=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-1490/paper21 |storemode=property |title=Critical phenomena in a model of fuel's heating in a porous medium |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1490/paper21.pdf |volume=Vol-1490 }} ==Critical phenomena in a model of fuel's heating in a porous medium== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1490/paper21.pdf
Mathematical Modeling


                     Critical phenomena in a model
                  of fuel's heating in a porous medium

                                         Shchepakina E.A.
                                  Samara State Airspace University



       Abstract. The autoignition of flammable liquid in an inert porous medium are
       studied. In this paper we concentrated on the critical case which is concerned
       with the phenomenon of delayed loss of stability in the dynamical model. The
       realizability conditions for the critical regime are obtained. It is shown that
       critical regime is modelled by a canard − a trajectory of slow–fast system,
       which first move near the stable part of the slow invariant manifold, then move
       near the unstable part of it.

       Keywords: ignition, critical phenomenon, canard, invariant manifold, delayed
       loss of stability.


       Citation: Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model of fuel's heating in
       a porous medium. Proceedings of Information Technology and Nanotechnology
       (ITNT-2015), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2015; 1490: 179-189. DOI:
       10.18287/1613-0073-2015-1490-179-189


Introduction
    This paper deals with the investigation of the critical conditions for autoignition of
combustible fluids in porous insulation materials [1, 2]. This phenomenon is usually
caused by a leaking of a combustible liquid into lagging material surrounding a hot
pipework. Due to highly insulation environment heat losses are remarkable low and
autoignition may occur as a result of exothermic oxidation reaction.
    The investigation of the autoignition process has been carried out by many authors,
see for instance [3–12] and references therein.
    We shall study a process which may be defined as the autoignition in two-phase
medium (combustible liquid and inert porous matrix). The possible depletion of oxygen or
its diffusion into porous structure and transport of the liquid or its vapour within the
insulation are all ignored, in order to focus attention on the competitive effects of the
reactive term of the dispersed liquid and evaporative heat loss. The dimensionless model
in this case has the form [1]
   du
       QK1 xe1/ u  (u  ua )  Qc K 2 xe βe / u ,
   dt
                                                                                         (1)
   dx
        K 2 xeβe / u  K1 xe 1/ u .
   dt

                                                                                         179

  Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                        Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


  Here, u is a dimensionless temperature of the reactant phase; the dimensionless
concentration x represents the mass fraction of combustible liquid present in the porous
material; the dimensionless parameters Q and K1 characterize the heat of reaction and the
reaction frequency, respectively, for the exothermic oxidation reaction, while Qc and K 2
are the similar terms for the endothermic evaporation reaction; β e is the ratio of the
enthalpy of vaporization to the activation energy of the oxidation reaction; ua is ambient
temperature.
   Introducing the new variables θ and τ by
   u  θ  β2 , t  τ exp(1/ β), β  u(0),
and taking into account
          1              1          1
exp               exp        exp    ,
       β(θβ  1)         1+βθ       β
leads (1) to the form
     QK1 x      θ           ua  β  1
θ         exp          θ  2  exp  
      β2        1+βθ          β     β
       Qc K 2 x      1-β     βθ 
               exp  e  exp  e  ,                                                    (2)
         β2           β      1+βθ 
                 1-β     βθ             θ 
x   K 2 x exp  e  exp  e   K1 x exp       .
                 β       1+βθ           1+βθ 
   We introduce the new parameters
        1                 1-β        u β
ε= exp    , a  K 2 exp  e  , θ a  a 2 ,
        β                 β           β
         QK      1          QK      -β 
    μ  2 1 exp    , ν= c 2 2 exp  e  .
          β      β           β      β 
   Due to the smallness of the parameter ε for typical combustible liquids, system (2) can
be rewritten in the singularly perturbed form (see, for instance, [13−17]):
             θ                             βe θ 
εθ  μx exp          θ  θ a   νx exp       ,                                    (3)
             1+βθ                          1+βθ 
             βθ             θ 
x  ax exp  e   K1 x exp       .                                                   (4)
             1+βθ           1+βθ 
  The chemically relevant phase space  of system (3), (4) is defined by
  x  0, θ  1/  .
   In [2] system (1) was investigated numerically under quasi-steady-state assumption that
corresponds to the assumption ε  0 for system (3), (4). This approach allows
determining the main types of chemical regimes of the investigated process. The quasi-
steady-state assumption is widely used in the theory of combustion and gives good results
                                                                                         180

