<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Farmers' Involvement in Online Public Consultations and the Corresponding Configuration of the Democratic Divide</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria G. Botsiou</string-name>
          <email>m_botsiou@yahoo.gr</email>
          <email>mbotsiou@uom.edu.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vassilios Dagdilelis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Stavriani Koutsou</string-name>
          <email>skoutsou@farm.teithe.gr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vasiliki Karavakou</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vagis Samathrakis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Accounting and Financial, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Agricultural Technology, Alexander Technological Educational Institute of Thessaloniki</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Department of Educational and Social Policy, University of Macedonia</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>777</fpage>
      <lpage>789</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The institution of online public consultations was adopted in Greece in 2009 (www.opengov.gr.) Participation or non-participation of citizens in this institution constitutes part of the digital divide, referred to as democratic divide. This paper attempts to disclose components of the democratic gap in the Greek agricultural sector, with particular reference to farmers. This disclosure is attempted by two approaches. The first approach was to perform content analysis on 5078 comments that have been posted on 21 public consultations by the Greek Ministry of Rural Development, in order to identify the participation frequency of farmers. The second approach was part of wider research, and relates to the collection of primary data from 112 farmers of Heraklion, Crete, using a structured questionnaire. The objective of the second approach is to study the farmers' digital and socio-professional profiles and the correlation with their awareness about the institution of online public consultations. The results indicate the existence of a democratic divide, and identify proposals for its reduction.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Digital divide</kwd>
        <kwd>democratic divide</kwd>
        <kwd>online public consultation</kwd>
        <kwd>farmers</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>2500 years ago, the institution of Ecclesia originated in Ancient Athens. This
institution was the main democratic assembly of the city-state, where the political
issues of the time where put to debate. The main feature of the Ecclesia was the
direct participation of the citizens in the legislative and judicial procedures of the
city-state.</p>
      <p>Today, ICTs represent a kind of reintroduction of the Ecclesia into the political
process, serving the need to redefine the relationship between state and citizens, to
restore confidence between them. A survey by Transparency International in 64
countries showed that political parties are seen as the most corrupt institutions in the
world (Transparency International, 2004). Especially in Greece, citizens strongly
question the role of political parties and are doubtful about their usefulness as
representational and promotional bodies for citizens' aspirations (Transparency
International, 2004:9). Tapscott (2000:303) argued that democracy in many countries
of the modern world is stagnant because governments, in their entirety, appear
inefficient and remote. The social consequences of the above, define the need for
open dialogue and an exchange of views between governments and citizens. In this
context the institution of online public consultations was adopted.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2 e-Democracy</title>
      <p>Since the early 90s, the implementation of information and communication
systems in the operation and organization of the public sector and government has
brought significant changes to the organization and functioning of states (Robison &amp;
Crenshaw, 2002). Thus, in political terminology there appear terms such as
egovernment and e-democracy (Bellamy, 2003; Lasse et al., 2006). The shift by states
in technology to broaden democracy coincides with the social need for a redefinition
of the relationship between governments and citizens. The use of ICT in an effort
towards open and public policy is applied more and more often as a means of
redefining this relationship (Kingham, 2003; Hoff, 2004; Ward &amp; Lusoli, 2005;
Welch et al., 2005; Tolbert &amp; Mossberger, 2006; Kikuchi, 2007). The redefinition of
this relationship is defined as a need both by the observed decline in the interest of
citizens in politics (McAllister, 2002; Dahlgren 2009) and by the weakening of
public confidence in politicians and institutions (Gibson et al., 2004; Parent, 2005).</p>
      <p>The United Nations define e-Government as the permanent commitment of the
government to improve relations between citizens and the public sector through the
effective and efficient provision of services, information and knowledge (Durrant,
