<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Multi-species Cover Crop Biomass Evaluation Using a Hand-held Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) Sensor and Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) Sensor</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christos Vasilikiotis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Athanasios Gertsis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Konstantinos Zoukidis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ali Nasrallah</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Environmental Systems Management, Precision Agriculture Laboratory, Perrotis College, American Farm School</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Thessaloniki</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Mediterranean Agronomic Institute of Chania (MAICh)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Alsyllio Agrokepio, 1 Makedonias str. PO Box 85, Chania 73100, Crete</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>644</fpage>
      <lpage>650</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Cover crops are essential in agricultural management and especially in organic farming for protecting the soil from erosion, competing with weeds, preventing evaporative losses and improving soil quality and fertility. The choice of cover crop species is crucial in achieving the highest level of weed suppression and soil fertility enhancement. Cover crop systems with rye or mixtures of legumes and grasses were set up in a randomized complete block design in Northern Greece. A hand held sensor was used to measure Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of the cover crop plots with parallel measurements of light interception with a PAR sensor, and destructive biomass determination. Weed biomass was also determined for each cover crop mixture. Multi-species cover crops produced higher total biomass than single-species cover crop systems. All cover crop systems evaluated were able to suppress weeds. Remote sensing results showed that NDVI could be used to estimate the total biomass of single cover crops but not cover crop mixtures.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>cover crops</kwd>
        <kwd>biomass</kwd>
        <kwd>weed suppression</kwd>
        <kwd>NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index)</kwd>
        <kwd>light interception</kwd>
        <kwd>PAR</kwd>
        <kwd>organic agriculture</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        A key issue in organic agriculture is weed suppression to prevent competition with
cultivated crops. The use of chemical herbicides is not allowed in organic agriculture,
creating a great need to enlist cultural or mechanical methods to control weeds.
Mechanical methods include plowing and frequent use of hoeing, disking, harrowing
or cultivating
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Liebman and Davis, 2009)</xref>
        . Mechanical disturbance of the soil
increases the risk of soil erosion and exposes lower soil layers to increased oxidation
resulting in loss of CO2
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Rodale Institute, 2012)</xref>
        . Cultural weed control methods
include intercropping, crop rotations and the use of cover crops
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Liebman and Davis,
2009)</xref>
        . Cover crops are crops planted with the sole purpose of protecting the soil,
competing with weeds and improving soil quality and fertility (Clark (ed.), 2007).
Cover crops provide a wide range of benefits. They help reduce soil erosion, improve
soil quality, control weeds, assist with biological control and enhance soil fertility
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref7">(Dabney et al., 2001; Worsham, 1991)</xref>
        . Single species or multi-species cover crop
mixtures can be used depending on the agroecological zone and the type of farming
system used
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Wortman et al., 2012)</xref>
        . The choice of cover crop species is crucial for
the achieving the highest level of weed suppression and soil fertility enhancement.
Multi-species cover crop mixtures containing both legume and grass cover crops
have been shown to have increased productivity and resilience compared to single
species cover crops
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">(Wortman et al., 2012)</xref>
        . This effect appears to depend on the type
of cover crop mixtures used and the farming system and in some cases, no enhanced
weed suppression or increased productivity of the subsequent crop was observed in
multi-species cover crop mixtures when compared to single cover crops
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Smith et al.,
2014)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>
        A cover crop trial was set up where individual species or multi-species cover
crops were compared for their ability to suppress weeds and enhance soil fertility.
The effect of each cover crop system on weed species was monitored and the
biomass and diversity of weed species in each cover crop system was measured. To
avoid the need to use destructive methods of biomass estimation, a hand held NDVI
sensor was used. Remote sensing with NDVI sensors shows high correlation with
biomass in grasses
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(Serrano et al., 2000)</xref>
        .
      </p>
      <p>Total crop biomass was measured by collecting crop samples and the relationship
between normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from a hand-held sensor
and the estimated crop biomass was evaluated. The objective of the study was to
assess the ability to monitor the development of cover crop mixtures and be able to
estimate final crop biomass through the use of non-destructive NDVI sensors. Partial
results are reported in this paper.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Materials &amp; Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1 Experimental Design</title>
        <p>The cover crop trial was set up at Zannas Farm owned by the American Farm
School, which is located in Chalkidona, Greece, with annual precipitation of 450
mm. The experimental design was a Complete Randomized Block Design (CRBD)
with four blocks and six treatments within each block. The size of each plot was 30 x
9 m.</p>
        <p>Five cover crop systems were used; a) AVEX + Rye, b) TRITIMIX, c) Vetch +
Oats, d) Rye, e) Lollium, and f) a non-cultivated fallow as a control. The crop
composition of each multi-species mixture is listed in Table 1. The two crop mixtures
AVEX and TRITIMIX were provided by the seed company Fertiprado in Portugal.
The field was cultivated and planted in mid-January. The establishment of the cover
crops was originally planned for late October, but due to unusual wet weather in
Northern Greece during the months of October to December we were not able to
prepare the fields and plant before January.
The seeding rate used listed in Table 2. There was no fertilizer added to the plots.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2.2 NDVI and incident Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) light monitoring</title>
        <p>NDVI monitoring was performed using an NDVI hand-held sensor. PAR light
above and below the cover crop canopy was measured with a canopy analysis system
(Delta-T Devices SunScan SS1) and the percent of PAR light intercepted (Li %) was
calculated using equation 1.</p>
        <p>  %
= 1 −</p>
        <p>∗ 100  .
!
!
