<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Semantic Annotation to Support Description of the Art Market</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dominik Filipiak</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Krzysztof We˛ cel</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Agata Filipowska</string-name>
          <email>lipowska@kie.ue.poznan.pl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Information Systems, Poznan ́ University of Economics al.</institution>
          <addr-line>Niepodległos ́ci 10 61-875 Poznan ́</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="PL">Poland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2015</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>51</fpage>
      <lpage>54</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The estimation of prices on the art market has been investigated as a research topic for many years, but only recently new approaches to this problem have been applied. One of these approaches concerns extending data on a work of art with data from the Internet to improve the quality of assessment. This, however, creates a lot of challenges mostly regarding the information extraction. Semantic annotation and enrichment of the crawled data enable additional reasoning and introduce new features into existing methods, resulting in a better estimation of indices for the art market. The problem tackled by this paper is as follows: what kind of semantic enrichment on documents collected from the Internet can be introduced to extend the data on the artwork and in uence the e ciency and quality of indices calculated for artworks.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>eol&gt;Art Market Analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>Linked Data</kwd>
        <kwd>Semantic Tagging</kwd>
        <kwd>Econometrics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1.1 Art Market</title>
      <p>With all their invaluable qualities, artworks are often treated
as a type of an asset, just like stocks or bonds. The idea of
considering art as a form of an alternative investment can be
perceived as a controversial one. Nonetheless, this approach
to artworks is recently gaining more and more attention1.
As a consequence, numerous studies have been carried out
to explore the topic.</p>
      <p>Surprisingly, artworks (such as paintings) traded in auction
houses can be described with a decent number of variables,
regardless of one's art history knowledge. The name of an
author, medium used, size of a painting, initial and hammer
price, to name a few. This data is often provided by
institutions taking care of the sale. Sometimes, among other
features, a long text description is associated with the
painting or artist. This is a valuable source of information, but as
it is provided in a natural language, it has to be processed
before machine-based data processing is possible.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>1.2 Problem Statement</title>
      <p>Since auction houses have started to frequently publish sales
results on the Internet, the perception of the art market has
changed. Numerous services have started to collect data and
even prepare market reports. Minimisation of information
asymmetry was not the only consequence of this step. With
a su cient amount of high-quality data, research carried
out on the art market nally can be conducted in a data
science manner. An employment of a hedonic regression
using semantically enriched information is presented in this
paper as a base for building art market indices. The concept
of using a regression in the art market analysis has been
intensively studied, but, to the best of our knowledge, the
use of semantic data enrichment constitutes a contribution
to this eld.</p>
      <p>The problem tackled by this paper was de ned as follows:
what kind of semantic enrichment on data published on the
Internet, e.g. by auction houses, can be introduced to extend
the data on the artwork and in uence the e ciency and
quality of the calculation of artworks' indices.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2. SOLUTION</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>2.1 Architecture of the Solution</title>
      <p>In order to tackle the presented problem, a solution o
ering a four-step processing pipeline has been designed. These
steps concern data collection, data re nement, information
extraction and data enrichment. The solution may be
per1An interesting case is provided by the National
Bank of Hungary, which started to invest in art
works http://blogs.wsj.com/emergingeurope/2014/03/
31/hungary-central-bank-to-buy-art/
ceived as a sort of framework, which is a base for future
research.</p>
      <p>A reasonable number of observations regarding sales in
auction houses must be collected to facilitate building of an
e ective prediction model. Therefore, the rst step
considers the data collection. Numerous services provide
historical sales information. Artprice2 and Artnet 3 are the most
prominent examples of data providers. However, these sites
are often subscription-based and do not provide data in a
parse-friendly format, not to mention various legal issues.
As a consequence, the data collection must be performed by
dedicated crawlers, operating on pages of numerous auction
houses.</p>
      <p>Data re nement and cleansing is indispensable in order to
obtain robust results. For example, due to a human error,
some observations have misspelled information about artists.
