<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>World Views - A Digital Archive Infrastructure for the Georg Eckert Institute for International Textbook Research</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Lena-Luise Stahn</string-name>
          <email>stahn@leibniz-gei.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Steffen Hennicke</string-name>
          <email>hennicke@leibniz-gei.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ernesto William De Luca</string-name>
          <email>deluca@leibniz-gei.de</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Georg Eckert Institute Leibniz Institute for International Textbook Research</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2015</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>42</fpage>
      <lpage>48</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper outlines the aims of the newly established project World Views. The paper mainly shows the work still to be done, as the project has only recently started and is still in initial consolidation phase. It presents an overview of the planned infrastructure which will work as a digital archive in the textbook research field. Therefore a data middleware is to be implemented to enable integration and standardization of the various GEI data existing in diverse forms as well embed it in a broader semantic context, thus enabling “World Views”.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Textbook research constitutes a rather diverse area of interest and research. By bringing
together professionals engaged in textbook research and their manifold knowledge and
expertise, the Georg Eckert Institute1 (GEI) is the central research institution in this field. This
role results in various new research projects which aim at promoting and using the textbook as
a medium for research in the historical sciences generating large amounts of data which are
especially characterized by their heterogeneity and furthermore, are bound to specific
infrastructures tailored towards the different kinds of data requirements. It has become apparent
that data curation has not been thoroughly considered in the projects’ workflows.
Standardization and archiving strategies have mostly been neglected. Up to this day this has
resulted in collections containing valuable and important data which, however, exist parallel in
separate environments with mostly no interfaces or linking possibilities. This goes against the
“Good Scientific Practice” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] postulated by the German Research Society (DFG) as the
projects were funded by public money and the projects’ data and results constitute valuable
scientific knowledge worth of long-term curation and preservation so as to allow sustainable
usage. Often no knowledge exists of the existing data even within the GEI thus resulting in
double work. Even if data has been “discovered” by other researchers its reuse is often difficult
or even impossible because of legacy or out-of-date data formats.
      </p>
      <p>
        Additionally, this situation has a negative effect on information retrieval and reuse by
external parties since the GEI data neither is interlinked nor is it enriched with information
from external sources. Despite its rich diversity and variety in terms of the available research
data the GEI infrastructure lacks semantic contextualization. The new project World Views
nationally funded (BMBF) and started in February 2015, is an effort to engage with the
aforementioned issues. The absence of joint data storage is considered the main cause for this
situation, which led to the decision to focus on establishing a suitable infrastructure, where the
data integration of each existing project is made possible and which additionally serves as a
standardizing basis for future project environments, eventually also leading to the
implementation of a long-term curation strategy. With one joint search index which will work
on all project data simultaneously the improvement of information retrieval is intended.
1 http://www.gei.de/home.html
Another question concerns the semantic enrichment of the (meta-) data, which already forms a
common method in other research environments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12">10, 11, 12</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1.1 Related work</title>
      <p>
        Guideline papers about research infrastructures and research data reuse in the Humanities
were found in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] and in several DINI papers, e. g., [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. A more international view was found
in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. In Germany mostly CLARIN-D [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], DARIAH-DE [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10 ref11 ref12">10, 11, 12</xref>
        ] are used to build large
information infrastructures, which is why these system have to considered during the evaluation
and decision process. In case the World Views infrastructure requires a generic framework apart
from these facilities [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] and [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] will provide a basis for evaluating the repository software. The
adaption and use of the DTABf is shown in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ], revealing some of the system’s main
advantages. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: part 2 provides an overview of
the status quo at the GEI and its various data collections giving two examples of the GEI data in
order to provide a more precise picture of how diverse the ways are in which the data is handled
(2.1 and 2.2). A summary of the drawbacks resulting from this infrastructure closes this section.
