=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-1427/paper11 |storemode=property |title=Conceptual Design and Evaluation of Maintenance Management Information System |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1427/paper11.pdf |volume=Vol-1427 }} ==Conceptual Design and Evaluation of Maintenance Management Information System== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1427/paper11.pdf
        Conceptual Design and Evaluation of Maintenance Management
                            Information System

           Bekim Fetaji                          Majlinda Fetaji, Ahmed Miftari                      Mirlinda Ebibi
  South East European University                 South East European University             International Balkans University
    Contemporary Sciences and                      Contemporary Sciences and                   Computer Science Faculty
    Technologies, 1200 Tetovo,                     Technologies, 1200 Tetovo,                Skopje, Macedonia Sci 88088
            Macedonia                                      Macedonia                              m.ebibi@ibu.edu.mk
      b.fetaji@seeu.edu.mk                           m.fetaji@seeu.edu.mk,
                                                     am21468seeu.edu.mk

                                                                      common understanding and analysis of a business
                                                                      process. A process model can provide a comprehensive
                                                                      understanding of a process. Business Process modeling
                          Abstract                                    is at the core of each of these approaches [Bro10]:
      The goal of the research study is the analyses                      • Business Process Reengineering (BPR)
      of published research on business process                           • Business Process Management (BPM)
      modeling and then conceptually design a                             • Activity Based Costing (ABC)
      business process model for Management                               • Business Activity Monitoring (BAM)
      Information system for Maintenance in South                         The arrival of modeling standards is now resulting
      East      European     University     (SEEU).                   in the rationalization of process analysis methods and
      Maintenance of facilities represents more                       the creation of a knowledge base that can be shared by
      services such as: recording of defects,                         market participants. Substantial progress has been
      reconstruction of defects, warehouse, budget,                   made in business process standardization.
      regular checkups, flexible overtime, etc and                        However, it is clear that the wide range of domain
      therefore classical ways to manage it do not                    covered by business process modeling requires more
      meet the needs of University and there is a                     that a single compacted standard. This study attempts
      need for electronic services. The research                      to present the current status and the need to embrace
      study aim is to present coherent ways to                        the multiple dimensions of business process
      transform and to improve the old way of                         approaches. The perspectives given in the report of ISO
      workflow of processes and maintenance with                      standards [Dum13] are based on MEGA customer
      new changes and its integration with other                      experience and are analyzed as such. Business Process
      electronic services. The research study                         Model and Notation (BPMN) is the global standard for
      investigates the need for implementing                          process modeling and one of the most important
      Management of Maintenance, analyze the                          components of successful Business-IT-Alignment.
      current state, design “SEEU Maintenance”                            BPMN has been primarily developed to support
      model and evaluate it. The 3 (three) study                      technical implementation of processes ("Process
      hypothesis have been investigated and                           Automation"). The more important the IT is in a
      statistically    analyzed.    Insights     and                  company, the more helpful the use of BPMN becomes.
      recommendations are provided.                                        Maintenance is crucial for a university.
                                                                      Maintenance of facilities represents more services such
 Keywords                                                             as: recording of defects, reconstruction of defects,
 Management Information system, Enterprise Resource                   warehouse, budget, regular checkups,etc and therefore
 Planning, Maintenance, conceptual design.                            classical ways to manage not meet the needs of
                                                                      organizations and the industry so there is a need for
                                                                      electronic services. Therefore the study focused on
 1. Introduction                                                      investigating new coherent ways to transform and to
                                                                      improve the old way of workflow of processes and
    Business process modeling (BMP) enables a
                                                                      maintenance with new changes and its integration with
Copyright © 2015 for the individual papers by the papers' authors.
                                                                      other electronic services in University.
Copying permitted only for private and academic purposes.
In: A. Bădică, M. Colhon (eds.): Proceedings of the 2015 Balkan       2 Literature Review
Conference on Informatics: Advances in ICT