This issue may be resolved by applying various fuzzy string
matching algorithms. According to the so-called garbage
in, garbage out principle, this step is crucial to assure the
quality of the experiment's results.</p>
      <p>The third step considers information extraction from the
collected documents. Auction lots are often described with an
unstructured text which contains useful information. For
instance, the presence of a signature on a painting or a number
in an edition in lithographies may carry important
information in uencing the hammer prices. Due to the complexity
of this process, possible approaches are described in detail
in section 2.2.</p>
      <p>The data enrichment, the nal step, makes use of annotated
entities in order to provide more complementary
information. Although minimising information asymmetry on the
art market is an obvious goal behind this approach, there are
various applications of enriched data. These possibilities are
covered in section 2.3.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>2.2 Annotation – From Text to Triples</title>
      <p>Ontologies used for annotation make it easier for people and
machines to understand the text. Document retrieval can be
signi cantly improved when additional relations from
ontology are leveraged. For example, we can ask for documents
containing information about impressionists and we actually
do not have to know the names of individual artists. Also,
any document containing the phrase \oil painting" will be
classi ed as a \document about art media".</p>
      <p>DBpedia Spotlight4 is a tool for automatically annotating
mentions of DBpedia resources in text. It classi es
entities according to the DBpedia ontology. Two modes are
available. In the rst one (candidates), it spots the
potential mentions (either statistically or based on gazetteer)
and retrieves the candidate DBpedia resources bound to
Wikipedia. In the second mode (annotate), it additionally
disambiguates candidates and links the mentions to the best
one. One of the strong points of the DBpedia Spotlight is the
richness of language resources that can be used for indexing
2http://www.artprice.com
3https://www.artnet.com/price-database/
4http://spotlight.dbpedia.org
by the underlying engine. Depending on the language
sometimes additional processing is required to improve recall of
spotting. For example, for the Polish language an
external morphology analyser is necessary to normalise various
in ectional forms.</p>
      <p>Several solutions base also on considering many ontologies
at once. NERD { Named Entity Recognition and
Disambiguation5 proposes uni ed numerous named entity
extractors using the NERD ontology, which provides a set of
axioms aligning various underlying taxonomies. Mappings are
established manually. According to the documentation,
several extractors are supported, including: DBpedia Spotlight,
OpenCalais and Zemanta.</p>
      <p>A similar \meta-approach" is taken by Apache Stanbol, a
general framework for semantic enhancement of
unstructured text. DBpedia Spotlight can work as an
EnhancementEngine for Stanbol. Stanbol also links to several other
external services via enhancement modules, for example:
Named Entity Linking Engine (suggests links to linked data
sources), FST Linking Engine (links Entities indexed in a
Solr index), Geonames Enhancement Engine (links to
geonames.org, with hierarchical links for locations), OpenCalais
(both NER and Entity Linking), Zemanta Enhancement
Engine (both NLP and Entity Linking).</p>
      <p>One of the best solutions regarding disambiguation is the
Dandelion6 service o ered by Spaziodati. The integration
is much deeper than in the case of NERD where only
ontology was aligned. It builds truly own knowledge graph
which allows for much better ranking and thus more precise
disambiguation of the mentions. Figure 1 presents a sample
annotation of an artwork with the Dandelion API.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>2.3 Data Enrichment</title>
      <p>
        Sometimes it is hard to distinguish data extraction from
enrichment; very often these phases are combined. Having
identi ed the entity in text, additional data can be retrieved.
Semantic enrichment sometimes covers phases three and four
of the proposed approach, being information extraction and
data enrichment stemming from semantic annotation. In the
context of data mining links to external information results
in additional attributes, they can improve the quality of the
predictive model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>There is a big number of open data sources that may enrich
data on artworks currently available on the Web. The
domain of ne art requires more thoughtful selection as not all
datasets contain relevant information. The obvious source
is DBpedia7. The recent version (2014) provides
informa5http://nerd.eurecom.fr/
6https://dandelion.eu/
7http://dbpedia.org
tion about more than 1,445,000 people and 411,000 creative
works in its English edition only. Other language chapters
can potentially provide additional data, particularly, when
the DBpedia language matches the nationality of the artist.
An intensive e ort has been observed to align artists'
descriptions in Wikipedia with external authoritative sources,
when possible. Therefore, we can expect more precise and
more complete information about at least some of the artists.
At the bottom of the Wikipedia article for some people one
can nd \Authority control" with links to external sources,
e.g. VIAF (Virtual International Authority File), ISNI
(International Standard Name Identi er), ULAN (Union List of
Artist Names). The number of available references depends
on the popularity of the artist. For example, there are 11
entries for the famous Polish painter Wojciech Kossak and
only four for his lesser-known son (see Figure 2).
VIAF is a joint project of several national libraries. It is
apparently the biggest dataset, with information on about
over 35 million names8. The provenance information is kept
for each piece of data, which is useful as some discrepancies
still exists. For example, Figure 3 presents di erent dates of
birth of Wojciech Kossak.
ISNI is an ISO 27729 global standard number for identifying
contributors to creative works. It currently (2015) holds the
information about more than 8 million individuals. ULAN9
is particularly interesting as it focuses on artists' names,
holding information on about 120,000 of them. The basic
information includes given names (in multiple languages),
pseudonyms and variants spelling, i.e. various surface forms
(almost 300,000). Such information is crucial for nding
mentions of an artist in the text. The search interface allows
to nd all artists with a given name (Figure 4) and within
individual page relations between artists are also provided
(Figure 5).</p>
      <p>Another dataset o ered by Getty is also relevant to our
research { The Art &amp; Architecture Thesaurus (AAT)10. It
contains terms useful in the description of art techniques (see
8VIAF Annual Report 2014,
www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/viaf/
OCLC-2014-VIAF-Annual-Report-to-VIAF-Council.pdf
9http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/
ulan/index.html
10http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/
aat/index.html
http://</p>
      <p>As we keep data in Open Re ne, it would be convenient
to use one of the extensions for named entity recognition.
