The Role of the Central Executive and Slave Systems of Working Memory in the Insight Problem Solving Ilya Yu. Vladimirov (kein17@mail.ru) P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Department of Psychology, Proezd Matrosova, 9, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation 150057 The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Laboratory for Cognitive Studies, Prospect Vernadskogo, 82, Moscow, Russian Federation 119571 Alexandra V. Chistopolskaya (chistosasha@mail.ru) P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Department of Psychology, Proezd Matrosova, 9, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation 150057 Sergei Yu. Korovkin (korovkin_su@list.ru) P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University, Department of Psychology, Proezd Matrosova, 9, Yaroslavl, Russian Federation 150057 Abstract (Wen, Butler, Koutstaal, 2013; Lyusin, 2014). An This paper deals with an investigation of specific alternative is the research carried out in the paradigm of mechanisms of insight problem solving. We take the differential psychology (Hambrick, Engle, 2003). Available functioning of working memory slave system as such methodical arsenal can reveal informative, structural mechanisms. In our research we use a dual task method as a specificity of insight processes, but has significant cognitive monitor (D. Kahneman) to fixing of microdynamics limitations at revealing the dynamics of insight process. for study mechanisms of thinking processes. We gathered Classical methods of psychology of thinking, such as the the data showing that modal-specific blocks of working memory are mainly used during insight problem-solving, while solving analysis of thinking aloud protocols (developed by K. algorithmic problems uses mainly executive control. Duncker) and analysis of sections of representations do not answer this question (about the microdynamics of thought Keywords: problem solving; working memory; insight; process) because: dual task; microdynamics.  They have an impact on the process of decision by Introduction interfering with him, distorting his move.  As a rule, they are based on the verbal report, and To date, the psychology of problem solving did not settle include analysis only conscious components of the question about the legality of allocation of insight thought process. Thus, there is a significant problems in a special category. Accordingly, there are two reduction basically to the phenomenological piece alternative positions. Participants of the first approach of the process under consideration. (Duncker, 1945; Metcalfe, Wiebe, 1987; Seifert., 1995,  They have a very low "sampling rate", while the Ohlsson, 1992, Knoblich,, 1999 et al) insist on specificity of process of solutions (especially insight solutions) is the process of insight solution. Another point of view is held often minimized and meaningful phases of by representatives of non-specific approach, which denies solutions can take micro intervals (thus only rough the specificity of insight problems as related to algorithmic analysis of the dynamics is possible, which is problems. They believe that any problem can be reduced to insufficient for reveal the mechanisms of insight an algorithm (Newell, Simon, 1972; Weisberg, Alba, 1981, solutions) MacGregor, Ormerod, Chronicle, 2002 et al). In cognitive One more method is the analysis of movements on psychology, in general, and in the theory of insight problem decision tree, used in the works of A. Newell and H. Simon solving in particular, there are virtually no data to get a clear (Newell, Simon, 1972). The analysis of movements on the idea of the microdynamics of the thought process, including decision tree, in turn, is imposed interpretive by the scheme solutions of insight problems. Typically, studies on this priori: it is assumed that the solution to every problem is a subject are exploratory, phenomenological, that do not set a consistent movement between adjacent representations. goal to reveal the underlying mechanisms. The existing Among the methods that allow to reveal the microdynamics experimental studies mostly don’t reveal the current of the solving process the monitoring method should be solution's genesis of both algorithmic and insight problems. allocated. Basically, in the study of the specifics in this case methods The monitoring method is based on the D. Kahneman's of distraction, pre-intervention (creation of emotional uniform resource model and implies the parallel solution of background, creating the effect of setting, etc.) are used. dual tasks. The monitoring method is based on the D. 532 Kahneman's common resource model and involves determine the type of the syllable (open - closed) - text simultaneous solution of two tasks. According to the format. It is assumed that the coincidence of the format of Kahneman's model, different structures require different the probe task and the main task creates the competition for amount of attention. In addition, their resource requirements a resource and affects the dynamics of the probe-task. To vary in different time moments. The total amount of mental describe the dynamics and results unification the time to effort (resource) that is potentially available for a system of solve each of the problems was divided into ten equal time information processing is limited. In order to test the degree periods. This made it possible to unify the different time of attention he used the method of the secondary probe task. solving problems of different problems in our experimental The main idea was that it can be possible to "catch" the trial. moment of the resource’s depletion when the subject deals The problem was the fact that the subject has to correct with the main problem (complex) and, paradoxically, cannot the incorrect mathematical statement by moving one match cope with the additional secondary problem (simple). The and parallel to determine the type of syllable. After the difference between total effort and an effort that is invested participant has identified the first syllable by pressing the in the core activity, D. Kahneman calls the spare capacity. corresponding key, the following syllable was presented. So Spare capacity is reduced with the increasing of an effort until then, until the problem is resolved. In this case, we see required to perform primary problem. Additional different formats of leading representation