                                                                     69
There’s a broad published literature reviewed on                  hand over the system to maintainers, but rather ensures
business process modeling. The term “business                     that the software project is controlled and that a
process” is often used in relation to very different types        structured and coordinated approach is used to transfer
of projects. Of these, we are addressing the following            the software to the maintainer. In this process, the
three according to [Nel12]:                                       maintainer will focus on the maintainability of this new
• The creation of a customer-oriented business                    software, and it means that a process is implemented to
management method. This means running the company                 follow the developer during the system development
via its business processes or value chains.                       life cycle. Once the software has become the
• The creation of procedures to oversee the                       responsibility of the maintainer, the Event and Service
organization’s operations.                                        Request Management process handles all the daily
• The integration of IT resources using a business                issues, Problem Reports, Modification Requests, and
process approach.                                                 support requests [IIB09], [Men07]. These are the daily
According to [Ald11] BPM helps divide complex                     services that must be managed efficiently. The first
business processes into smaller, less complex sub-                step in this process is to assess whether a request is to
processes. [San12] Declares that BPM makes it easier to           be addressed, rerouted, or rejected (on the basis of the
understand the business process and achieve the                   SLA and the nature of the request and its size) [Bro10].
desired outcome.                                                  Supplier agreements is concerned with the
In planning a company’s operations, one factor is the             management of contractual aspects (i.e.escrow,
relationship between strategy and business processes.             licenses, third-party) etc.
For example, a bank can decide to focus on the                    Accepted requests are documented, prioritized,
financial products market over the retail banking                 assigned, and processed in one of the service
market. The business process “Provide financial                   categories:
products” thus becomes the bank’s major value added               1)Operational Support process (which typically does
product line. Bank operations must be reorganized                 not necessitate any modification of software);
according to this business process so that each branch            2)Software Correction process; or
focuses on satisfying customers who buy financial                 3)Software Evolution process.
products.                                                         Certain service requests do not lead to any
According to [San12] Standards for analyzing business             modification of the software [Men10]. In the model,
processes must meet certain criteria that apply to any            these are referred to as operational support activities,
modeling standard:                                                and these consist of: a) replies to questions; b)
• An intuitive notation that is easily adopted for use by         provision of information and counseling; and c)
those involved with business analysis: a good diagram             helping customers to better understand the software, a
is worth a thousand words.                                        transaction, or its documentation. The next primary
• A metamodel and vocabulary—a group of concepts                  processes as discussed from [Ald11] concern the
and relationships—that are strictly and consistently              Version Management process that moves items to
defined to provide a solid foundation for the various             production, and the Monitoring and Control process,
business process approaches.                                      ensuring that the operational environment has not been
• A breakdown of the metamodel and notation for each              degraded. Maintainers always monitor the behavior of
level of analysis of business processes: value chain,             the operational system and its environments for signs
organization, and IT integration. This breakdown must             of degradation. They will quickly warn other support
be accompanied by a mechanism for navigating                      groups (operators, technical support, scheduling,
between the different levels of analysis.                         networks, and desktop support) when something
• An exchange format for both the process models and              unusual happens and judge whether or not an instance
their diagrams.                                                   of service degradation has occurred that needs to be
The key operational processes (also called primary                investigated. The last primary process addresses
processes) that a software maintenance organization               rejuvenation activities to improve maintainability,
uses are initiated at the start of software project               migration activities to move a system to another
development, beginning with the Transition process                environment and retirement activities when a system is
[Bre07].                                                          decommissioned [Bru13], [Deb06].
This process is not limited, as is the case with some
standards [Bor09], to the moment when developers                  3 Research Methodology




                                                             70
The research methodology involved fundamental                    1. Register Materials received from Supplier
research and representation design of the workflow of            2. Alarm Quantity
processes in SEEU and the strategy that will be used            3. List in grid view with quantity for each material in
throughout this work is given below. In general the                 warehouse
research study aim is to present coherent ways to               4. Order for materials that are near to end
transform and to improve the old way of workflow of             5. Received Order
processes with new changes and its integration with             6. Edit materials according to the tasks – according
other e-services of SEEU and my SEEU.                               to the task employee will take materials
The following research question were studied:                   7. Reports
1. How to improve the current workflow of processes             Maintenance
in maintenance of south East European University?
                                                                1. Define Category
2. What are the potential benefits from implementing
                                                                2. Create activity(Help Desk)
Management of Maintenance?
3. Which aspects of the organization will be affected?          3. Periodic Activity
Main Hypothesis: If we use one new system design of             4. View Activity
the process workflows that represent a coherent way to          5. Reports
transform the old way of maintenance management in             Task List
the form of e-service we will have better management           6. Task list in grid view
of maintenance.                                                7. Alarm notification for open tasks
Independent variable: New System                               Overtime
Dependent variable: Management of Maintenance                  8. Define employee payment for overtime
Indicator: Current situation, review of existing               9. Add overtime
documentation                                                  10. Reports
H1: If we use a new system for recording costs then we         Budget
will have better management of maintenance which can           11. Define Budget category and subcategory
be measured by the reduction of the costs.                     12. Define budget value for categories
Independent variable: a new system for recording               13. Register costs
Dependent variable: Management of Maintenance                  14. Reports
Indicator: Difference in costs
H2: If we use such a system for alarms (periodic tasks)        The warehouse page is used only from maintenance
then we will have better management which can be               department, all materials are registered in database
measured by the number of forgotten tasks in past.             from SEEU Campus Warehouse and they are defined
Independent variable: Systems for alarms (periodic             as standard materials, if the maintenance department
tasks)                                                         needs for material that is not standard then informs
Dependent variable: Management of Maintenance                  SEEU Campus Warehouse with activity in task list.
Indicator: Reduction of forgotten tasks to zero
H3: If the current state of materials in the warehouse                   TABLE 1. Register received materials from
will be followed then the optimal quantity of materials                            Main Warehouse
will be under control.
Independent variable: New Systems                                No.     Fields      Data       Type/         Short
Dependent variable: Management of Maintenance                                        Description
Indicator: Optimal quantity of materials.
                                                                 1       ID          Text Box - Disabled
4   The    Business Process                   Model              2       Date        Text Box – dd.mm.yyyy
Management of Maintenance                    “SEEU               3       Material    Drop Down List – Materials
Maintenance”                                                                         Table in DB