Part 3 discusses the aims of World Views and concludes the paper with a summary of the steps
which have been taken so far.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2 GEI data</title>
      <p>An overview of the GEI systems and their technical specifics illustrates the big gap between
current research and information infrastructure guidelines [13, p. 11] and the actual situation:
Edumeres2, the information and communication portal for international educational media
research amongst other provides access to the GEI’s working papers with manually edited
metadata and papers held in PDF; edu.data holds information on textbook systems worldwide;
edu.experts, a database for textbook research professionals. The structure is implemented in
Typo3 where every module has its own search and browse ui, partly with its own website as
well (edu.data with Typo3 backend, edu.experts planned as Semantic Media Wiki). The
Curricula Workstation provides central access to German and international curricula and also
aims to create an archive of curricula. As they are mostly printed the curricula need to be
scanned and stored in a DSpace repository, whereas the metadata is manually exported from the
library OPAC. Parallel to the OPAC the VuFind-based TextBookCat provides a search entry
point for the text book collection, with additional facettes and its own Solr index. And also
infrastructures and web representations resulting from scientific projects3 form a big data pool,
e.g. „Nuances” providing teaching materials in various multimedia-based forms, or „Children
and their world” trying topic modeling and again own Solr index. As such project proposals
require a suitable web-based presentation, every time a new one is implemented and
accompanied by its own system which seldom corresponds to the existing infrastructures, a
behavior not to be expected to change in the future. With the end of the project's financial
support these systems cannot be maintained appropriately and form the institute's legacy data,
e.g. „DeuFraMat”.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>2.1 Data example: GEI-Digital</title>
      <p>The GEI hosts one of the biggest research libraries in the field of textbook research. One of the
goals is to make this library fit for the future by giving the library a so-called hybrid profile
2 http://www.edumeres.net/nc/en/information/home.html
3 http://www.gei.de/en/projects/current-projects.html
through digitizing its content. For this purpose, the project GEI-Digital has been initiated, in
which the conversion of historic German speaking holdings into a machine readable format is
being undertaken. An adequate research corpus has been created which can be used in diverse
research areas.</p>
      <p>The presentation platform provides digital images (generated through external providers)
and automatically generated full text recognition file (via OCR) of every book page, written
mostly in Gothic type. With this a basis for Digital Humanities tools is facilitated: a couple of
projects, as e.g. “Children and their world”, have started to use methods such as topic modeling
on this corpus. In June 2015 the database contained ca. 3,500 digitized and indexed textbooks
with a time-span from 1648 to 1918 (ca. 900.000 digitized single documents). The used
metadata format is METS for structural data and MODS for bibliographic descriptions,
accessible through the GEI’s OAI-PMH interface. Data Integration takes place, amongst others,
in Europeana4 and the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek5 (DDB).</p>
      <p>The corpus can be searched on metadata level as well as on full text level. Also a facetted
search is provided, using the collection division which is based on metadata especially created
for GEI-Digital, describing the type (atlases or storybooks) or subject of the textbook
(geography, history), plus time frame in which it was used. Browsing options include the
common bibliographic data. For the visualization of the digitized images the intranda viewer6 is
used. For each digitized document additional (meta-)data like ToC, thumbnail gallery,
bibliographic data (partly also in English) and full text are provided and can be downloaded as
METS/XML, MARCXML and DC via the OAI interface, Europeana Semantic Elements
(ESE), OPAC/PICA, and PDF. Figure 1 shows an example screenshot. The Open Source
Software Goobi7 is used for digitization which provides an adequate environment for workflow
handling and metadata editing. The metadata profile is generic; the Goobi interface has been
customized and is filled manually except for the bibliographic data, which is harvested through
the OPAC interface, thus also using the Gemeinsame Normdatei 8 (GND) data and Handle9
service provided by GBV Common Library Network10. The same applies for the Solr index
which is built at the GBV and adapted for GEI use. For backup the GEI cooperates with the
Gauß-IT-Zentrum at the TU Braunschweig, where it holds server and storage capacities. Within
this contract also the long-term preservation of the GEI-Digital data (i.e. digitized images,
derivatives, metadata) is ensured.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>2.2 Data example: project EurViews11</title>
      <p>Through a comprehensive selection a collection of texts, maps and images from 20th and
21st century textbooks is established with the intention to present which notions of Europe and
Europeans are conveyed through national textbooks. Historical and contemporary textbook
sources from all European and many non-European countries are being incorporated, furnished
with commentaries and contextualized information like histories of education, both of which
4 http://www.europeana.eu/portal/
5 https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/
6 https://www.intranda.com/digiverso/intranda-viewer/intranda-viewer-overview/
7 http://www.goobi.org/en/
8 http://www.dnb.de/DE/Standardisierung/GND/gnd_node.html
9 http://www.handle.net/
10 https://www.gbv.de/?set_language=en
11 http://www.eurviews.eu/nc/start.html
are written by external researchers. Translations in German, English and sometimes also French
or Spanish are provided by the EurViews members.</p>