2002:101). In this context, the power of online public consultation has already
proven to be a means to influence citizens to government policy (Botsiou, 2011).</p>
      <p>However, the overall efficiency of online public consultation is related to the
existence of the democratic divide. Norris (2001:4) defines the democratic divide as
the third form of digital divide, and is described as the difference between those
people who use ICT for their participation in public life, and those who do not. In
countries where voting is not compulsory firstly, and secondly vote only by
electronic means, the democratic gap is widening between those who have access to
ICT and technology insiders, and those that do not have these privileges. This
element can result in an abnormal reflection of public opinion in online public
consultations, while creating a new type of economic and political elite which,
through ICT access privileges, will be able to exercise effective influence in shaping
government policy, promoting in this way their own interests.</p>
      <p>As an expansion of democracy, the institution of online public consultations was
established in Greece in 2009 (www.opengov.gr). Through this institution, 475
public consultations have been performed until now, and 127,205 comments have
been posted (OpenGov, 2015). The Greek Rural Development Ministry conducted 21
consultations, on which 5078 comments have been posted. This paper studies the
democratic divide in the Greek agricultural sector, and particularly for farmers.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research</title>
      <p>3.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Aim and Objective</title>
        <p>The purpose of this study is to investigate the democratic divide in the
agricultural sector, especially in relation to the institution of public consultations. The
study was conducted in two phases. At first, the 5078 comments posted in 21 public
consultations by the Greek Ministry of Rural Development were analyzed in order to
identify the frequency of participation of Greek farmers in these. Then, personal
interviews were conducted using structured questionnaires with farmers of the
Heraklion prefecture (Crete, GR). The objective was to study their digital features,
but also to ascertain if they were aware of the institution of online public
consultations. The interviews took place in April 2015 and numbered 112.
3.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Methodology</title>
        <p>As mentioned above, the study was conducted in two phases. At first, the 5078
comments posted in 21 public consultations by the Greek Ministry of Rural
Development were analyzed in order to identify the frequency of participation of
Greek farmers in these. According to Coleman (2004:2), in order to be effective, the
study of public consultations should apply a combined analysis system on the
quantitative and qualitative axes. So it was necessary to use methods to permit a
pooled study of the comments on the axes of quantitative and qualitative analysis.
The methods chosen were Content Analysis and Text Semiotics. To ensure the
validity of the results, the following were defined as attributes: i) the systematic basis
of criteria which clearly define the decision on whether data from the content of the
comments is to be included in the analysis or not, data constituting the
commentator’s occupation in the online public consultations, and consisting of
researchers in this decision; and ii) the assurance of validity and reliability through
rules to guarantee the reappearance of identical results when repeated on the same
content. Based on the above, if the commentator’s occupation was not explicitly
mentioned by him, then it resulted from the content of the comment. For example:
“[…] Unfortunately, I am still waiting for the registration notification […] due to my
authorization as a new farmer” (comment posted on 2010-04-19 18:40:21h).</p>
        <p>In the second phase of the survey, interviews were conducted using a structured
questionnaire on a sample of 112 farmers (Heraklion Prefecture, Crete, GR). The
municipal district selection, which was drawn in the survey sample, followed the
methodology of proportional stratified random sampling, based on four criteria that
are described below. Then, sampling of the population within those municipal
districts, was based on random sampling.</p>
        <p>The first criterion for the selection of municipal districts, of which the sample was
drawn, was its level of urbanization. As the study related to farmers, it was decided
to select rural municipal districts. According to the Greek Statistical Authority, rural
districts are those whose population is less than 2000 inhabitants. According to data
from the Population Census 2011, the districts of Heraklion Prefecture numbered
479. In all these, 3 are classified as urban, 20 as semi-urban and 466 as rural
(population up to 1,999) (Table 1). Thus, the first criterion of the sample selection
drew a distinction of 466 districts.</p>
        <p>The second criterion for municipal district selection was its hilliness coefficient.
