=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper29
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper29.pdf
|volume=Vol-1498
}}
==None==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper29.pdf
ICT Enable of Agricultural Innovation Systems:
Implications Environment, Population and Food
Production
Dr. R. Heather Jaffan1
1
12181 Hickory Knoll Place, Fairfax Virginia, USA 22033, e-mail: ejaffan@aol.com
Abstract. ICTs is ideally suited to enhance interaction between enterprises and
individuals focused on bringing new products, new processes and new forms of
organization into economic use, together with the institutions and policies that
affected their behavior and performance. This Model recognizes that an interaction
of people and ideas catalyzes innovation. And that technological advancements
consist of generating, accessing utilizing and managing knowledge. To this end
ICTs can expand communication cooperation and ultimately Innovation among the
mushrooming assortment of actors in agriculture. This paper will demonstrate that
ICTs especially mobile phone can and would drive participatory communication
including consultation with those on the margins of traditional research-extension
processes, and they are often the key instrument of organizations that used to
deliver to larger number of rural people than they could reach before.
Telecommunications networks have increased the speed, reliability, and accuracy
of the potential of nanotechnology to revolutionize Information and communication
technology, as well sustainable agricultural production via information exchange—
through text, voice, and applications—between farmers and other stakeholders.
Low-bandwidth networks have also started to trickle into rural areas in developing
countries, creating opportunities for farmers to connect with extension workers,
agribusiness, researchers, and each other.
Keywords: sustainable agriculture, mobile phone, cloud computing, advanced
technology, food production, policy maker
1 Introduction
It is widely held believe that Smallholder farmers would be responsible for feeding the
billion hungry populations. In his book 2012 “One billion Hungry: Can We Feed the
World?” Sir Gordon Conway indicated that the many interrelated issues critical to our
global food supply from the science of agricultural advances to the politics of food
security.
247
It is believed that 500 smallholders with less of 2 hectares of lands in sub-Saharan
Africa and Asia are responsible for feeding one third of the World population. In Africa
the dependence is higher, where small farms produce about 80% of the food consumed
(Vittorio Calao, CEO Vodafone, “The Role of Mobile in Driving Efficacy and
Sustainability in the Food and Agriculture Value Chain.”
To achieve Global sustainable agriculture demands appropriate policies to foster open
access to timely, cost-effective, innovations, research, advanced technologies and applied
technology transfer, services and storage, essential information on market prices and
Market Channels.
Understanding and addressing global agricultural developments-both positive and
negative –are critical to improving smallholders’ livelihoods. This paper presents a
comprehensive review on Information Communication Technology (ICT) that can
improve smallholder farmers’ incomes, reduces water scarcity, decrease CO2 emission
and increase agricultural productivities both in qualities and quantities
The Author will demonstrate that the prevailing, expanded and increasingly affordable
connectivity and tools, especially mobile phones, as well as advances in data storage –
Cloud Computing and open access, have made ICT significant ino Agricultural
Production Systems. Mobile phone and wireless Internet end smallholders isolation
therefore prove to be the most transformative Technology of economic and agricultural
development of our time.
2 Sustainable Agriculture
Sustainability underlines the principle that we must meet the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.
Therefore, stewardship of both natural and human resources is of prime importance.
Managing and administrating human resources includes consideration of social
responsibilities such as working and living conditions of laborers, the needs of rural
communities, and consumer health and safety both in the present and the future.
Governorship of land and natural resources involves maintaining or enhancing this vital
resource base for the long term.
Sustainable agriculture interlaces three main goals--environmental health, economic
profitability, and social & economic equity. A variety of philosophies, policies and
practices have contributed to these goals. People in many different capacities, from
farmers to consumers, have shared this vision and contributed to it. Despite the diversity
of people and perspectives, the above themes commonly weave through definitions of
sustainable agriculture.
Systematic methodology is essential to understanding sustainability. The system is
envisioned in its broadest sense, from the individual farm, to the local ecosystem, and to
communities affected by this farming system both locally and globally. An emphasis on
the system allows a larger paradigms and more orderly understanding of the
248
consequences of farming practices on both human communities and the environment. A
system approach gives us the tools to explore the interconnections between farming and
other aspects of our environment. A system evaluation implies interdisciplinary efforts in
research and education. This requires not only the input of researchers from various
disciplines, but also farmers, farmworkers, consumers, policymakers and others
stakeholders.
Transforming to sustainable agriculture is a process. For farmers, the transition to
sustainable agriculture mandates a series of small, realistic steps. Family economics and
personal goals and education influence how fast or how far participants can go in the
transition. It is important to realize that each small decision can make a difference and
contribute to advancing the entire system further on the "sustainable agriculture
continuum." The key to moving forward is the will to take the next step.