“SEEU Maintenance” model has the following                       4       Quantity    Text Box – Number
structure:                                                       5       Supplier    Text Box – automatically
Warehouse




                                                          71
                      from Materials Table in DB               (message on page) and should make new order to
                                                               SEEU Campus Warehouse, also row in grid view
     6    Price       Text Box – from Materials                which display materials which quantity is equal with
                      Table in DB                              alarm quantity will have red color background.


1.1 Alarm Quantity for all materials                           1.3 Order to SEEU Campus Warehouse for
                                                                   materials that are near to end.
For each material in this page will set alarm quantity,
this means that when a quantity of material in                 After user will receive quantity alarm for any material
warehouse will be equal with alarm quantity which is           in warehouse should make new order to SEEU Campus
defined in this page we will receive notification that         Warehouse which is main warehouse, making new
should make new order for that material.                       order page.
TABLE 2. Set alarm quantity                                    a.   ID – Text Box: text box will be disabled and will
                                                                    get automatically value .
 No.       Fields             Data    Type/      Short         b.   Date – Text Box: textbox will be disabled and
                              Description                           will gate today date automatically.
 1         ID                 ID Number                        c.   Material – Drop Down List: user will select
                                                                    material from list .
 2         Material           Drop Down List-                  d.   Quantity – Text Box: user will write material
                                                                    quantity for order.
                              automatically       from         e.   Received Date – Text Box: user will write date
                              Materials Table in DB                 when they need to receive a material from order.
                                                               f.   Description: user can write description for
 3         Alarm Quantity     Text Box -Number                      material or something else.
                                                               g.   Status –Text Box: when we are making new order
                                                                    for any material status automatically will have
2. ID – Text Box: this text box will be disabledd and               value Open and when we will receive that
   will get automatically value                                     material status will change from Open to Close
3. Material – Drop Down List: user will select material
   from list                                                   NOTICE: SEEU Campus Warehouse (main
4. Alarm Quantity – user will set alarm quantity for           warehouse) will receive order like a regular task in
   material (number)                                           their task list. If needed material is not standard then
                                                               user will select in drop-down list material with name
1.2 List in grid view with quantity for each material          “other” (which previously should register in DB Table
    in warehouse.                                              of materials like e material category) and in description
                                                               text box will write name and description about material
This page will use only like a report for quantity for         that they need.
each material in warehouse.
5. ID –:text box will be disabled and will get value           1.4 Received Order
   automatically(from 1 to number of materials)
6. Material – Name of material                                 After that we make new order for material and we
7. Quantity – Sum of all materials that are received           receive that material in Maintenance Warehouse by
   minus all materials that are taken from warehouse           help of this page we should register received order,we
Example: A = sum of all quantity that are received             need to register date when order is received and
         B = sum of all materials that are taken               description for order. NOTICE: If the order received is
         C = quantity in warehouse, C= A-B                     not the same with our order than should write textual
                                                               description in the text field dedicated for that.
NOTICE: If Quantity of materials is equal with Alarm
Quantity than user will receive alarm message




                                                          72
                                                          Figure 2: Business Process Model: Maintenance –
Warehouse – Process                                                            Process
                                                        Task List – Process




   Figure 1: Business Process Model: Warehouse –
                       Process                          Figure 3: Business Process Model: Task List – Process
Maintenance – Process
                                                        Overtime – Process




                                                   73
Figure 4: Business Process Model: Overtime – Process              3.28), therefore H3 is accepted. The relationship
                                                                  between perceived ease of use and attitude (β = 0.08; t
Budget – Process                                                  = 0.92) is found not to be significant, therefore H3 is
                                                                  rejected.


