.g., ‘death’ printed in red) vs neutral words (e.g., ‘desk’
printed in red) have been used to investigate interference
caused by emotional content. Generally, participants were
found to be slower in naming the color of emotional relative
to neutral words
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">(Williams, Mathews, &amp; MacLeod, 1996)</xref>
        .
A common interpretation is that the affective nature of the
emotional words interferes with color-naming by capturing
attentional resources
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">(Williams et al., 1996)</xref>
        . Similar results
were observed for studies using pictures or faces as
emotional stimuli
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">(Kindt &amp; Brosschot, 1997)</xref>
        . Although
some findings suggest that this effect is restricted to
negative items
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">(McKenna &amp; Sharma, 1995)</xref>
        , other studies
have shown that both positive and negative pictures
interfered stronger with color-naming than neutral pictures
as evidenced in longer RTs
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Constantine, McNally, &amp;
Hornig, 2001)</xref>
        . In a more recent study,
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Krug and Carter
(2012)</xref>
        reported higher interference by irrelevant emotional
relative to irrelevant neutral information in a Stroop task.
This effect was marginally more pronounced under low than
under high expectancy conditions and thus, when proactive
control was low. However, as in previous studies emotional
information was task-irrelevant, it is less clear how
taskrelevant emotion would affect performance in a Stroop task.
As suggested by the dual-competition model
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">(DCM; Pessoa,
2009)</xref>
        , emotion can improve cognitive performance through
enhanced target processing. Thus, it is possible that in a
Stroop paradigm, the processing of target emotional
information can be more resilient against distraction.
      </p>
      <p>
        More importantly, no previous study has investigated how
aging affects cognitive control in an emotional Stroop task.
It is important to consider age-related changes when
investigating the interaction between emotion and cognitive
control, as aging is associated with preserved or even
improved emotional functioning
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Charles &amp; Carstensen,
2010)</xref>
        . Older adults seem to place greater importance on
emotional information compared to younger adults
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Fung &amp;
Carstensen, 2003)</xref>
        . It was argued that an increased striving
for emotional well-being might underlie age-related changes
in emotional functioning. For instance, socioemotional
selectivity theory
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(SST; Carstensen, 1993)</xref>
        suggests that
perceiving time as limited promotes a prioritization of
emotional well-being. Consequently, older adults are
thought to focus more on emotional and particularly on
positive information, resulting in a ‘positivity bias’ in
attention and episodic memory
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">(for a review, see Reed &amp;
Carstensen, 2012)</xref>
        . For instance, it was found that older
adults showed gaze preferences towards positive and away
from negative stimuli
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16 ref17">(e.g., Isaacowitz, Wadlinger, Goren,
&amp; Wilson, 2006)</xref>
        and that they remembered positive
information better than negative information
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11 ref7">(Charles,
Mather, &amp; Carstensen, 2003)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        Other studies from the domain of working memory (WM)
have shown that older adults can benefit from task-relevant
emotional rather than neutral information in cognitive tasks.
For instance, Mammarella and colleagues
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13 ref22">(2013a; 2013b)</xref>
        found that older adults showed poorer performance than
younger adults in an operation WM span task with neutral
but not emotional words. In an n-back task with emotional
information, older adults were even more accurate than
younger adults when updating positive information
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">(Mikels,
Larkin, Reuter-Lorenz, &amp; Carstensen, 2005)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>Despite evidence of age-related changes in the effects of
emotion on attention, episodic memory and WM, to date, no
study has examined cognitive control of emotional material
in older as compared to younger adults.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Present studies</title>
      <p>
        We report results of two behavioral studies investigating
proactive and reactive control in aging. The first experiment
focused on neutral material in the classic Stroop
colornaming paradigm. In the second experiment, we extended
the task to include emotional material by using facial
stimuli. Cognitive control was manipulated by varying the
amount and thus, expectancy of congruent and incongruent
trials relative to neutral trials as in the study of
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Tzelgov,
Henik, and Berger (1992</xref>
        ). High-expectancy (HE) blocks
were thought to be associated with increased proactive
control, whilst low-expectancy (LE) blocks were thought to
be associated with reduced proactive control.