      <p>Although the workflow is similar, EurViews uses Typo3 as its digitization and metadata
editing backend which is completely different from the one used in GEI-Digital. The
homemade DigiSource extension supports handling the digitized image, storing the (meta-)data
in a MySQL database, even though they are mostly already stored in GEI-Digital. The backup
works through the TU Braunschweig, however no Solr index is used. The textbook sources can
be searched on metadata level and on full text level. Additionally the sources are indexed with
predefined search terms for time spans, categories, and keywords. A short summary completes
each item’s description. The collection is also accessible through a facetted search which
clusters time periods, countries, and source types (i.e. structure type of the document). Figure 2
shows a screenshot of the Typo3 backend.</p>
      <p>Both projects show the main problem to be handled: the data storage is done in a separate
way, depending partly on old fashioned software. Especially the EurViews backend now turns
out to be outdated resulting in unexpected high maintenance. The separate search indices
prevent a comprehensive information retrieval. Instead of being of any help for the information
seeking textbook researcher the separate search entry points constitute an obstacle which most
people are not willing or able to overcome. Therefore, usability improvements as well as better
information retrieval facilities are needed. Furthermore, there exists no connection to other GEI
data: the sources' full texts and annotations as well as commentaries could serve as a knowledge
base, easily enriched using other GEI data. However, lack of appropriate interfaces prevents the
use by other GEI projects. Also the custom-built Typo3 extension prohibits data reuse. The
metadata schema is generic and manually filled, despite the possibility of using bibliographic
data from the library OPAC.</p>
      <p>Analogous ways into the context of LOD/Semantic Web are absent: where GEI-Digital
barely uses the controlled vocabularies provided by the GND, the EurViews data lack semantic
contextualization completely.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>3 Aims of World Views and first steps</title>
      <p>
        The aforementioned projects are just two examples of the disconnected character of the
collections, which in spite of its frequent use, reproduces this data and stores it several more
times. Additionally there is the problem of the format variety: difficult to maintain, to curate
and preserve, and almost every new project using a new data format. This leads to the emerging
problem of data inaccessibility and thereby data loss. The aim of World Views is therefore to
consolidate the various data sources. Based on a three-tier architecture model the project’s
focus is on implementing a central middleware, which will serve as the logic tier, where the
metadata integration and standardization will be executed. The distributed and separated GEI
data (this forms the data tier in the architecture) in its various formats will be drawn together,
migrated into more standardized formats using metadata crosswalks and semantically enriched
using internal and external links. Eventually the construction of one joint search Index (possibly
based on Lucene/Solr) is planned, providing a comprehensive search through the main retrieval
platform edumeres, additionally to the presentation on each project’s platform, thus forming the
infrastructure’s presentation layer. Since the project has only just started no technical decisions
have been made so far. To make learned decisions, comprehensive knowledge about the GEI's
infrastructure and projects needed to be gained first. The project started with evaluation of main
technologies available at the moment (open source as a requirement). Here mainly the product
Fedora as the leading solution has been tested. But also DSpace and several other software
solutions, e.g. infrastructures in the context of CLARIN-D and DARIAH-DE, are taken into
account. The evaluation process contains creating a catalogue of requirements, testing the
software on a virtual machine on both requirements and data to be used and comprehensive
documentation. Eventually a decision is planned in the coming months. The decision on the
bibliographic metadata does not seem to be the problem (main formats like DC are in the focus,
as well as METS/MODS, as being already used) and crosswalks can be easily implemented, the
main work lies in deciding on the extent of annotation. Here the infrastructure’s intended
character of persistence and sustainable usage has to be given consideration as it shall provide
interfaces also for future projects, whose focus and functionality cannot be determined yet. For
this project’s part cooperation with professionals in the textbook research field is essential,
since they form the user community. Their requirements and possible future ways of use will be
surveyed through workshops and evaluations of other Digital Humanities projects. Thereby
World Views is intended to function as a platform, which prepares the data for further use in
the DH context. TEI [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ] as the most promising and prevalent format is the main focus of
analysis. It was mainly chosen for its applicability on annotated texts produced in the
humanities. Also its large community is considered as a benefit. Questions like annotation
functionalities and how to exploit them in the most adequate way for the resource textbook
have to be answered, forming a main part of the project’s scientific work, since no metadata
formats especially focusing on textbooks seem to be publicly available. Standardization plays
also an obligatory part in the repository certification process, for example to achieve the DINI
certificate [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], as is planned for World Views in the long run. The GEI data still resides in a
mostly isolated position which stands in the way of representing the different “views”, as the
project title claims them. Therefore a vital point of World Views is the data contextualization.