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                           Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


to draw conclusions about the qualitative behavior of the full system for sufficiently small
 ε . However, the critical phenomena are highly sensitive with respect to the parameters.
Hence, this fact implies the considerable difficulties under the numerical calculations.
Thus, detailed study of this mathematical object is possible with taking into account the
small perturbations and using of asymptotic methods, for example, methods of the integral
manifolds theory for singularly perturbed systems.


Criteria for the critical regimes
  The trivial solution is the final steady state of the system. The degenerate equation
             θ                              βe θ 
 0  μx exp           θ  θ a   νx exp         F ( x,θ) describes the slow curve S of
             1+βθ                           1+βθ 
(3), (4) (see, for example, [17, 18]). The subset S s ( S u ) of S with
F ( x,θ)
          0         ( 0)
  θ
is called the stable or attractive (unstable or repulsive) part of S. A point A on S in
which F / θ=0 is called the jump or turning point. Stable and unstable parts of the
slow curve are zeroth order approximations of corresponding stable and unstable slow
invariant manifolds. The invariant manifolds lie in an ε-neighborhood of the slow
curve, except near jump or turning points (see [17] and references therein).
   The slow curve has an asymptote θ  θ , where
                 1
θ                            ln  μ / ν  ,
       βe  1  β ln  μ / ν 
and intersects the axis Oθ in the point with θ  θ0 . The shape of the curve S varies
with the relation between values of the parameters, which leads to a change in
qualitative behavior of the system. So, if we change the value of one parameter, with
fixed values of the other parameters, we can change the type of chemical reaction.
Following [2], we consider β e as a control parameter. For θ  θ0 we have βe  b0
where
           1  βθ
b0  1           ln  μ / ν  .
             θa




                                                                                             181

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                        Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…




                               a)




                                b)




                                c)




                               d)
Fig. 1. – The slow curve of (3), (4) for b0  1 , β>ua , and a) βe  bT  b0 ; b) bT  βe  b0 ; c)
βe  b0 ; d) βe  b0




                                                                                               182

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                       Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…




                         a)




                         b)
Fig. 2. – a) The trajectory (the solid line) and the slow curve (the dashed line) of (3), (4), and
b) the x− and θ −components of the solution in the case of the slow regime: b=0.3685

   Consider the case β>ua and b0  1 . For βe  bT the lower branch of S can consist
of two stable parts ( S1s ) and one unstable part ( S1u ), see Fig. 1a. These parts are
divided by two turning points, which merge with one another and disappear at a value
βe  bT [2, 11], see Fig. 1b. In both cases the trajectories of system (3), (4) move
along the stable part of the slow curve to the final steady state. These trajectories
correspond to the slow regimes, which are safe, see Fig. 2.
   For βe  b0 the upper and lower branches of S consist of stable ( S1s and S 2s ) and
unstable ( S1u and S 2u ) parts, which are divided by the turning points A1 and A2 , see
Fig. 1d. And the system's trajectories starting at any point of the basin of attraction of
S 2s correspond to the slow regimes, see Fig. 3.
   In other case, when the initial point is out of the basin of attraction of S 2s , we can
observe the thermal explosion (Fig. 4) or thermal explosion with delay [8, 18]. The
thermal explosion with delay occurs when the initial point belongs to the basin of
attraction of S1s and the system's trajectories having reached the jump point A1 along
S1s at the tempo of the slow variable jump into the explosive regime.