      </p>
      <p>Based on previous research, we expected to find reduced
cognitive control in older adults in Experiment 1. In
Experiment 2, we expected that task-relevant emotion
would facilitate Stroop performance and reduce age-related
differences. It was an open question, whether task-relevant
emotion would interact with expectancy of conflict.</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Experiment 1</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>Subjects. Twenty younger (ages 20–40) and 20 older (ages
60–85) participated in the experiment. Younger adults were
students at Birkbeck, University of London, and received
either course credits or £7.50/hour for their participation.
Older adults were high-functioning volunteers, who were
recruited from the University of Third Age in London and
were paid £7.50/hour. Participants were
communitydwelling, pre-screened for psychiatric disorders and a
history of neurological disorders and had normal or
corrected-to-normal vision. Subjects were tested
individually.</p>
      <p>Stimuli. Three color words were used in this experiment:
red, green, yellow. Congruent items were created by
printing each of the color names in their own color (e.g.,
‘red’ printed in red ink). Incongruent items were created by
printing each of the color names in one of the two other
colors (e.g., ‘red’ printed in green or yellow ink). Neutral
items were created by printing a string of ‘XXXX’ in the
three different colors. The stimuli were presented centrally
on black background in 42-point Courier New font.
Procedure. After giving consent and completing a short
visual acuity test, participants were instructed to perform the
computerized Stroop task. The task consisted of two blocks,
and the order of the blocks was counterbalanced across
participants. In the HE block, 75% of the trials were either
congruent or incongruent (37.5%, respectively), while 25%
of the trials were neutral. In the LE block, 25% of the trials
were either congruent or incongruent (12,5%, respectively)
and 75% of the trials were neutral. Each block consisted of
192 randomly ordered items and the task was preceded by a
practice block of 24 items with an equal amount of
congruent, incongruent and neutral items. Participants were
instructed to indicate the color of the ink as quickly and
accurately as possible by pressing one of three color-labeled
buttons. Button presses initiated the next trials and the
assignment of color labels to buttons was counterbalanced
across participants. Median RTs for correct responses were
analyzed as the main dependent variable in this experiment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results and Conclusions</title>
      <p>Older adults were generally slower than younger adults,
F(1, 38) = 21.49, MSE = 15280, p &lt; .001. There was also a
main effect of congruency, F(2, 76) = 74.52, MSE = 10480,
p &lt; .001, with significantly longer RTs for incongruent than
congruent or neutral trials. No significant difference was
observed between neutral and congruent trials across both
conditions (p = .880). This main effect was qualified by a
significant congruency × age interaction, F(2, 76) = 8.83,
MSE = 10480, p = .004, as older adults showed a more
pronounced RT difference between incongruent and
congruent or neutral trials than younger adults.</p>
      <p>Although there was no main effect of condition (p =
.178), there was a significant condition × age interaction,
F(1, 38) = 8.47, MSE = 5091, p = .006, as older adults were
significantly slower under LE conditions than under HE
conditions. No such effect was observed for younger adults.
Both younger and older adults showed marginally
significant reversed facilitation (RT-congruent vs
RTneutral) and significantly increased interference under LE to
HE conditions, as revealed by a significant condition ×
congruency interaction, F(2, 76) = 12.66, MSE = 1759, p &lt;
.001. This interaction was qualified by a significant
condition × congruency × age interaction, F(2, 76) = 8.85,
MSE = 1759, p &lt; .001. This interaction was driven by higher
Stroop interference (RT-incongruent vs RT-neutral) in older
adults, t(19) = 7.01, p &lt; .001, relative to younger adults, p &lt;
.001, t(19) = 3.96, p = .001, in the LE condition (Figure 1).
