In an effort to minimize environmental degradation caused by the intensive use of agrochemicals, European Union adopted regulations relevant to afforestation and set aside of agricultural land. The multifunctional role of agriculture enhanced through these regulations and provided adequate motives for a change in the conventional land uses. Cultivators/investors that are interested in afforested agricultural land find them quite attractive and revealed an interest in implement them. In order to investigate the factors that influence the probability of adopting the above mentioned regulations we organize a research to the related cultivators/investors. For the collection of data we used questionnaire and the lists of approved for aid from the Regulations 2080/92 and 1257/99. Finally we collected 205 valid questionnaires from a) farmers by main occupation and b) other owners of agricultural land who are not farmers by main occupation. In this study we used a linear regression and a logistic regression model.
In the last decades we notice a change in the consideration of rural development due
to the successive revisions of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Intensive
agriculture is no more the leading developmental sector of rural areas. The
multifunctional role of agriculture, that enhances the natural environment, gradually
is been taking place in these areas: environmental, cultural, nutritional, social and
developmental (Arabatzis et al., 200
The survey was conducted in Evros regional unit. Evros area is characterized by
rich natural resources that contribute mainly in development of primary and tourism
sector
The questionnaire included questions mostly closed type with predetermined answers. The questionnaire investigated the individual and social characteristics of cultivators/investors farmers, the structural characteristics of their land and their attitudes to forest plantations. The questionnaires were collected in the period AprilMay 2012 by personal interviews at cultivators’/investors’ residence or place of work. Finally we collected 205 valid questionnaires that represented a) farmers and b) other owners of agricultural land who were not farmers by main occupation.
The purpose of this study is to explore the factors that differentiate cultivators/investors, and the factors that influence their income. The data processing was done with STATA statistical package and methods of descriptive statistics. A linear regression model and a generalized linear model (a logistic model) have been applied.
The variables used in the models are given below:
Education: What education level has the cultivator/investor (1=none, 2 =primary education, 3 = obligatory education, 4 = secondary education, 5 = tertiary education).
Age: Age of cultivator/investor (in years).
Gender (1 = male, 2 = female).
Family size: Number of members in the family (1-10).
Income: Annual income in euros
Cultivator/Investor: (1 = main occupation is farming, 2 = secondary occupation is farming).
Associations: (1= Yes, 2 = No) Seminars: (1 = Yes, 0 = No).
Educational tv, radio broadcasts: (0 = never, 1 = rarely, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = very often).
Experience: Number of years of farming as main occupation.
Heredity: (1 = father was a farmer, 0 = father was not a farmer).
Area: in ha.
Agricultural holdings: No of agricultural holdings
Type: Type of species plantations (1 = Poplar, 2 = Pine, 3 = Black locust, 4 = Walnut) (1=Poplar, 2= Black locust, 3= Mulberry, 4= Walnut).
Reforestation: Worked in reforestation (1 = Yes, 2 = No).
Value: (0 = no increase in the value of agricultural land in the region over the past 5 years, 1 = increased, 2 = remained stable).
Profit and loss account: (0 = no records, 1 = yes).
Laws: Aware of others regulations for the agriculture (1 = Yes, 2 = No).
Forest: There is a municipal/community forest near the plantation (1 = Yes, 2 = No).
Market: Purchased of land for productive purposes before installing forest plantations (1 = Yes, 2 = No).
Lease: Land hiring before installing forest plantations (1 = Yes, 2 = No).
We used a linear and a generalized linear (logistic) model. Applying the logistic model we found and compared the characteristics and factors that differentiate those who have agriculture as their main occupation to those who have it as secondary. The choice of the most appropriate model was stepwise regression with pe (0.1) and pr (0.2), the dependent variable (the farmer) is categorical. Table 1 shows the coefficients of the model.
The model was tested for its validity with Hosmer Lemeshow test
Thus, we conclude that the factors that differentiate the cultivators/investors whose main occupation is agriculture to other farmers are the educational level, the fact that they have read articles with rural content and their participation in associations.
We examined the factors that shape the agricultural income for farmers by main occupation. So by linear regression with the dependent variable, the income of the cultivator/investor and independent almost all variables in the table mentioned previously, with Collet's approach we selected the following model (Table 2):
For the validity of the model we examined the regularity of residuals with appropriate statistical tests (Sh.Wilk, S.Francia) and diagrams (histogram, Q-Q plot).
From the linear model we find that the factors influencing farm income are gender, leasing and the number of family members, etc. From the logistic model by examining how the statistically significant independent variables affect the dependent (income) we found that the vast majority of farmers by main occupation have not finished secondary education, while the figures for the remaining are significantly smaller. From the interpretation of the corresponding coefficient of the model we conclude that for each increase in educational level of a unit (as defined earlier) the probability that the farmer has agriculture as main occupation rather than secondary reduces by 1- exp (-0.45) = 20.1%.
Moreover we noticed that by main occupation farmers read fewer articles than others. Interesting is that, there is no statistically significant difference in income and loans to cultivators/investors, and there is a difference in income from agriculture.
Moreover statistically significant difference has the cultivator/investor located near community forest in relation to the others (the corresponding averages are 11.19 thousands euro versus 17.50).