The Greek Statistical Authority provides hilliness coefficient data for 182 of the 466
districts of Heraklion Prefecture, and therefore the selection of the sample was
limited to 182 of 466 districts. Amongst these 182 districts, 89 are lowlands, 45 are
semi-mountainous and 48 mountainous (Table 1).</p>
        <p>The third criterion for municipal district selection was the exclusion of very small
districts, as they do not have supporting infrastructures (schools etc.). Based on the
census of the year 2011, 89 out of 182 municipal districts of Heraklion Prefecture
had more than 300 inhabitants (i.e. 48.9%). The hilliness coefficient of these 89
municipal districts is about 48 lowlands, 21 semi-mountainous and 20 mountainous
(Table 2).</p>
        <p>The fourth criterion was the municipal districts’ inclusion in the broadband
network. Based on the GIS Broadband Map (Hellenic Telecommunications &amp; Post
Commission, 2015), 72 of the 89 districts have access to the broadband network (i.e.
80.89%), 39 of the 48 lowland districts have access to the broadband network (i.e.
81.25%) and 14 of the 20 mountainous districts have access to the broadband
network (i.e. 70.00%) (Table 2).</p>
        <p>
          Finally, it was decided to select 10% of these 89 municipal districts, which
resulted in the four stratification criteria, i.e. 9 rural municipal districts
(89*10%=8.9). Mutatis mutandis of hilliness coefficient and broadband (Table 2)
selected: i) five (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ) lowland municipal districts (9*53.9%= 4.8) four (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ) of which
have access to the broadband network (5*81.3%=4.065) and one (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ) has not
(5*18.7%=0.935), ii) two (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) semi-mountainous municipal districts (9*23.6%=2.1)
that have access to the broadband network (2*90.5%=1.81), iii) two (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) mountainous
municipal districts (9*22.5%=2.025) of which one has access to the broadband
network (2*70.0%=1.4) and one (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ) has not (2*30.0%=0.6).
        </p>
        <p>The final decision on the selection of nine municipal districts of Heraklion
prefecture was defined using the random number generator in an Excel program. The
method of random sampling then followed, where 112 interviews were conducted
using a structured questionnaire.
3.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Content analysis of the online public consultations</title>
        <p>
          In Greece, the institution of online public consultation was launched in 2009. Until
today, 475 consultations have been carried out, 21 out of which by the Greek
Ministry of Rural Development. In total, 5078 comments have been posted. These
consultations are: (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ) Changing the institutional framework for the integration and
rehabilitation of the agricultural trade union movement; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ) Farmers' register; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          )
Reconstruction of agricultural cooperative organizations of Greece; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ) Protection
and security of agricultural activity; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ) Establishment of single registry of
agricultural trade; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ) Framework law on pesticides; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ) Pets and stray animals,
animal welfare from exploitation or use for profit; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ) Institutional framework for
agricultural cooperatives, collective organizations and entrepreneurship of rural
society - Organization of the state supervision; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ) Arrangements for livestock and
livestock facilities; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ) Rational use of pesticides; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ) Health and safety of food and
animal feed, animal health and animal welfare, management of animal by-products;
(
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ) Integrated Crop Protection Guidelines I; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ) Integrated Crop Protection
Guidelines II; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ) Recommendation by the organization "Hellenic Agricultural
Organization - DIMITRA"; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ) Management competence of the Ministry estate
Rural Development; 16) Integrated Crop Protection Guidelines III; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ) Integrated
Crop Protection Guidelines IV; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ) Aquaculture development; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ) Authorizing the
marketing of plant protection products formulated for amateur use; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ) Organization
and operation of ELGO-DIMITRA; (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ) Integrated Crop Protection Guidelines V
(Table 3).