Age-related effects were present but less pronounced in the
HE condition, where again higher interference was shown
by older adults, t(19) = 6.39, p &lt; .001, than by younger
adults, t(19) = 4.41, p &lt; .001.</p>
      <p>This pattern of results suggests that similarly to young
adults, older adults exhibited proactive control under HE
conditions, as evidenced by facilitation and reduced
interference in both age groups. Notwithstanding, aging was
associated with changes in cognitive control as evidenced
by an age-related increase in interference. Moreover,
ageeffects were more pronounced under LE conditions und
thus, when proactive control was low. Incongruent trials
caused disproportionately longer RTs relative to neutral
trials in older than in younger adults. This indicates that
Stroop-interference is affected by aging and interacts with
available levels of control.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Experiment 2</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>Subjects. Twenty-four younger (ages 20–40) and 24 older
(ages 60–85) participated in the experiment. Both younger
and older adults were recruited from the same pool of
volunteers as in Experiment 1 and met the same criteria.
They were compensated in the same way and none of the
subjects, who participated in Experiment 1, were included in
Experiment 2. Subjects were tested individually.</p>
      <p>
        Stimuli. Stimuli consisted of 36 images of faces from the
FACES database
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">(Ebner, Riediger, &amp; Lindenberger, 2010)</xref>
        ,
a validated set of photographs of naturalistic faces of
different ages in front view. Faces showed angry, neutral or
happy expressions (12 items per emotion). Faces were
selected in a way that age group (young, middle-aged, older)
and sex (male, female) of the face models were balanced
equally in each emotion category. The faces had been rated
in a preliminary evaluation study and were selected based
on high agreement ratings between younger and older raters.
      </p>
      <p>Angry, neutral and happy faces varied significantly in
their valence and angry and happy faces were matched for
arousal. Congruent items were created by printing matching
emotion labels across the emotional faces (e.g., happy face
with ‘happy’ label). Incongruent items were created by
printing non-matching emotion labels across the faces (e.g.,
happy face with ‘angry’ label). Neutral items were created
by printing a string of ‘XXXX’ across the faces. Face
pictures were turned to grey-scale, whilst labels were
printed in red, 38-point Courier New font, and placed
between eyes and mouths of the faces. To facilitate label
reading, labels appeared 100 ms before the face.</p>
      <p>Procedure. After giving consent and completing a short
visual acuity test, participants were instructed to perform the
computerized emotional Stroop task. The task consisted of
two blocks and the proportion of congruent, incongruent
and neutral in the HE block and in the LE was identical as in
Experiment 1. Each block consisted of 288 randomly
ordered items and the task was preceded by a practice block
of 24 items with an equal amount of congruent, incongruent
and neutral items. Participants were instructed to indicate
the emotion of the face irrespective of the label as quickly
and accurately as possible by pressing one of three labeled
buttons (‘A’ for angry, ‘N’ for neutral, and ‘H’ for happy).
A button press initiated the next trial and the assignment of
labels to buttons was counterbalanced across participants.
Median RTs for correct responses were analyzed as the
main dependent variable in this experiment.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Results and Conclusions</title>
      <p>Older adults were generally slower than younger adults,
F(1, 46) = 20.03, MSE = 472052, p &lt; .001. A main effect of
congruency, F(2, 92) = 42.24, MSE = 21342, p &lt; .001, was
observed as RTs were faster for congruent than neutral
items and faster for neutral than for incongruent items. Both
younger and older adults showed increased interference
under LE relative to HE conditions, as evidenced by a
significant condition × congruency interaction, F(2, 92) =
4.73, MSE = 6897, p = .019. Facilitation was unaffected by
condition. No further effects including the factor condition
were observed. Emotion significantly affected RTs, F(2, 92)
= 21.17, MSE = 48104, p &lt; .001, as all participants were
faster for happy than neutral or angry faces. No significant
difference was found between angry and neutral faces (p &gt;
.05). However, this main effect was qualified by a
significant emotion × age interaction, F(2, 76) = 3.95, MSE
= 48104, p = .04. This interaction was driven by a more
pronounced RT advantage for happy faces relative to neutral
and angry faces in older as compared to younger adults
(Figure 2).</p>
      <p>These findings suggest that emotion modulated RTs
irrespective of item congruency or expectancy of conflict. In
the presence of emotional material, interference was
increased under LE conditions relative to HE conditions in
both younger and older adults, with no effects of conflict
expectation observed for facilitation. Happy faces were
associated with fastest RTs compared with neutral or angry
faces in both age groups. However, it was found that this
RT advantage for happy faces was more pronounced for
older than for younger adults. These results suggest that
older adults benefit from positive information as conveyed
by smiling faces to a greater extent than younger adults do.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>General Discussion</title>
        <p>The aim of the present research was to investigate how
emotion and aging affect cognitive control in a Stroop task.