                                                                                   Table 3. Hypothesis results
                                                                     Hypothesis            Effect       T-value           Results
                                                                           H1            PU -> BI           4.39          Accepted
                                                                           H2             PU -> A           3.41          Accepted
                                                                           H3            PEU -> PU          3.28          Rejected


                                                                     Table 4. Correlation of reliability of Management
                                                                    Information System with IT Skills level and have a
                                                                                    computer at home
                                                                                     IT Skills level

                                                                   Benefits of       1                 2                  3
                                                                   using    the                        intermediat
                                                                                     low               e                  advanced
                                                                   developed e-
                                                                   service           What is the benefit of using the new
                                                                   system            developed system?
                                                                                     yes       No      yes         no     yes       no
 Figure 5: Business Process Model: Budget – Process
                                                                   Unsatisfactor                                   1.5
                                                                   y                 1.8%                          %
5 Results of Hypothesis Testing                                                                                    1.5
                                                                   Satisfactory      10%               6%          %
Within the study used the questionnaire as evaluation
method to asses the hypothesis. The sample size was                Good              8.1%              3.1%
22 participants. We have used the analysis of variance                                         1.7                        12.7
(ANOVA) which is a collection of statistical models                Very good         1.7%      %       15.7%              %
used in order to analyze the differences among group                                                   23.00              15.5
means and their associated procedures. The statistics              Outstanding       1.5%              %                  %
distribution is given in the tables below.                                           23.10     1.70    47.80        3.0    28.2      0.0
                                                                   Total                %        %        %         0%      0%       0%
Regarding the hypothesis one (H1) and hypothesis two
(H2) which are about the effect of perceived usefulness
(PU) on behavioral intention (BI) and attitude (A) the                                        TABLE 5.
results are as follows: perceived usefulness (PU) is                Attitude expressed through level of satisfaction towards
positively related to behavioral intention (BI) (β = 0.39;                             process modeling
t = 4.39), therefore H1 is accepted. Perceived
usefulness has a positive influence on attitude of social          Level                 of
                                                                                              X1               X2             X3
                                                                   Satisfaction
media (β = 0.34; t = 3.41), therefore H2 is found to be
significant and it is also accepted.                               Unsatisfactory             11%              8%             6%
For the hypothesis three (H3) effect of perceived ease
                                                                   Satisfactory               17%              17%            18%
of use (PEU) on perceived usefulness (PU) and attitude
the results are as follows: perceived ease of use is               Good                       14%              19%            14%
positively related to perceived usefulness (β = 0.29; t =




                                                             74
 Very Good              45%         24%        31%               that the paper "Seven process modeling guidelines
                                                                 (7PMG)" has been cited more than 250 times already
 Outstanding            12%         32%        31%               since it was published only several years ago. Clearly,
                                                                 only seven guidelines can not cover everything that a
    “The level of attitude towards you are in-time:              modeler needs to know. For example, this particular
informed, you can have access to all needed                      paper does not tell how to decompose a business
information”. They were given five options to answer:            process model - only that is need to be decomposed it
Unsatisfactory(1); Satisfactory(2); Good(3); Very                beyond a certain size of the model. Also, more research
Good(4) and Outstanding(5). In order to investigate              is needed with respect to quality metrics. In particular,
that, we had specific indicator questions marked as:             the analysis of the results reveals that a large amount of
   X1 - You get information in time.                             research on metrics is not addressing guidelines and
   X2- You are informed about the status of each                 vice versa.
process in time/ at any time.                                    Existing quality metrics would need a critical review to
   X3 – You are informed about each new process in               make them applicable as a measurement to evaluate the
time/ at any time.                                               outcome of applying guidelines.
                                                                 The devised strategy proposed is continuous
                                                                 improvement, module by module. Any new software
6 Conclusions                                                    refresh is preceded by the user definition of the
The conclusion based on the review analyses is that              business process; thus the users drive development of
guidelines to improve the understand-ability of                  the improvements.
business process models are very important. They                 Based on the literature review, as the most significant
should be focused primarily on efficiency of modeling            steps toward implementing and developing a successful
and should be described in a structured way using                management system are the users involvement in the
graphs and textual description. The realized research            business process analyses and acceptance of its
on the quality of the modeling process is quite scattered        processes, deciding which of the multiple features
because of the many factors and its multidimensional             should be implemented, in order to assist specific
nature. The main emphasis is put on enhancing the                groups and maintain their satisfaction. Also,
efficiency of modeling by means of promoting the                 identifying the optimal requirements and definitions is
reuse of existing process artifacts.                             considered as a major step in order application to be
Parallel with the growth of the organization increases           powerful and reliable. A final research area that seems
the need for Management of Maintenance systems, in               worthwhile to pursue further concerns the quality of
the near future it will be necessary to implement the            the modeling process. Such research should not only
software system for maintenance management. The                  look at the different tasks in a modeling process, such
focused on the design of the system by trying to                 as elicitation, modeling and validation, but also look at
present coherent way to transform the old way of                 the contextual factors.
maintenance management incorporated with different               Little research effort has been spent on assuring and
e-services.                                                      understanding business process modeling quality.
Based on the review analyses there is no generally               Among the various research methods, experimentation
accepted framework of model quality types: we refer to           is the most popular one, followed by the use of
quality types using many different quality names and             examples and case studies. A little more than half of
not a standard for quality. Only one fourth of the               the papers performed empirical validations, and
studies used a precise definition of quality. Among the          experiments were mostly conducted with students.
used quality terms, most research focuses on                     Descriptive research methods are scarce in this
understand-ability and maintainability for the product           research area.
cluster and on efficiency and effectiveness of the               The major opportunities for improvement within the
modeling process for the process cluster. An interest in         work-flow that were identified for highest potential
and demand for guidelines is substantiated by the fact           impact included:




                                                            75
−Analyzing the content of applications (both scientific        [Bru13] P. D. Bruza and Th. P. van der Weide. 2013,
content as well as involved individuals/institutions)                  "The Semantics of Data Flow
−Scheduling meetings (calendaring software)                            Diagrams".Springer-Verlag, 2013.
−General operations (downtime, slow performance,               [Deb06] Paul, Debra; Donald Yeates, Keith Hindle
and lack of documentation and training)                                (April 2006). Business analysis. BCS. p. 4.
                                                                       ISBN 978-1-902505-70-1.
−Identifying qualified reviewer pool and facilitating
best match of reviewers to applications.                       [Bro10] Vom Brocke, J.HKVJH & Rosemann, M.
                                                                       (2010), Handbook on Business Process
Critique templates that are more user friendly for both                Management: Strategic Alignment,
reviewers in composing and submitting their critiques                  Governance, People and Culture (International
and for staff in assembling and finalizing summary                     Handbooks on Information Systems) (Vol. 1).
statements.                                                            Berlin: Springer
This system will be an important factor for the                [Men07] J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, J. Cardoso, What
operation and organization of SEEU by eliminating                     makes process models understandable?, in: G.
the coincidence at work and creating standard for                     Alonso, P. Dadam, M. Rosemann (Eds.)
work-flow of the processes in maintenance.                            Business Process Management, Springer-
                                                                      Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Brisbane,
References                                                            AUSTRALIA, 2007, pp. 48-63.
                                                               [Dum13] M. Dumas, M.L. Rosa, J. Mendling,
[Nel12] H.J. Nelson, G. Poels, M. Genero, M. Pia ttini,
                                                                      H.A.Reijers, Fundamentals of business
        A conceptual modeling quality framework,
                                                                      process management, Springer-Verlag Berlin
        Software Quality Journal, 20 (2012) 201-228.
                                                                      Heidelberg, 2013.
[IIB09] IIBA (March 2009). Kevin Brennan. ed. A
                                                               [Bre07] P. Brereton, B.A. Kitchenham, D. Budgen, M.
         Guide to the Business Analysis Body of
                                                                       Turner, M. Khalil, Lessons from applying the
         Knowledge (2.0 ed.). IIBA. p. 3. ISBN 978-0-
                                                                       systematic literature review process within the
         9811292-1-1.
                                                                       software engineering domain, The Journal of
[Men10] J. Mendling, H.A. Reijers, W.M.P. van der                      Systems and Software, 80 (2007) 571-583
       Aals t, Seven process modeling guidelines
       (7PMG), Information and Software
       Technology, 52 (2010) 127-136.
[Ald11] L. Aldin, S. de Cesare, A literature review on
        business process modelling: new frontiers of
        reusability, Enterprise Information Systems, 5
        (2011) 359-383.
[San12] L. Sánchez-González, F. García, F. Ruiz, J.
        Me ndling, Quality indicators for business
        process models from a gateway complexity
        perspecti ve, Information and Software
        Technology, 54 (2012) 1159-1174.
[Bor09] M. Born, J. Kirchner, J.P. Mueller, Context -
        driven business process modelling, in: O.
        Camp, H. S. (Eds.) Advanced Technologies
        and Techniques for Enterprise Information
        Systems (11th International Conference on
        Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS
        2009)), INSTICC Press, 2009, pp. 17-26.)




                                                          76