        </p>
        <p>Content analysis of the posted comments in these public consultations revealed 5
main groups of participants, based on the capacity in which, in a statement or
content, they were consulted. These are: a) Farmer; b) Farmers’ collective
(professional, cooperative and trade unions); c) Scientist (agronomists, technologists
agronomy, biologists, veterinarians, lawyers, surveyors); d) Collective scientific
institutions (business, trade unions, learned societies, research groups); e) Other
(public bodies and their employees, agricultural products traders (non farmers),
commercial companies, environmental and animal welfare organizations, but also
cases we were not able to identify). Note that, although there is substantial difference
between professional associations and trade unions, in this paper it was not
considered appropriate to make the distinction, as the subject of the research did not
affect the quality of participation in the consultation, but its quantity (representation
frequency of the agricultural sector).</p>
        <p>
          Table (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ) presents the results of content analysis of these 21 consultations. The
first column of Table 3 shows the s/n of each consultation as it was presented in the
first paragraph of this section. The second and third columns of Table 3 show the
frequency of posted comments in each consultation and the relative frequency. The
remaining columns concern the commentary frequency per occupation group. As can
be seen from the table, in 14 of the 21 consultations, farmers or collective bodies
thereof participated. Higher participation of farmers (relative frequency &gt;10%) is
displayed in consultations s/n 1 (43.4%), 2 (68.8%), 3 (36.1%), 4 (21.1%), 5
(41.2%), 8 (66.0%), 9 (11.5%), 17 (21.1%), 18 (16.6%). These consultations related
to the integration and restructuring of the agricultural trade union movement, the
farm register, the reconstruction of rural cooperatives in the system of protection and
security of agricultural activity, the establishment of the single registry of dealers in
agricultural products, regulations for animal husbandry, instructions on integrated
pest management, and the development of aquaculture. The participation of farmers
was nil in the consultations concerning the adopting and stray pets, in four
consultations relating to guidelines for integrated crop protection, and in both
consultations concerning the establishment of the Greek agricultural organization
DIMITRA.
S/N
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Total
        </p>
        <p>Total
comments
113
80
36
38
17
59
2663
47
200
130
962
14
3
235
136
28
19
199
6
80
13
5078</p>
        <p>The sample consisted of 112 farmers, 101 of which were male, and 11 female
(90.2% and 9.8% respectively). The age of the participants ranged from 20-78 years
old, where 27.7% were under the age of 35, 36.6% aged 35-50, 32.1% aged 50-65,
3.6% older than 65 (Table 4).</p>
        <p>Of the total participants, one person was illiterate (0.9%), 36.6% were elementary
graduates, 21.4% middle school graduates, 30.4% high school graduates, 10.7%
graduates of tertiary education (higher education). In total, 40.1% were at least high
school graduates (Table 5).</p>
        <p>Concerning ICT access, 88.4% of the respondents (i.e. 99 farmers) stated that
there is access to a PC at home (including tablet and laptop), 33.9% declared
themselves smartphone owners (Table 6). 94 of the 99 participants who declared that
there is PC in their home, also have Internet access (broadband network or USB
stick), while 1.8% do not know whether online access is available at home. In total,
112 participants 67 (i.e. 59.8%) declared themselves ICT users, while 40.2% had
never used ICT.</p>
        <p>As mentioned in the previous table, 40.2% of respondents have never used ICT.
Table 7 shows that in contrast to these 40.2%, 8.9% declared themselves ICT users in
the last year, 10.7% 1-3 years, 6.3% 3-5 years, 8.9% 5-8 years, and 25% have been
ICT users for more than 8 years.</p>
        <p>Regarding the participation of farmers in rural collective bodies, it appears that
65.2% of the sample are members of professional associations (cooperatives and
producer groups) and 6.3% are also members of farmers’ trade unions (Table 8). Of
the total of 112 surveyed, 39 (i.e. 34.8%) are not members of a professional or trade
union.</p>
        <p>Regarding the participation of the sampled farmers in public consultations, it
appears that 84.8% were not aware of the online public consultation (Table 9). Aware
of the existence of the institution were 15.2%, of which 52.9% follow public
consultations and 23.5% participate in them.