                                                                                              183

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                          Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…




                            a)




                            b)
Fig. 3. – The case of the slow regime: b=1; the initial point belongs to the basin of attraction of
S 2s

    For βe  b0 the point A1 merges with A2 to give one self–intersection point A of
the slow curve, see Fig. 1c. As it was noted above, in ε-neighborhood of the subset
                                                                         s     u
 S1s ( S 2u ) there exists a stable (unstable) slow invariant manifold S1,ε ( S2,ε ). For some
value βe  b*  b0  O(ε), (ε  0) [11], the stable and unstable slow invariant
            s
manifolds S1,ε      u
               and S2,ε are glued at the point A . As a result for βe  b* system (3),
(4) has a canard trajectory [17-22] which, at first, follows an attractive invariant
manifold, and then a repulsive one. In both cases the distances travelled are O(1) as
 ε  0 , see Fig. 5.
   This canard simulates the critical regime, separating slow chemical regimes from
regimes with a self–acceleration in the case b0  1 .
   If β>ua , one can observe the similar transformation of the slow curve (and the
qualitative behavior of the system) as shown in Fig. 1 but with a decreasing value of
the parameter β e ( bT  b0 in this case).
   For b0  1 plots of the slow curve are mirror images with respect to the vertical
axis of the graphs shown in Fig. 1, and for nonsignificant values of the initial
concentration of a combustible liquid the thermal behavior of the chemical system is
safe. Otherwise, the value βe  bT determines the boundary of the safe region [2].
                                                                                               184

       Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                          Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…




                            a)




                            b)
Fig. 4. – The case of thermal explosion: b=1; the initial point is out of the basin of attraction of
S 2s

   Our goal is to reveal the sufficient conditions for realization of the critical regime
for the case b0  1 . As it has been noted above, the main feature here consists in fact
that during the critical regime the temperature attains a high value but without
explosion. The interest in critical phenomena is occasioned by not only for reasons of
safety, but in many cases the critical regime is the most effective in technological
processes [6-9, 18, 20-22].


Realizability conditions for the critical regime
    Using the method of integral manifolds and the canard techniques in [17,18] it is
possible to find the critical value of the parameter βe  b* and corresponding
trajectory in the form of the asymptotic representation
 θ  φ( x,ε)  φ0 ( x)  εφ1 ( x)  o(ε),                                        (5)
βe  b*  b0  εb1  o(ε).                                                                      (6)
       We write (3), (4) as



                                                                                                185

       Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                            Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


             βθ             θ 
εθ  ax exp  e   K1 x exp        
             1+βθ           1+βθ  
                   βθ            θ 
 θ  θ a +νx exp  e   μx exp        ,
                   1+βθ          1+βθ 
or, taking into account (5), (6),
                              φ0                φ1     
x  εφ0  ε 2 φ1   K1 exp          1  ε           
                                               1+βφ0  
                                                         2
                               1+βφ 0  

         b φ        1+βφ0  b1φ0  b0 φ1 
 a exp  0 0  1  ε
         1+βφ0         1+βφ0            
                                     2
                                              

                          b φ        1+βφ0  b1φ0  b0 φ1 
 φ0  εφ1  θ a +νx exp  0 0  1  ε
                          1+βφ0         1+βφ0            
                                                      2
                                                                                             (7)
         φ0               φ1     
μx exp         1  ε             o(ε).
                          1+βφ0  
                                  2
         1+βφ0  




                           a)




                           b)
Fig. 5. – a) The trajectory (the solid line) and the slow curve (the dashed line) of (3), (4), and
(b) the x− and θ −components of the solution in the case of critical regime: b  b*  0.56827


                                                                                              186

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                                 Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