To get it enriched also provides its embedding in a semantic context which comprises
interlinking the GEI projects further with controlled vocabularies up to Semantic Web
applications, and thus providing comprehensive information retrieval possibilities as well as
enriched corpora adequate for future DH research questions.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>References</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[1] Kommission Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: Vorschläge zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis: Empfehlungen der Kommission "Selbstkontrolle in der Wissenschaft"</article-title>
          ; Denkschrift. Wiley-VCH (
          <year>1998</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>DTA</given-names>
            <surname>TEI</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Basisformat (</article-title>
          <year>2007</year>
          -2015), http://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/doku/basisformat_en
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dobratz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Open-Source-Software zur Realisierung von Institutionellen RepositoriesÜberblick</article-title>
          . Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Zentraleinrichtung Universitätsbibliothek, Berlin (
          <year>2007</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Deutsche</given-names>
            <surname>Initiative</surname>
          </string-name>
          für Netzwerkinformation e.V.:
          <article-title>Positionspapier Forschungsdaten. Arbeitsgruppe „Elektronisches Publizieren"</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2009</year>
          ) http://edoc.huberlin.de/series/dini-schriften/2009-10/PDF/10.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bagdanov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Katz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nicolai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Subirats</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Fedora Commons 3.0 versus DSpace 1.5: Selecting an enterprise-grade repository system for FAO of the United Nations</article-title>
          . (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Battino</given-names>
            <surname>Viterbo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Gourley</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Digital humanities and digital repositories: sustainable tech-nology for sustainable communications</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '10)</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>109</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>114</lpage>
          . ACM, New York, NY (
          <year>2010</year>
          ), USA, doi:10.1145/1878450.1878469
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haaf</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Geyken</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiegand</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <string-name>
            <surname>The</surname>
            <given-names>DTA</given-names>
          </string-name>
          “
          <article-title>Base Format”: A TEI Subset for the Compilation of a Large Reference Corpus of Printed Text from Multiple Sources (</article-title>
          <year>2012</year>
          ), doi: 10.4000/jtei.1114
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wissenschaftsrat</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020</article-title>
          , Berlin (
          <year>2012</year>
          ), http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/2359-
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          .pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[9] DINI: DINI-Zertifikat für Open-Access-Repositorien und-</article-title>
          <year>Publikationsdienste 2013</year>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ), http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/dini-schriften/
          <year>2013</year>
          -3/PDF/3.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herold</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kolbmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kollatz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Th.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Romanello</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rose</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walkowski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.-O.: Interdisciplinary</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Interoperability. DARIAH-DE Working Papers</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Nr. 3</article-title>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>DARIAH-DE</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Göttingen (
          <year>2014</year>
          ), urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2014
          <source>-1-0</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fiedler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Werthmann</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stührenberg</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schonefeld</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bingel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Witt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Forschungsinfrastrukturen in außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen: Forschungsbericht. (
          <year>2014</year>
          ), http://dok.idsmannheim.de/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10932/00-0230-5FEB
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          262D-CA01- 8/Forschungsinfrastrukturen.pdf?sequence=
          <fpage>4</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Puhl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Andorfer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Höckendorff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schmunk</surname>
          </string-name>
          , St.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stiller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thoden</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Diskussion und Definition eines Research Data LifeCycle für die digitalen Geisteswissenschaften</article-title>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>DARIAH-DE Working Papers Nr</surname>
          </string-name>
          . 11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>DARIAH-DE</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Göttingen (
          <year>2015</year>
          ), urn:nbn:de:gbv:7-dariah-2015
          <source>-4-4</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <article-title>Research Infrastructures in the Leibniz Association (</article-title>
          <year>2015</year>
          ), http://www.leibnizgemeinschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/downloads/Presse/Publikati onen/Leibniz_Infrastrukturen_
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2015</lpage>
          _web.pdf
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>