Correlations. The relationships among age, educational attainment, usage of ICT,
experience in ICT, participation in professional and trade unions, and the overall
experience in the institution of public consultations, were examined using Pearson
correlations. The awareness of the existence of the institution of public consultations
shows a small positive relationship with educational level (r=0.300, p&gt;0.01) and with
experience in the use of ICT (r=0.326, p&gt;0.01). A moderately positive relationship
shows awareness of the existence of the institution of public consultations with
participation in trade unions (r=0.405, p&gt;0.01). This indicates that people who are
members of a trade union are more likely to be aware of the existence of the
institution than someone who has no trade union involvement. It is possible that the
information on the existence of the institution spreads faster among trade union
members than among members of professional organizations, since normally the role
of trade unions concerns the preservation of vested interests and the promotion of
collective interests, which is connected with the philosophy of the institution of
public consultations. Finally there is strong positive correlation between awareness of
the existence of public consultations and the following of and participation in these
consultations (r=0.943, p&gt;0.01). It is normal for farmers who do not know of the
existence of this institution not to attend or participate.</p>
        <p>The institution of online public consultations was introduced in 2009 in Greece
(www.opengov.gr). Under this institution, the Greek Ministry of Rural Development
has conducted 21 consultations, on which 5078 comments have been posted.</p>
        <p>This paper does not aim to assess the involvement of farmers in electronic public
consultation, in the sense of quality participation in the formulation of laws that
concern them, but the emergence of democratic divide probability within the rural
world. These public consultations involve farmers and their collective bodies in a
proportion that reaches up to 68.8%. It can be argued that participation rates of
farmers and their collective bodies in public consultations are high, and indeed in
many public consultations constitute the majority of commentators. However, field
research revealed the existence of a democratic divide among farmers, as the vast
majority of farmers do not know of the existence of the institution of electronic
public consultations. Although the awareness of the existence of the institution of the
farmers does not necessarily mean active participation in it, moreover participation is
a personal choice of each farmer, consistent with the attitude to life, the information
deficit of the existence of this institution is a structural expansion material the
democratic divide.</p>
        <p>The institution of electronic public consultation promotes the participation of
citizens in shaping public policy and is part of a new form of democracy,
edemocracy. Freedom of expression and formulation of ideas, thoughts and
suggestions of citizens is the basis and foundation of any type democracy. The
possibility of creating dialogue, not only between citizens and the initiator of the
consultation, but also between the citizens themselves, gives the online public
consultation a special dynamic feedback of ideas and policy. In this sense, the
institution of electronic public consultation is an important rural development tool in
the hands of farmers, element defines the need to reduce the democratic divide.</p>
        <p>Within the context of closing the democratic divide in the agricultural sector, we
propose to intensify the publicity of the public consultations institution, press
releases to local communities and promotion in local and national media. We also
propose the organization of seminars in the context of lifelong learning, in
coordination with the informal lifelong learning schools of the municipalities, where
we promote the ideal of the institution of public consultations.
May
1, 2015.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bellamy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <article-title>Moving to e-government, the role of ICTs in the public sector</article-title>
          . In T. Bovaird and E. Loffler (Eds.).
          <source>Public management and governance</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>126</lpage>
          ). New York: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dahlgren</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
          <article-title>Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication and democracy</article-title>
          . New York: Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Durrant</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
          <article-title>E-Government and the internet in the Caribbean: An initial assessment</article-title>
          . In R. Traunmuller (Ed.).
          <source>Electronic Government</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>101</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>104</lpage>
          ). Berlin: Springer
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Botsiou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <article-title>E- Democracy on the field of the educational policy reform for LifeLong Learning</article-title>
          . In V. Karavakou (Ed) Lifelong
          <source>Learning: Interdisciplinary Approaches</source>
          , (pp.