Data from Experiment 1 show that older adults can deploy
proactive control in the face of varying task demand. This
was evidenced by facilitation and reduced interference in
the HE relative to the LE block. However, cognitive control
was found to be affected by aging in both conditions: Older
adults showed increased interference from incongruent trials
relative to younger adults. More pronounced age-related
changes were observed when proactive control was low, as
interference in older relative to younger adults was more
increased under LE compared to HE conditions.</p>
        <p>Data from Experiment 2 suggest that emotion affects
performance in a Stroop task irrespective of expectancy
manipulations and thus, task demands. It was found that
both age groups were fastest when responding to happy
faces rather than neutral or angry faces. However, this effect
was more pronounced for older adults as they showed a
higher speed advantage for happy faces than younger adults.
This facilitating effect of task-relevant positive emotion was
observed across congruent, incongruent and neutral items.</p>
        <p>
          Both experiments shed light on age-related changes in
cognitive control in the presence of neutral and emotional
material. The findings add to the empirical evidence
obtained in studies using the AX-CPT paradigm. Our results
are compatible with studies showing impairments in goal
maintenance in older adults, which were interpreted as an
age-related reduction in proactive control
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">(Haarmann et al.,
2005)</xref>
          . Under HE conditions, older adults showed increased
interference from incongruent trials relative to younger
adults. This might indicate that active maintenance of task
goals was reduced in older adults, resulting in higher
conflict experienced for incongruent stimuli. Moreover, our
results extend previous findings by showing that
wordreading interfered stronger with color naming in older than
in younger adults when proactive control was low: older
adults were disproportionately slower than younger adults
when responding to incongruent relative to neutral items
under LE conditions. Given the implication by the dual
mechanisms of control (DMC) theory that a shift away from
proactive control facilitates the use of reactive control
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Braver et al., 2007)</xref>
          , our results suggest that reactive control
might also be affected by aging. Previous studies have
shown that reactive control is largely preserved in older
adults
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Braver, 2012)</xref>
          , but there is also evidence that older
adults’ reactive control is less efficient, as compensatory
mechanisms might be recruited at neural levels
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">(Paxton et
al., 2008)</xref>
          . Our results are in line with those pointing at less
efficient reactive control in older relative to younger adults.
Finally, the finding of increased interference in older adults
is consistent with findings of reduced inhibition of irrelevant
information with aging
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(e.g., Hasher, Stoltzfus, Zacks, &amp;
Rypma, 1991)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          The results from Experiment 2 suggest that emotion
affects Stroop performance irrespective of expectancy
across all trial types. Both age groups were fastest when
responding to happy faces, but this RT advantage was more
pronounced in older than in younger adults. The speed-up in
responses for happy faces is in line with research showing
that happy expressions are processed quicker and more
accurately relative to other facial expressions
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Becker &amp;
Srinivasan, 2014)</xref>
          . However, a purely perceptual account of
our results would imply that older adults are faster or better
in recognizing happy faces than younger adults, which is not
supported by research
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">(for a meta-analysis, see Ruffman,
Henry, Livingstone, &amp; Phillips, 2008)</xref>
          . In contrast, a more
pronounced RT advantage for happy faces in older relative
to younger adults is more consistent with a conceptual view
of emotional changes in aging and findings showing a
‘positivity bias’ in attention and memory in aging
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">(Reed &amp;
Carstensen, 2012)</xref>
          . It is possible that the emotion × age
interaction in Experiment 2 was driven by motivational
changes in aging, with older adults focusing more on
positive information and thus, responding faster to happy
faces relative to younger adults. However, as both age
groups generally showed an RT advantage for happy faces,
it is likely that perceptual and conceptual features of happy
faces contributed to the observed results. Our stimuli do not
allow disentangling these effects and future studies using
different stimuli such as words or pictures are needed to
investigate this question further.
