=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper3
|storemode=property
|title=A Review of ABC Methodology for Agricultural Sector
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper3.pdf
|volume=Vol-1498
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/haicta/KoutouzidouVTB15
}}
==A Review of ABC Methodology for Agricultural Sector==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1498/HAICTA_2015_paper3.pdf
A Review of ABC Methodology for Agricultural Sector
Georgia Koutouzidou1, Athanasios Vazakidis2, Alexandros Theodoridis3, Christos
Batzios4
1
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, Greece, e-mail:
koutouzidougeorgia@yahoo.com
2
Department of Applied Informatics, University of Macedonia, Greece, e-mail: vasak@uom.gr
3
School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, e-mail:
alextheod@vet.auth.gr
4
School of Veterinary Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, e-mail:
batzios@vet.auth.gr
Abstract. This study examines recent advances in cost accounting methods
with special reference to the application of Activity Based Costing
methodology in primary sector. Large scale agricultural enterprises that depend
heavily on capital investments require rational allocation of the available
resources and efficient utilization of the existing production technology. The
accurate and reliable computation of cost per unit of product is crucial for the
evaluation of the economic performance of the enterprises and the
investigation of the optimal allocation of the production factors in different
activities. The concept of Activity Based Costing methodology, which is of
great importance in the system of cost accounting, allows the allocation of
indirect costs to specific activities and individual products, overcoming the
drawbacks of the traditional method of cost accounting. A synopsis of the
Activity Based Costing method is described, followed by a review of recent
cost accounting applications to agricultural systems.
Keywords: Activity Based Costing, Cost accounting, Agriculture
1 Introduction
The primary sector in Greece remains one of the most important economic pillars,
which plays a vital role from both a social and environmental perspective.
Agriculture in Greece was based mainly on small-sized, family-owned dispersed
productions units, however since the 2000’s a rapid increase of large size, market-
oriented farms was emerged along with the development of food-processing
companies. These production units, which are of purely entrepreneurial nature,
depend heavily on capital endowments and high human capital. Despite its
diminishing contribution in GDP (about 5%) and employment (479.612 persons are
employed in agriculture (ELSTAT, 2014), that is 12.5% of the total labor force),
livestock and crop farming and agricultural processing industry constitute important
production sectors for the Greek economy, that support manufacturing and boost
rural economy. Agriculture supports rural family incomes offers employment to a
20
large number of people and reverses depopulation and marginalization of
mountainous and less-favored areas, contributing this way to the recovery of national
economy and the stimulation of economic growth.
The economic crisis in Greece has undoubtedly influenced the productivity and
economic performance of the primary sector, challenging the competitiveness of the
agricultural farms and food-processing units. The high prices of inputs - mainly of
fuel - affect the profitability of agricultural production units adversely, low producer
prices cannot counterbalance income losses from the increased production cost and
the uncertain overall economic environment which is the main cause of financial
stress impedes the effective marketing of processed and non-processed products. The
capital intensive agricultural enterprises with a significant share of indirect costs
require efficient utilization of the existing production technology and rational
allocation of the available resources, which implies the important role of
management accounting in the evaluation of the operational performance of such
modern agricultural enterprises.
In this context, the accurate computation of cost per input, activity and product
can be a useful tool in order to design a medium - long term strategic plan regarding
resource allocation and pricing, vital elements for the improvement of the producer’s
profitability. The purpose of this study is to examine recent advances in cost
accounting with special reference to the Activity Based Costing methodology in
primary sector.
2 The ABC methodology
The concept of ABC was developed in the manufacturing sector of the United
States during the 1970s and 1980s, however the method was first clearly defined in
1987 by Kaplan and Bruns. The Consortium of Advanced Management, International
(CAM-I), an international consulting group, provided a formative role for studying
and formalizing the principles that became more formally known as Activity-Based
Costing (Cardos and Pete, 2011). The concept of ABC was introduced in order to
overcome the shortcomings of the traditional method of cost accounting through the
proper allocation of the fixed costs to products (Cooper and Kaplan, 1988). The
traditional cost methods were used efficiently at a time when the dominant factors of
production were labor and variable capital and hence, their corresponding direct costs
were easy to allocate (Carli and Canavari, 2013). The inefficacy of the standard
method occurs when the share of the indirect cost of the fixed capital (mainly
maintenance, insurance and machine preparation) was significant in total production
cost. The traditional cost accounting methods in modern business environment where
the level of fixed costs is high usually leads to underestimation and overestimation of
the cost per unit in small and large production untits, respectively.