Setting ε=0 in (7) we obtain the slow curve equation:
                      φ0 
F ( x, φ0 )  μx exp          φ0
                      1+βφ0                                                                     (8)
                            bφ 
             θ a  νx exp  0 0   0.
                            1+βφ0 
Conditions for self-intersection of the slow curve in point A  xs ,φ0 ( xs ) 

F                   F
                                     0                                                          (9)
x  xs ,φ0 ( xs ) φ0  x ,φ ( x )
                            s   0   s


give us the coordinates of the self-intersection point and the zeroth-order
approximations for critical value b* . Indeed, from (8), (9) we obtain
                  1  βθa  θa
xs                                             ,   φ0 ( xs )  θ a                             (10)
       μ exp θ a / 1  βθ a  ln  ν / μ 
and
           1  βθ a
b0  1             ln  μ / ν  .                                                              (11)
              θa
   Equating the coefficients with ε1 in (7) we get
             bφ             φ0  
xφ0  a exp  0 0   K1 exp         
            1+βφ 0         1+βφ 0  
           x               bφ            φ0   
 φ1 1+             b ν exp  0 0   μ exp 
                 2  0                                                                       (12)
       1+βφ0            1+βφ 0        1+βφ 0   
          b φ  bφ
 νx exp  0 0  1 0 .
          1+βφ 0  1+βφ 0 
  From (9) we note that the expression in brackets in r.h.s. of (12) is equal to zero at point
A . To avoid a discontinuity in function φ1 ( x) at xs we put
                      b φ (x )         φ0 ( xs )  
   φ0 ( xs )  a exp  0 0 s   K1 exp                
                     1+βφ0 ( xs )     1+βφ 0 ( xs )  
            b φ (x )  b φ (x )
    ν exp  0 0 s  1 0 s .
            1+βφ0 ( xs )  1+βφ 0 ( xs ) 
   From this and (10) we get
          φ0 ( xs ) 1  βθ a           (1- b0 )θ a  
   b1 =                           K1 exp                a .                                (13)
                   νθ a                  1  βθ a  


                                                                                                  187

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                                  Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


   Note, that the value φ0 ( xs ) can be found from equation (8) after double
differentiation with respect to x, taking into account (9):
                μ 1  βθ a  ν
                                                        3
                                         θ 
φ0 ( xs )  2                ln exp  a  
                    θa         μ       1+βθ a                                              (14)
                                  1  βθ a  μ 
            2β 1  βθ a   2             ln  .
                                      θa       ν
   Expressions (13) and (14) give us
       2μ 3 1  βθ a 
                          4
                                     ν      3θ a  K1 a 
b1 =                          ln 3     exp             
             θa   4
                                     μ      1+βθ a   μ ν                                     (15)
                         1  βθ a  ν 
   2β 1  βθ a   2             ln  .
                             θa       μ
   Thus, the expressions (8), (11), (12), and (15) determine the first−order
approximation for canard and corresponding critical value βe  b* .
   It should be noted that it is not possible to explicitly solve equation (8) with respect
to φ 0 , while the critical value b* has been found in the explicit form. However, one
can use the implicit or parametric representation for slow invariant manifold [17] to
obtain an approximation of the canard.


Conclusion
   In this paper the model of autoignition of combustible fluids in an inert porous
medium has been studied. The realizability conditions for the critical regime have
been obtained as the explicit asymptotic expression for the control parameter. It was
shown that the critical regime is modelled by the canard. This regime plays the role of
a watershed between the safe processes and regimes with self-acceleration that leads
to the explosion.
   It should be noted that the critical regime is not a slow regime, since the
temperature may attain a high value, and is not explosive, as the temperature increases
at the tempo of the slow variable. Thus, for the examined model the new type of the
safe regime has been revealed.


Acknowledgements
   This work is supported in part by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research
(grants 13-01-97002-p, 14-01-97018-p) and the Ministry of education and science of
the Russian Federation in the framework of the implementation of Program of
increasing the competitiveness of SSAU for 2013−2020 years.