That would allow us to extend our data about a certain
artwork with additional attributes, thus leading to better
predictive models. In such context RDF-extension
(developed by DERI Galway) with such functionalities as
reconciliating against SPARQL endpoints or RDF dumps and
exporting to RDF might be used. DBpedia-extension (by
Zemanta) added the possibility to extend reconciled data with
data from DBpedia and to extract entities from full text
descriptions via Zemanta API. Regarding integration, one of
the most comprehensive solutions is LODGre ne, developed
within thr LOD2 project12. Unfortunately, it is targeted at
the English language, and we need to adapt it for Polish.
It also does not contain domain-speci c ontologies like for
example ULAN.</p>
      <p>To conclude, the way various tools conduct analysis is very
similar. In fact, only two aspects make these solutions
different: the underlying dictionary and the ability to
disam11http://www.getty.edu/research/tools/vocabularies/
lod/
12http://lod2.eu
biguate entities. None of the solutions o er a direct support
for the Polish language. These aspects open a space for our
improvements. Our solution will base on the DBpedia
Spotlight with an index built for the Polish language resources
from the Polish DBpedia supplemented with domain-speci c
ontologies like ULAN.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>3. MARKET INDICES PREDICTION</title>
      <p>
        The semantically annotated data used while describing art
works may improve the process of creation of indices for
the art market. The art market indices are build for
outlining general trends and measure its volatility and overall
value. Comparison of artworks with more traditional forms
of assets (like bonds) or searching for a correlation between
various economic factors and behaviour of the market
complement the rationale behind constructing indices [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
Currently, two ways to develop art market indices are the
most popular: based on repeat-sales and hedonic regression.
The rst method takes into account all items sold at least
twice and calculates indices based on the proportion of the
rst and the second sale prices. Probably the most notable
example of this approach is the Mei&amp;Moses Art Index [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
Its weakness relates to the fact that artworks are considered
as a long-term form of investment, what results in a
relatively small amount of data to base on. Therefore, many
researches have employed hedonic regression [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. It is a form
of linear regression, which takes into account various features
of artworks and their year of sale separately compared to the
auction lot hammer price in this case. The Ordinal Least
Squared method is used to estimate coe cients. A simple
example of this linearised model is presented in equation 1.
ln Pit =
      </p>
      <p>z
+ X
j=1
jXij + X
t=0
tDit + "it;
(1)
where ln Pit represents the natural logarithm of a price of
a given painting i 2 f1; 2; :::; N g at time t 2 f1; 2; :::; g; ,
and are regression coe cients for estimated
characteristics. Xij represents hedonic variables included in the model,
whereas Dit stands for time dummy variables.</p>
      <p>Considered hedonic variables are, for example, the artist's
name, the painting's size, year of creation and other related
features describing a given painting. An indirect
information, such as a time of death of the artists, may also be
included. In some cases information can be missing,
therefore this method is considered to be prone to the selection
bias. Having a wide range of relevant data is one of the most
important steps in the index calculation process. Therefore,
this is the place where the approach discussed in the paper
can be used for yielding more accurate indices. More
complete data with extracted variables (such as the mentioned
presence of a signature or edition in the case of lithographies)
allows to build more sophisticated representation of a
painting. Used in the equation (1), it results in more accurate
coe cients representing various sales periods ( t). These
coe cients are actually employed to construct indices:
(2)
Indext+1 =
e t
which can be used to measure and visualise overall art
market performance through di erent periods.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>4. CONCLUSIONS</title>
      <p>Nowadays, we deal with an increasing popularity of
investment in artworks. This imposes the need for employing
various methods for estimation of prices of these artworks.
Therefore, researchers and practitioners work on methods
enabling market description and price estimation. This
relates also to indices developed for the art market that were
addressed in the paper.</p>
      <p>The paper presented the approach of how the semantic
processing may enrich data available for the current methods
of estimation of indices for the art market. It discussed the
data sources as well as proposed the semantically-based
document processing pipeline. Currently, this approach is being
implemented and the rst results seem promising.
Having annotated descriptions of artists and artworks, it
is possible to conduct further research. A complementary,
detailed and semantically enriched catalogue raisonne
obtained in the previously mentioned process could be a
valuable source of information for performing art market
analysis itself. In addition, well-structured data may pave the
way towards usage of methods from a graph theory, topic
labelling or even employment of machine learning.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>C. d'Amato</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Berka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Svatek</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>We</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,cel, editors.
          <source>Proc. of the International Workshop on Data Mining on Linked Data collocated with (ECMLPKDD</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          ), Prague, Czech Republic, Sep.
          <volume>23</volume>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , volume
          <volume>1082</volume>
          <source>of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
            <surname>Ginsburgh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mei</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Moses</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The Computation of Prices Indices</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture</source>
          , volume
          <volume>1</volume>
          , pages
          <fpage>947</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>979</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elsevier</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Kra</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>ussl and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>N. van Eisland. Constructing</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>the True Art Market Index - A Novel 2-Step Hedonic Approach and its Application to the German Art Market</article-title>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mei</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Moses</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Art as an Investment and the Underperformance of Masterpieces</article-title>
          . NYU Finance Working Paper,
          <source>(FIN-01-012):</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          {
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>