The strategies for realizing sustainable agriculture are grouped according to three
separate though related areas of concern: Farming and Natural Resources, Plant and
Animal Production Practices, and the Economic, Social and Political Context. They
represent a range of potential ideas for individuals committed to interpreting the vision of
sustainable agriculture within their own circumstances.
3 Major Actors in Sustainable Agriculture
Policy Makers are critical decision makes in the process of sustainable agriculture.
Policies makers must adopt policies that provide incentives to smallholders to practice
sustainable agriculture. In addition, the policy makers must pave the roads to create
appropriate technical infrastructure including building Institutional complexes and
technical information centers, establishing appropriate educational & technical colleges
and extension resources. Policies that provide; adequate energy, water supplies,
transportation systems, and ports. Establish Incentive and balanced policy to promote
imports & exports.
Multidisciplinary Researchers: An agricultural sector encompasses soft and hard
sciences. Therefore researchers must collaborate in their efforts to bring about
comprehensives advancements in agricultural sustainability.
Institution & Educators are the key in trickling down/trickling up information to and
from the famers and smallholders.
Farmers and smallholders are the executive that implement and practices sustainable
agriculture. They are major decision makers and their roles in developing and enduring
sustainable agriculture s of paramount important.
Innovators: Smallholders and social actors actually do to innovate their practices can
be understood as networking: social actors in search of relevant ideas, knowledge,
information and experiences, continuously build and manage relationships with others
which, by some standard, they consider relevant to innovating their practices
249
Investors: Agriculture is very risky investment. However, sustainable agriculture
drives down risk factors.
Postharvest /Primary Processors and Packagers: Technological advancements are
available to prevent postharvest loses. Protecting commodities at the farmgates preserve
commodities quality and prolong its shelflife. As such it is significant value added
Transporters: Refrigerated and appropriately cooled trucks are are value added
Marketers & Traders, understanding market opportunities, and prices mechanisms
both at the local and international level are crucial to increase income revenues and
profits
And on the demand side is the Consumers that utilize the commodities.
Factors to be considered in Practicing Sustainable Agriculture:
Farming and Natural Resources, in Specific non Renewable resources:
water, (b) soils and (C) energy
2. Plant and Animal Production Practices,
3. Innovations and Advanced Technologies
4. Macro and Micro Economic,
5. Social and Political milieus
4 Advanced Technologies
Traditionally the Smallholders often can’t easily access new and advanced
technologies such as Genetically Modified Seeds (GMS) and Nanotechnology. These
technologies prove to increase productivities, control losses and manage risk. GMS first
and second generations produced drought & disease resistant seeds, high yields varieties
that can be mechanically be harvested and meet consumer expectation.
On the other hand, Nanotechnology applications are gaining momentum in all aspects
of food production system. Both GMS and Nanotechnology research are considered
private properties and remained in the multinational corporations and private research
institution domain.
5 ICT and Sustainable Agriculture
ICT is an Umbrella term that Includes: Anything ranging from Radio to Satellite
Imagery to mobile phone or Electric money Transfer
ICT no longer is considered luxury for Developing Countries (DC.) In fact, many of
the ICT innovations are emerging from DC. They are creating new ways of
communicating, doing business and delivering services. Through extending access to
ICTs
250
A linear approach can exclude other stakeholders in the agricultural sector such as
universities, agribusiness, traders, and nongovernmental and civil society organizations.
It does not reflect the many well-documented ways that agricultural innovation actually
occurs, such as experimentation by individual farmers, informal networking among farm
communities, private sector participation, collaboration among extension workers
interested in a particular idea, collaboration between researchers and farmers, and the
adaptation by all of these actors of knowledge and practices from domains outside
agriculture.
6 Key that Drive ICT in Agriculture
ICT in agriculture, particularly for poor producers:
Ø low-cost & Pervasive Connectivity
Ø Adaptable and more affordable tools
Ø Advances in data storage and exchange,
Ø Innovative business models and partnerships, and
Ø The democratization of information, including the open access movement and social
media. These drivers are expected to continue
7 ICT and Agriculture
ICTs appear ideally suited to the task of enhanced interaction because they can expand
communication, cooperation, and ultimately innovation among the growing array of
actors in agriculture. ICTs, especially mobile phones, can and do drive participatory
communication, including communication from those on the margins of traditional
research-extension processes, and they are often the key instruments that organizations
use to deliver services to larger numbers of rural people than they could reach before.
