<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Case Study of Project Outcome Prediction for an IT Vendor</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tomoyuki Kawamura</string-name>
          <email>tomoyuki@z5.keio.jp</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>B. Project Outcome Prediction Model</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Graduate School of System Design and Management Keio University Yokohama</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>[2] T. Kawamura and K. Takano, “Development of Project Outcome Prediction System for an IT Vendor,” Proceedings of the 22st Asia- Pacific Software Engineering Conference</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>in print</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2011</year>
      </pub-date>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Researchers have found that approximately 70% of
information systems development projects in Japan have failed,
thus increasing the demand for solutions that will raise
expected project success rates. It is said that to improve
success rates, support should be provided by the organization
to which the projects belong. The study aims to identify
projects that an organization should support preferentially by
predicting a project outcome. Several researches have
demonstrated that they could predict project outcomes using
risk assessment results in projects with specific characteristics
such as in-house embedded software development. In this
study, we try to predict project outcomes using the results of
risk assessment at the establishment of requirements stage for
the projects of a specific IT vendor in Japan.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>II. PROJECT OUTCOME PREDICTION SYSTEM</title>
      <p>The project outcome prediction was performed for
“Company A,” one of Japanese IT vendors. In Company A,
risk management specialists of the organization support the
identification of project risks at the establishment of
requirements stage and then determine the degrees of their
participation in the project. We try to develop a project
outcome prediction system including “risk assessment sheet”
and “project outcome prediction model” to predict project
outcome at the stage.</p>
      <p>The risk assessment sheet enumerates the risk assessment
items of a project at the establishment of requirements stage.
The sheet was created by referring to the framework of
McLeod and MacDonell [1] and the knowledge of Company A.
As a result, a risk assessment sheet consisting of 17 risk
assessment items was created.</p>
      <p>The outcome assessment sheet enumerates assessment
items for project outcomes at the end of the project. The sheet
is used for the development of the project outcome prediction
model. This research characterizes project outcome as the
difference between expected and actual measures of quality,
cost, and scheduling.</p>
      <p>Kenichi Takano</p>
      <p>The project outcome prediction model was created by
applying logistic regression analysis using the 88 project data.
Logistic regression analysis was performed with the stepwise
selection method by utilizing the classification results of
success/failure as the response variable and utilizing the
assessment results of 17 items collected by the risk assessment
sheet as the explanatory variables. As a result, a model using
five risk assessment items was obtained. Then, the degree of
generalization error was checked by applying the 10-fold
cross-validation method to the model. As a result, the
predictive accuracy of the model is 73.9%.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>III. CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>The research aimed to develop a project outcome
prediction system including “risk assessment sheet” and
“project outcome prediction model” in order to identify
projects that an IT vendor should support preferentially. As a
result, 73.9% of the project outcomes were predicted correctly.
Considering that the research object is an IT vendor whose
projects have various characteristics and that the prediction is
conducted in an early project stage, the system is considered to
have achieved the research purpose. Details of the study can be
found in our previous paper [2].</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>