          <fpage>289</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>310</lpage>
          ). Thessaloniki: University of Macedonia Press (in Greek)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gibson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lusoli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ward</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Australian public and politics online: Reinforcing or reinventing representation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Australian Journal of Political Science</source>
          ,
          <volume>43</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>111</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>31</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6. National Statistical Service of Greece (
          <year>1984</year>
          )
          <article-title>Municipalities and Communities of Greece and those discriminated lowland, hilly and mountainous. Excerpt from the report “Profile of the extent of the Country by main use categories</article-title>
          .
          <source>Pre census Data</source>
          <year>1980</year>
          ”.
          <article-title>For use of the Civil Service and Public Entities (Decision no</article-title>
          .
          <issue>82029</issue>
          /2230/07.16.
          <year>1984</year>
          . Athens: National Statistical Service of Greece. Available from http://www.taxheaven.gr/pagesdata/GRESYE_02_
          <fpage>0901</fpage>
          _
          <fpage>00002</fpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>pdf</surname>
          </string-name>
          (access date 05/04/2015)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Hellenic</given-names>
            <surname>Statistical Authority. Database: Census - Residential 2011- Permanent Population</surname>
          </string-name>
          . www.statistics.
          <source>gr (access date 20/03/2015)</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Hellenic</given-names>
            <surname>Telecommunications</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp; Post
          <string-name>
            <surname>Commission</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          . GIS Broadband Map, http://mapsrv1.terra.gr/eettutilities/mapnew.aspx (
          <issue>access date 20</issue>
          /3/2015)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
          <article-title>The democratic potentials of information technology: Attitudes of European MPs towards new technology</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Polity</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          .2), p.
          <fpage>55</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>66</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kikuchi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
          <article-title>Assessing government efforts to (re)build trust in government: Challenges and lessons learned from Japanese experiences</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Public Management Network</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>183</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>201</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kingham</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
          <article-title>E-Parliaments: The use of information and communication technologies to improve parliamentary processes</article-title>
          . Washington: World Bank Institute.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lasse</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Healy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hahamis</surname>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dunville</surname>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Esteves</surname>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>Parliamentary Web Presence: A Comparative Review</article-title>
          . In D. Remenyi (Ed.),
          <source>Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on e-Government</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>17</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          ). Pittsburgh: Academic Conferences Limited.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>McAllister</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <source>(23 March</source>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <article-title>Civic education and political knowledge in Australia</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved on December 7</source>
          ,
          <year>2010</year>
          , from http://wopared.parl.net/senate/pubs/pops/pop38/c05.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Norris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
          <article-title>Digital Divide: Cibic Engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide</article-title>
          . New York: Cambridge University Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>OpenGov</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
          <article-title>Statistics Page OpenGov</article-title>
          . Retrieved http://www.opengov.gr/home/%CE%BFpengov-statistics
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parent</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>Building Citizen Trust Through E-government</article-title>
          .
          <source>Government Information Quarterl</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>720</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>36</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Robison</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Κ. and Crenshaw, Ε. (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
          <article-title>Post industrial transformations and cyberspace: a cross-national analysis of Internet development</article-title>
          .
          <source>Social Science Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>31</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>334</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>363</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tapscott</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril In The Age of Networked Intelligence</article-title>
          .
          <source>McGraw Hill Professional: New York</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          19. Transparency International (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <source>Report on the Transparency International: Global Corruption Barometer</source>
          <year>2004</year>
          . Berlin: Policy and Research Department Transparency International - International Secretariat.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          20.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tolbert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mossberger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
          <article-title>The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government</article-title>
          .
          <source>Public Administration Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>66</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>354</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>69</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          21.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ward</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lusoli</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          ) “
          <article-title>From weird to wired”: MPs, the internet and representative politics in the UK</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Legislative Studies</source>
          ,
          <volume>11</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>81</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          22.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Welch</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hinnant</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>Linking citizen satisfaction with egovernment and trust in government</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ), p.
          <fpage>371</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>91</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>