of tasks. There (secondary) problem can only be solved using spare are visual algorithmic problem and the textual probe task. capacity. If the primary problem requires more cognitive effort, the spare capacity is reduced and the productivity of the secondary task solution is reduced by the same amount, and vice versa. Consequently, the change of productivity of the secondary task reflects the change in the degree of mental effort that is invested into primary problem. Considering attention as a limited resource of mental effort was further developed in theoretical and applied investigations. Thus, D. Navon and D.Gopher (Navon, Gopher, 1979) proposed a model of integrated resource information processing, i.e, plurality and specificity of human's energy resources. The degree of interference between the tasks depends on how similar the combination of resources is required to complete each of them. Thus, the theory of resource’s limitations formed the basis of the dual task paradigm, and this type of the method may be used for dynamics description. Method and experimental design The dynamics of the resource loading on the main task is determined by the productivity of the performance of the secondary task. The primary is a thinking task (problem) and a tempo task (choice of two alternatives) performed in parallel. The reaction time and a number of errors in the implementation of the second task are fixed. The dynamics of the performance quality serves as a marker of the loading of working memory by operations which are carried out in the main problem. The secondary task must satisfy a number of requirements: a) the equal complexity, b) the same procedure of the presentation, c) the dichotomous choice, d) the equal probability of alternatives (50/50). Decreasing productivity at a given time moment indicates that currently the resource is used by the primary task. The main problem's leading representation format (insight / algorithmic) was varied: visual or text. Similarly the type of the probe task was varied. It was required to determine the type of the angle (obtuse - acute) - visual format, or to Figure 1. The original example of an experimental task 533 (the different formats of leading representation of tasks) And at this figure, we can see the same format leading representation of tasks. There are visual algorithmic problem and the visual probe task. It’s assumed that in this case cognitive load is higher and the execution of activity is Hypotheses: more difficult. The hypotheses are:  There is a specificity of insight solution process regarding algorithmic solution;  There is a domain specificity of information processing in the process of insight problem solving: the nature of the insight solution's dynamics can be reflected in the dynamics of the operation of slave systems of working memory. The independent variables are: 1) the type of problem (insight / algorithmic) 2) the leading representation's format of the main thinking problem (visual / text) 3) the representation's format of probe task (visual / text) The dependent variable is the productivity of the probe task (reaction time) So, the subject of this study is specific information processing in insight problem solving Participants. 58 people participated in total. (Average age is 24 years, from 18 to 56, 36 male and 22 femail. SD = 6). They were asked to solve 8 problems, but first they performed two training tasks. Results 1. The Role of the Central Executive in Solving Problems of Various Types. Investigation of the role of the central executive in solving insight and algorithmic problems was carried out by comparing the data in the performance of all tasks without focus on its representation format. An important fact is the reproducibility of the results. The graph below shows the results of two experiments performed in a uniform methodological paradigm. Figure 2. The original example of an experimental task (The same formats of leading representation of tasks) The Stimulus material was prepared using PsychoPy - an open-source application to allow the presentation of stimuli and collection of data for a wide range of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics experiments. It’s a free, powerful alternative to Presentation or e-Prime, written in Python (Peirce,2007) 534 Similar results were obtained in our experiment (Figure 2). But in our trial all results are significant (Alg: F (9, 1479)=3.62, p<.001; η =.06. Ins: F (9, 1479)=10.12, p<.001; η =.02) (Figure 3). We can observe that the data structure is reproduced. The greater complexity of the task in our series (more reaction time) is explained by more complexity of the probe-task (assignment to one of the two categories of 24 stimuli, whereas in the cited work the incentives were only two). We found the presence of the dynamics of working memory's loading in solving algorithmic problems. The expressed dynamics is manifested in the presence of a "hump" near the end of the solution. High productivity decreases on the steps of low-cost operations: the reading of the conditions and the voicing of the answer. Probably, the decrease in productivity near the end of the solution is connected with the implementation of combinatorial operations. 2. The Role of Domain Specificity Units of Working Memory in Solving Problems of Various Types. Figure 3. The dynamics of reaction time on performing the probe-task in parallel solution of the main thinking Also, one of the results of the above-cited studies problem (insight / algorithmic) in provisional experimental (Korovkin, Vladimirov, Savinova, 2012) was the lack of a series (cited by Korovkin, Vladimirov, Savinova, 2012) dynamics on the insight problem solving. As a possible Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. reason was the suggestion that manipulations with a representation are important in insight problem solving and domain specific units of working memory are utilized rather than central executive. The purpose of this series was to investigate the loading of slave modal specific systems of working memory as a possible locus of information processing in the insight solutions. Separately for insight and algorithmic problems let us consider the data on the average rate performance (average reaction time) of the probe-task in conditions when its format of representation matches the format of the thinking problem and in conditions of the discrepancy between these formats. Figure 4. The dynamics of reaction time on performing the probe-task in parallel solution of the main thinking problem (insight / algorithmic) in main experiment trial. Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. There is the graph of reproducibility in two experiments. The results of the first experiment are shown in Figure 2. There is a significant dynamics in insight solving problems and its absence in algorithmic problem solving (Alg: F (9, 149)=2.3, p=.02; η =.12. Ins: F (9, 200)=1.7, p=.09; η =.07) 535 Figure 5.The effect of competition of resource on the the graph of possible intermediate states between the average reaction time in performing the secondary condition and purpose most adequately describes the probe-task in parallel solving insight problems. process of algorithmic problems. Slave systems are loaded Vertical bars denote 0.95 confidence intervals. harder in the process of solving the insight problem. In this case, a subsystem of the same representation's format of the There is a expressed cross effect (F (1, 1527) =5.96, basic problem is maximally loaded. Most clearly this fact is p=.01; η=.003). When there is coincidence of the leading expressed for the spatial type of representation. The data type of the representation of the main tasks and the probe- allow us to assume that when a subject solves insight task in the solution of insight problems then we observe a problems, he manipulates with his own representation by significantly lower pace of implementation of the secondary searching elements and their correlations. Probably, this task (probe-task). Especially pronounced effect is for visual process corresponds to the model of problem’s field representation. A different picture is observed in algorithmic proposed by Karl Duncker and has quasi-spatial structure. problems. Conclusions: 1. A consecutive movement on the decision tree underlies the solution in the course of solving algorithmic problems. A significant role in this process is played by the central executive. For insight problems such process is not characteristic. 2. A non-directional movement in a field of the problem (obviously, it's a spatial or quasi-spatial structure) underlies the solution in the process of insight solving problems. Acknowledgments This work is supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 15-06-07899a) and The Mikhai Prokhorov Foundation (Karamzin grant program 2015) References Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Figure 6.The effect of competition of resource on the Monographs, 58(5) average reaction time in performing the secondary probe- Hambrick D., Engle R.(2003) The Role of Working task in parallel solving algorithmic problems. Vertical bars Memory in Problem Solving .. Davidson J., Sternberg R. denote 0.95 confidence intervals. (Eds.). The Psychology of Problem Solving. NY:Cambridge University. 176-207 As can be seen from the graph in the algorithmic type of Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. tasks the cross effect (F (1, 1493) =.01, p=.9; η<.001) is not (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in expressed. Probably, these findings can be explained by the insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental fact that in solving insight problems more important is to Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), manipulate with the initial representation of the problem, 1534-1555. especially for the "visual" problems where the spatial Lyusin D.V (2014). The influence of emotion on attention: characteristics and moving into the field of the problem are an analysis of current research. Cognitive psychology: the important because of high uncertainty of problem space. In phenomenon and problems. Moscow: Lenand Publ,. .146- the type of algorithmic problems, apparently, the central 160. (In Russian) executive is more important because the main resource Metcalfe J., Wiebe D. (1987) Intuition in insight and burden falls on a phased program switch solutions that do noninsight problem solving . Memory & Cognition, vol. not require taking into account the modal specifics, but it's 15, no. 3, 238-246. rather more complicated switching between tasks of Navon, D.; Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the different modalities. human-processing system. Psychological Review, Vol Summarizing, the data show that slave systems of 86(3),. 214-255 working memory are less important for algorithmic Newell A., Simon H.A. (1972) Human problem solving. problems. Central executive plays the main role and allows Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 920 p. to keep the algorithm of solutions. Ohlsson S. (1992) Information processing explanations of Accordingly, the model designed by H.Simon and insight and related phenomena. In M. Keane, K. Gilhooly A.Newell (1972) - the model of problem space, which (Eds.), Advances in the psychology of thinking. Vol. 1. describes the solution process as a successive movement on London, OK: Harvester Wheatsheaf. 536 Peirce, JW (2007) PsychoPy - Psychophysics software in Python. J Neurosci Methods, 162(1-2):8-13 Seifert C.M., Meyer D.E., Davidson N., Patalano A.L., & Yaniv I. (1995) Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared mind perspective . Sternberg R.J., Davidson J.E. (Eds.). The nature of insight. NY: Cambridge University Press,..65- 124. Thomas C. Ormerod James N. MacGregor Edward P. Chronicle. (2002) Dynamics and Constraints in Insight Problem Solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 28, No. 4, .791– 799 Vladimirov I.Yu., Korovkin S.Yu. (2014) Working memory as the thinking process utility system. Cognitive psychology: the phenomenon and problems. Moscow.: Lenand Publ . 8-21.(In Russian) Vladimirov I.Yu., Korovkin S.Yu., Chistopol'skaya A.V., Savinova A.D. (2013) Executive control load monitoring as a method of the thinking process microdynamics registration. Psychology of cognitive processes. Smolensk: Universum Publ,. pp.18-22. (In Russian) Weisberg R.W., Alba J.W (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, vol. 110, 169–192. Wen, M.C., Butler, L.T., & Koutstaal, W. (2013). Improving insight and non insight problem solving with brief interventions. British Journal of Psychology,104(1), 97-118. Wiley, J., Jarosz, A.F. (2012) How working memory capacity affects problem solving. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 56, 185-227. 537