In recent years, many production units have improved their cost management by
utilizing the ABC system, a tool for providing accurate and relevant cost information
(Lee and Kao, 2001). Activity-based costing (ABC) is a costing methodology that
identifies activities in an organization and assigns the cost of each activity with
resources to all products and services according to the actual consumption by each.
21
This model assigns more indirect costs into direct costs compared to conventional
costing. According to Dierks and Cokins (2000) ABC “measures costs and
performances of activities, resources and cost objects1, assigns resources to activities
and activities to cost objects based on their use and recognizes causal relationships of
cost drivers to activities”. There are four steps involved in Activity-Based Costing
(Lanen et al., 2008). The first step includes the identification of the key activities, by
classifying them into value added and non value added activities. After the selection
of the activities the resources consumed and the associated costs are allocated to
individual activities. In the second step, the cost drivers (measure of output of an
activity) are associated with each activity, while in the third step a cost rate per cost
driver is computed. In the final step, costs are assigned to products (Fisher, 2012).
The ABC methodology is still developing and comprehensive reviews and
extensions of the model can be found in Hansen and Mowen (2000). This
methodology has been extended to the field of agriculture production activities,
although limited studies have been so far focused on the estimation of the cost
elements of entire products, activities and services through ABC.
3 Review of ABC studies in agriculture and their implications
This section provides a review of empirical applications of Activity Based Costing
to various agriculture production systems. In general, the implementation of ABC
methodology is limited due to the high quantity of data required for its application.
Especially in the farming and food processing sector the relevant studies on ABC
applications are very few and include fish markets and fish processing, winemaking,
ornamental plant cultivation, sawmilling, crop farming and dairy production.
Lee and Kao in 2001 analyzed the operational costs of the Pu-Shin wholesale fish
market, which has the highest automation level in Taiwan, using a simulation
technique as complement to activity-based costing model. The results of the
simulation approach are used to obtain more accurate allocated resource costs and to
avoid arbitrary allocation. The results of the ABC model indicate that the total
processing cost is 2.36 NT$ per kilogram of fish, 0.17 NT$ higher than the cost
calculated by using the traditional accounting methods. This can be attributed to the
fact that Pu-Shin wholesale fish market does not calculate machinery depreciation
during cost calculation. The authors claim that the ABC model used with system
simulation can be applied to other agricultural systems.
ABC method has been also applied in Finish fish processing sector by Setälä and
Gunasekaran (1996). The production process in fish industry in the country is highly
automated and diversified. However the processors do not easily adopt tools in
evaluating their economic performance. They believe that the accurate tracing of
indirect costs and their efficient management is not a necessity for the success of the
processing unit. Setälä and Gunasekaran applied ABC to fish filleting operations,
which were split into ten micro-activities (cutting operations, washing, quality
1
Cost object is any item as products, departments, projects, activities, etc, for which costs are
measured and assigned (Lee and Kao, 2001)
22
inspection, etc.) and cost drivers were calculated in proportion of fish taken to
production. The time consumed by filleting activities and flesh loss ratio were the
most important performance measures incorporated in the model. These new
measurements required for the application of ABC technique increased the cost of
the production system; however the benefits from more accurate and reliable cost
information were greater than the cost of these new measurements. Concluding their
case study, the authors claim that ABC would be an appropriate system in fish
processing.
González-Gómez and Morini (2006) proposed the application of an adapted ABC
system for the cost estimation of winemaking in Spain, a sector that faced many
changes in production and in consumer demand. The ABC model was applied based
on data which were collected from local equipment and grape providers and from
surveys of winery managers and operators. In this study the production process is
divided into activities performed in the harvesting, in the winemaking and in the
complementary winemaking process. The costs for each activity are divided into
direct and support costs. The findings of the study indicate that the ABC model could
provide valuable cost information to assist winery managers in improving their
business competitiveness.
