=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1458/E08_CRC8_Schmitz
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1458/E08_CRC8_Schmitz.pdf
|volume=Vol-1458
}}
==None==
<pdf width="1500px">https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1458/E08_CRC8_Schmitz.pdf</pdf>
<pre>
     Deploying Machine Learning at Web Scale

                               Christoph Schmitz

               1&1 Mail & Media Development & Technology GmbH


Presentation Abstract
1&1 uses machine learning on some of the largest German web portals with
practical challenges which are underrepresented in the academic literature. In
our presentation, we will discuss these and some of our solutions in practice.
Data. Data quality is a major concern when integrating data sources within
the company. The hardest problems in our production environment are gradual
degradations in data quality. The root causes are hard to find, often occuring
several steps upstream in the data pipeline. Organizational constraints can im-
pede the collection of good quality data. Data sets from questionnaires can be
skewed and thus require considerable preprocessing to be usable.
Modeling. Machine learning tools are usually targeted at an exploratory, inter-
active work flow. Building and maintaining hundreds of models at the same time
leads to other requirements, though. We treat models like code, using versioning,
continuous integration, and deployment strategies from software development.
Much of the training work flow is automated, allowing a small team of data
scientists to maintain models for a large number of target groups.
Constraints. In our applications, constraints are important when assessing the
quality of models. One major example is the joint distribution of target variables
with the age and gender of customers. Thus, measuring and visualizing these
additional constraints is part of our modeling work flow. We are also looking
into including these constraints directly in the training of models itself.
Processing. To be able to efficiently score more than 300 models, we use cus-
tom planning logic to split data flows into a minimal number of MapReduce
jobs. Again, the common machine learning tools are not made for this. We will
discuss challenges and solutions embedding Weka into a Hadoop application,
e. g., schema handling, missing values, and dealing with errors.
Keeping Up. Since big data technology evolves at a breakneck pace, we need
to trade off missing the latest features or the newest frameworks against the
considerable cost of updating dozens of machines. While vendors promise hassle-
free rolling upgrades, in practice upgrades are much more involved and entail
considerable risk, effort, and organizational overhead.
  Copyright c 2015 by the papers authors. Copying permitted only for private and
  academic purposes. In: R. Bergmann, S. Görg, G. Müller (Eds.): Proceedings of
  the LWA 2015 Workshops: KDML, FGWM, IR, and FGDB. Trier, Germany, 7.-9.
  October 2015, published at http://ceur-ws.org




                                     78

</pre>