(1)</p>
        <p>Where Li = PAR light intercepted, PARt = PAR transmitted through the canopy,
PARb = PAR beam incident upon the canopy.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>2.3 Field biomass sampling</title>
        <p>In early May, at the full flowering stage for most crops, three samples from each
plot were harvested using a 0.5m*0.5m square frame. The weeds were separated and
the samples were dried at 60°C to a constant dry weight.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>2.4 Statistical analysis</title>
        <p>Statistical analysis was performed using JMP Pro v.11.0, SAS Institute Inc.
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Results &amp; Discussion</title>
      <p>All five cover crop systems evaluated were able to suppress weed growth in most
experimental plots. The cover crop with the highest biomass was TRITIMIX, which
was significantly higher than the single-species cover crops Lollium and Rye, with an
estimated biomass of 12,470 kg/ha (Table 3.). AVEX+Rye and Vetch+Oats had the
second largest biomass, but they were not significantly different from Lollium or Rye
(Table 3).
a
b
c</p>
      <p>Light interception by the cover crops ranged from 92.5% for Vetch+Oats to 38.3%
for Rye (Table 3). Even though Rye allowed more radiation to penetrate its canopy,
there were no weeds detected in the Rye plots, possibly due to the allelopathic
properties of Rye.</p>
      <p>One possible explanation for the small differences detected is that the cover crops
were planted late. This prevented the legumes in the multi-species cover crops from
optimal development, while the grass species were better able to develop in the
colder temperatures of January. Legumes in the multi-species cover crops did not
perform as well as grass species and contributed less than their full potential in total
biomass (data not shown).
Levels not connected by the same letter are significantly different (LSD at the 5% level)
*ND = weeds not detected
Using a regression analysis of the relationship of NDVI with crop biomass found that
it was not statistically significant, when analyzing all field plots (Fig. 2).
15000
)
a
h
/kg10000
(
s
s
a
m
o
i
B
5000
0
0.3
0.4
0.5</p>
      <p>NDVI
0.6
0.7
0.8</p>
      <p>
        When single cover crop systems were analyzed though, the relationship of NDVI
and crop biomass was statistically significant for the single cover crop species plots
(Table 3.). A strong regression relationship was found for Lollium (R2=0.94) and for
Rye (R2=0.81). A similar relationship was found in the fallow plots, which were not
cultivated and only weeds were grown. The inability to obtain a good regression
relationship between NDVI and crop biomass can be attributed to the complex
canopy structure of densely planted cover crop mixtures, which contain grasses and
legumes. Grains, such as rye and oats grow taller, while some of the trifolium species
of legumes remain lower in the canopy. As leaf area index increases, the regression
relationship becomes weaker and NDVI cannot be used to predict biomass reliably
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(Serrano et al., 2000)</xref>
        .
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4 Conclusions</title>
      <p>All cover crop systems studied performed well in producing sufficient biomass
and suppressing weed development in the experimental plots. Multi-species cover
crops were more productive and demonstrated the potential to provide higher
biomass and very satisfactory weed suppression. In terms of using remote sensing to
monitor cover crop development, the complex canopy structure of a densely planted
multi-species cover crop, presents a greater challenge in using an NDVI sensor as a
monitoring device. Further studies will be required to determine a method of using
NDVI sensors in the ground and/or aerial measurements to estimate biomass in
multi-species cover crops. The handheld NDVI sensor along with the canopy
analysis system (PAR and Li) can be used successfully in estimating very efficiently
the biomass in single cover crops systems.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (ed.). (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <source>Managing Cover Crops Profitably, Handbook Series Book</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          . 3rd ed. Beltsville, MD:
          <article-title>Sustainable Agriculture Network (SAN).</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dabney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Delgado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. a.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reeves</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Using Winter Cover Crops To Improve Soil and Water Quality</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis</source>
          ,
          <volume>32</volume>
          (
          <issue>7-8</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>1221</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1250</lpage>
          . [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1081/CSS100104110.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liebman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Managing Weeds in Organic Farming Systems: An Ecological Approach</article-title>
          . In: Francis,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (ed.), Organic Farming:
          <article-title>The Ecological System</article-title>
          , Madison: American Society of Agronomy (
          <year>2009</year>
          ):
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>196</lpage>
          ., p.
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>196</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Rodale</given-names>
            <surname>Institute</surname>
          </string-name>
          . (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Technical Bulletin: No-till management for sustainable and organic systems</article-title>
          . Rodale Institute. Rodale Institute. [Online]. Available at: http://rodaleinstitute.org/technical
          <article-title>-bulletin-no-till-management-for-sustainableand-organic-</article-title>
          <source>systems/ [Accessed: 2 May</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          ].
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Serrano</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Filella</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and Pen˜uelas, J. (
          <year>2000</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Remote Sensing of Biomass and Yield of Winter Wheat under Different Nitrogen Supplies</article-title>
          .
          <source>Crop Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>723</fpage>
          . [Online]. Available at: doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.403723x.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Atwood</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Warren</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Increased productivity of a cover crop mixture is not associated with enhanced agroecosystem services</article-title>
          .
          <source>PloS one</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>e97351</fpage>
          . [Online]. Available at: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.
          <volume>0097351</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Worsham</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1991</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Role of cover crops in weed management and water quality</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Weed and Disease Management</source>
          , (
          <volume>21</volume>
          ),
          <source>Soil &amp; Water Conservation Society</source>
          , p.
          <fpage>141</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>156</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wortman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Francis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lindquist</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Cover Crop Mixtures for the Western Corn Belt: Opportunities for Increased Productivity and Stability</article-title>
          .
          <source>Agronomy Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>104</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>699</fpage>
          . [Online]. Available at: doi:10.2134/agronj2011.
          <fpage>0422</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>