ICTs are fundamental to the Sustainable Agriculture, smallholders and “farmers,” public
and private—extension agents, consultants, companies contracting farmers, and others—
emerging to stakeholders device, knowledge, collaboration, and interaction among
groups and communities throughout the agricultural sector.
Numerous electronic tools increase interaction among the actors involved in
agriculture. On a macro level, e-Science (e-Research) draws on increasingly connected
and extensive digital infrastructure to facilitate collaboration and knowledge exchange
nationally, regionally, and globally. On a micro level, m-Agriculture, powered by
increasingly affordable mobile digital devices such as phones, laptops, and sensors, how
much processor, bandwidth, and storage capacity are needed? The required resource is
made available immediately
251
8 Cloud Computing-- (CC :)
For the Smallholders cloud computing is a form of outsourced IT services. Enabled
smallholders and farmers to store their information and data with little upfront costs, does
not require purchase or maintenance of significant hardware and scale down to the need
of the farmers or smallholders without purchasing new software or hire new personnel.
The advantage of cloud computing is that it offers pooled and elastic resources on
demand over the Internet (Porcari 2009) National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST.) More specifically, cloud computing has been described as “a model for enabling
convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing
resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly
provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider
interaction” (Mell and Grance 2009 NIST)
Over the years Cloud Computing eased the data collection and aggregation process,
which is critical for research, extension, and education. Smallholders often lack access to
timely, cost-effective, and personally relevant information on improved practices,
markets, prices, inputs, weather and impending disasters, Smallholder farmers, who still
provide a significant portion of the world’s food, need to level the plain and access
information, technology, innovation and market channels to advance their production to
feed the world.
The need to Access essential information on prices, markets, varieties, production
techniques, services, storage, or processing underscores growth in Food production. ICT
is changing the above scenario as the types of ICT-enabled services useful to improving
the capacity and livelihoods of poor smallholders are growing quickly.
9 Mobile Phone
v Around three-quarters of the world’s inhabitants now have access to a mobile phone
and the mobile communications story is moving to a new level, which is much
about the phone but how it is used.
v The number of mobile subscriptions in use worldwide, both pre-paid and post-paid,
has grown from fewer than 1 billion in 2000 to over 6 billion now, of which nearly 5
billion in developing countries.
v The mobile phone has evolved from a simple voice device to a multimedia
communications tool capable of downloading and uploading text, data, audio, and
video—from text messages to social network updates to breaking news, the latest hit
song, or the latest viral video
v A mobile handset can be used as a wallet, a compass, or a television, as well as an
alarm clock, calculator, address book, newspaper, and camera. Mobiles are also
contributing to social, economic, and political transformation. Farmers in Africa obtain
252
pricing information via text messages, saving time and travel and making them better
informed about where to sell their products, thereby raising their incomes (World Bank
2011a, 353).
The Mobile phone impacts on stallholders and farmers in four major areas:
· Improving access to financial services,
· Providing Agricultural information
· Cultivating data conspicuousness for supply chain adeptness, and
· Promoting access to Market
Short Messaging Service (SMS)
v SMS is now enabling mobile phones to be used as a platform for agricultural
information exchange.
v SMS enable the smallholders to exchange technology advancement
v SMS will enable the smallholders to access innovation
v SMS enable smallholders to enhance the implication, adaptation & adoption of
Technologies advancement.
v SMS enable the smallholders to communicate their best practices
10 Mobile Phone Opportunities and Constraints
v Mobile phone can link farmers and smallholders to finance, education, nutrition &
health, prices and market channel
v Monitors resource, track processing, control quality and production
v Collect data on biodiversity
v Access research and advanced technology from available public information centers:
Such as FAO, UNIDO UNDP, the World Bank, the Coherence in Information for
Agricultural Research for Development (CIARD) Formally, Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) that funded the 15 International
Agricultural Research Centers
253
12 Conclusions
In conclusion Sustainable Agriculture and ICT are integral part of food production
chain. Both are multidisciplinary & convoluted sectors. Therefore demand collective
support and coordination of all main actors, policy makers and decision makers in Food
Production. ICT networking provide upstream/downstream movement as well as
backward/forward collaboration and cooperation,
The Author underscored critical achievement factors include the development of local
stewardship and understanding, testing solutions and methodological regulatory
participation. These fundamental elements can ensure that the content and methods of
delivery are designed to both market and crop type. Therefore, not only the smallholder
and farmers benefit from increased incomes and revenues, but also all main actors in both
ICT and Sustainable Agriculture benefit through systematic data collection and
information.
The domino effects of social and economic revenues that these prospective could
deliver are well beyond the food production chain.
254