        </p>
        <p>It should be noted that Experiment 2 did not replicate the
pattern of results obtained in Experiment 1, particularly with
regards to differences in LE and HE conditions. Although
increased interference was observed under LE conditions
relative to HE conditions, no effect of condition was
observed for facilitation. Methodological differences in task
design may account for the different results observed. In
Experiment 2, we used facial expressions with labels to
create incongruent, congruent and neutral stimuli. A 100 ms
label preview was also introduced before the face appeared.</p>
        <p>
          These changes to the original Stroop task might have
contributed to the discrepancy in results between the two
experiments. Faces rather than words were used as they are
ecologically valid emotional stimuli, whereas words convey
emotional meaning in a symbolic way. A comparison of
stimulus types indeed showed stronger effects of valence for
pictorial stimuli than for words
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">(Kensinger &amp; Schacter,
2006)</xref>
          . Also, it was suggested that even with word stimuli,
emotional Stroop tasks differ from the Stroop color-naming
task for a number of reasons
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Algom, Chajut, &amp; Lev, 2004)</xref>
          .
For instance, it was argued that the Stroop effect cannot be
calculated in an emotional Stroop as no “true” consistency
exists for non-color words printed in different colors. Thus,
the inclusion of stimuli other than color words comes with
major methodological changes, independently of stimulus
type.
        </p>
        <p>To conclude, our studies extend previous research by
showing that age-related changes were more pronounced in
a Stroop task when proactive control was low. Furthermore,
it was shown that performance in an emotional Stroop task
was affected by aging and by emotion. More specifically,
older adults were disproportionately faster when responding
to happy rather than angry or neutral faces compared to
younger adults. Further research is needed to clarify whether
this happy face advantage was driven by perceptual or
conceptual features of the stimuli. By furthering our
understanding of the effects of emotion on cognitive control
in aging, such work can help identifying situations in which
older adults’ cognitive performance can be facilitated
through emotion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>Acknowledgments</title>
        <p>This work was supported by Birkbeck, University of
London.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Algom</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chajut</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a Stroop effect</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</source>
          ,
          <volume>133</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>323</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>338</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0096</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3445</lpage>
          .
          <year>133</year>
          .3.
          <fpage>323</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Becker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Srinivasan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The vividness of the happy face</article-title>
          .
          <source>Current Directions in Psychological Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>23</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>189</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>194</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1177/0963721414533702
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Braver</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework</article-title>
          .
          <source>Trends in Cognitive Sciences</source>
          ,
          <volume>16</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>106</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>113</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.tics.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <volume>12</volume>
          .010
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Braver</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gray</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Burgess</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control</article-title>
          . In A. R. A.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conway</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jarrold &amp; M. J. Kane</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.), Variation in working memory (pp.
          <fpage>76</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>106</lpage>
          ). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1993</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Motivation for social contact across the life span: A theory of socioemotional selectivity</article-title>
          . In J. E. Jacobs (Ed.),
          <source>Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Developmental perspectives on motivation (</source>
          Vol.
          <volume>40</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>209</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>254</lpage>
          ). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Charles</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Social and emotional aging</article-title>
          .
          <source>Annual Review of Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>61</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>383</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>409</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1146/annurev.psych.
          <volume>093008</volume>
          .100448
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Charles</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mather</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Aging and emotional memory: The forgettable nature of negative images for older adults</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: General</source>
          ,
          <volume>132</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>310</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>324</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0096</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3445</lpage>
          .
          <year>132</year>
          .2.
          <fpage>310</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Constantine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McNally</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hornig</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Snake fear and the pictorial emotional Stroop paradigm</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cognitive Therapy and Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>757</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>764</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1023/A:1012923507617
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ebner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Riediger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lindenberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2010</year>
          ).
          <article-title>FACES-A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Behavior Research Methods</source>
          ,
          <volume>42</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>351</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>362</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3758/BRM.42.1.
          <fpage>351</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Entel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tzelgov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Bereby-Meyer,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Shahar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>N.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological Research</source>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>15</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/s00426-014-0630-0
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fung</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Sending memorable messages to the old: Age differences in preferences and memory for advertisements</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Personality and Social Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>85</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>178</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0022</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>3514</lpage>
          .