The same authors applied ABC model for cost calculation and management in a
multiproduct agricultural framework, using ornamental plant cultivation as a case in
point (González-Gómez and Morini, 2009). In their approach internal costs are used
instead of accounting data. The authors estimated the direct and indirect costs
through economic and financial assessment of the activities, with the total cost being
the sum of these components. After calculating the total cost and gross margin of
each plant in the sample, an overall cost and performance analysis is conducted for a
“standard crop” (weighted means of each plant). According to the authors the study
achieves through the ABC model “a more objective assignation criterion for indirect
costs as well as for the differentiation between several products and technologies in
the cost calculation process”.
The study of Pockeviciute (2008) develops a budgeting model for dairy farms in
Lithuania using the ABC method. The actual production cost budget per 1 kg of milk
was estimated to be 0.572 TL/Kg, while the share of the overhead costs was 47% of
the total production cost. The authors conclude that the calculations of the production
cost of the milk yield (the cost driver) provided a detailed overview of the expenses
and their contribution in total production cost of milk.
4 Conclusions
The diversification and intensification of international competition, the adoption
of new and innovative technologies on machinery and equipment and the uncertain
economic environment has made proper and accurate production cost information
essential to competitive success. The complexity of contemporary production units
that produce a wide range of products and have a high share of overhead costs to
total costs renders the reliable estimation of the cost per unit problematic. The ABC
method provides the flexibility required for the accurate calculation of cost per unit
23
in modern businesses by tracing indirect costs first from resources to activities and
then from activities to specific products. In comparison with traditional, conventional
cost accounting systems, ABC is more adjustable, faster and more accurate, enabling
a detailed cost analysis. The importance of ABC in agricultural systems is justified in
large modern production units of non processed and processed products that have a
significant share of indirect costs. ABC in crop and livestock production could be an
important tool for planning and accounting analysis; however its applications in
primary sector are still very limited.
References
1. Cardos I.R. and Pete S. (2011). activity-based costing (ABC) and activity-based
management (ABM) implementation – is this the solution for organizations to
gain profitability? Romanian Journal of Economics, 32, p. 151-168.
2. Carli G. and Canavari M. (2013). Introducing direct costing and activity based
costing in a farm management system: a conceptual model. Procedia
Technology, 8, p. 397-405.
3. Cooper R. and Kaplan R.S. (1988). Measure costs right: Make the right
decisions. Harvard Business Review, 66, p. 96-103.
4. Dierks, P. and Cokins G. (2000). The CAM-I Glossary of Activity-based
Management. CAM-I.
5. ELSTAT (2014). The Greek economy. Hellenic Statistical Authority.
1. Fisher T. (2012). Cost Accounting Applied to Farming in Southwest Michigan.
Honors Theses. Paper 2320.
6. González-Gómez, J.I. and Morini S. (2006). An Activity-Based Costing of
Wine. Journal of Wine Research, 17, p. 195–203.
7. González-Gómez J.I. and Morini S. (2009). A model for cost calculation and
management in a multiproduct agricultural framework. The case for ornamental
plants. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7, p. 12–23.
8. Hansen D.R. and Mowen M.M., 2000. Cost Management: Accounting and
Contron, 3rd Edition. South-Western College Publishing.
9. Kaplan R.S. and Bruns W.J. (1987) eds. Accounting and Management: Field
Study Perspectives. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
10. Lanen W.N., Anderson S.W. and Maher M. (2008). Cost concepts and
behavior. fundamentals of cost accounting (3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill
Irwin.
11. Lee T.R. and Kao J.S. (2001). Application of simulation technique to activity-
based costing of agricultural systems: a case study. Agricultural Systems, 67, p.
71-82.
12. Pockeviciute R. (2008). Case study: Activity based budgeting at agricultural
holdings in Lithuania. Economics and Rural Development, 4, p. 26-33.
24
13. Setala J. and Gunasekaran A. (1996). Activity-based costing and management--
a way to improve the profitability of fish processing? Production and Inventory
Management Journal, 37, p. 63–69.
25