                                                                                                   188

   Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)
Mathematical Modeling                     Shchepakina E.A. Critical phenomena in a model…


References
 1. McIntosh AC, Bains M, Crocombe W, Griffiths JF. Autoignition of combustible fluids
    in porous insulation materials. Combust Flame, 1994; 99: 541-550.
 2. McIntosh AC, Griffiths JF. On the thermal runaway of combustible fluids in lagging
    material. IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 1996; 55: 83-96.
 3. Spalding Von DB. Combustion and mass transfer. Oxford, New York: Pergamon Press,
    1979.
 4. Zeldovich YaB, Barenblatt GI, Librovich VB, Makhviladze GM. The mathematical
    theory of combustion and explosions. New York: Consultants Bureau, 1985.
 5. Babushok VI, Goldshtein VM, Sobolev VA. Critical condition for the thermal explosion
    with reactant consumption. Combustion Science and Technology, 1990; 70: 81-89.
 6. Gorelov GN, Sobolev VA. Mathematical modeling of critical phenomena in thermal
    explosion theory. Combust Flame, 1991; 87: 203-210.
 7. Gorelov GN, Sobolev VA. Duck−trajectories in a thermal explosion problem. Applied
    Mathematics Letters, 1992; 5(6): 3-6.
 8. Gol'dshtein V, Zinoviev A, Sobolev V, Shchepakina E. Criterion for thermal explosion
    with reactant consumption in a dusty gas. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A,
    1996; 452: 2103-2119.
 9. Shchepakina E. Black swans and canards in self−ignition problem. Nonlinear Analysis:
    Real Word Applications, 2003; 4: 45-50.
10. Kuo K−K. Principles of Combustion. New York: Wiley, 2005.
11. Sobolev VA, Shchepakina EA. Model reduction and critical phenomena in macrokinetics.
    Moscow: “Fizmatlit” Publisher, 2010. [in Russian]
12. Sazhin S. Droplets and sprays. London, New York, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014.
13. Mishchenko EF, Rozov NKh. Differential equations with small parameters and relaxation
    oscillations. New York: Plenum Press, 1980.
14. O'Malley RE. Singular perturbation methods for ordinary differential equations. Applied
    Mathematical Sciences, 1991; 89.
15. Mishchenko EF, Kolesov YuS, Kolesov AYu, Rozov NKh. Asymptotic methods in
    singularly perturbed systems. New York: Plenum Press, 1995.
16. Vasilieva AB, Butuzov VF, Kalachev LV. The boundary function method for
    singular perturbation problems. In: Series in Applied Mathematics. Philadelphia:
    SIAM, 1995; 14 p.
17. Shchepakina E, Sobolev V, Mortell MP. Singular perturbations. Introduction to
    system order reduction methods with applications. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
    Cham − Heidelber − NewYork − Dordrecht − London: Springer, 2014; 2114 p.
18. Shchepakina E, Sobolev V. Black swans and canards in laser and combustion
    models. In: Mortell, M.P., O'Malley, R.E., Pokrovskii, A., Sobolev, V. (eds) Singular
    perturbation and hysteresis. Philadelphia: SIAM, 2005; 207-255.
19. Benoit E, Callot JL, Diener F, Diener M. Chasse au canard. Collectanea Mathematica,
    1981-1982; 31-32(1-3): 37-119. [in French]
20. Sobolev VA, Shchepakina EA. Duck trajectories in a problem of combustion theory.
    Differential Equations, 1996; 32: 1177-1186.
21. Shchepakina EA, Sobolev VA. Integral manifolds, canards and black swans. Nonlinear
    Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications - Series A, 2001; 44(7): 897-908.
22. Gorelov GN, Shchepakina EA, Sobolev VA. Canards and critical behavior in
    autocatalytic combustion models. Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 2006; 56: 143-160.



                                                                                       189

  Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT-2015)