          <year>85</year>
          .1.
          <fpage>163</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goldfarb</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henik</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance</source>
          ,
          <volume>33</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1170</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1176</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0096</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1523</lpage>
          .
          <year>33</year>
          .5.
          <fpage>1170</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goldfarb</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henik</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The effect of a preceding cue on the conflict solving mechanism</article-title>
          .
          <source>Experimental Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>60</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>347</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>353</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1027/
          <fpage>1618</fpage>
          - 3169/a000205
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haarmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ashling</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davelaar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Usher</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Age-related declines in context maintenance and semantic short-term memory</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology</source>
          ,
          <year>58A</year>
          ,
          <fpage>34</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>53</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/02724980443000214
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hasher</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stoltzfus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zacks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rypma</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Age and inhibition</article-title>
          . Learning, Memory, and Cognition,
          <volume>17</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>169</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0278</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7393</lpage>
          .
          <year>17</year>
          .1.
          <fpage>163</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Isaacowitz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wadlinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goren</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp; Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H. R.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Selective preference in visual fixation away from negative images in old age? An eye-tracking study</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychology and Aging</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>40</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0882</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7974</lpage>
          .
          <year>21</year>
          .1.
          <fpage>40</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kensinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schacter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cognitive, Affective &amp; Behavioral Neuroscience</source>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>110</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>126</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3758/CABN.6.2.
          <fpage>110</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kindt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brosschot</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Abnormal Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>106</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>644</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>648</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0021</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>843X</lpage>
          .
          <year>106</year>
          .4.
          <fpage>644</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Krug</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety</article-title>
          .
          <source>Brain Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>1481</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.brainres.
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <volume>08</volume>
          .045
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>MacLeod</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological Bulletin</source>
          ,
          <volume>109</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>163</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>203</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0033</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2909</lpage>
          .
          <year>109</year>
          .2.
          <fpage>163</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mammarella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carretti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leonardi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fairfield</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Examining an emotion enhancement effect in working memory: Evidence from age-related differences</article-title>
          .
          <source>Neuropsychological rehabilitation</source>
          ,
          <volume>23</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>416</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>428</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1080/09602011.
          <year>2013</year>
          .775065
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mammarella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fairfield</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Di</surname>
            <given-names>Domenico</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Borella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            , &amp;
            <surname>Carretti</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>B.</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Is working memory affective in dementia of Alzheimer's type? Neuroscience Discovery</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>70</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>4</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .7243/2052-6946-1-4
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>McKenna</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sharma</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Intrusive cognitions: An investigation of the emotional Stroop task</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1595</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1607</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0278</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7393</lpage>
          .
          <year>21</year>
          .6.
          <fpage>1595</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mikels</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Larkin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reuter-Lorenz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: Changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychology and Aging</source>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>542</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>553</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0882</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7974</lpage>
          .
          <year>20</year>
          .4.
          <fpage>542</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paxton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Racine</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Braver</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging</article-title>
          .
          <source>Cerebral Cortex</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>1010</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1028</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1093/cercor/bhm135
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pessoa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>13</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>160</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>166</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.tics.
          <year>2009</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .006
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reed</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carstensen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The theory behind the age-related positivity effect</article-title>
          . Frontiers in Psychology. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3389/fpsyg.
          <year>2012</year>
          .00339
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruffman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Livingstone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Phillips</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A meta-analytic review of emotion recognition and aging: Implications for neuropsychological models of aging</article-title>
          .
          <source>Neuroscience &amp; Biobehavioral Reviews</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>863</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>881</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1016/j.neubiorev.
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <volume>01</volume>
          .001
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stroop</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1935</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Experimental Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>643</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>662</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/h0054651
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tzelgov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henik</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1992</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words</article-title>
          .
          <source>Memory &amp; Cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>727</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>735</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .3758/BF03202722
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. M. G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mathews</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>MacLeod</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The emotional Stroop task and psychopathology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Psychological Bulletin</source>
          ,
          <volume>120</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1037/
          <fpage>0033</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2909</lpage>
          .
          <year>120</year>
          .
          <issue>1</issue>
          .
          <fpage>3</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>